Rue Posted February 4, 2008 Report Share Posted February 4, 2008 This is a good point. It gives me more optimism for what could happen if America chooses Obama.As for Paris Hilton, I'll pass. You can have my turn if you want. Sorry for the tongue in cheek. I couldn't resist. But imagine. We have a man who truly is a symbol of reconciliation not in what he says but what he is, and people are worried about that? I don't get it. Not to mention he is one intelligent son of a bitch. Does that not count? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rue Posted February 4, 2008 Report Share Posted February 4, 2008 Very funny, but technically flawed. Paris Hilton does not meet the US constitutional requirement for the office, regardless of who she "screws". I guess when Canada does it you're being screwed by a nobody? Fine then. I was hoping for a state visit. I mean geez. Nick just married Ms. Bruni. I wanted to spice things up. Imagine Paris on the international circuit. Lindsay Lohan could be her Vice President and Brittany could be State Secretary and head of Manic Affairs (the replacement for Homeland Security). Listen I head rumours Celine Dion was running for office. Imagine her as Prime Minister. Personaly I think the most qualified would be Brent Butt. He's a genius. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rue Posted February 4, 2008 Report Share Posted February 4, 2008 Certainly, a great deal of political experience is required for the position of president. You probably are confusing my feelings relating to fraudulent social engineering in a country such as Canada with a dysfunctional political system. Actually many would argue its the last thing you want since this "experience" you talk about is in fact corupted thought. Prostitutes can be very experienced at their craft but they still are prostitutes. All the experience does is give them more skin lesions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BubberMiley Posted February 5, 2008 Report Share Posted February 5, 2008 (edited) http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=jjXyqcx-mYY Edited February 5, 2008 by BubberMiley Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leafless Posted February 5, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 5, 2008 Prostitutes can be very experienced at their craft but they still are prostitutes. All the experience does is give them more skin lesions. What an analogy, but... The more experienced prostitutes nevertheless know who the good johns are and who the bad johns are, in turn they stay away from, whereas the younger less experienced ones could end up dead by not knowing this. It is relatively unknown whether Obama has the experience to know how to walk the political talk and can apply the necessary muscle when confronted with volatile actions especially from countries that harbour his race. Say what you want about George W. Bush but he had the insight and experience to know what HAD to be done after 9/11. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melanie_ Posted February 5, 2008 Report Share Posted February 5, 2008 Well when you consider Obama is the creation of MSM and in reality is a 'NOBODY' with a blank resume and with a name of 'Hussein' who will be 'Commander -in-Chief' while the nation is fighting the 'Hussein's' of the world is proof extreme liberalism is alive and well. Hang your head in shame Melanie as your type is helping to destroy not only the U.S. but Canada. What is being destroyed is the cowardice of judging people based on assumptions, rather than on fact. If I can help destroy attitudes like yours, I'll celebrate, not hang my head. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leafless Posted February 5, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 5, 2008 (edited) What is being destroyed is the cowardice of judging people based on assumptions, rather than on fact. If I can help destroy attitudes like yours, I'll celebrate, not hang my head. Typical dictatorial socialist response. You are confusing the word attitude to the word 'loyality' especially pertaining to the traditional values relating to the origin of our country, Canada and its values. Let me hear you say 'God save the Queen'. Edited February 5, 2008 by Leafless Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BubberMiley Posted February 5, 2008 Report Share Posted February 5, 2008 Why would anyone want to destroy Leafless' attitudes? They're one of my favourite diversions on this forum. My favourite was when he blamed minorities for the fact he couldn't get anything better than a minimum wage job. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melanie_ Posted February 5, 2008 Report Share Posted February 5, 2008 Typical dictatorial socialist response. You are confusing the word attitude to the word 'loyality' especially pertaining to the traditional values relating to the origin of our country, Canada and its values. Let me hear you say 'God save the Queen'. Nope. Your imaginary friend, the Magic Sky Pixie, has no impact on the queen. You and I debated the monarchy in another thread some time ago (it had to do with Peter Phillips marrying a Catholic), so maybe revive that if you want to discuss the monarchy again. Bubber, I don't think you need to worry. Even with all the amazing powers Leafless believes I have (you know, to destroy the US and Canada with my powers of Extreme Liberalism), I don't think I'm going to destroy his attitudes anytime soon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leafless Posted February 5, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 5, 2008 Why would anyone want to destroy Leafless' attitudes? They're one of my favourite diversions on this forum.My favourite was when he blamed minorities for the fact he couldn't get anything better than a minimum wage job. Ha-ha-ha. Stooping to new lows with a totally fabricated false statement. Ask me again why I dislike minorities who are just itching to take over our country. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leafless Posted February 5, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 5, 2008 Nope. Your imaginary friend, the Magic Sky Pixie, has no impact on the queen. You and I debated the monarchy in another thread some time ago (it had to do with Peter Phillips marrying a Catholic), so maybe revive that if you want to discuss the monarchy again.Bubber, I don't think you need to worry. Even with all the amazing powers Leafless believes I have (you know, to destroy the US and Canada with my powers of Extreme Liberalism), I don't think I'm going to destroy his attitudes anytime soon. You are in no position to even dream about destroying the attitude of Leafless, no matter how you may think to even define that. Magic Sky Pixie???? Besides being a dictating socialist, it appears you are suffering from acute memory loss. I have never discussed with you in any thread, Peter Phillips marrying a Catholic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melanie_ Posted February 5, 2008 Report Share Posted February 5, 2008 (edited) You are in no position to even dream about destroying the attitude of Leafless, no matter how you may think to even define that. Magic Sky Pixie???? Besides being a dictating socialist, it appears you are suffering from acute memory loss. I have never discussed with you in any thread, Peter Phillips marrying a Catholic. Obviously my Powers of Extreme Liberalism have met their match. We discussed the monarchy here..... Why Canada Must Take on Britain over the 1701 Act of Settlement Edited February 5, 2008 by Melanie_ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Community Advocate Posted February 5, 2008 Report Share Posted February 5, 2008 GO OPRAH! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VfzFmYoZajY Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leafless Posted February 5, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 5, 2008 Obviously my Powers of Extreme Liberalism have met their match. We discussed the monarchy here..... Why Canada Must Take on Britain over the 1701 Act of Settlement Correct! But it was Rover1 who interjected with the Peter Phillips bit, post #26 in response to your post #25 in that thread, not I. Still feeling a little absent minded, are we? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guyser Posted February 5, 2008 Report Share Posted February 5, 2008 Ask me again why I dislike minorities who are just itching to take over our country. Okay, why do you (mistakenly since they arent) dislike minorities who are just itching (they arent) to take over our country (and they arent) Why...why ...why? We would all love an answer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melanie_ Posted February 5, 2008 Report Share Posted February 5, 2008 Correct! But it was Rover1 who interjected with the Peter Phillips bit, post #26 in response to your post #25 in that thread, not I. Still feeling a little absent minded, are we? Nope, not absentminded at all, since I said we discussed the monarchy in a thread about Peter Phillips, not that you and I had discussed Peter Phillips ourselves (although I think you are grasping at straws here). You and I debated the monarchy in another thread some time ago (it had to do with Peter Phillips marrying a Catholic), so maybe revive that if you want to discuss the monarchy again. Maybe now we can go back to discussing whether or not Barack Obama's race and religion pose a credible threat to the US. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leafless Posted February 6, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 Nope, not absentminded at all, since I said we discussed the monarchy in a thread about Peter Phillips, not that you and I had discussed Peter Phillips ourselves (although I think you are grasping at straws here). No, not picking straws, just stating a fact. Maybe now we can go back to discussing whether or not Barack Obama's race and religion pose a credible threat to the US. 1.- The church Obama is a member of has an anti-white policy or a Black cultural agenda. 2.-He won Alabama playing the race card. 3.- He represents a minority with insufficient numbers (7% of the U.S. electorate is Black African), that could produce a conflict of interest. He is not a U.S. Black but sees himself as one and uses U.S. Black status to win votes. 4.-No one knows for certain whether he retains Muslim loyalties which if he does could jeopardize the safety of U.S. residents or the country itself, pertaining to U.S. national interest. Does he in fact hold dual citizenship with one being a citizen of Kenya? 5.- The man has no great deal of political experience, but granted he is charismatic, especially with the younger crowd. 6.- What "CHANGE" is he actually talking about, that his supporters are screaming about and waving place cards in your face with that message on it? I am not a democratic, but I think Hillary would make a better president, basically because two heads are better than one. Bill should like that one and the fact Hillary to her credit has years of political experience and is a dedicated politician. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GostHacked Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 Leafless 4.-No one knows for certain whether he retains Muslim loyalties which if he does could jeopardize the safety of U.S. residents or the country itself, pertaining to U.S. national interest. Does he in fact hold dual citizenship with one being a citizen of Kenya? No one knows for certain. So anything you suposedly have on Obama is all not for certain. How about we focus on things that are certain, instead of making guesses and wild accusations. You are only hurting yourself and making yourself look like Chicken Little. He is black... and well, looks black to me. There is only one point I think you might be able to get Obama on is the citizenship. If he poses citizenship in any other country other than the US, he should not be allowed to run for president. I think this is the reason Ahnuld The Guvenatah, cannot run for President. If as a child, Obama was naturalized as a US citizen, then I am still not sure. This is the only technicality I can see that might have an issue, and I agree with you on that one. But he is black, and seems to be proud to be black. Just like he might be proud to be human, or an American. I am proud to be white, and I am proud of my german background. What does that make me?? You might twist things if I run for President and call me a Nazi, for my Grandfather had fought for Nazi Germany back in WWII. So how do you view me after knowing all that?? Once a Nazi always a Nazi? Even by your logic since he was, my dad is automatically a Nazi, and I am one too?? How does this make sense to you or anyone? Once a Muslim always a Muslim? I will call this utter tripe. The powers that be sure know how to divide us and conquere us. I will call it now as I have called it. If the next President is a Dem it will be Hillary, if it is a Rep, it will be McCain. Althought I would like Edwards/Kucinich (dem) or Ron Paul (rep) in the whitehouse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carinthia Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 LeaflessAlthought I would like Edwards/Kucinich (dem) or Ron Paul (rep) in the whitehouse. Edwards quit too soon. Look what happened to Huckabee yesterday? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BubberMiley Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 (edited) Edwards quit too soon. Look what happened to Huckabee yesterday? Huckabee only did well because McCain is so reviled within the party. They feel, with good reason, that he is not a real conservative, so on the conservative side they chose the hillbilly kinfolk over the plastic morphing mormon. Edwards had no such niche to fit into. Clinton and Obama represent the full range of the Democratic party quite nicely by themselves. Edited February 6, 2008 by BubberMiley Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Visionseeker Posted February 7, 2008 Report Share Posted February 7, 2008 I don't have to prove anything, Shari Law proves it for me. Hum... So you've studied Sharia Law eh? Maybe we ought to look into your background a little. It is up to Obama to publicy announce his total disassociation with the Muslim faith which unfortunately still does not get him off the hook. We might also ask him to answer yes or no to the following question: "Are you still beating your wife?" My attempt is to suggest an individual such as Obama would be a threat to America if he ever became president. Which could suggest that you suffer from an affliction that impairs your judgment. How about Obama is a dual citizen, a citizen of the U.S. and a citizen of Kenya. Even if this were true, who cares? I suspect that you, a student of Sharia Law, would have a hard time making the case that Obama is a Kenyan government plant standing as the vanguard for a Kenyan takeover of the US. Digest this: http://www.godlikeproductions.com/bbs/repl..."e=7300036 Obviously you did not read a further posting tying in Obama and the Trinity church which reasonably proves he has a cultural/race hidden agenda. OMG!!! Katy bar the door! Compelling evidence that Obama is part of a wider Kenyan power play! [/sarcasm] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Visionseeker Posted February 7, 2008 Report Share Posted February 7, 2008 Say what you want about George W. Bush but he had the insight and experience to know what HAD to be done after 9/11. GWB couldn't even situate Afghanistan on a map before 2000. He was also too busy taking time-off in 2001 to deal with foreign policy issues. Following 9/11, Bush made the most of international sympathy by invading Afghanistan to route not Al-Queda, but the Taliban; Osama and Co. made there way to western Pakistan seeking shelter from the storm. Did Bush press matters and get Mushareff to agree to a Waziristan campaign? No, Bush decided that they best way to defend America from Bin Laden was to invade another country some 1,600 miles west of Osama's suspected location. Bush blew it on security, foreign policy and the economy. He will be regarded as the worst US president for 200 years (assuming the US lasts that long). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Visionseeker Posted February 7, 2008 Report Share Posted February 7, 2008 Why would anyone want to destroy Leafless' attitudes? They're one of my favourite diversions on this forum.My favourite was when he blamed minorities for the fact he couldn't get anything better than a minimum wage job. Someone is actually obliged to pay him minimum wage! Oh the injustice of leftist policies. I'm sure Trudeau is somehow to blame for such coddling. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oleg Bach Posted February 7, 2008 Report Share Posted February 7, 2008 Someone is actually obliged to pay him minimum wage! Oh the injustice of leftist policies. I'm sure Trudeau is somehow to blame for such coddling. If the so-called internationalist or globalist if you will had their way - all of us would be working for minimum wage, and if they could we would work for a bowl of rice and a couple of fishheads...as far as this surogate Obama - as are all candidates surogates..he does not have the intellecutal or spiritual or political where with all to lead, but he if he were to get in, then I worry about who his handlers really are - now that is a mystery and will most certainly be an unpleasant surprise. With Hillary the Trotskyite fanatic - at least that is the devil we know - Obama may just betray what is left of the white Christian race...by the time we find out it may be to late, if that is the case. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Topaz Posted February 7, 2008 Report Share Posted February 7, 2008 Good question is Obama a threat? Obviously, someone think he does. A friend of mine told me they were on the web and came across an article that said that Obama has had death threat letters sent to him. Is this true? Who knows but the letter said that that he may get to be president but he would end up like Kennedy. This didn't surprise me because its happened before and in the US anything can happen. I myself went looking on the the web and ended up at liz michaels.com/soapbox.htm which she has a list of people who had died that knew or worked for Bill Clinton, which included his bodyguards!!! There also something about Bush family list of people. It does make a person wonder what is wrong with this society to take a live so easily. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.