Jump to content

Election Talk


Recommended Posts

What this poll means to me is that Liberal support has moved to the NDP, for now.

This might result in the Bloq picking up more seats due to a stronger NDP.

The Liberals are down 6% in Quebec and that could translate into a loss of about 15 seats. Ontario could kick out as many as 40 Liberals, some to the NDP and some to the Conservatives. That is 55 seats! Why would they call an election?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The poll was taken between 12-22 February. Sample 1003. (Please note these details in the future.)

(The poll's main purpose was to determine the popularity of the Charest government. Result? Fast and direct south. What does this mean for ROC? God knows.)

Look, English Quebec (including so-called allophones) will vote for the "Federalist Candidate Most Likely to Win". By common consent, this is the Liberal candidate. That's 20 or so of the 38. (These people do not park their votes in polls. The matter is too serious.)

More interesting is the NDP. For the non-Liberal federalist vote (anglo/franco/allo), it seems to choose the NDP 2:1 to the CPC. If there's a Liberal tipping point, would they go NDP?

I

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Correction

NOT 2:1. But the NDP at 13 and CPC at 11 is almost statistically significant.

By informal info, the federalist vote in Quebec may choose the NDP as a Liberal alternative. That would be something. The NDP would be wise to identify the ridings where it has a chance. (The federalist vote cares less about specific party and absolutely does not want a BQ MP.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Liberals Seen Heading for Spring Election

Mon Mar 1,11:20 PM ET

By David Ljunggren

OTTAWA (Reuters) - Canada's ruling Liberals are set to stick to plans for a May election now that opinion polls show public support rebounding in the wake of a major scandal, party sources said on Monday.

A poll released on Saturday showed support had rebounded to 42 percent, just above the 41 percent that gave the Liberals a majority government in the November 2000 election.

Party insiders said it made sense to go to the polls before bad news started flowing from the public inquiry Martin has called into how money destined for a program to boost national unity ended up in the hands of advertising firms with close Liberal ties.

"I personally think it will be spring," said a senior aide to one of Martin's most experienced cabinet ministers.

"The longer we wait the more chances there are of scandalous revelations coming out. And I don't see preparations for the election slowing down," the aide said.

Another well-connected Liberal told Reuters: "The election will be this spring, I'm sure of it."

But a veteran Liberal legislator told Reuters last Wednesday that even June was too late "because who knows what else there is out there waiting to hit us?"

Professor Alan Whitehorn of the Royal Military College, who has been studying Canada's political parties for 40 years, said Martin was "strongly predisposed" to go to the polls early.

"This is a man who wants to go in the spring and, unless he can see overwhelming reasons not to, his predisposition is to go... It's certainly easier to govern with a mandate than constantly be reminded by the opposition that you haven't gone to the people," he told Reuters.

Liberal insiders say an early election would also put pressure on the newly formed opposition Conservative Party, which will elect a leader later this month and will not have time for a policy convention before May.

More vulnerable Liberal members of Parliament, some of whom won their seats with as little as 35 percent of the vote in 2000, have said they would rather hold an election later. But the veteran Liberal legislator said this was unlikely.

"Anyone who is not ready to start campaigning right now is a fool," he said.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor..._electionnn_col

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Layton will sweep Quebec :)

If you're either serious or mocking me, you're wrong.

I could see the NDP sweeping Quebec should the separatist movement ever collapse, but only because the NDP is the only party that isn't an asshole to them. (God knows they deserve it, and I'd probably be kicked out of the NDP if someone important found out that I'm ideologically even more hard-line anti-separatist than the CPC, but from a Machiavellian perspective, the NDP is smart to not treat them like the shit that they are.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NDP will NOT sweep Quebec.

There is a chance that the NDP will get some votes in traditionally federalist/anglo/Liberal ridings. (That would be something!) I don't know if this will turn into seats. The NDP would be wise to go shopping. (Layton was recently on local radio saying all the right things for an English audience - he registers nowhere with French.)

The hard-core federalist vote is in a holding pattern, waiting to see what happens with PM PM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

The original plan was clearly to have a spring election. I suspect delaying it will cause the Liberals problems. In addition, it will catch the Tories short - they've only nominated half their candidates; about 10 or so in Quebec.

The Liberals seem happy with the reaction to the budget.

I suspect though the polls are not kind to the Liberals - in both Quebec and Ontario. Anyone know when the next polls will be made public?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An interesting sidenote: If Martin sticks to the original election date of May 10, that means he'll have to dissolve Parliament on April 4th at the latest, even if he calls the election later, that doesn't give us much more. That leaves very little Parliament session time left, and so any bills currently going through will in all likelihood not be completed when Parliament is dissolved and so die forever. Svend Robinson's Bill C-250 is currently going through.

What this means is that a spring election will almost certainly be the kiss of death for this bill. I wonder how that will impact the NDP and the gay-rights activists?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...