newbie

LMAO, good one BD.

I don't know who you consider "the rest of us." Given the latest Gallup, it's certainly not Americans. http://www.pollingreport.com/iraq.htm

Oops. Sorry folks, my computer froze and I didn't think the first one went through.

This can't be good news for Dubya. Can everybody say lame duck? http://www.pollingreport.com/BushJob.htm http://www.pollingreport.com/iraq.htm

This can't be good news for Dubya. Can everybody say lame duck? http://www.pollingreport.com/BushJob.htm

I guess it's hard for you to face facts Monty. Check out what the American people think of their great leader. http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/na...lnews-headlines And some even talk of impeachment: http://www.kentucky.com/mld/kentucky/news/13705324.htm Finally the Americans are waking up to the blunders, lies and scandals of the Bush administration.

Small point but it's in keeping with Harper's M.O. Actually, he "lured" (as in Emerson) the GG's cook. http://www.nealenews.com/nealenews_GGChef_24%20Feb%2006.htm

They are as Republican as you can get. You don't count media then? Too bad. I was going to throw Bob Novak into the mix. Are you saying O'Reilly isn't frothing from the right? Oh, and I guess you don't count hitman Pat Robertson then either. How about George Allen or Karl Rove? And then there's that self-righteous Mormon Orrin Hatch and scandal laden Tom Delay. And of course, the grand daddy of em all, good ole Dubya his self. There's so many they even have a group: http://groups.msn.com/AngryRepublicans O'Reilly is as Republican as you can get? Get real! He's pro-gun control, pro-abortion, anti-death penalty, and supports gays adopting. I'll admit that overall he leans to the right, but he is hardly "as Republican as you can get." Pat Robertson is on the fringes of the Republican Party and does not speak for the GOP (although he was right about Hugo Chavez). Btw, do you want me to bring up all the hatemongers on the left? In my previous post I just issued a short list of the angry representatives of the Democrat Party. George Allen has a 50/50 chance of getting the GOP nomination for the 2008 election. He is a fine conservative and is one of a small number of politicians with low negatives. Karl Rove rules! The Evil Dark Lord™ has the left totally psyched out. Tom DeLay has been convicted of nothing. Orrin Hatch. He's religious! Ergo, self-righteous!...unlike us progressive liberals. Dubya: Liberated over 50 million people from 2 murderous regimes in 2 wildly successful liberations, author of the Bush Doctrine, a steely resolve in the War on Terror, and a man who will be treated kindly by history as the ME slowly changes in the future. Number of people freed from totalitarian dictatorships by anti-American Bush-bashing terrorist-appeasing whining elitists? Zero. "They" refer to Coulter and Limbaugh. Where did I say Robertson speaks for the GOP. I mention him as he's an angry Republican (and a major hypocrite, you know, love your enemies and all that stuff.) Rove, the CIA leaker. Yeah, he's credible. Delay, well you got me there - however this list of indictments can't be a picnic: http://www.trmpac.org Hatch - just another angry Republican Dubya - responsible for: - between 33000 and 37000 civilian deaths in Iraq, - close to 2300 U.S. soldiers deaths - 16,700 wounded U.S. soldiers - numerous skeletons http://www.realchange.org/bushjr.htm - this quote when asked by Bob Woodward about his legacy: "Who cares. We'll all be dead."

Clarification that reports and findings of the Ethics Commissioner are final and may not be overturned by the Prime Minister; is part of Harper's new Accountability Act. Speaking of hyprocrisy.... http://www.conservative.ca/EN/1091/40485

Is this the same CIA that had the faulty intel prior to Iraq invasion?

It seems like it's way more of a threat than Iraq posed.

It's over thank God: http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/03/09/por...rity/index.html

Right on.

Anyone with the slightest insight into Ottawa knew Shapiro was dead meat on election night. The only reason he hasn't already resigned is he wants to milk us for a fat severence package just like all Liberals. The posturing by the opposition is pathetic. With the exception of the Liberals, they didn't like him either. His removal will be among the first acts of the new parliament. And rightly so. So Liberal appointees bad; Con appointees good. Aah, good ole partisan politics at work.

They are as Republican as you can get. You don't count media then? Too bad. I was going to throw Bob Novak into the mix. Are you saying O'Reilly isn't frothing from the right? Oh, and I guess you don't count hitman Pat Robertson then either. How about George Allen or Karl Rove? And then there's that self-righteous Mormon Orrin Hatch and scandal laden Tom Delay. And of course, the grand daddy of em all, good ole Dubya his self. There's so many they even have a group: http://groups.msn.com/AngryRepublicans

Harper also admitted he tried to replace Shapiro immediately after he was elected. Why is that not a big surprise. And you all thought Martin was arrogant? http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/stor...0309?hub=Canada And Geoffrey, this is an important precedent Harper may be setting and needs to be addressed, not swept under the rug as you suggest.

No more so than political polls, which appear to be quite accurate. Do you think people lie on these surveys regarding their happiness?

But what about the very angry and very public Ann Coulters, Rush Limbaughs, and Bill O'Reillys of the right? I think their left wing counterparts (Al Franken, Michael Moore) are just funny, employing satire, not anger.

Not in my case. Chasing the almighty buck caused my illness and forced me to retire early. I have less possessions, a lot less money but am a whole lot happier. In fact I'm still getting rid of stuff. I think the "money buys happiness" is an immature illusion. And as far as the depression part, the black and white world of Monty's ilk don't seem too happy. Check out some of the angry posts on this slightly right leaning forum.

racism = a form of discrimination based on race, especially the belief that one race is superior to another. Your words: So I gather you find it racist for White America to be concerned about cultural control by a race other than White in America? Are you claiming that a certain race that makes very significant gains in scientific, technological and social areas should be void of any recogniton and should not stand out and be considered superior among other races? If you should answer YES to any of the above, then you qualify as a racist. The internet is a huge resource and yet you pick a supremely racist site to answer my question or to form a new one?

Is that the best you got Monty? You must be getting awfully tired of using that BDS mantra. Well, put me down as I believe Murtha is right on the money.

But what about them blackies who are so good at basketball and music? Doesn't them count?(satire) Hey pal, your views are called racist, not merely opinions.

Are you serious? You quote from a Klan site? Me thinks a racist is afoot.

Remember this guy: http://www.adl.org/learn/Ext_US/zundel.asp...d=2&item=zundel

And Belinda didn't do exactly the same thing, crossing the floor for prestege, power, and a Cabinet Post? If it is wrong for Emerson, it was equally as wrong for Belinda, and Martin's lap-dog Shirpiro should have investigated her actions. I agree 100%.