craiger Posted November 24, 2008 Report Share Posted November 24, 2008 hypothetically in Greater Depresion we enter civil war and martial law is imposed what side will you take? Alliance= the people and the poor and the most effected or Horde= filthy rich,government, the bankers, the advisers (the group that got in this mess) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Canada Posted November 24, 2008 Report Share Posted November 24, 2008 hypothetically in Greater Depresion we enter civil war and martial law is imposed what side will you take?Alliance= the people and the poor and the most effected or Horde= filthy rich,government, the bankers, the advisers (the group that got in this mess) Please don't use Warcraft references as your own ok. I'm pretty sure it's against the rules. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blueblood Posted November 24, 2008 Report Share Posted November 24, 2008 hypothetically in Greater Depresion we enter civil war and martial law is imposed what side will you take?Alliance= the people and the poor and the most effected (the group that got in this mess) or Horde= filthy rich,government, the bankers, the advisers There fixed it for you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vancouver King Posted November 24, 2008 Report Share Posted November 24, 2008 hypothetically in Greater Depresion we enter civil war and martial law is imposed what side will you take?Alliance= the people and the poor and the most effected or Horde= filthy rich,government, the bankers, the advisers (the group that got in this mess) As a society we are at least a generation away from action in the streets as those with nothing left to lose act out their despair against the establishment. In the interim, expect thinly disguised platitudes along the lines of, "sorry, the cupboard is bare, all possible resources have been expended on banks, car companies etc. This govt. remains committed to it's long planned priority of $40 billion in additional corporate tax cuts and this revenue shortfall will have to be made up elesewhere in the budget, such as reducing entitlements for pensioners and working Canadians." If nothing else the current financial calamity will make it quite clear where Harper's priorities lie. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blueblood Posted November 24, 2008 Report Share Posted November 24, 2008 As a society we are at least a generation away from action in the streets as those with nothing left to lose act out their despair against the establishment.In the interim, expect thinly disguised platitudes along the lines of, "sorry, the cupboard is bare, all possible resources have been expended on banks, car companies etc. This govt. remains committed to it's long planned priority of $40 billion in additional corporate tax cuts and this revenue shortfall will have to be made up elesewhere in the budget, such as reducing entitlements for pensioners and working Canadians." If nothing else the current financial calamity will make it quite clear where Harper's priorities lie. Yes lets punish the people who are responsible for providing jobs which has resulted in our strong economy. Typical leftist idea, punish people for succeeding. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guyser Posted November 24, 2008 Report Share Posted November 24, 2008 There fixed it for you. Curious, how so? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vancouver King Posted November 25, 2008 Report Share Posted November 25, 2008 Yes lets punish the people who are responsible for providing jobs which has resulted in our strong economy. Typical leftist idea, punish people for succeeding. Since when is not granting someone/something a tax break punishing them? Tax punishment is increasing taxes on those least able to afford them - exactly what Harper and his neo-cons did in 2006 against the lowest wage earners in Canada. Typical Harper supporter, lots of empty bluster and precious little fact. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kimmy Posted November 25, 2008 Report Share Posted November 25, 2008 For some reason, I'm not in the least surprised that Craiger's world view is based on -k Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argus Posted November 25, 2008 Report Share Posted November 25, 2008 For some reason, I'm not in the least surprised that Craiger's world view is based on -k Come on, Kimmy, you know you want to play! Be an elf mage and turn those nasty orcs into sheep! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White Doors Posted November 25, 2008 Report Share Posted November 25, 2008 I had a 70 on Bladefist server. an Elf Hunter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oleg Bach Posted November 25, 2008 Report Share Posted November 25, 2008 hypothetically in Greater Depresion we enter civil war and martial law is imposed what side will you take?Alliance= the people and the poor and the most effected or Horde= filthy rich,government, the bankers, the advisers (the group that got in this mess) Let the horders continue to horde. The Canadian bankers will never let you know how much they have accumulated - and that hording in a strange way is providing stablity. As my mother used to say"never let them know you are broke or they will persecute you and never let them know that you are rich or they will also persecute you..just can't win. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argus Posted November 25, 2008 Report Share Posted November 25, 2008 I had a 70 on Bladefist server. an Elf Hunter. But were you a BELF or a NELF? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White Doors Posted November 25, 2008 Report Share Posted November 25, 2008 But were you a BELF or a NELF? NELF Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blueblood Posted November 25, 2008 Report Share Posted November 25, 2008 Since when is not granting someone/something a tax break punishing them? Tax punishment is increasing taxes on those least able to afford them - exactly what Harper and his neo-cons did in 2006 against the lowest wage earners in Canada.Typical Harper supporter, lots of empty bluster and precious little fact. It is punishing them in that they contribute jobs and tax dollars to the economy. By not offering a tax break when other areas of the world have better rates, you are in fact punishing them. Tax punishment happens to people of all classes. Having high taxes whether your rich or poor is tax punishment. Cry me a river about your wage earners, businesses contribute far more to the country than wage earners. All wage earners are good for is cheap labour and votes. Here's a fact, taxing the hell out of our business's adds costs. Have too many costs and that leads to outsourcing, which means the wage earners are even worse off. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.