Russell by-law spat sparks bilingual study

[CANADIEN]

To label one a racist is against forum rules.

So, complain. It won't change the facts. And I would assume that you calling me a Nai would against forum rules... but I'll treat as the idiocy it is.

(...)what else can you expect from a obnoxious Francophone who thinks Canada is all about a minority cultural takeover.

I think Canada is a country. You think it's still a British colony.

Galganov also knows all about it.

You mean the baffoon who was once denounced by the Canadian Jewish Congress for calling Quebec separatists a bunch of Nazis?

Edited June 27, 2008 by CANADIEN

[capricorn]

To label one a racist is against forum rules.

This is rich coming from someone who just recently called other posters "bastard" and "moron". I guess Leafless thinks the rules are for everyone else, eh?

If I was a racist, I would be banned.

Racist views are allowed on MLW, free speech and all you know, but it's pretty hard to determine if the poster is really racist or just pulling our leg. You could have been banned for your personal insults toward posters who dared disagree with your extremist views. I forgive the mods for not banning you as they probably recognize the comedy your posts bring us.

[CANADIEN]

This is rich coming from someone who just recently called other posters "bastard" and "moron". I guess Leafless thinks the rules are for everyone else, eh?

Racist views are allowed on MLW, free speech and all you know, but it's pretty hard to determine if the poster is really racist or just pulling our leg. You could have been banned for your personal insults toward posters who dared disagree with your extremist views. I forgive the mods for not banning you as they probably recognize the comedy your posts bring us.

He has also called people Nazis and traitors, and has used fouled language.

[Leafless]

I think Canada is a country. You think it's still a British colony.

I think Canada is a country given to us by the British.

Beats thinking Canada is Quebec.

[Leafless]

This is rich coming from someone who just recently called other posters "bastard" and "moron". I guess Leafless thinks the rules are for everyone else, eh?

After being provoked, YES

Anything the matter with that?

Racist views are allowed on MLW, free speech and all you know, but it's pretty hard to determine if the poster is really racist or just pulling our leg. You could have been banned for your personal insults toward posters who dared disagree with your extremist views. I forgive the mods for not banning you as they probably recognize the comedy your posts bring us.

My extremist views?

Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha.

Now that is comedy.

[Leafless]

He has also called people Nazis and traitors, and has used fouled language.

I referred to Nazi type racial policies and did make reference, in the way of a question, to one particular poster asking him how it feels to be a traitor for agreeing with Quebec Nazi type racial policies.

CANADIEN must think FORCE is his middle name and is unable to tolerate anyone elses opinion.

This only proves, to date, Canada is not a free country, especially with its citizens being denied guaranteed Charter protection against oppression and racial discrimination.

Shame!

Edited June 27, 2008 by Leafless

[CANADIEN]

CANADIEN must think FORCE is his middle name and is unable to tolerate anyone elses opinion.

I do believe FARCE is your middle name.

I referred to Nazi type racial policies (...)

I can see why you want to forget that you said Hitler would be proud of me. I haven't, and it will keep me busy laughing all through my vacations.

(...)and did make reference, in the way of a question, to one particular poster asking him how it feels to be a traitor for agreeing with Quebec Nazi type racial policies.

The man was stating his opinion that immigrants are Canada's future. Must be part a part of Quebec's language policies that even escaped the seeparatists

This only proves, to date, Canada is not a free country, especially with its citizens being denied guaranteed Charter protection against oppression and racial discrimination.

Through laws that limit or even suppress uses of certain languages, like Quebec's language laws or... the laws you want for Ontario.

[Remiel]

So, what is your excuse for implying that you would be happy to see one of our posters die from AIDS?

[Leafless]

So, what is your excuse for implying that you would be happy to see one of our posters die from AIDS?

Your erroneous accusations are indeed laughable.

Firstly you are in the wrong thread.

And secondly ask your friend 'Guyser' why is he so vulgar.

And maybe I can ask you why you are so eager to exploit the emotions of degenerates?

[Remiel]

Firstly you are in the wrong thread.

The wrong thread? Impossible. All threads that involve you are essentially the same.

And maybe I can ask you why you are so eager to exploit the emotions of degenerates?

I do not know, Leafless. Why are you so eager to be that degenerate?

[Leafless]

I do believe FARCE is your middle name.

You are a two faced turn coat unable to understand your own twisted linguistic aspirations.

I can see why you want to forget that you said Hitler would be proud of me. I haven't, and it will keep me busy laughing all through my vacations.

Yes, Hitler would be proud of you supporting forced Nazi type language legislation by way of the LAW.

The man was stating his opinion that immigrants are Canada's future. Must be part a part of Quebec's language policies that even escaped the seeparatists

Dragging issues from other threads into this one, like Remiel, for purposes of degradation only proves the hate and animosity you harbour for English speaking citizens of Canada.

Regardless this is what the man said:

Back then, being a Canadian meant refusing that godawful concession to the Quebeckers! My, how times have changed! So it seems to me that if there is anything tangible to define Canadian culture, it is a work-in-progress and like it or not, those immigrants you hate so much are going to play a role in molding and shaping Canadian identity in the future!

What this man is saying is that he condones cultural legislative policies over the natural evolution of Canadian society.

That is why he received the traitor he so readily deserve as he is another proponent of forced Hitler type cultural legislation.

This flows against the common cultural aspirations of ANY democratic country in the world.

Through laws that limit or even suppress uses of certain languages, like Quebec's language laws or... the laws you want for Ontario.

You seem to be in denial that language laws fall under the jurisdiction of the province and is proven that French LEGISLATED language aspirations are not in the democratic interest of majority (approx. 96%) of the population of Ontario.

Yes, language laws are becoming a necessity due to racial discrimination by Quebec and their language laws and the federal government for failing to protect linguistic minorities from oppression and racial discrimination resulting from Quebec imposed language laws.

These Quebec style language laws have spilled into provinces that harbour NO language laws but now Ontarians must protect their linguistic interest from the actions of Ontario Francophones mimicking the actions of Quebec style language laws.

English speaking majority provinces must also protect themselves from the harmful actions of a dysfunctional federal government who NEVER did know that primary cultural majority interest must be preserved at all or any cost.

Edited June 27, 2008 by Leafless

[M.Dancer]

The wrong thread? Impossible. All threads that involve you are essentially the same.

I do not know, Leafless. Why are you so eager to be that degenerate?

Quote of the day

[CANADIEN]

I knew that I should not read whiule on vacations. Enjoying the joys of a BILINGUAL city (Montreal) and getting a good laugh

You are a two faced turn coat unable to understand your own twisted linguistic aspirations.

My aspirations are clear... respect fro rights of all Canadian. Yours, I must admit, is unclear... Is it proving you hate, or proving you are an imbecile

Dragging issues from other threads into this one, like Remiel, for purposes of degradation only proves the hate and animosity you harbour for English speaking citizens of Canada.

And when you do it, it proves your double standard and lack of logic. Like in the following:

Regardless this is what the man said:

Back then, being a Canadian meant refusing that godawful concession to the Quebeckers! My, how times have changed! So it seems to me that if there is anything tangible to define Canadian culture, it is a work-in-progress and like it or not, those immigrants you hate so much are going to play a role in molding and shaping Canadian identity in the future!

What this man is saying is that he condones cultural legislative policies over the natural evolution of Canadian society.

That is why he received the traitor he so readily deserve as he is another proponent of forced Hitler type cultural legislation.

Not a word on language policy, not a word on cultural policy. And Nazis, last time I checked, where not known for their commitment on multiculturalism. On the contrary, they were known for what they did for the majority. As I said before, learn to read English

You seem to be in denial that language laws fall under the jurisdiction of the province (...)

Which does not preclude municipalities legislating commerce. If an Ontario municipality pased an English only bylaw, you would appalud it.

Yes, language laws are becoming a necessity (...)

So, you admit you want those, as long as it discriminate against non-anglophoes, that is

due to racial discrimination by Quebec and their language laws and the federal government for failing to protect linguistic minorities from oppression and racial discrimination resulting from Quebec imposed language laws.

The may you massacre the English language asside, | thought English-sepaking Canadians were the majority

English speaking majority provinces must also protect themselves from the harmful actions of a dysfunctional federal government who NEVER did know that primary cultural majority interest must be preserved at all or any cost.

Including passing laws that are wrong when in French, but needed when they're in English.

[Leafless]

The wrong thread? Impossible. All threads that involve you are essentially the same.

Why don't you stick to your specialty, religion, bigot.

I do not know, Leafless. Why are you so eager to be that degenerate?

Tell that to your French friends and those who agree with your French friends.

[Remiel]

Why don't you stick to your specialty, religion, bigot.

That is really rich coming from you, Leafless. The term bigot does refer to one of us, but here is a hint: It does not refer to me.

[Leafless]

I knew that I should not read whiule on vacations. Enjoying the joys of a BILINGUAL city (Montreal) and getting a good laugh

Montreal is not a bilingual city according to any self imposed 'bilingual policy'.

As a matter of fact, there are NO bilingual policies ANYWHERE in the entire province of Quebec.

Educate yourself, as you are right, you are giving us all a good laugh.

My aspirations are clear... respect fro rights of all Canadian. Yours, I must admit, is unclear... Is it proving you hate, or proving you are an imbecile

More orders from the rulers of Canada, ha, ha, ha.

The only thing that is unclear is your version of respecting the rights of ALL Canadians.

And when you do it, it proves your double standard and lack of logic. Like in the following:

Not a word on language policy, not a word on cultural policy.

Be specific, quote whatever you are talking about??????

And Nazis, last time I checked, where not known for their commitment on multiculturalism.

Quebec and Francophones are not either.

On the contrary, they were known for what they did for the majority. As I said before, learn to read English

Yes, we are quite aware of what Quebec and Francophones did for the majority.

Which does not preclude municipalities legislating commerce.

Stop being an idiot, commerce has NOTHING to do with legislating language.

Commerce is a division of trade or production which deals with the exchange of goods and services from producer to final consumer. It comprises the trading of something of economic value such as goods, services, information or money between two or more entities.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commerce

If an Ontario municipality pased an English only bylaw, you would appalud it.

No.

Only if the province of Ontario decided to make English the official language of Ontario, I would applaud it.

The reasons for this were previously discussed.

So, you admit you want those, as long as it discriminate against non-anglophoes, that is

Language policies designed to maintain the language of commerce and of common communication in the province of Ontario is not discrimination.

Except in Quebec where they have legitimized an obsolete French Quebec club regional language.

The may you massacre the English language asside,

Heh, heh, heh.

| thought English-sepaking Canadians were the majority.

English SEPAKING Canadians are the majority, ha, ha, ha.

Including passing laws that are wrong when in French, but needed when they're in English.

You are simply being a fool.

You know French (I think) is only a federal recognized language and is not applicable to Canadian provinces except New Brunswick, a province where they have designated themselves as an 'officially bilingual province'.

I understand they are having cultural problems in New Brunswick.

Minister to fix problems in French-language programs:

Less than a quarter of Grade 12 students who volunteered to be surveyed in regular French and immersion programs met comprehension goals set by the department.

Lamrock says the recently released test results from Fredericton district schools are especially dismal.

Just seven of 47 students surveyed from the regular French program achieved targets, and none of the five students surveyed in early immersion programs met expected language goals.

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/new-brunswick/sto...rockfrench.html

Edited June 28, 2008 by Leafless

[Leafless]

That is really rich coming from you, Leafless. The term bigot does refer to one of us, but here is a hint: It does not refer to me.

I am anti -communist and certainly not a bigot.

It is you and friends that harbour anti-democratic initiatives and favour communist aspirations.

In our society YOU ARE the bigot.

[Remiel]

I am anti -communist and certainly not a bigot.

It is you and friends that harbour anti-democratic initiatives and favour communist aspirations.

In our society YOU ARE the bigot.

Apparently it is not only your grasp of English that is arthritic, Leafless. You are the only one who does not seem to get that.

[Leafless]

Apparently it is not only your grasp of English that is arthritic, Leafless. You are the only one who does not seem to get that.

Little fellow, you are a screwed up communist along with your other evil communist propagandist.

[Remiel]

Little fellow, you are a screwed up communist along with your other evil communist propagandist.

Better to be red in the head than have an empty white shell, like one poster I know.

[Leafless]

Better to be red in the head than have an empty white shell, like one poster I know.

Trudeau couldn't have said it better, commie.

[Remiel]

Trudeau couldn't have said it better, commie.

Why exactly are you congratulating me on how well I have descibed your (lack of) cerebral function?

Further proof of my point, I guess.

[Charles Anthony]

Everybody,

Stop the insults and personal attacks.

[CANADIEN]

I deleted it... repeat.

Edited June 30, 2008 by CANADIEN

[CANADIEN]

Montreal is not a bilingual city

Go say that to all those Montrealers who speak English on the street, get and offer service in English in restaurants, conduct their private lives in English.

Stop being an idiot, commerce has NOTHING to do with legislating language.

Then why are you clamoring for laws that would restrict commerce in languages other than English?

Only if the province of Ontario decided to make English the official language of Ontario, I would applaud it.

Nice to know that you do not approve of a municipal by-law of the City of Toronto that regulate the language of commerce by stating that clients have the right to deal with cab drivers able to speak English. Me, I have no problem with it.

The reasons for this were previously discussed.

And dismissed as non-sense.

Language policies designed to maintain the language of commerce and of common communication in the province of Ontario is not discrimination.

Any language policies that restrict use of any language, or all languages except one, IS discriminatory. But thank you for demonstrating double standard again.

English SEPAKING Canadians are the majority, ha, ha, ha.

You are simply being a fool.

Because my English is almost as bad as yours, or because I caught you describing English-speaking Canadians as a minority?

You know French (I think) is only a federal recognized language and is not applicable to Canadian provinces except New Brunswick, a province where they have designated themselves as an 'officially bilingual province'.

Wrong again. Quebec is a Canadian program, a fact you deplore of course. Also, as per the term of Manitoba's terms of entry into Confederation (1871), English and French have equal status in laws and debates of the legislature. As per the terms of the French-Language Services Act (1986), the Government of Ontario provides provincial services in French through most of the provinces, and provincial laws are voted both in English, and French. Under the terms of the Constitutional Act of 1982, education is available (in a limited fashion) in both English and French in all provinces and territories.