Radsickle Posted February 23, 2010 Report Posted February 23, 2010 I've tried to post on the CBC comments a few times and most of my comments never made it through, since they were somewhat right wingish. Of course my post about global warming did make it through, since I do agree that it is occurring, and that is in accord with the "leftist" position. There is no doubt in my mind that the CBC comments are heavily censored. That's a hell of an accusation. Let's test it. What was one of your comments? Maybe someone else with a CBC account can try to post it again? It'll have to be word for word though... Quote
Smallc Posted February 23, 2010 Author Report Posted February 23, 2010 I disagree. The National Post comments section is full of idiots too....the difference is, they aren't getting funded by the taxpayer...and they suck at journalism. Quote
Radsickle Posted February 24, 2010 Report Posted February 24, 2010 I disagree. The National Post comments section is full of idiots too....the difference is, they aren't getting funded by the taxpayer...and they suck at journalism. Wow, I'm surprised. The people who read the National Post can type?! Quote
Bonam Posted February 24, 2010 Report Posted February 24, 2010 That's a hell of an accusation. Let's test it. What was one of your comments? Maybe someone else with a CBC account can try to post it again? It'll have to be word for word though... I don't have my exact posts word for word, last time I tried was years ago and I have certainly forgotten them. The specific examples I remember best were a few attempted "pro-Israeli" type comments back during the Lebanon war did not make it through. Quote
Smallc Posted February 24, 2010 Author Report Posted February 24, 2010 I don't have my exact posts word for word, last time I tried was years ago They didn't have a comment section years ago. Quote
Smallc Posted February 24, 2010 Author Report Posted February 24, 2010 The CBC - National Post relationship can be amusing at times: http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/October2009/01/c2936.html Quote
Bonam Posted February 24, 2010 Report Posted February 24, 2010 They didn't have a comment section years ago. The comments section has been there for quite a while. Certainly 2 or 3 years ago. Quote
bloodyminded Posted February 24, 2010 Report Posted February 24, 2010 The comments section has been there for quite a while. Certainly 2 or 3 years ago. I remember it was there several years ago too; then discontinued; then brought back. So you're right. Quote As scarce as truth is, the supply has always been in excess of the demand. --Josh Billings
JB Globe Posted February 25, 2010 Report Posted February 25, 2010 It's not much different in the Globe or Star's comment sections. I think you should just remember that the vast majority of Canadians didn't vote for Harper, and even many who did vote for him are less than thrilled about his performance so far. Quote
Bonam Posted February 25, 2010 Report Posted February 25, 2010 I think you should just remember that the vast majority of Canadians didn't vote for Harper I find it funny when people make this red herring statement. First, no one except those in Harper's riding have the opportunity to vote for Harper. Second, since you obviously mean the vast majority didn't vote for the Conservatives, you should keep in mind that the vast majority did not vote for any one particular party, the vote is split amongst multiple parties, and of all those parties, the Conservatives got the most votes. Quote
Smallc Posted February 25, 2010 Author Report Posted February 25, 2010 It's not much different in the Globe I would say it is or Star's comment sections. I would say you're right here. Quote
Mr.Canada Posted February 25, 2010 Report Posted February 25, 2010 Oh, bit I disagree. Go read almost any story with comments on the site. You'll find something about Harper in almost every story...even though the story has nothing to do with him or the government. People who dislike Harper are obsessed with him for some reason. Don't kid yourself these people will bash whoever happens to be the leader of the Conservative Party, Harper isn't special. They wouldn't vote for the Tories no matter who the leader was so what they say can be dismissed. Quote "You are scum for insinuating that isn't the case you snake." -William Ashley Canadian Immigration Reform Blog
DogOnPorch Posted February 25, 2010 Report Posted February 25, 2010 (edited) By rights, CBC radio should have Mark Steyn immediately after Anna-Marie Tremonti every morning. Speaking of Anna-Marie...she just had an Israeli spokesperson on who claimed Naiomi Klein and her ilk constituted what basically amounted to a terrorist 5th column. That lasted...oh...about three minutes until she got angry over the suggestion. See-yah...lol. She didn't even put it up on her pod-cast. Yeah...would have been a different interview if Mark Steyn did it, alright. Edited February 27, 2010 by DogOnPorch Quote Nothing cracks a turtle like Leon Uris.
JB Globe Posted February 25, 2010 Report Posted February 25, 2010 Second, since you obviously mean the vast majority didn't vote for the Conservatives, you should keep in mind that the vast majority did not vote for any one particular party, the vote is split amongst multiple parties, and of all those parties, the Conservatives got the most votes. Of course, but the fact remains that most Canadians did not vote Conservative, hence why it shouldn't surprise you that most Canadians aren't fans of Harper. Quote
Smallc Posted February 25, 2010 Author Report Posted February 25, 2010 shouldn't surprise you that most Canadians aren't fans of Harper. That doesn't excuse the constant attacks in articles that have nothing to do with Harper. Quote
Mr.Canada Posted February 26, 2010 Report Posted February 26, 2010 Of course, but the fact remains that most Canadians did not vote Conservative, hence why it shouldn't surprise you that most Canadians aren't fans of Harper. Just Like Chretien who at his highest won around 40% of the vote, same as Martin who won something like 36%, same as Trudeau, same as well, the last PM to win a majority of the vote was Brian Mulroney in 1984. We have a three party system here in Canada, if we had a two party system like the states then there would be 50%+ almost everytime. In the future please try to actually read something before posting. Yeah we know your teachers are socialists and you're rebelling against your someone who may be conservatives. You like to smoke your bong and demand things. You're part of generation "y" not me, we get it. It doesn't excuse you from reading and posting things that make sense. Thanks a lot. Quote "You are scum for insinuating that isn't the case you snake." -William Ashley Canadian Immigration Reform Blog
Topaz Posted February 26, 2010 Report Posted February 26, 2010 People who dislike Harper are obsessed with him for some reason. Don't kid yourself these people will bash whoever happens to be the leader of the Conservative Party, Harper isn't special. They wouldn't vote for the Tories no matter who the leader was so what they say can be dismissed. Well, Mr Canada you are wrong. There are people who have voted for conservatives in the past, the PC Party, and still don't like Harper. I voted twice for Mulroney, and don't care for the guy now. The reason some Canadians don't like Harper is that he said he would be accountable and clean up the corruption in Ottawa. His promises are no good, so his word is no good and all he has done is bring back to what the PC's did, put us in debt. It's NOT I don't like him because he's a Conservative, I don't like him because of the above. Quote
kimmy Posted February 27, 2010 Report Posted February 27, 2010 The CBC attracts a certain clientele; a rather think-alike group for the most part. The comments section reflects as much. -k Quote (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ Friendly forum facilitator! ┬──┬◡ノ(° -°ノ)
Smallc Posted February 27, 2010 Author Report Posted February 27, 2010 Well...I read the CBC....but, I agree with your point for the most part. Quote
JB Globe Posted February 28, 2010 Report Posted February 28, 2010 (edited) JIn the future please try to actually read something before posting. Yeah we know your teachers are socialists and you're rebelling against your someone who may be conservatives. You like to smoke your bong and demand things. You're part of generation "y" not me, we get it. It doesn't excuse you from reading and posting things that make sense. How is that you're at least a decade or two older than I am and you're incredibly more immature? Edited March 1, 2010 by JB Globe Quote
Mr.Canada Posted March 1, 2010 Report Posted March 1, 2010 How is that you're at least a decade or two older than I am and you're incredibly more immature? I have no idea how old you think I am but I'm not that old. I was born in the mid 70's. Quote "You are scum for insinuating that isn't the case you snake." -William Ashley Canadian Immigration Reform Blog
JB Globe Posted March 1, 2010 Report Posted March 1, 2010 (edited) I have no idea how old you think I am but I'm not that old. I was born in the mid 70's. So you corrected my on your age, but you didn't correct me when I called you immature? Telling. Edited March 1, 2010 by JB Globe Quote
scorpio Posted March 1, 2010 Report Posted March 1, 2010 (edited) My only objection is that we all have to pay for their little echo chamber. Well, this is in Harper's court now. But he doesn't have the balls to cancel the CBC. Edited March 1, 2010 by scorpio Quote
Smallc Posted March 2, 2010 Author Report Posted March 2, 2010 Ok, after reading the CBC reader comments in the article about Chile asking Canada for help, I've changed my mind. Most of the posters on CBC are simply idiots, and not anti Harper. You'd think people who spent so much time on a news site would know something about what's going on in the world or how things work, but, they don't. Quote
kimmy Posted March 3, 2010 Report Posted March 3, 2010 The CBC knows its audience and it panders to them. My only objection is that we all have to pay for their little echo chamber. I am also saddened by the loss of a wonderful opportunity.By rights, CBC radio should have Mark Steyn immediately after Anna-Marie Tremonti every morning. The CBC itself acknowledged as much 18 months ago, and promised to bring in a wider range of opinions. I'm hard-pressed to see any evidence that anything has changed at all. -k Quote (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ Friendly forum facilitator! ┬──┬◡ノ(° -°ノ)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.