Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Now here is a film that prides itself on a strong dose of reality. Has that Jarhead kind of touch.

This joint is a 2009 favorite for the usual movie critics, but did not get wide release. Recommended for anyone with a DVD player that can handle it.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

I really really really liked this movie. Anyone who liked military movies will dig this. It's not as broad and all encompassing as Oliver Stone epics or something like Apocalypse Now, it's a much narrower storyline without broad themes. But it's believable, realistic, and fantastic. Apparently the director is a female, too.

Edited by Gabriel
Posted (edited)

But it's believable, realistic, and fantastic. Apparently the director is a female, too.

James Cameron's Canadian x wife, in fact.

Edited by Smallc
Posted

James Cameron's Canadian x wife, in fact.

Wow, that's quite a cool factoid in a semi-ironic way given our recent chit chat about Avatar.

Posted

I was just going by what I heard on the radio. I didn't bother to look into it any further. They must have made a mistake.

Posted

I was just going by what I heard on the radio. I didn't bother to look into it any further. They must have made a mistake.

Syntax error....Canadian director's ex wife...

pfff...candadian director...I checked the imbd site and cameron is no where to be found on The Littlest Hobo, Beachecombers or Degrassi ...

RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS

If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us

Posted

yes, whoever it was saying it must have said Canadian in the wrong place.

Or you heard it and processed it incorrectly. My wife does that all the time..

RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS

If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us

Posted

I doubt it. I very rarely hear things wrong.

How would you know without me beside you to correct you?

RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS

If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us

Posted

Well, because I spend enough time (in the real world) showing other people that they in fact heard wrong...when I didn't.

Maybe you are right....anybody who marries a Canadian citizen often becomes a Canadian citizen by design! :lol:

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

No, it seems that I was wrong in this case, but I'm quite sure of what I heard. I thought that she was just his wife, until I heard them say Canadian wife.

Posted
I agree...it is so real, you can taste it. Nominated today for Best Picture.
I just rented this movie and I didn't know quite what to think of it. I was suspicious of its realism because first, it used the artifices of a shaky camera, POV and close-ups to imitate the documentary look. And second, while I have only passing acquiantance with the military, well-organized systems rarely allow the individual behaviour shown in this movie.

So, after watching it, I realized that if you take away the realism, what does the movie have? Very little. There's no plot to speak of. There are a series of scenes of rising tension (with dramatic music). I suppose it was a character study/buddy movie but other movies have done that better. (In a military setting, The Last Detail comes to mind.) There is also the "adrenalin junkie" angle but I think that's a Hollywood-style insight into the people who do this job.

And then I went to a few websites where the comments of US military people were roundly negative. The movie is completely unrealistic and does not portray accurately how bomb detonation units operate.

[incidentally, a movie that gets high marks for realism is We Were Soldiers.]

-----

The movie was filmed in and around Amman, Jordan. (I was happy they didn't use Morocco or Tunisia because then they would have lost all credibility. Amman is a suitable stand-in for Baghdad.) I lived in this area of the world for several years and I can simply note that the movie does not portray well the beauty of the landscape nor in particular the changing colours throughout the day.

There was one scene I liked - when the soldier returns home and is shopping for cereal. But this scene has been done before (Moscow on the Hudson, for example) and in fact is a lazy way to juxtapose.

Posted

I just rented this movie and I didn't know quite what to think of it. I was suspicious of its realism because first, it used the artifices of a shaky camera, POV and close-ups to imitate the documentary look. And second, while I have only passing acquiantance with the military, well-organized systems rarely allow the individual behaviour shown in this movie.

Sure....but "well organized systems" were regulary getting their asses blown up by chaotic IEDs in 2004 Iraq. Sometimes individual behaviours are preferred for survival....your mileage may vary.

So, after watching it, I realized that if you take away the realism, what does the movie have? Very little. There's no plot to speak of. There are a series of scenes of rising tension (with dramatic music). I suppose it was a character study/buddy movie but other movies have done that better. (In a military setting, The Last Detail comes to mind.) There is also the "adrenalin junkie" angle but I think that's a Hollywood-style insight into the people who do this job.

That's really all Bigelow wanted to do....focus on each moment with "hyperbolic tension". If it was typical Hollywood schlock, there would have been bright red LED countdown timers a la "24".

And then I went to a few websites where the comments of US military people were roundly negative. The movie is completely unrealistic and does not portray accurately how bomb detonation units operate.

Obviously the pace and risk taking were amped up for this film, but US Army EOD was involved from Mark Boal's script born of embedding in a bomb squad and Renner's training for his role. In real life, just as it is for Alaskan bush pilots, there are "old" EOD specialists, and "bold" EOD specialists...but there are no "old bold" EOD specialists.

The screenwriter and director couldn't sell many tickets to the sterile reality:

The movie was filmed in and around Amman, Jordan. (I was happy they didn't use Morocco or Tunisia because then they would have lost all credibility. Amman is a suitable stand-in for Baghdad.) I lived in this area of the world for several years and I can simply note that the movie does not portray well the beauty of the landscape nor in particular the changing colours throughout the day.

A secondary consideration no doubt....leave that to NatGeo.

There was one scene I liked - when the soldier returns home and is shopping for cereal. But this scene has been done before (Moscow on the Hudson, for example) and in fact is a lazy way to juxtapose.

Soldiers, sailors, airman, and marines still come home and welcome such a simple opportunity at normalcy....especially going to MacDonalds.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Congratulations to Ms. Bigelow and company for winning Best Picture / Director. Very classy of her to thank the people of Jordan and the US armed forces in her Oscar acceptance speech.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

Wow, I thought director and movie would be a split. Well done Ms. Bigelow and co.

it was already rumored because of the new voting system that Avatar would not win...which brings up the question what are the awards for the best artsie fartsie movie or best entertainment?...Hurt Locker was an excellent movie it's already in my personal library but more entertaining than Avatar? no...

“Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives.”- John Stuart Mill

Posted

....Hurt Locker was an excellent movie it's already in my personal library but more entertaining than Avatar? no...

Avatar is a splendid CGI cartoon, and was rewarded in the appropriate categories: cinematography, art direction and visual effects.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

Congrats to Bigelow et al.

Haven't seen the movie yet - going to wait and rent it with The Messenger as it seems that the two should accompany each other nicely.

Got lucky once - rented I Heart Huckabees and The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy and watched them one after the other. Quite the experience.

Hmmm, maybe we should start a thread on movie accompaniment?

If a believer demands that I, as a non-believer, observe his taboos in the public domain, he is not asking for my respect but for my submission. And that is incompatible with a secular democracy. Flemming Rose (Dutch journalist)

My biggest takeaway from economics is that the past wasn't as good as you remember, the present isn't as bad as you think, and the future will be better than you anticipate. Morgan Housel http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2016/01/14/things-im-pretty-sure-about.aspx

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,896
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    postuploader
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Politics1990 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Akalupenn earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • User earned a badge
      One Year In
    • josej earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • josej earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...