Oleg Bach Posted June 8, 2009 Report Posted June 8, 2009 That's called auctioning off natural resources to the most efficient users. Good money is money that can be imagined coming out of this original auction. Just because someone imagines themselves as being the most efficent user of resourses does not entitle them to take what they want by propogating myth that the persons with the resourse - is inferiour..and has no rights - that the force that imagines themselves as superiour is only so by a long sequence of crimminal acts and the hording of the proceeds of those acts - the most "efficent user" is just that - a user....Your whole concept reminds me of someone coming into my house - getting me drunk because I am weak and poor - and walking out with my art collection - that he sells at a premium because the artist is dead or drunk - What should happen is that I should be paid for my natural resourse..no one has the right to suck my blood - and not pay me for it. Quote
benny Posted June 8, 2009 Report Posted June 8, 2009 Just because someone imagines themselves as being the most efficent user of resourses does not entitle them to take what they want by propogating myth that the persons with the resourse - is inferiour..and has no rights - that the force that imagines themselves as superiour is only so by a long sequence of crimminal acts and the hording of the proceeds of those acts - the most "efficent user" is just that - a user....Your whole concept reminds me of someone coming into my house - getting me drunk because I am weak and poor - and walking out with my art collection - that he sells at a premium because the artist is dead or drunk - What should happen is that I should be paid for my natural resourse..no one has the right to suck my blood - and not pay me for it. The idea is rather that the person who want the resource more than others will be the highest bidder. Quote
Oleg Bach Posted June 8, 2009 Report Posted June 8, 2009 The idea is rather that the person who want the resource more than others will be the highest bidder. No it won't - it will be the meanest most cruel murderous son of a bitch that will get the resourse by stealth or brute force - YOU like to belive you are part of a civilized group - and you "bid" on things like gentleman - you are marading barbarians...live with the fact that you might just be the barbaric bad guys..nice suits and offices - with smooth words does not make a prince or king...you have the mind of a pirate..and all the fancey talk will not change that - you are attempting to justify crimminal behavour..by cloaking it in respectablity...DON'T BE ASHAMED OF WHAT YOU ARE AND WHAT YOU REPRESENT -----------REPEAT AFTER ME.................I AM A MURDERING PIRATE AND I AM NOT ASHAMED OF WHAT I AM.......THERE - that wasn't so hard was it? I still love you....because you are OUR pirate. Quote
bush_cheney2004 Posted June 8, 2009 Report Posted June 8, 2009 .... I have always said as far as the Palistinian crisis - IF - the world had sent the same amount of aid to Palistine are they did Israel - Palistine would not have been debased to a slave master relationship.....and Hamas would not exist - bribery must be done tactfully and with intelligence. Nothing was stopping the "world" from doing so.....how much did Canada send? Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
benny Posted June 8, 2009 Report Posted June 8, 2009 (edited) Nothing was stopping the "world" from doing so.....how much did Canada send? Zionists could have financed their immigration ideology. Edited June 8, 2009 by benny Quote
Oleg Bach Posted June 8, 2009 Report Posted June 8, 2009 Zionists could have financed their immigration ideology. You just killed your credibilty with the insertion of the word ------------get original benny - do some real thinking and stop parroting. Quote
benny Posted June 8, 2009 Report Posted June 8, 2009 You just killed your credibilty with the insertion of the word ------------get original benny - do some real thinking and stop parroting. Back to the topic Bach! Quote
Oleg Bach Posted June 8, 2009 Report Posted June 8, 2009 Back to the topic Bach! Nope - not playing any more. Quote
benny Posted June 8, 2009 Report Posted June 8, 2009 Nope - not playing any more. Immigration is a very important and urgent issue. Quote
Jerry J. Fortin Posted June 8, 2009 Report Posted June 8, 2009 Immigration is a very important and urgent issue. Yes it is urgent. However not in the way folks seem to think it is. Quote
benny Posted June 8, 2009 Report Posted June 8, 2009 (edited) Yes it is urgent. However not in the way folks seem to think it is. It is urgent in part because there is such a divergence of views. Edited June 8, 2009 by benny Quote
Machjo Posted June 8, 2009 Author Report Posted June 8, 2009 and the Ainu were the original inhabitants and now like our natives at the bottom of Japanese society, and the Koreans cannot ever gain Japanese citizenship... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koreans_in_Japan You tell me, what citizenship do you think they have? All empires have had their share of immigrants. Often, the price of empire has been granting citizenship to subjects, resulting in mass migration to the mother country. THis happened with the Roman Empire, the British Empire, and even the American Empire (Puerto Ricans are still US citizens even though Puerto Rico is not a part of the US). Quote With friends like Zionists, what Jew needs enemies? With friends like Islamists, what Muslim needs enemies?
benny Posted June 9, 2009 Report Posted June 9, 2009 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koreans_in_JapanYou tell me, what citizenship do you think they have? All empires have had their share of immigrants. Often, the price of empire has been granting citizenship to subjects, resulting in mass migration to the mother country. THis happened with the Roman Empire, the British Empire, and even the American Empire (Puerto Ricans are still US citizens even though Puerto Rico is not a part of the US). With Japan aging so rapidly and so closed to immigration, it opens the door to a Chinese conquest of Japan. Quote
bush_cheney2004 Posted June 9, 2009 Report Posted June 9, 2009 ....THis happened with the Roman Empire, the British Empire, and even the American Empire (Puerto Ricans are still US citizens even though Puerto Rico is not a part of the US). Puerto Rico is an unincorporated US territory. Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
Jerry J. Fortin Posted June 9, 2009 Report Posted June 9, 2009 Puerto Rico is an unincorporated US territory. Like Guam, Wake and a host of others. Quote
benny Posted June 9, 2009 Report Posted June 9, 2009 Like Guam, Wake and a host of others. These islands can become attractive to boat people (refugees). Quote
Leafless Posted June 9, 2009 Report Posted June 9, 2009 These islands can become attractive to boat people (refugees). Benny the third world immigration troll. Quote
benny Posted June 9, 2009 Report Posted June 9, 2009 Benny the third world immigration troll. I'm all for topics' second wind. Quote
bush_cheney2004 Posted June 9, 2009 Report Posted June 9, 2009 (edited) These islands can become attractive to boat people (refugees). Not so attractive as the Canadian and Mexican U.S. borders. Edited June 9, 2009 by bush_cheney2004 Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
Smallc Posted June 9, 2009 Report Posted June 9, 2009 (edited) Not so attractive as the Canadian and Mexican U.S. borders. Peopel are that eager to get out of the US, eh? Edited June 9, 2009 by Smallc Quote
benny Posted June 9, 2009 Report Posted June 9, 2009 Not so attractive as the Canadian and Mexican U.S. borders. Dying in hot waters is more attractive than dying in cold ones. Quote
bush_cheney2004 Posted June 9, 2009 Report Posted June 9, 2009 Peopel are that eager to get out of the US, eh? Yes, but not nearly as eager as those trying to get in. Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
Smallc Posted June 9, 2009 Report Posted June 9, 2009 Yes, but not nearly as eager as those trying to get in. Depends on which border we're speaking of I suppose. I don't know too many Canadians that want to do anymore than visit. Quote
benny Posted June 9, 2009 Report Posted June 9, 2009 Yes, but not nearly as eager as those trying to get in. Give us the link of an American discussion forum where Canadians are annoying Americans, like what you are doing here. Quote
bush_cheney2004 Posted June 9, 2009 Report Posted June 9, 2009 Depends on which border we're speaking of I suppose. I don't know too many Canadians that want to do anymore than visit. I do....Hint: they were not born in Canada. Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.