kactus

I h I hope he gets every dollar he can get for this unprofessional behaviour. Overbooking the flights is NOT the passengers problem but the airline... Fact remains that he had a valid ticket and the brutality he received from the staff is absolutely OTT. http://uk.businessinsider.com/video-police-united-airlines-flight-passenger-removed-plane-2017-4?r=US&IR=T Best way to get airliners like UA to make sure next time they won't overbook their flights....I am sure if you were at the receiving end of this you wouldn't want to be treated that way....

Well given that some of our politicians these days don't even recognise their left arm from the right one let alone be able to address an audience appropriately like the press secretary I think he did the appropriate thing before escalating this into yet another bashing of a groups of people of a certain origin.

Too late for that...Spicer has already apologised for his comments....

Answer the question....Is he nit right wig enough for you just let like Harper? it is not just Trump's sectetary his whole cabinet is a shamble...the resignation of Michael Flynn. The embarrasing speeches by Spicer. He is the press secretary for f@ck sake and it is not the first time he screwed up.... Common admit it BC you just don't like Justin because of your political leniency towards right.....

Why? Because he is not right wing enough for you just like Harper?

Who needs a Sean Spicer? He is an embarrassment as a press secretary.

For once in your life stay out of Canada's business and try to focus on your own domestic issues...Can you do that? Canada can do without you taking on every opportunity to discredit JT for rhe bismal performance of Donald Trump. Even his staff cannot get their act together...

Oh yes. The good old BC's argument to blame it all on Canada...Where is the good old Waldo I wonder....

There is no hope in trying to convince him...Evidence is there....The poor people who Saddam Hussein used those chemicals on were sadly at the receiving end and nothing is gonna change that fact.

So?

Typical argument....Just because Russians and other Arab countries may have supplied Iraq with chemicals it's ok for US...Those handshakes between Saddam and Rumpy in eighties are not just a publicity stunt.....One minute Saddam is the darling of the West for gassing Iranian Kurds in Halabja with western supplied chemicals next he becomes the bad boy....How quickly we forget.... I guess the US does not need to be reminded about "Chemical Ali" legacy of Reagan....The hypocrites..,,

Being a press secretary for WH means keeping your mouth zipped when you don't know what you are talking about. It's a very stupid remark by Spicer regardless in what context it is used....Never had any admiration for this deluded man but it seems like a norm these days for people in Trumps administration to make such stupid remarks and then make an apology.... https://stream.org/spicer-apologizes/

Same can be said when certain groups who blame everything scapegoating every incident to Iranians, Turks, Arabs etc.....Whilst it is wrong to make a mockery of historical events I think there is just too much importance attached to one event (holocaust) whilst ignoring many mini holocausts happening right now! You have seen the blanket statements some make on an entire country with no basis. What I have seen here is a bunch of members colluding together defending an argument to an irrational point with many biases and the occasional interjection by moderators calling for thread drift..... I guess the question I am getting at is why does that moral judgement work for some like a one way street?

They never bloody give an answer on who supplied in the first place all these chemicals in the eighties to Saddam Hussein but quick to jump on the bandwagon and falsely accuse Iran of using it. Oh never mind the Saudi king and israeli government. They are our lap dogs and will dance to any tune we want them to play...

Absolute BS and you are so full of it....Iran did not use did not use any chemical weapons against any other country. But it doesn't stop some people spreading the fear.... Your incoherent arguments to throw in the name of Iran every time you mention the western backed terrorist organisations like Daesh, Al Qaeda, etc, speaks a volume about your propaganda machine on this forum to exonerate the actions of the apartheit state of Israel and wash it off with Iran... Yah! Do carry on with the cover story for the fear of Iran...The real fear...Jog on msn! Finish off what you started. Israel doesn't have the balls and the West should deal with this imaginary fear in your head by confronting Iran.... The problem with zionists like you (and yes I am referring to you rue) is that you sometimes talk from your backside without ever thinking through the consequences for spreading such lies...It just creates a bad smell that throws a spell on a bunch of gullible/ sheepish individulas to buy into these stories and take it as a gospel truth.... I have encountered many people with your views spreading the same horse cr@p to make sure the mud sticks to the wall....Ironically, people expressing such views support a kind of government that is either complicit or actively supporting such savage actions against other nations yet they have the audacity to blame other countries....(Israel's government springs to mind) It is your corrupted government in Israel that has long been spreading fear about Iran and fearing the nuke. Now that the program has stopped ppl like you are still winging and moaning that oh there might be a justification that not a nuclear armed Iran will attack the West (but what you actually mean to say Israel...) The argument for Iran acquiring nuclear capability has always been about the balance of influence in the ME may shift in favour of Iran. Iran despite having the chemicals has never attacked another country but has been subjected to attacks such as Halabja (which for once you have rightfully talked about...Haleluja) It just takes a bit of decency, sanity and common sense to realise why would a chemically armed Iran (as you put it) wants to attack a nuclear armed Israel in possession of 200-400 nuclear warheads according to your own whistleblower 20 years ago Link That is why some apologists for Israel like yourselves don't have the balls to tell the truth. They make up things to provoke Iran to initiate an attack. Just like the baiting you are used to...

The United States the best can do is deal with its own unemployed nationals let alone foreigners....

That's a matter of interpretation...

There's nothing in that sentiment that I would dispute since you agree that change is ineviable.

That's pretty obvious...Even a five year old kid doesn't want to get a bad outcome from a change. That's life! I would argue the place in the middle is infact a very dangerous place to be in because making a good or bad decision is better than making no decision at all! And that's where some of the conservative thinking is stuck in the middle or what I would call that status quo. And guess what when you are in that status quo then life will make the decision for you which is far worse than a bad decision you would have made....

In the context of technology change is the only constant. And for this reason we have reached the point of no return....

The problem with Syria is that there is no credible opposition to Assad if the West tries to topple him. Any rebel opposition friendly to the sunni Saudi Arabia will bolster ISIS.

The intel community does not reveal much....Enough to cause ambiguity... One if the reports saud that the syrian patients are kept in a turkish hospital but they cannot be interviewed...

You have misspelled Syria in your title.

Survival of Assad regime is totally irrelevant to North Korea....maybe China but nothing to do with NK ....That cesspool people keep referring to is very important to the West, Russia and China....But hey only if all the above could keep their nose out of that region...A dream come true!

Wrong...