B. Max

So what it doesn't change the facts the or list of references. You are down to smear as your evidence of man made global warming.

Temperatures are at their highest level today since records began (back to about 1880) so temperature couldn't have reached it's peak around 1940 That is wrong. As is pointed out in the swindle documentary. The US historical records confirm the average temperature as being warmer in 1940. http://www.john-daly.com/usa-1999.gif

Yes peaking today, while temperatures reached their peak around 1940 as opposed to today.

Here you go: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_Change -Has graphs and pictures. http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/ http://www.nature.org/initiatives/climatechange/issues/ http://www.panda.org/about_wwf/what_we_do/...hange/index.cfm http://www.unep.org/themes/climatechange/ http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/sci_te...climate_change/ Unfortunately that is not evidence let alone proof, and is junk science, misleading information, and outright fraud at best. http://www.co2science.org/scripts/CO2Scien...V8/N48/EDIT.jsp In investigating this question, Siegenthaler et al. say they obtained the best correlation between CO2 and temperature "for a lag of CO2 of 1900 years." Specifically, over the course of glacial terminations V to VII, they indicate that "the highest correlation of CO2 and deuterium, with use of a 20-ky window for each termination, yields a lag of CO2 to deuterium of 800, 1600, and 2800 years, respectively." In addition, they note that "this value is consistent with estimates based on data from the past four glacial cycles," citing in this regard the work of Fischer et al. (1999), Monnin et al. (2001) and Caillon et al. (2003). Clearly, therefore, it is temperature that is the robust leader in this tightly-coupled relationship, while CO2 is but the humble follower, providing only a fraction (which could well be miniscule) - of the total glacial-to-interglacial temperature change.

Why do you think they call it the dirty thirtys then.

Nice try, but the facts are in the global swindle documentary and the truth is out. You have no facts to dispute them just as you have no evidence of man made global warming.

So you chose communism, which tends to confirm what Klaus says. I'm quit sure then, that the apocalypse will be right on time.

The facts are niether biased or unbiased, they are simply the facts. So you chose communism.

It is the climate alarmists who don't no the difference and of course the dupes of dooms day.

Actually, Gore came off as the expert he is - the truth is, the zinc peddling greed merchants like Inhofe are finding themselves increasingly on the short end of the stick Gore has won national and international awards and recognitions -- the polluters are, OTOH, diving for cover as they are bombarded by criminal investigations and congressional hearings. even the freeper morons will eventually give up on this pathetic pap imitation of science which denies the truth about global climate change Of course that is all nonsense. I suggest you produce the science. Right now.

If boxer was doing her job she would have made Gore answer the questions. In fact Gore should be arrested for lying to a senate committee. http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?Fus...n_id=&Issue_id=

Yes the facts are generally meaningless to those who are easily duped.

Gore wouldn't answer the questions concerning the real known science that proves he is a liar. Inhofe tried to make him answer the questions. That makes Gore look like fool. Gore refuses to debate climate scientists time after time. Boxer is as big of idiot as Gore.

Obviously you don't know what you are talking about.

Oh wait: that's stupid. Inhofe is right. The alarmists try to associate everything they can with man made global warming. But can't make the same connection when the weather doesn't cooperate with their global warming alarmist scare tactics.

It is a bunch of nonsense like the rest of his claims that have been proven to be lies in his science fiction movie.

Wrong, Gore wouldn't answer the questions. Inhofe kept telling him to answer the questions, but instead he kept going off on a rant to avoid answering the questions. Of course the MSM ignores, and is actually complicit in a cover up of the underpinnings of the man made global warming fraud. Responding yesterday to U.S. Rep. Joe Barton, R-Texas, and former House Speaker Denny Hastert, R-Ill., the Czech leader said: "It becomes evident that while discussing climate we are not witnessing a clash of views about the environment, but a clash of views about human freedom." "As someone who lived under communism for most of my life I feel obliged to say that the biggest threat to freedom, democracy, the market economy and prosperity at the beginning of the 21st century is not communism or its various softer variants," said Klaus, responding to questions posed by the two lawmakers. "Communism was replaced by the threat of ambitious environmentalism." http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article....RTICLE_ID=54784

I watched some of this today and Gore made himself look like an idiot. "There are hundreds of thousands of people who adore you and would follow your example by reducing their energy usage if you did. Don't give us the run-around on carbon offsets or the gimmicks the wealthy do," Senator Inhofe told Gore. http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2007/3/...3901.shtml?s=ic

What truck gets that kind of mileage. Perhaps with diesel. People are right to call Harpers budget absurd.

What oil business. I guess you would like to see thousands in Alberta lose everything. Actually so would I. To many people and most of them new comers were not here at the time of the NEP. Send them packing back to Ontario or where ever they came from and dump them onto their welfare roles. That will leave the rest of us in Alberta to get Alberta out of this toon country.

your source is the best I've seen from a right winger - congrats It all sounds like something that should have made it into the goracles science fiction move for scaring little kids and gullible adults.

I don't think they died out. http://english.pravda.ru/science/19/94/377..._autotroph.html

Trucks (pick ups) are exempt. I stand corrected again. Thankfully.

Not quite , ours will have rust . I stand corrected.

How is one going to pull a fith wheeler with a mini van. The pick up plants in this country could end up closing. Along with all the holiday trailer plants. If anything this little commie experiment will keep the older ones on the roads for many more years than they might have other wise been. This country could start looking like cuba.