B. Max

I agree, the Liberals screwed up because they weren't willing to pay the political price for implementing the changes that were required for Kyoto. The Conservatives govt., know that they would also pay a political price, especially in their stronghold of Alberta, refuse to take seriosuly, the warning of future disaster by the increase of greenhouse gases and its negative influence on Earth's climate. It's typical human rationale. Who cares about the future, let's think about today. The economy is booming, Canada is doing well from oil and gas, the automobile industry has a major impact on Ontario's economy, people are making lots of money, there are lots of jobs....things are great so why would we want to change that. Let's zoom back 100 years in the fishery, lots of fish, people are working, companies are making money...things are great. What? There are people say that if we catch too much fish that eventually the fish will diminish, jobs will be lost, species of fish will be threatened to the point of extinction...nahhh...just scare tactics, it'll never happen. People back then only thought of the now, not the future. The same thing is happening today. Industry continues to spew out gases, there are indications that the Greenhouse Effect is in its starting stages. A majority of scientists say that its points to devastation in the future. Of course, some of you will say that there are also scientists that say it won't happen, but I would have to point out two things. These scientists are in the minority and many are employed by ogranizations that are sympathetic to "big business." The tobacco industry for years used to cite scientists that said who there was no proof that tobacco was harmful.... The problem is that we are too greedy, who cares about 100 years from now, when we won't even be alive...all we care about is the now and the near future. I wonder what our grand grandchildren, when they are suffering from the full impact of greenhouse gases will ask about this generation. One question I'm sure they will ask is why we didn't try to stop the devastation from starting when we had the chance and they will wonder how we could have been so cruel to allow it to happen. Where is your proof.

That's generally the way liberal types operate and was best summed up some time ago by others. At the core of modern liberalism is the spoiled child - miserable, as all spoiled children are, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic and useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats . (PJ O'Rourke)

That's because they are not conclusions. They are facts.

Do you understand now. People were dying before the war. Iraq is part of the war on terror. People tend to die in wars that's a fact. The thugs that are still causing problems are saddams's thugs. Proves we were right to go in there in the fisrt place.

If the green whack jobs had their way people wouldn't need a cheque book because they wouldn't have a pay cheque. The greens are the threat to the world not global warming.

Are you talking about recent FoxNewsblican talking points that Clinton provided NK with the technology to make the bomb? Lies, all lies. This article gives an accurate portrayal of what went down during this time. http://www.slate.com/id/2151354/nav/tap2/ Not quite. Your time lines are wrong. In 99 Clinton succumb to KN blackmail and responded with appeasement. http://www.guardian.co.uk/korea/article/0,,893965,00.html By making possible for the nuke deal to be signed. In 2000 KN threatened to sue the US for lost power due to some delays and began test firing rockets. That's why the deal that never should have been made in the first place began to fall apart. Bush called it right when he took over, saying they can't be trusted and are part of the axis of evil. https://www.afa.org/magazine/Jan2000/0100missile.asp

Michael Ignatieff's comments that the Israeli air strike in Qana was a war crime reflect the "anti-Israeli position" of most of the Liberal leadership contenders, the prime minister said Thursday. "Well, that's a serious charge," Stephen Harper said when asked about Ignatieff's comments. "As you know, I don't support that view." "Frankly, I think, though, this is consistent with the anti-Israeli position that has been taken by virtually all of the candidates for the Liberal leadership. And I don't think it's helpful or useful." Harper is only stating what should be obvous to everyone. Unfortunately liberals can't stand the way others see them.

You must be referring to revisionist history. The federal government has persecuted Alberta since it join confederation. http://www.freealberta.com/historical_grievances.html How would one know if the clean air act is a joke, before one knows the details.

Would that be the same province who over the last thirty years has had over two hundred billion dollars extorted from it to keep the rest of the country from turning into a third world backwater, and who has taken in the rest of the countries unemployed.

As opposed to Clinton who gave them a basketball and the means to make bombs in eight years.

It is made up. There is no confirmation those numbers and whatever the real numbers are, are caused mainly by the people we are fighting. Do you understand now.

Those numbers can't be confirmed and the method at arriving at them seems ridiculous and are disputed by everyone. On top of that the majority are caused by saddam's thugs and foriegn terrorists. The very type of people we are at war with around the world. http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2...12/105715.shtml

One of the funniest things I've seen lately. Click where it says power line video. http://powerlineblog.com/archives/015516.php

Actually that's where it came from before we were infected. You might be surprised to find out that it originally came from 1920's Germany where its various components were conceived in a school called the Frankfurt school.

Turner admits he couldn't decide what side he was on. Bush never said with us or against us. He said you are either with us or you are with the terrorists. Since the events of 911 we now know the left sided with the terrorists. http://www.canadafreepress.com/2006/cover101106.htm

delete Moved to Us politics.

Nice spin. Now how about some facts that relate directly to the subject. HELLOW

That's because there is none that hasn't been proven to be junk science and outright fraudulent.

There is nothing to apologize for. It looks like Dole took Rumsfeld's advice to oppose the sale. Many members of the Bush administration are on record as opposing Mr Clinton's plans, saying that weapons-grade nuclear material could be extracted from the type of light water reactors that ABB sold. Mr Rumsfeld's deputy, Paul Wolfowitz, and the state department's number two diplomat, Richard Armitage, both opposed the deal as did the Republican presidential candidate, Bob Dole, whose campaign Mr Rumsfeld ran and where he also acted as defence adviser.

News flash Ladyjen. Foley is gone. We know the dems would like to keep talking about Foley because otherwise they'd have to talk about their plan to fight the terrorists, whatever that is, or their promised tax increases.

An outrage yes, surprising no.

I would hate to see gerry get banned, he makes me laugh.

There is no doubt that China has kept this nut bar regime in place all these years to be a thorn in the side of the US. However when the price of that becomes a regional arms build up among countries that are not allies of China but those of the US then the price is to high and game is up and this nut bars days are numbered. When China decides to pull the plug on this guy he's gone.

Yeah perhaps he can. Once China takes care of its problem. Bonus!

It all depends on how he plays his cards.