M.Dancer Posted March 31, 2010 Report Posted March 31, 2010 Sorry. I didnt know you werent able to fend for yourself. Go to Google> type in fox news>click on first link> scroll down near the bottom> read the reference. I'll do one better... Ohio man gets 4-year sentence in red kettle theft Court: Defendants entitled to immigration advice U.S. Law Firm Implicates Vatican, Pope in Abuse Case Texas Town on High Alert as Mexican Town Across Border ... Evangelist Alamo loses prison phone privileges Missouri Man Sentenced for Attempting to Cook Meth at ... Hearings scheduled for Christian militia suspects Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
waldo Posted March 31, 2010 Report Posted March 31, 2010 Your lack of attention to detail is noted. your Fox trot dance needs work, Dancer! Quote
Born Free Posted March 31, 2010 Report Posted March 31, 2010 I'll do one better... yep...just where I said it was... Quote
M.Dancer Posted March 31, 2010 Report Posted March 31, 2010 yep...just where I said it was... Indeed, your reference on the home page is actually a link to the story. In fact, everything on the homepage is a link. Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
BubberMiley Posted March 31, 2010 Author Report Posted March 31, 2010 In fact, everything on the homepage is a link. Indeed. And the only difference between them all is that some stories are prominent and highlighted, while others are buried. Quote "I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
M.Dancer Posted March 31, 2010 Report Posted March 31, 2010 Indeed. And the only difference between them all is that some stories are prominent and highlighted, while others are buried. How do you bry something on Page one (the home page)? Now if it was a follow the link..you know, click America, click crime, click story...you might have a point. Meanwhile, while it is still on Fox home page, find a follow up (like the Fox Story) that you asked for on Globe and Mail... Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
Shady Posted March 31, 2010 Report Posted March 31, 2010 A Trip Down Memory Lane...(I guess the mainstream media just musta forgot) The last guy has the best line. "You know, we'll have to come out and kill somebody I guess." Don't worry though guys. I'm sure Bubber's all over this case! Quote
waldo Posted March 31, 2010 Report Posted March 31, 2010 How do you bry something on Page one (the home page)? Now if it was a follow the link..you know, click America, click crime, click story...you might have a point. Meanwhile, while it is still on Fox home page, find a follow up (like the Fox Story) that you asked for on Globe and Mail... give up your Fox trot dance, Dancer... the story wasn't on the Fox home page; it wasn't even a main-highlighted story (with a bold increased font/picture) on the sub-section U.S. News home page... it only appeared on that sub-section as a link. Like I said, there wasn't a Muslim angle, so Fox, effectively, downplayed it... ultimately, burying it. Quote
M.Dancer Posted March 31, 2010 Report Posted March 31, 2010 Nonsense....Dancer is right...you whiffed on this one for obvious reasons. Better luck next time. http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/03/30/monitoring-militia-feds-decided-time-come/?test=latestnews ...handsome group! That's the exact same link I provided. Check out the comments section. Curious how they're up to 4 on a domestic terrorism story, 24 hours after it came out, isn't it? And three blame Obama. Talk about the "blame America" crowd. I know....you stabbed yourself with your own knife. The update you linked to is still on the front page. Yep...buried on page one give up your Fox trot dance, Dancer... the story wasn't on the Fox home page; it wasn't even a main-highlighted story (with a bold increased font/picture) on the sub-section U.S. News home page... it only appeared on that sub-section as a link. Like I said, there wasn't a Muslim angle, so Fox, effectively, downplayed it... ultimately, burying it. While I applaud your late arrival insights, perhaps you should ..you know...wait till you know what it is you are babbling about instead of looking like a fool. On the otherhand, so with your natural self. Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
waldo Posted March 31, 2010 Report Posted March 31, 2010 While I applaud your late arrival insights, perhaps you should ..you know...wait till you know what it is you are babbling about instead of looking like a fool. On the otherhand, so with your natural self. not late; I already informed you I checked the story shortly after this thread was put up. Perhaps it's just your confusion... tell us... that link in BC's initial post (your first quote reference) - do you consider that a "home page"? (that would be this link ... is that your "home page" reference?) Quote
M.Dancer Posted March 31, 2010 Report Posted March 31, 2010 (edited) US pledges $1.15B to earthquake-stricken Haiti Reward Offered for Arrest in Arizona Rancher's Killing VA doctors prohibited from prescribing medical pot Suspected Militia Members Set for Court Hearing Hearings scheduled for suspected militia members For Flooded Northeast, the Worst Is Yet to Come 4 Killed, 6 Wounded in D.C. Drive-By Shootings http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/03/31/suspected-militia-members-set-court-hearing/ When I posted the above, earlier today, it was still on the front page. When bubber posted his story yeasterday, it was on the front (home) page. I'll do one better... Ohio man gets 4-year sentence in red kettle theft Court: Defendants entitled to immigration advice U.S. Law Firm Implicates Vatican, Pope in Abuse Case Texas Town on High Alert as Mexican Town Across Border ... Evangelist Alamo loses prison phone privileges Missouri Man Sentenced for Attempting to Cook Meth at ... Hearings scheduled for Christian militia suspects This, posted a little later ...is taken from the front (home) page not late; I already informed you I checked the story shortly after this thread was put up. Perhaps it's just your confusion... tell us... that link in BC's initial post (your first quote reference) - do you consider that a "home page"? (that would be this link ... is that your "home page" reference?) Yes and I already informed you your lack of attention to deatail was noted. And as B|C pointed out yesterday, it was on the front (home) page. If you want to be like the hibernating bear who claims there is no winter or a jackass who is incapable of seeing when they are wrong, I shan't get in your way. Edited March 31, 2010 by M.Dancer Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
BubberMiley Posted March 31, 2010 Author Report Posted March 31, 2010 Yes and I already informed you your lack of attention to deatail was noted. The only lack of attention to detail I see are those failing to recognize the difference between the few large-font "headline" stories on the FoxNews homepage and the countless buried stories on the bottom of the page. Quote "I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
waldo Posted March 31, 2010 Report Posted March 31, 2010 When I posted the above, earlier today, it was still on the front page. When bubber posted his story yeasterday, it was on the front (home) page. This, posted a little later ...is taken from the front (home) page Yes and I already informed you your lack of attention to deatail was noted. And as B|C pointed out yesterday, it was on the front (home) page. If you want to be like the hibernating bear who claims there is no winter or a jackass who is incapable of seeing when they are wrong, I shan't get in your way. of course, that's the whole premise of this thread - that's why BubberMiley started it... to highlight Fox News' prominent positioning of the story! Allrightee. that link from B_C, the same one BubberMiley points out is the same link he provided... where ever you decide that page originates from... where ever... it's most definitely a linked article - from somewhere else. In this case, from a link supplied from the U.S. News sub-section home page. But you still didn't answer the question - since you keep repeating the same linked page, over and over... the same page that B_C provided, the same page that BubberMiley states he provided (linked to)... do you infer that same page is a home page? Because, obviously... it is not - it's a page presented from a higher level link reference. clearly, your attention to detail is fine... you simply don't understand what you're detailing. Let me reinforce what I saw when I looked shortly after this thread was posted - the Fox News article was a linked follow-through as available on the U.S. sub-section home page. It wasn't an article on the U.S. sub-section home page, proper... it most certainly was not an article highlighted on the main Fox News home page... it was not even a link from the main Fox News home page. Again, it had no Muslim undertone, so Fox News, effectively, downplayed it - buried it. Quote
M.Dancer Posted March 31, 2010 Report Posted March 31, 2010 It wasn't an article on the U.S. sub-section home page, proper... it most certainly was not an article highlighted on the main Fox News home page... it was not even a link from the main Fox News home page. Again, it had no Muslim undertone, so Fox News, effectively, downplayed it - buried it. Would you describe yourself as dishonest jackass or a lying jackass? Normally I would allow a possibility of stupidity when someone makes such blatant falsehoods, but clearly you are not stupid so I have to assume you are simply devoid of morals and not to be trusted. Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
M.Dancer Posted March 31, 2010 Report Posted March 31, 2010 The only lack of attention to detail I see are those failing to recognize the difference between the few large-font "headline" stories on the FoxNews homepage and the countless buried stories on the bottom of the page. Of course there is a difference. (glad you acknowledge they are both on the home page, shamne waldo doesnn't have the decency to be as honest) The difference is, one is for bigh breaking news stories. The smaller font stories to the left are for smaller stories, which the militia one is. After the story became old, it moved down the page. I would say there is a fair chance had you seen the page within a hour of the story breaking, it had large fonts. You might be surprised, but Clinton's Impeachment is no longer on the front page either. Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
Oleg Bach Posted March 31, 2010 Report Posted March 31, 2010 It's old news that Bubber wants to lead, but it doesn't bleed. Don't worry, Fox News will give the next Canadian border bomber more respect! YOUR law enforcement guys are retards that frame and capture other retards..so where is Bin Laden big shot? Quote
Oleg Bach Posted March 31, 2010 Report Posted March 31, 2010 Lazy, inept and diversionary...is the way I describe the dellusional and self important arresting authorities in the states...............Have you seen these so called dangerous men? They look like they did not have the ability to run a variety store let alone over throw a government..when are they going to go after the real bad guys that profit through fear? Quote
M.Dancer Posted March 31, 2010 Report Posted March 31, 2010 (edited) In the better late than never category, what bubber claimed was an old story taking up page real estate instead of a minor local crime story...the Globe and Mail covers the vindication of one of the climategate scientists... http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/technology/climategate-scientists-vindicated-in-investigation/article1519115/ The first of several British investigations into the e-mails leaked from one of the world's leading climate research centres has largely vindicated the scientists involved. Adn for the record, the link is on the G&M's home page. Technology Personal Technology Science Google service disruption bodes ill for Chinese Climategate' scientists vindicated in investigation Ford, Microsoft align to recharge cars In e-book era, you cant even judge a cover Twice! Health and Science The Large Hadron Collider: A step closer to the beginning of time ‘Climategate' scientists vindicated in investigation Can toads detect earthquakes? The keys to avoiding diverticulitis: fibre, water, exercise Edited March 31, 2010 by M.Dancer Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
Oleg Bach Posted March 31, 2010 Report Posted March 31, 2010 FURTHER MORE BC....if you are listening...are the dull and inbred faces of the arrested culprits indicative of the every day American? If so....a bit of CANADIAN style eugenics might come in handy---make sure they breed and create more idiots to serve the empire---seems that this batch was over cooked....if you want a recipe - call me....we know how to make perfect retards that do not turn on you. Quote
Born Free Posted March 31, 2010 Report Posted March 31, 2010 that was quick...it doesnt seem to be on the home page anymore... Quote
M.Dancer Posted March 31, 2010 Report Posted March 31, 2010 that was quick...it doesnt seem to be on the home page anymore... The G&M Story? unless my cache is going for the max, it is on mine. Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
Oleg Bach Posted March 31, 2010 Report Posted March 31, 2010 MY POINT IS..How come the Americans never catch the real smart bad guys? Quote
BubberMiley Posted April 1, 2010 Author Report Posted April 1, 2010 The difference is, one is for bigh breaking news stories. The smaller font stories to the left are for smaller stories, which the militia one is. Precisely. It's priorities. If it involved ACORN, it would have stayed in the prominent three for a week. If it were an out-of-context email from a discredited climate scientist, it would have been there for a month. If it were an islamist group that planned a terrorist plot, it would have stayed in the prominent three the rest of the year. But because it's anti-government right-wing christians, it's old news within a few hours. And no one in the Republican party will have no comment at all. I'm glad we can agree. Quote "I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
M.Dancer Posted April 1, 2010 Report Posted April 1, 2010 Precisely. It's priorities. If it involved ACORN, it would have stayed in the prominent three for a week. So the premise of your thread is pure speculation. If it were an out-of-context email from a discredited climate scientist, it would have been there for a month. Prove the story, without developments was there for a month...and no one else carried it either. If it were an islamist group that planned a terrorist plot, it would have stayed in the prominent three the rest of the year. Funny, the underware bomber story seems to have been dislogdged.... But because it's anti-government right-wing christians, it's old news within a few hours. And no one in the Republican party will have no comment at all. I'm glad we can agree. Well old news within 3 days anyway, until there are new developments...but what do you expect from such a little story. Seems to me, now, that this whole thread is about your paranoia ....with little to go one. You were wrong when you said it was buried in the OP, you were wrong when you said it disappeared, you were wrong when you said the Climategate story was old news. Do you know a dead horse when you beat it? Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
BubberMiley Posted April 1, 2010 Author Report Posted April 1, 2010 (edited) I guess some people are more concerned about terrorism on U.S. soil than others, even when it doesn't involve foreigners. Now Dancer can deny there's anything weird that CNN still has the most recent developments in the story, above the fold, with photos, in the most prominent place on the page. And FoxNews no longer has any reference whatsoever---even buried in their dead story list. Curious contrast of priorities. And given the fact that Fox has never before met a terrorism story they didn't love as much as a dead co-ed story, one has to wonder why this one doesn't cut it. Edited April 1, 2010 by BubberMiley Quote "I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.