Should ageing lesbians be allowed to indoctrinate children?

Oleg Bach · January 11, 2008

Standing on the corner and along comes a group of little kids under the control of two very big and bullish females. I saw one of these never to be married matrons bark to one of the small children..they were all about 5 years old..."Do you want to have a nap? WHY are you touching other peoples bodies?" - the poor kid just faded under her nasty glare....OK - I will get to the point...the two bull lesbians were inforcing some sort of no touch liberal policy...made me wonder what this poor little persecuted boy is going to be like by the time his is twenty. I can imagine a poor young adult who is not capable of intimacey - someone who will never hug a friend - male or female and will probably never even shake hands. To be indoctrinated in such a manner is abuse...and these two bitter hags seemed to enjoy having power over the little children - who the hell hires these freaks?

Melanie_ · January 11, 2008

You read an awful lot into a casual encounter!

noahbody · January 11, 2008

Standing on the corner and along comes a group of little kids under the control of two very big and bullish females.

This is Harper's fault. These bullish women should have cabinet posts.

AngusThermopyle · January 11, 2008

Hahahaha! Woo boy! You know Oleg we can always rely on you to come up with the really wild theories and suppositions.

At first I found a lot of your posts to be offensive on one level or another. I think we've turned a corner now though. I find I'm actually enjoying your posts, they add some much needed levity to my days. Thanks man. :lol:

Michael Bluth · January 11, 2008

Hahahaha! Woo boy! You know Oleg we can always rely on you to come up with the really wild theories and suppositions.
At first I found a lot of your posts to be offensive on one level or another. I think we've turned a corner now though. I find I'm actually enjoying your posts, they add some much needed levity to my days. Thanks man.

Agreed Angus.

The 'hags' probably work at a 'collective' daycare of some sort....

BubberMiley · January 12, 2008

The 'hags' probably work at a 'collective' daycare of some sort....

Keen observation, but what's your point?

guyser · January 12, 2008

Those werent lesbian hags .

Its just that they were married for thirty years to guys who didnt work nor paid taxes. Now they find they have to work til death just to support themselves and to keep off welfare.

And they are really pissed that their husbands spend all day on the internet instead of looking for a job....one that is not "beneath" him.

But they have pride, and there they are, out looking after kids all day.

BubberMiley · January 12, 2008

I used to know a couple of cross-dressing marines who supervised narcoleptic midget sex offenders. I bet it was them.

Oleg Bach · January 12, 2008

Those werent lesbian hags .
Its just that they were married for thirty years to guys who didnt work nor paid taxes. Now they find they have to work til death just to support themselves and to keep off welfare.

And they are really pissed that their husbands spend all day on the internet instead of looking for a job....one that is not "beneath" him.

But they have pride, and there they are, out looking after kids all day.

You are funny - come to think of it they did looked like taller and stronger versions of my mother inlaw and her sister...some woman are just big bad men locked in a mans body suffering from clitoral dysfunction - meaning the penis was never fully developed due to some syphletic Victorian idea pasted down from generation to generation that masterbating would cause manly enlargement.

I doubt very much that these ladies were ever married. They are simply feminist eccentrics who took a course in man hating called "woman's studies". Now years later they can not admit that hating men brought on servitude and poverty forcing them to be stewards to sperm doners..called DAD. Speaking of insulting myself by actually listening to your comments about taking gin and cigarette money from the government...and that playing the welfare game is the cheapest paying job I have ever had - well I decided that I would simply do what I want to do at this point - set up a little studio and get back to painting - to hell with the system - I seen the top and the bottom - and it is not pretty.

The funky upscale neigbourhood sprinkled with crack addicts is full of older feminist..who are now ALONE. At Christmas and Haloween - I manage to get a kiss and a hug out of the bull dykes - actually I lived with a lesbian for a couple of years - she sure liked sex - Frankly I believe that 95% of all homosexuality is generated by conditioning - my point was - don't hire these types who are going to bear up on the little male children as if they are settling a score from 1969 - they were pathetic.

BC_chick · January 13, 2008

some woman are just big bad men locked in a mans body suffering from clitoral dysfunction.
...

Frankly I believe that 95% of all homosexuality is generated by conditioning.

At least you don't contradict yourself...

Oleg Bach · January 13, 2008

At least you don't contradict yourself...

That's contradictory. Of course I do..who said I keep track of my passage of rants? It's been a pleasure being invited in to stay perminently with you folks..hope you don't mind being stuck with me for life? Did you ever watch the Jim Carey movie Cable Guy -now that's friendship..can you tell that it's time for my nap? Truely the big woman with the masculine personas really did not bother me that much - it was just the fact that a this woman was threatening the kid for touching the other kid with a nap- Imagine - I would love to have a job where the boss yelled at me and said - "If you don't stick to the company not touch politically correct policy - you will be force to take a nap..threatened with rest - wow - the kid should have defied the "early childhood learning instructor and just layed down on the sidewalk and snoozed.

kengs333 · January 13, 2008

Personally, I don't think that it's appropriate for homosexuals to be in the teaching profession or in any position of authority over children, for that matter. It's not going to happen with my children, regardless of what anyone says, because I know that it's not in their best interest to be influenced by people who have an outlook on life that is contrary to what children need in order to be raised properly. Looking back at my educational experiences, and teachers that I had or knew about in my schools: the homosexuals, the ones engaging in extra-marital affairs, the perverts (one now convicted), the substance abusers, the mentally ill, the anti-Christians and adherents to pessimistic worldviews... I really could have done without that. I did have a few good teachers, but in the end the public school system is a real mess; I don't want my kids going through that at all.

Moxie · January 13, 2008

LOL Oleg, you do have some strange tales to tell. Very amusing sometimes. Personally when I see a couple of "Sensible Shoe Wearen" gals I usually just cross the street. Their glares of hatred and envy are usually to harsh.

guyser · January 13, 2008

Personally, I don't think that it's appropriate for homosexuals to be in the teaching profession or in any position of authority over children, for that matter.

And you have a right to your opinion , but there is nothing to indicate that gays make inferior teachers or persons of authority.

Besides, one cannot teach another to become gay. They either are or they arent.

It's not going to happen with my children, regardless of what anyone says, because I know that it's not in their best interest to be influenced by people who have an outlook on life that is contrary to what children need in order to be raised properly.

As far as it being what is in your childrens best interests, thats fine for your kids since no one but you has that right, but as far as what children need in order to be raised properly is unfounded and wrong.

Maybe Ted Haggerty used to be a teacher? And if he was , would he have passed muster with you?Sure he would have. And therein lies the problem.

Looking back at my educational experiences, and teachers that I had or knew about in my schools: the homosexuals, the ones engaging in extra-marital affairs, the perverts (one now convicted), the substance abusers, the mentally ill, the anti-Christians and adherents to pessimistic worldviews... I really could have done without that. I did have a few good teachers, but in the end the public school system is a real mess; I don't want my kids going through that at all.

Nice unwarranted slag on on the public school system. Going to send them to Catholic school? Private school?

Good luck.....the same ones inhabit them also.

Home schooling seems to be the answer for your kids. Pretty sad IMV just what their teacher will be teaching. Piousness and intolerance.

Melanie_ · January 13, 2008

Here's an article for you, Keng.

Winnipeg Free Press

A Winnipeg School Division teacher who placed a photo of his same-sex marriage partner on his classroom desk has educators scrambling to decide how much teachers can tell kids about their personal lives.
The family of a Grade 7 student is trying to transfer to another school because the boy's teacher has placed a photo of his partner on his desk, and is answering students' questions about his personal life, said a source within the division.

Bravo to this teacher for being honest. If other teachers can put pictures of their husbands, wives, kids, dogs, etc. on their desks, there is no reason for this teacher to be stopped from putting a picture of his partner on his desk.

Rue · January 14, 2008

Personally, I don't think that it's appropriate for homosexuals to be in the teaching profession or in any position of authority over children, for that matter. It's not going to happen with my children, regardless of what anyone says, because I know that it's not in their best interest to be influenced by people who have an outlook on life that is contrary to what children need in order to be raised properly. Looking back at my educational experiences, and teachers that I had or knew about in my schools: the homosexuals, the ones engaging in extra-marital affairs, the perverts (one now convicted), the substance abusers, the mentally ill, the anti-Christians and adherents to pessimistic worldviews... I really could have done without that. I did have a few good teachers, but in the end the public school system is a real mess; I don't want my kids going through that at all.

Are you sugesting you are planning on having children?

kengs333 · January 14, 2008

And you have a right to your opinion , but there is nothing to indicate that gays make inferior teachers or persons of authority.

I never said it had anything to do with the ability to teach. Persons of authority is another matter.

Besides, one cannot teach another to become gay. They either are or they arent.

Nice myth. People can be influenced into engaging in deviant sexual behaviour. People who openly adhere to a deviant sexual lifestyle contribute to its normalization, and people tend to engage in activity that is normalized in a given society.

Maybe Ted Haggerty used to be a teacher? And if he was , would he have passed muster with you?Sure he would have. And therein lies the problem.

You mean Ted Haggard. Excellent example. Perfect example of how people who engage in sexual deviance slyly deceive and manipulate others in order to facilitate their lifestyle.

Nice unwarranted slag on on the public school system. Going to send them to Catholic school? Private school?

No, the slag is warranted.

Home schooling seems to be the answer for your kids. Pretty sad IMV just what their teacher will be teaching. Piousness and intolerance.

Yeah, home schooled kids tend to be better educated and more knowledgeable than their public school counterparts. Not to mention more well adjusted and respectful.

The accusation of "intolerance" when it comes to not wanting one's child to become a sinner or sexual deviant is getting rather old. Can't you come up with something better?

kengs333 · January 14, 2008

Here's an article for you, Keng.
Winnipeg Free Press

Bravo to this teacher for being honest. If other teachers can put pictures of their husbands, wives, kids, dogs, etc. on their desks, there is no reason for this teacher to be stopped from putting a picture of his partner on his desk.

Well, yes there is a reason, because homsexuality is deviant sexual behaviour and it's no different than putting a picture of a man-boy-love partner or fifteen wives on their desk. Or do you think that beastiality, polygamy, incest, pedophelia are also NOT sexual deviant behaviour?

Melanie_ · January 14, 2008

Nice myth. People can be influenced into engaging in deviant sexual behaviour. People who openly adhere to a deviant sexual lifestyle contribute to its normalization, and people tend to engage in activity that is normalized in a given society.

Homosexuality should be "normalized", as there is nothing wrong with it. It won't increase the amount of homosexuality, it will just let it be out in the open rather than hidden as it has been in the past.

People either are or are not homosexual. If it were simply a matter of exposure and influence, homosexuality would have been eradicated long ago, as there is so much more exposure to heterosexuality, and the influences of heterosexuality can be seen everywhere.

Michael Hardner · January 14, 2008

Kengs,

Well, yes there is a reason, because homsexuality is deviant sexual behaviour and it's no different than putting a picture of a man-boy-love partner or fifteen wives on their desk. Or do you think that beastiality, polygamy, incest, pedophelia are also NOT sexual deviant behaviour?

'Deviant' as in 'unacceptable' is a subjective term. Certainly the other behaviors you describe here are illegal and that is a major difference.

Melanie_ · January 14, 2008

Well, yes there is a reason, because homsexuality is deviant sexual behaviour and it's no different than putting a picture of a man-boy-love partner or fifteen wives on their desk. Or do you think that beastiality, polygamy, incest, pedophelia are also NOT sexual deviant behaviour?

The difference is that same sex marriage is legal in this country, and this teacher's partner is equivalent to any other teacher's husband or wife. Beastiality, polygamy, incest, and pedophelia are not related to homosexuality, and are illegal behaviours, so your argument is pointless.

guyser · January 14, 2008

I never said it had anything to do with the ability to teach. Persons of authority is another matter.

Why? Do you gear indoctrination? If so I think you are grossly misguided. None of us were ever schooled in the heterosexual way at school, what makes you think it does the other way around?

Nice myth. People can be influenced into engaging in deviant sexual behaviour.

No myths attached. Teachers cannot teach sexual lifestyles, other than in health class, at fear of criminal penalties.

People who openly adhere to a deviant sexual lifestyle contribute to its normalization, and people tend to engage in activity that is normalized in a given society.

You were schooled on this numerous times, so I wont bother showing you again. Suffice to say you have been shown where it is not deviant to be gay.

You mean Ted Haggard. Excellent example. Perfect example of how people who engage in sexual deviance slyly deceive and manipulate others in order to facilitate their lifestyle.

Nice try but answer the question. You would not have any problem w Ted Haggard (correction noted) as a teacher of your children prior to his being exposed.

No, the slag is warranted.

Based likely on the fact that christianity is not dominant in todays classrooms.

Yeah, home schooled kids tend to be better educated and more knowledgeable than their public school counterparts. Not to mention more well adjusted and respectful.

I dont doubt that for the most part. I would question social abilities though.

The accusation of "intolerance" when it comes to not wanting one's child to become a sinner or sexual deviant is getting rather old. Can't you come up with something better?

Naw, stick to the tried and true.

I never mentioned deviancy or sinner, you did. But should you teach your children the way you think, that is exactly the result. Why deny it?

Your intolerance comes from your refusal to see the truth, (gays=deviants=pedophiles)

M.Dancer · January 14, 2008

I applied twice to heterosexual indoctrination school but the tuition feew were extremely expensive so I took part time evening adult education courses instead.

I graduated in 1976 and got a 92% on my oral exam.

Edited January 14, 2008 by M.Dancer

Kitchener · January 14, 2008

Today when we were out at an arcade with a bunch of little boys for my son's birthday party, my wife told one of the boys to keep his hands to himself after he'd poked a couple of kids in the eye.

Fortunately, my presence probably made my wife seem sufficiently heterosexual that she looked like a straight woman telling a kid to keep his hands to himself, instead of a "bull" saying the same thing. Close call, eh? Otherwise some nutjob might have run out and started an Internet thread about it!

Kitchener · January 14, 2008

Well, yes there is a reason, because homsexuality is deviant sexual behaviour and it's no different than putting a picture of a man-boy-love partner or fifteen wives on their desk. Or do you think that beastiality, polygamy, incest, pedophelia are also NOT sexual deviant behaviour?

Ah, well, since you're a Guy On The Internet and all, I guess your knee-jerk hot and embarrassed feelings about what constitutes deviance should dictate official educational policy. Especially since you confirm your bona fides by explaining that your opinions are unaffected by anything that anyone might say to you -- including, no doubt, experts, people bearing empirical data, and folks who've plain old thought more carefully about the matter than you.