Shwa

Yes and this is what I wonder about Dissenter. He/She/It is wailing like a baby over the decline of the "white people," meanwhile, over in India, there are a billion of them.

I am sure I could. But let's not forget those British muskets, lead shot and gunpowder right?

Stiffness and pain. If it is in his back, I have heard a few pancreatic cancer patients make this same complaint. And that isn't good.

So is the lictardedness too. A telltale sign I think.

More cancer, apparently he is not doing well and is recommending Nycole Turmel to be interim leader until he comes back in the fall after treatment...

Well they have to balance the budget, I thought, by law. So what they will do is overbudget by a billion or so and then apply that to the deficit, thereby wiping the deficit out in one or two years. Pure genius if you ask me. Ford doesn't get enough credit. (well he had better hope he does with his new multi-billion dollar budget!)

Well, to be honest, I would rather screw than work, wouldn't you? Am I am not an immigrant. Then again, this might explain all the Russian strippers they are allowing into our country. They do both.

Wait a minute. Did the people of Denmark have any rights or free speech "taken away" over those cartoons?

I heard that Ford hired a $350,000 consultant because he didn't like what he heard. $350,000! That's a lot of money! Imagine all the dog licenses that could have been collected, or old ladies babysitting in the park. :angry:

Thanks for the history lesson! Oops. Must have been a different Tecumseh because the famous one was killed at the Battle of the Thames in 1813. You know, in the middle of the War of 1812. Oops. You mean "on their own" with the exception of British muskets, lead balls and gunpowder? On second thought, that wasn't such a good history lesson after all Chippewa.

Yep, it sure does. You are far more deluded that I could ever hope to be. No, of course Scotty. You are right here. I mean, what possible meaning could statistics pertaining to the mandate and responsibilities of a federal department possibly have. They are meaningless. I am not ever sure why they report in the first place. So to allay the costs of crime to society, add more costs to society by giving longer prison sentences. Because that equation is "economically sensible." Meh. Ankle bracelets show promise. Yep. Once he gets out in 25 years or never. Dangerous Offender legislation shows promise. Well anyone with your level of superpowers would, naturally, have the superpower of humility and insight. Too bad it doesn't transfer over to your wit.

if the shoe fits... Besides, you have already more or less admitted that Breivik is a sane mainstream Right Winger like yourself, who agrees with his politics. And after all that, there are only his actions left. As in his case, the same, mainstream Right Wing isn't satisfied with mere Muslims and other undesirables, they literally are hunting liberals now. (as opposed to the Sarah Palin figurative gun sight fiasco). As for CNN, no doubt, their liberal bias is showing again.

Well, I did cite the article and now you are disputing it, so could you kindly provide some legitimate sources (and than your own vaunted opinion please) and show there wasn't a $350 million dollar surplus? What's that? You can't? Didn't think so.

Well at least you admit to it and that is the first step in becoming aware. So what? They are the ones charged with the responsibility and have therefore developed the research. When "everyone" can come up with something better - and in sufficient force -I am sure they will look into it. Because Corrections Canada is a... wait for it... federal institution. Most of the rest of us would say that less than 2 years in prison is for minor crimes. The major stuff - the real, fearsome, horrifying stuff that counts the most - is federal jurisdiction. So let's take a look at this statement, regardless of it's substantiation. You say that "Canadian want" for criminals to be kept in as long as they are a danger. But then you say this: Criminals who don't re-offend are not dangerous. Do you get that? Do you actually understand that linkage between your fearful thought and how recidivism can help you through those teeth gnashing tough times? So you are saying 75% of the population wants longer criminal sentences for every single conviction? Substatiate that please. Go ahead, show me ample evidence about what "Canadians want." If you can't, then you are not too bright. Well, its more evidence that you are not too swift at any rate. And you can prove this... how? Let me guess: a Fraser Insitute study right? Come on now, bring it on. Wow, Scotty, I grossly underestimated you. You now have your pulse on the "collective interest" of Canadians. WOW! That's like superpowers or something. Surely, with such astute insight, you should be able to lead our country or at least win a seat in a local election... you have more power than the CBC!

I think there must be another way and would gladly pay for research to find it. Wouldn't you?

Good CNN article, with some interesting comments at the bottom. Europe's resurgent far right focuses on immigration, multiculturalism Of course we see an inkling of this in our mainstream right wing, the same arguments and complaints. Heck you could probably do a search on this forum and see some of that. But if you did an Google search, would you? Where is the Fraser Institute when you need it? Interestingly enough, even comments about the 'far right' elements of the CPC are enough to get some MLW posters to comment. Are there any of these 'far right' advocates among those CPC elected in the last election and, if so, what percentage of them? Is it long before mere partisanship devolves here into the kind of violence we are now seeing in Europe?

So what you have proven is that the legal system needs some adjustment, not that such adjustments are impossible.

Well that is the problem right there isn't it? Your "feeling" about something. Do you often argue a point with a feeling? I get a sense you do. LOL!

Yep and it was likely a combination of this mixing with environmental factors that we derive this nice white skin colour (except gingers, who we know are part Neanderthal) What will eventually happen is that with all this mixing and inter-breeding and environmental factors, a new skin colour will emerge - probably fuschia. Then we will have these people coming around saying we are anti-fuschia or that the lighter fuschia coloured people aren't as bad. Or something like that. The neat thing is that when the Fuscians tan, they go purple. Yea Fuschians!

How so? Do you have some sort of corollary you can refer to, some sort of relevant example from another sector? One thing to consider - what IT folks used to call the 'stretch factor' back in the day - is the threshold of higher costs and poorer service clients are willing to endure given the current costs and service levels. You'd be surprised what people will put up with when they think there are abstract benefits to be obtained. I think that the Ford Brainstrust is operating under the principles of the stretch factor actually. So if there is a large savings to be had overall for slightly higher client costs and slightly poorer service, I think the public would go for that. Consider the idea of 'shared services' within a government. A well known, oft implemented phenomenon that is being trotted out in the federal government now and has been tooled with in the Ontario provincial government. Why have 35 HR departments when you can have 1? Why have 35 separate IT groups, when you can have 1? So that people have to wait an extra two weeks for their overtime cheque in shares services is a slightly poorer service. However, prior to automation, people had to wait longer anyways. So we can afford some slippage in service levels when we go to shared services, at least for this generation who remember how it was 'back then.' The other idea is that the next generation will have to get used to it. Adapt or opt out.

Well now that is interesting wyly, because yes we do "spend real money on imaginary prisons." It is called "architecture." That and planning, consultants, PR campaigns to make the populace afraid...

You are still using the exception to prove the rule.

How about "Hug-a-genocidal-maniac?" No wait, the government has put up wanted posters for them now...

I think we can see the true "dissention" going on here. It is a ruse. "White countries for white people." Since we live in a white country, then it is pretty obvious that "Dissenter" is actually dissenting about our white country. So: Dissenter means anti-white.

Yes because of all the important white inventions to turn the planet into a Global Village - like television, the internet and air travel. Oh, and immigration policies. You should be happy that another white invention - the Global Village - is happening because now we have a market place in said Village. Prosperity for all. Long live the Golden Mean! Nope, because there is reproduction going on. Haven't you noticed all the mulatto babies these days? They're everywhere! It's a white government. By your logic you should appreciate everything that they do. If you don't, you are anti-white. Dissenter means anti-white. Yeah, but healthy breeding stock is more important than money. Temporary, remember? It isn't what I want, it is what the white people want themselves since they invented the Global Village and air travel. Oh. And immigration policies. No destruction going on, just evolution.