bjre

Why CAS love to use bias? It is because they want more money. Each child "in care" will bring them money from tax payers. They want use any means they can find to take kids into their control. No matter how dirty it is. They are evils.

Now is not the back time 150 years ago. If boys were sold, that is a crime and we have cops to deal with that. What about the girls? Why have you only responded to the part of the post that dealt with abuse of boys? If girls were sold, that is a crime and we have cops to deal with that. I answered boys because original post talk about boy. Don't use the classic CAS and Canadian politician bias to people from China to talk about this. The ratio of women in Chinese congress and in Canadian parliaments are similar. in Canada, 22.1% of seats in the House of Commons currently held by women. http://www.parl.gc.ca/information/library/PRBpubs/prb0562-e.htm In China, 21.3% seats are occupied by women. http://lianghui.china.com.cn/2009lianghui/2009-03/09/content_17405293.htm (in Chinese) One of the worst human right situation in Canada is caused by CAS or police legal attacking parents based on bias instead of fact. They say because you are from China, Chinese people like boy, your daughter is a girl, so you will not like her, so you will abuse her, and we need to take her away, according to this logic, people from China can not have girl. How ugly CAS is. Did you teach your CAS students as this? Are you a racist?

I think that depend. Sometimes it is not bad. Such as control the content that is not good for children such as porn, suicide, and others. Although I don't like hate be defined as a crime, I think hate speech is not good for public security, so, make it less appear in Internet is not a bad idea. And something both China and Western world did not do is they did not block most of bloody violence content on TV. Others I think China and Canada are in different situation. For China, it is still very weak in many area, the communications need to be protected from the damage from western corporate media which constantly give out lies, partial truth, filtered content that aimed to control to public opinion as they do in western country, because they are too strong and China is not strong enough to resist it, the reason is current Chinese government are not as smart as Mao who can always see the real purpose of his rivals soon enough and tell people the truth. And make action with the power of people. No one in current Chinese government is good at this as Mao can. In 1945, when media was controlled by Nationalist who were supported by the states, Mao easily gained support from most people in the country. And the fact is, China is the best of the world in improvement of its economy. They did it well, why they need change? While in Canada, I think it is better to loosen its control from corporate lobbyist, so that people can know more about the truth, that is definitely good to Canadian people, so that people can vote correct lawmakers that can speak for them, to abolish laws aimed to rob taxpayers and profit huge interest groups. But I believe the most important is education, China has many Confucian style moral taught in school that make people (the future politician) to have integrity. Such as "Others first, me last", "be the first to worry about the problems of the world and the last to enjoy its happiness", "Positioned high at court, they worried about the people. Banished to remote regions, they worried about their sovereigns.", Kindly treat enemy such as 7 times seize an enemy chief of rebel, and 7 times release him until he surrender. Even in kindergarten, kids are singing the song, "big apple give to Wang Xiao Li, small one remain for herself". I think Canada need such education to make future politician some integrity. If politician have the willingness to think of people and work for the interest of most people instead of think of themselves most, the type of the system will not be so important.

The most agreed comment to the news "Loosen internet control, Obama urges China." http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2009/11/16/china-barack-obama.html is: [ quote ] On his next visit, can we get Obama to urge corporate lobbyist to loosen its control of the CRTC, here in Canada, too? [ /quote ] Other high agreed comment include:

Do you think police believe they can find her in the 6000 homes? I don't think so, because they send this message to media before their action, isn't that tell possible criminal (if he is there) to clean up all possible clue before they come? That is not normal style when they feel they can do the job, when they rush to the place before any message leak out.

No matter for what reason, police should not mass intrude public, even if because they are too stupid to find any clue to be able to do their job, or because they just want to tell public that they did not rest when they receive salary from taxpayers.

"Laws are made to protect criminals, ... You know what, If you try to go and sue the government, whose funds are going to use in court? The tax payers. And what you are gonna to get money to fight them? You pocket? " --- from --- And think of the cops involved in Robert Dziekanski case, how about them? nothing even there is a life lost.

I don't think people are willing to pay higher, if you let them choose same quality, most people would choose cheaper one for sure. Why house becomes expensive? The most large problem is morgage. If someone pay $50k for his house and use $50k morgage, he will pay bank 100k in 25 years. So after 25 years, the value of the house will become 150k if ignore any other factors. That is the Number 1 reason. There are many other reasons, include various house related taxes. Higher management cost and insurances cost makes people pay even more. Now new law allow people possible to pay morgage for 30 years, it will add more value to house. So where is the money, it goes to bank, goes to insurance companies, goes to brokers. Who will have to pay it? your children.

Not just asking permission for something, they will threat "under suspicion" or "look at more carefully" if they can not get the permission. In Somalia, pirates ask for permission to take some money, they threat to take someone's life if they can not get the permission.

The question is why decades ago, people in Toronto can afford a house with a simple labor work but now, but their children can not with the same kind of job now.

When a new law defines a higher minimum salary, it makes lots of small business unable to hire, the result is more people will have no job. If people who have different level skills and different life condition are allowed to have different choice either have their own small business or work in relative worse work condition, much less people will rely on social benefit such as EI, less people will have time to crime. When hard time passed or they have better skills though their own effort (such as learning), they can move to better job. the salary can be adjusted by market when they found short of labour, that means free. instead of define a labour hour price artificially by government. and encourage laziness by government. (big business will have more competitors, maybe this is the real reason they want this new law) This is just one of the examples. Now politicians are experts in spent, so that they always find money shortage, they always try to raise more tax, they don't think about how to solve social problems, they just busy in finding more ways to take money. Actually, I don't think they can solve any problem, what they can do is they tell people, they have already spent money on the problems and please pay bills.

I have no idea if the chicken came first or the egg.

I was to young to be a Red Guard, I would be one if I older one or two years. My sister was a Red Guard, I never heard of anyone of her fellow Red Guard did anything not good to society, only what I know is they "learn from Lei Feng", which means help anyone that need to help, such as help senior people in the street to cross street, In Canada I will never do for fear of being sued if I try to help others to catch a thief. I become very cold since I came to Canada. I'd better stay as far away as possible whenever there is an event. There are too many dangerous laws I don't know.

Watched too many TV show, include recent "Law & Order". Find the basic thing police do is make others to trust them and drive their emotion and try to take what they want, even if it is not truth, they can make use of it by their explanation. And they try to explain it like that even you have a good wish, your behavior can be fit in some law item that you never heard of. I hope your children will not be used to collect non sense things against you. I always tell my children think before talk, think what others want before talk, because in Canada, I don't trust anyone except my wife and several friends. I don't 100% trust my kids because I don't know what they teach them in school.

My understanding is that free market capitalism is no longer so free. The expense (include tax for too many unnecessary social services, too many management rules, too many inspectors, police, jail, court, lawyer, legal systems, military system, health system, insurance system, union) has been increased too much so that lots of business can only be run by large groups, small business becomes harder and harder, and lots of such small business even earn less than find a job and work for others. Even large groups found expense is too high. So that when globalization become possible, jobs turn to move to places that have lower cost. Therefor, it is not the free market itself has very large problem, it is the politicians who makes too many laws so that the free market is no longer so free as before. Those laws make huge business groups earn easier and makes protectionism easier to work and make life of ordinary people become harder and harder.

http://www.harpercollins.com/books/9780061859441/Chinas_Megatrends/index.aspx http://www.amazon.com/Chinas-Megatrends-Pillars-New-Society/dp/0061859443

I like this kind of thinking method. Are you grown up in Canada. I guess you are an immigrant too. probably from east Asia that has affected by the culture of Confucius morals, that is normally not include in the western style of education and thinking. If Canadian politicians knows how to use this kind of thinking that put himself into others situation, and if they know "what you don't want done to you, don't do to others", they might be able to have a slightly moral integrity.

If you insist kill all people in the world, the murders will sure be killed. What damage it will caused?

[ Quote ] Although Nealon said Monday that people "certainly" have the right to refuse entry to the police, Sapiano told CBC News that those who deny police entry will come under suspicion. The police service's methods mean "a Canadian citizen is deemed guilty until police are satisfied you are innocent," he said. "And a Canadian citizen who insists on exercising the rights of [a] Canadian citizen is immediately deemed a suspect." Another criminal lawyer, James Morton, said the police force's request of residents didn't amount to "a tremendous intrusion" if there is some reason to believe Makhniashvili is alive. "And certainly if you say no, that doesn't mean you're going to be subject to enormous police scrutiny," he told CBC News. "But it will mean that you'll be somebody the police will look at more carefully." [ /Quote ] http://www.cbc.ca/canada/toronto/story/2009/11/10/mariam-search-police361.html

Now he and his husband come. What kind of empty promise will he bring? Compare with this one, I prefer Miller, although I do not like Miller at all. http://www.metronews.ca/toronto/local/article/364707--will-smitherman-s-furious-george-persona-work-as-mayor

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33704314/ns/us_news-the_new_york_times/It seems that if he has the freedom not to be deployed to Afghanistan, this tragedy might be avoided.

Informative? I did not find from that map how many in the number has also a link with other kind of illness or disease... http://www.calgaryherald.com/health/Alberta+woman+first+H1N1+related+death+Canada/1577557/story.html

Obviously, it is not useless, someone want to make use of it, they want to use that money to another place, so that some other group of people can take it. That is because the money will not return to taxpayers, taxpayers pay more each year as the result of the "hard work" of the law makers.

Thanks god that there is no law to define those who don't get the shot as a criminal yet.

No, I will not get a shot for this. For regular flu, for 2 years in Canada I got shot, I still get flu. the rest of years, I didn't get shot, sometimes I got flu, sometimes not. I believe health balanced food and some sports will better than any kind of medicine. If this time H1N1 has not cause more death than regular flu, why regular flu has not no fully reported as H1N1. It is not only a "Pandemic", it is almost worldwide media campaign, and keep on emphasis on there are another death. But not emphasis how many death is mixed with other kind of diseases. And report some other animals got that H1N1 and with emphasis on the virus has not changed. I even guess it can be somewhat medical company designed with a carefully chosen from new flu that happened every year. They might choose one for sell their medicines. They can make a lot of money from a lot of nations. With the help of media and politicians they can earn even more. But this is a pure guess although I think it is very possible. p.s. If you want to get a shot, please go ahead, I don't know that much.