bud

nazi germany felt the same way about its annexation of austria and poland regardless of what the law says and what the rest of the world thought. this is a common habit of rogue states.

it doesn't matter what israel and you feel about annexing east jerusalem, it breaches international law. this is something the world recognizes.

eh? first of all, this has nothing to do with harm to peace advocates and second, you're wrong. israel has started a campaign in trying to punish those who speak out against many of its actions. i'll get back to you on that in another thread. talk to me about the 60% who prefer to see the settlements gone instead of the usual throwing around jew hater and anti-semite bs, like it holds any meaning any more. you and the rest of the people here have killed the meaning of anti-semite. one single criticism of israel and all you can do is call the critic an anti-semite... even if they're jewish. so pathetic.

the typical cries of anti-semite and 'jew hater' is always expected by the vermin who can't handle any criticism of israel, even if it's by jews. here are some facts: A survey of the Israeli general public and Israeli settlers taken in early March shows three-fifths of the Israeli public (60%) support "dismantling most of the settlements in the territories as part of a peace agreement with the Palestinians." This is eleven points higher than the previous reading (49%) taken in December, 2009, and is the highest level recorded since 2005, during the debate over evacuating the Gaza Strip. Just one-third of the Israeli public (33%) opposes dismantling most settlements, including 13 percent very strongly opposed. This is the lowest level of strong opposition to dismantling settlements recorded by the Truman Institute for the 26 surveys in which this question has been asked since 2001. WPO Poll an example of how the government is controlled by the extremist settlers. one false move against the settlements by bibi and his coalition will fall apart.

palestinians in east jerusalem are 'not' living in israel. the annexation is not recognized by majority of the, no wait, all of the world (except by the law breaker, israel), since it breaches international law.

hasbara bots usually don't give up until they're ignored. it doesn't matter how much reality you shove down their throats.

dancer mentions the poll in his statement: The poll has value because Jeruslaem as a capital of a Palsestian state won't fly if a majority of Arabs would rather stay Israeli. the poll says 35% would rather remain israeli, which is not majority.

did the information ministry give you the permission to include the 35% undecided as decided? if so, i understand. go on, tell us more muhammad saeed.

image of israeli carpet bombing

poll and article says: A poll this week shows that 35 per cent of Jerusalem's Palestinian residents would choose Israeli citizenship over Palestinian citizenship. you wrote: The poll has value because Jeruslaem as a capital of a Palsestian state won't fly if a majority of Arabs would rather stay Israeli. that's a quote from you. i wrote: 35% is not majority. you wrote: Boy are you thick... Where did I say that 35% is a majority? Are you really this stupid? go on, tell us more Muhammed Saeed al-Sahaf.

ah. right. okay. i guess you're the new iraqi information minister. "the poll shows that 35% would rather remain israeli, therefore that holds a lot of value since majority want to stay israeli. you're so thick for not understanding this."

wrong. i support the existence of the israeli state. fight for what? stealing land? i do not support anyone, jewish or not jewish, who tries to steal another person's land. i love rights, especially human rights. this is why i don't support expansionism and theft of another group's land. i don't care what religion they follow. you have a habit of lying and trying to defame people with those lies. you're a weak person.

this is what you wrote, time waster: The poll has value because Jeruslaem as a capital of a Palsestian state won't fly if a majority of Arabs would rather stay Israeli.. in the poll that you have posted, 35% of those polled in east jerusalem expressed that they would rather stay israeli if a peace deal is reached and a palestinian state is formed. 35% is not majority. it's very simple. it's not what i think, it's about what you've written. i know you don't care about your dignity, but c'mon, you need to just accept that you've made a mistake.

you said majority of arabs would rather become israeli. why do you continue to make yourself look like an idiot?

yes. it has nothing to do with the incredible deficit accumulated during the bush era and continues under obama. it also has nothing to do with the irresponsibility we've seen by the financial institutions. it's all by design. muhahaha... bushcheney plan is all coming together... muhahaha.. usa usa usa!

i definitely do not support any attacks from anybody. israel is nervous about any state that does not accept their occupation and treatment of palestinians. most of the surrounding states have been bought by incentives going to the dictatorships in power, by the US. for exmaple, the millions egypt and jordan receive every year. it would be if hezbollah took control of lebanon, which they can't and will not. support for them comes from a minority. just like the support for the 2 other major groups. that's a good point. iran would probably welcome any type of instability that takes attention and focus away from them. for example, they've been long time enemies of the taliban and also despise the group that is running kabul. but they welcome the fighting as it keeps the US busy there. iran is also quite friendly towards the government of iraq and despise the sunni groups that continue to keep the country unstable, however, i'm sure they don't mind the instability.

you're an idiot.

you don't seem to know much about the canadian immigration process.

instability in lebanon would make hezbollah focus on the infighting (or possible civil war) between the different groups in lebanon, like the sunnis and christians. this would weaken hezbollah and not allow them to restock and strengthen in case of another israeli attack on them. israel has been worried since their failed attack on lebanon a few years ago that hezbollah has continued to grow their arsenal through syria and iran. this is why israel has talked about another attack on lebanon.

enemy of his state would be hezbollah. his state would be israel. i hope it makes sense now.

35% is not majority. you need to work on your math.

why would you consider me a jew hater? i don't hate jews.

yawn all you want radical leftist lawyer, but this is the political situation in israel. the far right extremists have taken control over the direction of politics in israel. as a radical leftist, i figured you'd care.

haaretz read a piece in the haaretz which describes the current political atmosphere quite well: "Keen to avoid elections at literally all costs, Netanyahu's actions in recent weeks - letting Avigdor Lieberman and Arab-hating rabbis run wild, humiliating the United States in the settlement freeze fiasco while exacerbating tensions with the Muslim world - mean that his government now meets the five essential criteria of a settlement: It exists in order to obstruct progress toward Israeli-Palestinian peace. It insists that it has nothing to do with the impasse in Israeli-Palestinian peace. It serves the aims of the Orthodox Jewish minority, often at the direct expense of the needs and hopes of the Israeli majority, and the future of Israeli democracy. Its actions anger and alienate Israel's allies and further inflame its enemies. It will do anything – including at times of extreme risk to Israel, nothing – in order to avoid being dislodged."

bonam's reason for posting this thread is not because he cares for the lebanese people. he posted it because he wants to take the opportunity to further defame the enemy of his state. if he cared about the lebanese people, he would not have supported israel's carpet bombing of lebanon a few years ago.