Melanie_ Posted March 9, 2008 Report Share Posted March 9, 2008 (edited) Actually I liked it a lot because it revealed the real you. Just another hating American who doesn't like to hear the truth so he has to turn to that sort of tactic. Now I have you where I want you and I knew all along that you would step over the lines of decency. Because you don't like your wars criticized right? ABut the same as American woman. See if you can get my name censored now so it doesn't challenge you and hurt your feelings. I'll just continue to play the game fairly. Do you even read what you are writing? How can you accuse someone else of stepping over the lines of decency when you post drivel like this: No, you're just intent on demonizing me because you don't like to admit that it's all about revenge. Why don't you try to say something worthwhile for a change. I don't think that Canada will be attacked by terrorists, as much as Americans hope we will be, but now that we have changed our stance in Afghanistan to outright fighting as opposed to our normal role as peacekeepers, I fear they are going to see Canada as just a puppet of the US aggressor. This may lead to notiions of revenge for our participation in Afghanistan. Edited March 9, 2008 by Melanie_ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Regulus de Leo Posted March 9, 2008 Report Share Posted March 9, 2008 The new media hit job on McCain...bringing up his melanoma from .............(can you believe it?) 2000! Maybe Dan Rather can dig up some fake medical reports on it. http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/03/09/america/mccain.php Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UShaditComing Posted March 9, 2008 Report Share Posted March 9, 2008 jbg- You see nothing wwong with the PNAC report? Even the part about going to war with Iraq regardless of whether Saddam was there or not? Good, at least a purpose was served in posting it again. There goes the lie to overthrow a brutal dictator. And other purpose served was to hear all the Americans trying to put it down because it's old stuff. Old stuff alright but still a classic faux pas which was never meant for public consumption. Now listen to them howl out their indignation that I would bring it up here! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BubberMiley Posted March 10, 2008 Author Report Share Posted March 10, 2008 The new media hit job on McCain...bringing up his melanoma from .............(can you believe it?) 2000! Melanoma is an extremely quirky form of cancer and, given his history, age, and complexion, McCain has a high risk of a reoccurence. The scars on his face indicate that his surgery was aggressive, and Americans have every right to enquire about his progress in beating the disease before electing him president. His choice of VP candidate will be very important because, to be frank, he'd be very fortunate to last two terms. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted March 10, 2008 Report Share Posted March 10, 2008 ...His choice of VP candidate will be very important because, to be frank, he'd be very fortunate to last two terms. You mean his choice of "VP candidate" wouldn't otherwise be important? Why does he have to "last two terms"? See FDR. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.9a49e1b2f22a6d34a345152c50044aa9.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.