newbie

It was meant as sarcasm. But with the amount of info out there on everyone of us, I'm not totally comfortable with even more surveillance. What's next, the bathroom stall?

A little levity: Q. What's the difference between the Vietnam War and the Iraq War? A. George W. Bush had a plan to get out of the Vietnam War.

Well, Robertson advocated murder. Does that count?

Hate to pick on the Catholics, but there is that nasty bit about the Spanish Inquisition, Pope Pius XII refusing to mention and express disgust over Jewish extermination, and of course Benedict XV Nazi past.

http://www.conservative.ca/EN/2692/41607 A Conservative Government will restore democratic accountability in the House of Commons by allowing free votes. A Conservative Government will make all votes free, except for the budget and main estimates. On issues of moral conscience, such as abortion, the definition of marriage and euthanasia, the Conservative Party acknowledges the diversity of deeply held personal convictions among individual Party members and the right of Members of Parliament to adopt positions in consultation with their constituents and to vote freely. I don't think anyone is wanting to take away his free vote but, a blatant attempt to insult your party and leader is pure assinine. This guy is looking for his 15 minutes of fame & every lefty media outlet will give it to him. When they are done with him, he will be nothing more than a toilet bug. Nobody is saying, shut your mouth on things you believe, use a little tact is all! What about Myron Thomspon? Another loose cannon?

This ad is currently running the NY Times, SF Chronicle, and the Boston Globe. http://www.impeachbush.org/site/DocServer/...3.pdf?docID=121 This is far more serious than a lie an embarrased President told to cover up a bj.

Unsurprising how all the lefties love a conservative who speaks out against the party. It's similar to the white supremecists and Nazis who love to find Jews saying bad things about Israel and Jews. Poor misguided Monty. If you've read any of my past posts you would know that I applauded the Liberal MP who quit Martin's cabinet for voting against same sex marriage based on what his constituents wanted. I also was against floor crossing from any side. Comparing me to a white supremecist and a nazi is typical of your low regard for anyone who disagrees with you.

Bravo for Mr. Turner. He's one conservative that actually speaks HIS mind and works for his constituents; the true meaning of democracy.

Worth contributor? By whose standards and criteria? So if some of us don't happen to like Harper, we're now deemed unworthy contributers? And it seems to me there was a LOT of Martin bashing on this forum awhile ago. But I guess you cons think that's okay. Harper lost credibility for me with what he has said and when he stole Emerson. It might not have been illegal, but it showed his hypocrisy and true colours. http://www.stephenharpersaid.ca

Why am I not surprised that these activists are acting this way? Not so Monty. Is that egg on your face? http://www.canada.com/topics/news/national...8342eac&k=97385

Sean Penn is considered a hero by the left Yeah, kinda like the hero (albeit dumb) righties, like Pat Robertson, Tucker Carlson, Bill O'Reilly, Ann Coulter, and.............

A couple for you Monty: December 1999 In December 1999, "Bush surprises veteran political chroniclers with his blunt pronouncements about Saddam at a six-way New Hampshire primary event: “It was a gaffe-free evening for the rookie front-runner, till he was asked about Saddam’s weapons stash,” a Boston Globe reporter penned. ‘I’d take ‘em out,’ [bush] grinned cavalierly, ‘take out the weapons of mass destruction…I’m surprised he’s still there,” said Bush of the despot who remains in power after losing the Gulf War to Bush Jr.’s father… It remains to be seen if that offhand declaration of war was just Texas talk, a sort of locker room braggadocio, or whether it was Bush’s first big clinker.” (Boston Globe; Also Russ Baker) January 2001 From the moment he took office, Bush made noises about "finishing the job his father started." (Time Magazine) George Bush’s former treasury secretary Paul O’Neill asserts that Bush took office in January 2001 fully intending to invade Iraq and desperate to find an excuse for pre-emptive war against Saddam Hussein. “From the very beginning, there was a conviction that Saddam Hussein was a bad person and that he needed to go,” O’Neill said. “For me, the notion of pre-emption, that the US has the unilateral right to do whatever we decide to do, is a really huge leap.” (Sunday Herald) http://www.rawstory.com/exclusives/muriel/...imeline_613.htm

Recently leaked memos of meetings between Bush and Blair show that Bush had decided to go to war in January of 2003, even before Powell made his case for war at the UN. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/27/internat...7memo.html?_r=1 http://politics.guardian.co.uk/iraq/story/0,,1700881,00.html

Very. As long as the evidence gathered can only be used in crimes that are above the misdemeanor level, I'm fine with it. Would we have a problem hiring policemen to stand everywhere if we could afford it ? Think of the cameras as automated policemen. Think "1984."

Dubya in his own words on the topic: "No question that the enemy has tried to spread sectarian violence. They use violence as a tool to do that."—Washington, D.C., March 22, 2006

Open your eyes folks. http://www.thedailystar.net/2006/03/22/d60322020325.htm http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march...306civilwar.htm It's here.

Civil war in Iraq is raging. http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle...ticle353501.ece

You've always got Annie-get-your-gun Coulter: http://www.joycekaufman.com/ann1.htm

Besides Parrish, what other "members" of the Liberal party were involved in this Monty?

Care to compare the ratings of the Daily Show versus Tucker's little "situation?"

Check this out: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11979370

This guy is insane. This is what he said on the 700 club a few days ago promoting David Horowitz's book titled, “The Professors: The 101 most dangerous academics in America.” ROBERTSON: Ladies and gentleman this is a fascinating book. If you want to, you'd better take your blood pressure medicine before you read it, but it's "The Professors: The 101 most dangerous academics in America" and that's just a short list of the 30-40,000 of them, they're like termites that have worked into the woodwork of our academic society and it's appalling. This is available at CBN.com and book stores everywhere, and you really ought to read it and be informed. TERRI: It’s interesting that so many conservatives haven't seen this because decades ago we were told that infiltrating education was the way to take over the country, we should have been on alert. ROBERTSON: They gamed it, these guys are out and out communists, they are radicals, you know some of them killers, and they are propagandists of the first order and they don't want anybody else except them. That's why Regent University for example is so terrifically important and why we're setting up an undergraduate program that hopefully will see shortly 10,000 students, and then from there 250,000 because you don't want your child to be brainwashed by these radicals, you just don't want it to happen. Not only brainwashed but beat up, they beat these people up, cower them into submission. Ahhh! "The Professors", read it. They beat them up! http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/ (Oops, should have put this under Moral and Religious - sorry folks)

Can everyone say stereotype?

I think the best line in that story was: Mounties involved, but it's not clear how.