jdobbin Posted October 22, 2008 Report Posted October 22, 2008 The Tories will NOT go after Layton. There's nothing to be gained for them in that. They'll attack the NDP locally, in BC, for example, but will generally ignore them in the rest of the country. There's nothing to be gained there. NDP votes would not go to the Tories anyway, they'd go to the Liberals. I don't think you see what I'm getting at. The Tories are not after the NDP core votes if they attack Layton. They are trying to make Liberals think twice about voting NDP rather than Tory. That is what is gained in attacking them. Quote
Oleg Bach Posted October 22, 2008 Report Posted October 22, 2008 It's better to have benevolent and intelligent facism than civl war...what lunitic would even contemplate violence as a way of gaining peace and prosperity and freedom? First thing you have to incrimentally and gently get rid of are people who have no honour or love for society. Politics is a service - but - what I notice with corporate Orwellianism is that any group that attatches the word service to their title usually serve only themselves and create insidious and nasty monopolies - parasites are to be removed gently. Quote
jdobbin Posted October 22, 2008 Report Posted October 22, 2008 Very true. If anything the Tories want more people to vote for the NDP to further dilute the Liberals. If the Liberal vote collapses completely as it has in some provinces, you see NDP start gaining lots of seats. In Manitoba for example, the NDP loses election when Liberal support rises higher. I don't think the Tories can afford to ignore the NDP and hope for a vote split that leaves them coming up the middle. A complete collapse of Liberal support might result in the NDP winning all urban seats and then some. Quote
Oleg Bach Posted October 22, 2008 Report Posted October 22, 2008 The liberals are full of quiet violence. Quote
Mad_Michael Posted October 22, 2008 Report Posted October 22, 2008 I must say that Mike Duffy Live has a lot of scoops lately about the beleaguered Liberal Party. Mike Duffy is rather an embarrassment for Canadian journalism. He's a Conservative party hack and has been for decades. Nothing wrong with that, but to pretend that he's a journalist is insulting to real journalists. Quote
M.Dancer Posted October 22, 2008 Report Posted October 22, 2008 Mike Duffy is rather an embarrassment for Canadian journalism.He's a Conservative party hack and has been for decades. Nothing wrong with that, but to pretend that he's a journalist is insulting to real journalists. Cite? Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
Oleg Bach Posted October 22, 2008 Report Posted October 22, 2008 Mike Duffy is rather an embarrassment for Canadian journalism.He's a Conservative party hack and has been for decades. Nothing wrong with that, but to pretend that he's a journalist is insulting to real journalists. I could have sworn that he was a sports commentator!~ Jounalism is not a raw raw Roman type spectator sport....for the dull and drunken masses - so I could have sworn ----- OH Duffy the glutton - now i REMEMBER....naw - he can't control his appitite let alone a pen. Quote
Mad_Michael Posted October 22, 2008 Report Posted October 22, 2008 Cite? The video clip with Elizabeth May makes the point rather clearly. The Puffster was speechless in reply. Quote
Oleg Bach Posted October 22, 2008 Report Posted October 22, 2008 The video clip with Elizabeth May makes the point rather clearly. The Puffster was speechless in reply. Again -calling Duffy a glutton is not an insult - it is a fact. What I find is that some journalist can be influenced with a drink - others with cash - and this one naturally enough with a big fat steak and a sweet apple pie..The poor man can barely breath - what am I suppose to say - that he is not defective - that he is credible? If he were a skinny female bulemic CNN talking head - I would"insult" her also and deny her credablity - those mildly mentally ill or severyly so are not to be taken to seriously - and Duffy is about 200 lbs over weight - why? Quote
guyser Posted October 22, 2008 Report Posted October 22, 2008 - those mildly mentally ill or severyly so are not to be taken to seriously - We don't. <cough cough> Quote
M.Dancer Posted October 22, 2008 Report Posted October 22, 2008 The video clip with Elizabeth May makes the point rather clearly. The Puffster was speechless in reply. The Video Clip? A speechless Duffy is proof he's a conservative party hack? Sorry, that don't cut it. Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
wulf42 Posted October 22, 2008 Report Posted October 22, 2008 (edited) The concept of the Liberal's being dead forever is merely a pipe dream. Back in the 90's people were said the right wing was dead because they were split.Politcis is like a pendulum. In the 80's it swung the Tories way, the 90's it went to the Liberals, now its swinging back to the Cons and in a few years, it will swing back to the Libs Well unless they can shake the corruption image and thanks to Chretien that isn't going to happen.....they don't stand a chance...a matter of fact i heard on a talk show this morning a political professor doubted that the Liberal party will survive another few years.....they simply have no credibility...and they have no plan ...and they have no leader......they are dishonest.......they have no.....well you get the idea................ Liberal's are Kaput! Here is what Canada thinks of the Liberal party ......! http://www.canada.com/reginaleaderpost/new...68-20d689627241 Edited October 22, 2008 by wulf42 Quote
PoliticalCitizen Posted October 22, 2008 Report Posted October 22, 2008 Liberal's are Kaput! Liberals are Canada Red flag, multi-culturalism, French origin, social programs.... Like it or not, we are more a Liberal country than anything else Quote You are what you do.
PoliticalCitizen Posted October 22, 2008 Report Posted October 22, 2008 The Video Clip? A speechless Duffy is proof he's a conservative party hack?Sorry, that don't cut it. 2 lines, Dancer? WHAT HAPPENED ??? Quote You are what you do.
Who's Doing What? Posted October 22, 2008 Report Posted October 22, 2008 blah..blah..blah................the Liberals lost and will never be anything but a side show in the future................get over it!Liberal party= Kaput! I seem to remember a two seat sideshow not to far in the past. Quote Harper differed with his party on some key policy issues; in 1995, for example, he was one of only two Reform MPs to vote in favour of federal legislation requiring owners to register their guns. http://www.mapleleafweb.com/election/bio/harper.html "You've got to remember that west of Winnipeg the ridings the Liberals hold are dominated by people who are either recent Asian immigrants or recent migrants from eastern Canada: people who live in ghettoes and who are not integrated into western Canadian society." (Stephen Harper, Report Newsmagazine, January 22, 2001)
Who's Doing What? Posted October 22, 2008 Report Posted October 22, 2008 The Video Clip? A speechless Duffy is proof he's a conservative party hack?Sorry, that don't cut it. I don't think he is by any means a party hack but I have no doubt he is a conservative and has been most of if not all of his life. I think he does a decent job of getting to the bottom of things and getting the story out. There have been a few times where I thought he was showing a bit of bias towards the CPC but by no means enough to say he is a hack, or even a promoter of the CPC. Quote Harper differed with his party on some key policy issues; in 1995, for example, he was one of only two Reform MPs to vote in favour of federal legislation requiring owners to register their guns. http://www.mapleleafweb.com/election/bio/harper.html "You've got to remember that west of Winnipeg the ridings the Liberals hold are dominated by people who are either recent Asian immigrants or recent migrants from eastern Canada: people who live in ghettoes and who are not integrated into western Canadian society." (Stephen Harper, Report Newsmagazine, January 22, 2001)
Mr.Canada Posted October 22, 2008 Report Posted October 22, 2008 (edited) I seem to remember a two seat sideshow not to far in the past. The LPC is far from dead. They need to reinvent themselves like the conservative movement in this country did. SO far they are still the rank and file that ADscam is connected to. They need to distance themselves from that and give Canadians something new to think about. And I don't mean a new carbon tax scheme EDIT- drewski, can you use the <shift> key more often after periods. It would make your points easier to follow Edited October 22, 2008 by Mr.Canada Quote "You are scum for insinuating that isn't the case you snake." -William Ashley Canadian Immigration Reform Blog
drewski Posted October 22, 2008 Report Posted October 22, 2008 (edited) Well unless they can shake the corruption image and thanks to Chretien that isn't going to happen.....they don't stand a chance...a matter of fact i heard on a talk show this morning a political professor doubted that the Liberal party will survive another few years.....they simply have no credibility...and they have no plan ...and they have no leader......they are dishonest.......they have no.....well you get the idea................ Liberal's are Kaput! Here is what Canada thinks of the Liberal party ......! http://www.canada.com/reginaleaderpost/new...68-20d689627241 wishing won't make it so. as the saying goes, time heals all wounds. bad things wil no doubt befall the Conservatives over the years, possibly many or few, while the memory of the Liberals will soften over time, as all things do. that combined with the rebuilding and reinvention that we admittedly must do, as all parties must do every once in a while (ie the Cons in the past decade), means a Liberal run government is both possible and probable at some point within the next decade. Possibly sooner if the economy REALLY tanks under Harper Edited October 22, 2008 by drewski Quote If you oppose Bill 117, the governments ban on child passengers on motorcycles, join this FB group http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=52185692512 Support Dominic LeBlanc for Liberal Party Leader http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=32208708169
wulf42 Posted October 22, 2008 Report Posted October 22, 2008 Liberals are Canada Red flag, multi-culturalism, French origin, social programs.... Like it or not, we are more a Liberal country than anything else Really???...............I guess that is why they lost and the Conservatives won...now come on you must be able to see that statement makes no sense................lmao!! Quote
munsinger Posted October 22, 2008 Report Posted October 22, 2008 New Liberal slogan: "The Land is Wrong" Quote
betsy Posted October 23, 2008 Author Report Posted October 23, 2008 Very true. If anything the Tories want more people to vote for the NDP to further dilute the Liberals. The Liberal Party under Dion made the mistake of moving more to the left. The Conservative Party is now the right-center party, and Harper wants it that way. Quote
betsy Posted October 23, 2008 Author Report Posted October 23, 2008 Here's the video that features McCallum, Orchard and Ledrew on Mike Duffy Live yesterday. It takes quite a while to play.... http://watch.ctv.ca/news/mike-duffy-live/#clip104858 Quote
PoliticalCitizen Posted October 23, 2008 Report Posted October 23, 2008 Really???...............I guess that is why they lost and the Conservatives won...now come on you must be able to see that statement makes no sense................lmao!! Liberals got unseated just because people felt like "punishing" them for bad behaviour. Once the general opinion is that the punishment has been carried out they'll return to rule as usual - as a majority. Quote You are what you do.
normanchateau Posted October 23, 2008 Report Posted October 23, 2008 Liberals got unseated just because people felt like "punishing" them for bad behaviour.Once the general opinion is that the punishment has been carried out they'll return to rule as usual I suspect you're right. The best indicator that the Liberals will return is that the Conservatives have made no meaningful gains in the popular vote. If you look at the numbers in the last five elections, there's no evidence whatsoever that Canadians have suddenly, or even gradually, become right wingers. The right wing vote has been remarkably consistent despite the braying of Conservatives on this board. The problem for the Liberals is that some Liberal voters have moved left. Here are some numbers: 2008 election Conservative votes =5,205,334 % of votes=37.6% 2006 election Conservative votes =5,374,071 % of votes=36.3% 2004 election Conservative votes =3,994,682 % of votes=29.6% 2000 election Alliance and PCs combined =4,843,927 % of votes=37.7% 1997 election Reform and PCs combined =4,959,785 % of votes=38.2% The only Conservative to win a majority in half a century was Brian Mulroney who, unlike Stephen Harper, was (1) not a social conservative and (2) had values consistent with those of most Quebecers. As long as Harper supporters continue to insist that he's not a social conservative, they're doomed to minority status. Meanwhile, the Liberals will surge again under a new leader. Quote
wulf42 Posted October 23, 2008 Report Posted October 23, 2008 Liberals got unseated just because people felt like "punishing" them for bad behaviour.Once the general opinion is that the punishment has been carried out they'll return to rule as usual - as a majority. lol.....they got unseated because nobody can trust them........they are a bunch of crooks...............you will never see the Liberals in power again.......like i said i have seen several talk shows most experts think it is the end for the Liberal party. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.