bush_cheney2004 Posted March 22, 2009 Report Posted March 22, 2009 Did I doubt that America was more "diverse" (whatever that weasel word means) then canada? If you don't know what it means, then your claim is meaningless. If you want that lamentable prize ... go ahead. I do....too many dead bodies from playing Euro-trash war games in the 20th century. but please show me when the forefathers we're planning 1776 with chicanos and "essays" - ... Hispanics always were seen as alien and brutish ... and again NEVER FORMED ANY PART OF AMERICAN SOCIETY. You are surely a fool...not realizing where the very term "dollar" comes from. Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
lictor616 Posted March 22, 2009 Report Posted March 22, 2009 I do....too many dead bodies from playing Euro-trash war games in the 20th century. And I don't ... too many bodies done to death in the great egalitarian society (SOVIET UNION) ... Diversity is weakness and a cancer to a nations commonwealth. I,d rather be playing euro-trash war games (mastering the world and following knowledge like a sinking star) then living in a disconnected, rootless, empty Politically Correct theocracy (or rather ochlocracy) that is a new dark age ... surrounded by millions of imported anthropoid pests, a fetid mass of half a billion coffee-colored mongrels with the minds of rats. Quote -Magna Europa Est Patria Nostra-
bush_cheney2004 Posted March 22, 2009 Report Posted March 22, 2009 And I don't ... too many bodies done to death in the great egalitarian society (SOVIET UNION) ... Diversity is weakness and a cancer to a nations commonwealth. No, monarchy is/was the underlying weakness. That's why we shouldn't have sex with our siblings or parents. I,d rather be playing euro-trash war games (mastering the world and following knowledge like a sinking star) then living in a disconnected, rootless, empty Politically Correct theocracy (or rather ochlocracy) that is a new dark age ... surrounded by millions of imported anthropoid pests, a fetid mass of half a billion coffee-colored mongrels with the minds of rats. How did that work out...oh superior one? Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
lictor616 Posted March 22, 2009 Report Posted March 22, 2009 (edited) No, monarchy is/was the underlying weakness. That's why we shouldn't have sex with our siblings or parents.How did that work out...oh superior one? worked out brilliantly actually until we started to commit suicide by tolerating mattoids and misfits... Europe was really advancing in leaps and bounds in the field of knowledge and technical applications of science... and we also produced a people of magnificence and breathtaking beauty, with such revered traits as blond hair, big and convexe blue eyes, green eyes, that gives our eyes an expressive and lucid quality which we see as beautiful. a non-sloping facial angle... so no, we were doing just fine I guess... at least in comparative standards... Edited March 22, 2009 by lictor616 Quote -Magna Europa Est Patria Nostra-
bush_cheney2004 Posted March 22, 2009 Report Posted March 22, 2009 (edited) .....so no, we were doing just fine I guess... at least in comparative standards... Then what happened oh superior one? You got your ass kicked by "substandard" humans. ...if only you could dance. Edited March 22, 2009 by bush_cheney2004 Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
lictor616 Posted March 22, 2009 Report Posted March 22, 2009 Then what happened oh superior one? You got your ass kicked by "substandard" humans. ...if only you could dance. hmmm who were this substandard humans? and who's ass did they kick? explain... Quote -Magna Europa Est Patria Nostra-
bush_cheney2004 Posted March 22, 2009 Report Posted March 22, 2009 hmmm who were this substandard humans? and who's ass did they kick? explain... No, I think you have explained it all very well. You half-life on this forum can now be calculated....in days. Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
lictor616 Posted March 22, 2009 Report Posted March 22, 2009 No, I think you have explained it all very well.You half-life on this forum can now be calculated....in days. no no, please, enlighten me.... who kicked who's ass? i'd really love to know... Quote -Magna Europa Est Patria Nostra-
benny Posted March 22, 2009 Report Posted March 22, 2009 Agreed....Canada did develop a domestic aerospace capability, with some help from the UK and nationalizations in the past. For some reason, a Canadian automotive make did not survive the leap. On January 16, 1965, Canada and United States sign the Auto Pact: an agreement to refrain from competing against each other. Quote
lictor616 Posted March 22, 2009 Report Posted March 22, 2009 On January 16, 1965, Canada and United States sign the Auto Pact: an agreement to refrain from competing against each other. fascinating, thanks for the heads up. Quote -Magna Europa Est Patria Nostra-
Smallc Posted March 23, 2009 Report Posted March 23, 2009 On January 16, 1965, Canada and United States sign the Auto Pact: an agreement to refrain from competing against each other. The Auto Pact no longer applies. Quote
bush_cheney2004 Posted March 23, 2009 Report Posted March 23, 2009 The Auto Pact no longer applies. Thank you...glad somebody is paying attention. Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
Oleg Bach Posted March 23, 2009 Report Posted March 23, 2009 Thank you...glad somebody is paying attention. It made our auto industry dead - and no one was paying attention. Quote
Jerry J. Fortin Posted March 23, 2009 Report Posted March 23, 2009 Its time to make some choices people. Capitalism or something else, because we are rapidly headed toward something else. Having tax dollars grease the wheels of corporate efforts headed toward Chapter 11 cases for businesses headquartered in the US does very little for the citizens. Yes there are some employees who will see benefit, yet their numbers are relatively low when compared to those who have already lost their jobs or who are about to lose their jobs. In Canada, the Chrysler group represents about 10,000 employees, and we have already dumped billions on this failing company. We have been told that we must either deliver even more money which s to say billions more, stop Revenue Canada from collecting taxes owed, and have the workers take a huge pay cut of 25%. Looks nice on a balance sheet as a proposal, but utter lacks any kind of reasonable reality based problem resolution being run by a government with a minority in the House of Commons. Here is what I think should happen; call their hand. Lets see if they have the balls to play. I suggest that the government refuse to hand over any more money as a first step. The next move should be seeking the taxes owed to the government, equal treatment with citizens. You either pay or the government starts to seize accounts and property to cover the debts. The next step is to show them the door to the exit. Tell them to have a nice day, and engage a very good lawyer because they will need one to retain any Canadian assets, those are forfeit until their debts are paid. Those debts will also include any pension moneys owed to Canadian citizen workers. Its time to get serious about the problems people. Governments cannot and should not be involved in the banking and credit sectors, they should not be bailing out corporations and subsidizing business efforts. Tax dollars are for the care and funding of programs and services related to the wants and needs of citizens. Quote
M.Dancer Posted March 23, 2009 Report Posted March 23, 2009 And I don't ... too many bodies done to death in the great egalitarian society (SOVIET UNION) ... Diversity is weakness and a cancer to a nations commonwealth. I,d rather be playing euro-trash war games (mastering the world and following knowledge like a sinking star) then living in a disconnected, rootless, empty Politically Correct theocracy (or rather ochlocracy) that is a new dark age ... surrounded by millions of imported anthropoid pests, a fetid mass of half a billion coffee-colored mongrels with the minds of rats. Isn't there an ignorant neo nazi site you would prefer to haunt? Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
benny Posted March 23, 2009 Report Posted March 23, 2009 The Auto Pact no longer applies. It's not because something doesn't apply anymore that it stops having explaining power about our present situation. Quote
bush_cheney2004 Posted March 23, 2009 Report Posted March 23, 2009 Here is what I think should happen; call their hand. Lets see if they have the balls to play. I suggest that the government refuse to hand over any more money as a first step.... Agreed...but the question is....does government have the balls to play? Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
benny Posted March 23, 2009 Report Posted March 23, 2009 Agreed...but the question is....does government have the balls to play? Why should the government refuse to give money as a first step since it has the capacity to determine the value of that money in the next step!? Quote
lictor616 Posted March 23, 2009 Report Posted March 23, 2009 Isn't there an ignorant neo nazi site you would prefer to haunt? did you have a refutation or? ... Quote -Magna Europa Est Patria Nostra-
benny Posted March 23, 2009 Report Posted March 23, 2009 Chrysler is more related to the virginity of New World than to the ugly affairs of the Old Continent. Quote
M.Dancer Posted March 23, 2009 Report Posted March 23, 2009 did you have a refutation or? ... abject ignorance... ... surrounded by millions of imported anthropoid pests, a fetid mass of half a billion coffee-colored mongrels with the minds of rats. Need not be refuted.... Only singled out and laughed at. Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
lictor616 Posted March 23, 2009 Report Posted March 23, 2009 abject ignorance...Need not be refuted.... Only singled out and laughed at. precisely what was "ignorant" in my posted comments? i.e.: what was "lacking knowledge or information as to a particular subject or fact" perhaps you can show me... Quote -Magna Europa Est Patria Nostra-
M.Dancer Posted March 23, 2009 Report Posted March 23, 2009 precisely what was "ignorant" in my posted comments? i.e.: what was "lacking knowledge or information as to a particular subject or fact"perhaps you can show me... I did. Carry on... Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
lictor616 Posted March 23, 2009 Report Posted March 23, 2009 (edited) I did.Carry on... no you didn't you merely SAID it was ignorant, while carefully refraining from showing HOW what I said was lacking in knowledge in science or whatever. you simply rejected it out of hand... but did'nt refute. Edited March 23, 2009 by lictor616 Quote -Magna Europa Est Patria Nostra-
M.Dancer Posted March 23, 2009 Report Posted March 23, 2009 no you didn't you merely SAID it was ignorant, while carefully refraining from showing HOW what I said was lacking in knowledge in science or whatever. you simply rejected it out of hand... but did'nt refute. Let me help you here.... abject ignorance...Need not be refuted.... Only singled out and laughed at. Believe me, I'm not laughing alone... Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
.thumb.jpg.9a49e1b2f22a6d34a345152c50044aa9.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.