B. Max

I have no criticism of you. I do have some criticism for Tim Ball who has't written a paper in a decade and who won't submit to peer review of his work. As if that has anything to do with it. You are critical of anyone who does not agree with the global warming scam.

The Globe and Mail had a long expose on this group. You should read it. Only 19 of them are even Canadian yet feel compelled to write Harper? One of them has since recanted. So unless you are canadian you have no credibility. Well that lets out Al Gore. By the way what kind of a scientist is he.

Please let me know what academic work they have done on this. Tim Ball, for example. What university in the last ten years? What paper? The answer is none. Right wing stooge is what he is. Looks credible to me. http://www.fcpp.org/main/publication_detail.php?PubID=864 Again we see the one worlder leftwing spear carriers and their smear tactics at work.

Discredited. Friends of Science are not scientists. You have just discredited yourself. Take a seat in the corner with gerry.

Those 60 have been discredited, one has recanted. Many aren't even climate specialists. Economists? Agronomists? Right wing tripe and no science. No they haven't been discredited. The only ones discredited have been the scare mongers like Al Gore.

I am all ears to hear the scientists explain it to us. No you're not, you've been to busy talking when the facts have been presented. What the rest of want to see is the proof of man made global warming, not some useless computer models. But if you are all ears then watch these videos and hear it from the scientists themselves. http://www.friendsofscience.org/index.php?ide=3

What a phony outfit.

Ton Deweese is paid by Exxon and Philip Morris. He is not a scientist. Show me a real scientist who backs up the claim that global warming is a myth. The right wing just can't do that. I have no idea who he is payed by and neither do you. Who he is payed by doesn't matter and doesn't change the facts. Once again you demonstrate the smear tactics of the global warming fanatics. I guess Harper took these folks advice and stepped back from the abyss of global climate nonsense perpetrated by the gloom and doom industry. I would urge him to go much further and write economic treason laws to deal with the fear merchants and the doom and gloom industry. Meanwhile, more than 60 leading international climate change experts have gone on record to urge Canada’s new Prime Minster to carefully review global warming policies, warning that ‘“Climate change is real’ is a meaningless phrase used repeatedly by activists to convince the public that a climate catastrophe is looming and humanity is the cause.”

By whom? Scientists? By scientific fact.

Gore duh's move has been fully debunked and found to have no credibility what so ever.

If the right wing believes that then do actual scientific research rather than claim that universities are lying. Do the work. Stop being lazy. We are, and at the same time exposing the junk science missleading information and out lies spewed by the global warming scare mongers of the gloom and doom industry. For example, in May of 1996, unannounced and possibly unauthorized changes to the United Nation’s report on climate change touched off a firestorm of controversy within the scientific community. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the science group that advises the United Nations on the global warming issue, presented a draft of its report in December 1995, and it was approved by the delegations. However, when the printed report appeared in May 1996, it was discovered that substantial changes and deletions had been made to the body of the report to make it conform to the Policymakers Summery. Specifically, two key paragraphs written by the scientists were deleted. They said: 1. “None of the studies cited above has shown clear evidence that we can attribute the observed climate changes to increases in greenhouse gases.” 2. “No study to date had positively attributed all or part of the climate change to …man-made causes.” http://www.newswithviews.com/DeWeese/tom52.htm

The way to expose bad science is better science. The right wing wishes to discredit all science as theory and no fact. The left like to repeat their lies hoping they will become true.

That's exactly what they've been doing. http://www.hawaiireporter.com/story.aspx?c...6b-f55e0881ec34

Milloy is no scientist. The oil industry tries to hide its funding of activists like Tim Ball. These people don't actually do any research. No one said he was. He compiles the research points out the misrepresentation of the junk science. The oil industry is hiding nothing. In fact they have helping to expose the agenda of the anti capitalist one worlders. An agenda we want nothing to do with.

If the AP is referring to the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the AP should become aware that the IPCC report itself (the part written by scientists) reached no consensus on climate change. What did reach a conclusion was an IPCC "summary for policymakers" prepared by political appointees.8 Most reporters quote only the summary, being either too lazy or too undereducated to understand the actual report. This does not explain, however, why reporters don't more frequently interview scientists who helped prepare it -- scientists such as IPCC participant Dr. Richard Lindzen of MIT, who says the IPCC report is typically "presented as a consensus that involves hundreds, perhaps thousands, of scientists... and none of them was asked if they agreed with anything in the report except for the one or two pages they worked on." Lindzen also draws a sharp distinction between the scientists' document and its politicized summary: "the document itself is informative; the summary is not."9 http://www.nationalcenter.org/TSR032204.html

What scientists have put their name to this paper? None. The publisher of the site Milloy has been discredited with his connections to big tobacco and thoroughly embarrassed FOX News when it was disclosed thus. http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Steve_Milloy http://info-pollution.com/milloy.htm http://www.trwnews.net/Documents/Dow/junkscicom.htm Just as the Friends of Science in Canada is paid by oil industry trying to hide in the tall grass, Milloy is paid by polluters. All part of the smear campaign by the gloom and doom industry, fear merchants and scare mongers. The facts are the facts and that can't be changed or disputed. Steve Milloy, freinds of science or whoever have every right to put out the facts and the oil industry also has a right and obligation to see that the facts are presented. For you say someone has been discredited because of association is ridiculous in the extreme. I guess that's all one has when they can discredit the scientific facts.

The goal of the right is to claim all science is theory so as to discredit it. No you have that backwards. The goal of the left is to take theory and computer models and hold them up as factual science, while at the same time dismissing real science and discredit those who present it. http://www.junkscience.com/Greenhouse/

If I were Harper I think my response would be why don't you separate in stead of blackmailing the rest of the country for more money.

Since they've never gotten money before, I expect they will ask for none. How about a reduction in emissions which you say are not a problem. Get real, sask. has been on the dole for years and destoyed their own economy which is why people fled from there to alberta for years. I say whatever emissions there are are not a problem but rather an invention.

That's not what they said. They said they don't need millions of dollars and social engineering judges. What they are saying is a place for everything and everything in its place. Men and women are different trying to make men out of women and women out of men is social engineering by social engineers and work and we have a brainwashed screwed up society to prove it who can't even reproduce its self.

Not according to real women. http://www.realwomenca.com/press.htm#09_26_06

As far as acid rain goes, the Alberta government is looking into it. http://www.canada.com/reginaleaderpost/new...33-1adb3613fdc4 I wonder how much money sask. is looking for. My response to that is maybe we should be looking into sending the thousands and thousands of sask. people back to sask. who are working in the alberta oil patch.

And what is that? Does Drea call herself a feminist? Sounds like one. If something is equal it is equal, it doesn't need millions of dollars and activist social engineering judges to make it so called equal.

Now that is nonsense. It's a fact.

Wrong. Feminists have been trying to prove they are something they are not. Or at least convince others they are.