dub

at the risk of throwing out blanket statements; you are part of the reason why jews hate arabs.

how do you explain iran's second largest jewish population in the middle east after israel? how do you explain the 9+ synagogues in tehran? how do you explain the thousands of jews who have turned down large sums of money and other incentives by israel to move out of iran and to israel? how do you explain the iranian government even allowing iranian jews to travel to israel? that doesn't sound like iran has an irrational hate of jews. i know man... all these facts keep getting in the way of a fake world that you've been trying to create. you're either very ignorant about the situation or you're not an honest person. what's the difference with ahmadinejad saying he wants the zionist regime removed when israel and US continue to say the same thing about the iranian regime?

fact: iran was not pro-german or pro-nazi as you and dog on porch have tried to claim. fact: england and the soviet union attacked iran because iran's neutrality in the war did not allow british supplies to go through it. you can try to go against facts and use "preemptive" as justification for your "iran was pro nazi" comment, but i will keep reminding you that you're not being honest. again, iran was neutral during world war 2.

bad idea for who? maybe for the pro settler, anti palestinian state zionists. but it would be great for the american people who wouldn't have to pay billions a year of their money to israel and they wouldn't have to worry about people hating them for supporting israel's violation of international law.

you're not an honest person.

so what you're trying to say is that iran was not collaborating with the nazis and they were a neutral country as they declared themselves to be. then why have you been posting otherwise? i don't know why you keep contradicting yourself. is there really a point having a discussion with a person like you?

my world is not as black and white as yours. abandoning giving US taxpayer's money to israel would be the best thing US has ever done for itself in a long time.

really. how is your comment proof that iran violated the rules of neutrality? show me how iran violated the rules of neutrality. can you do that or are you going to continue shooting blanks? before you go on your google and wikipedia hunt, read the rules: http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/hague05.asp

nice quote. did you purposely forget the first sentence? where is your claim that britain attacked iran to to end the oil shipments to the the Nazis and becoming a Nazi sattelite.? here is your own quote, maybe you'll learn something from it: The need to pass munitions and supplies of all kinds to the Soviet Government and the extreme difficulties of the Arctic route, together with future strategic possibilities, made it eminently desirable to open the fullest communication with Russia through Persia. The Persian oilfields were a prime war factor. An active and numerous German mission had installed itself in Teheran, and German prestige stood high. there is nothing here about iran breaking the law of neutrality. do you have any more quotes to paste that prove absolutely nothing in regards to your make belief world?

look at your contribution above. another lie. reality was that when hitler invaded the soviet union in 1941, the Allies urgently needed to transport war material across iran to the soviet union, an operation that would have violated iranian neutrality. so they attacked iran.

as orwell has said: To tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to forget any fact that has become inconvenient, and then when it becomes necessary again, to draw it back from oblivion for just so long as it is needed.

what israel has that the arabs/iranians or many other countries don't have is this: Benefits to Israel of U.S. Aid Since 1949 (As of November 1, 1997) Foreign Aid Grants and Loans $74,157,600,000 Other U.S. Aid (12.2% of Foreign Aid) $9,047,227,200 Interest to Israel from Advanced Payments $1,650,000,000 Grand Total $84,854,827,200 Total Benefits per Israeli $14,630 ---- Cost to U.S. Taxpayers of U.S. Aid to Israel Grand Total $84,854,827,200 Interest Costs Borne by U.S. $49,936,680,000 Total Cost to U.S. Taxpayers $134,791,507,200 Total Taxpayer Cost per Israeli $23,240

eh? you're trying to substitute spins, lies and misinformation for reality. you're a liar just like people like bill o'reilly and glenn beck are liars.

iranians partied with germans back during the world war and so they are nazis and shouldn't have nuclear power. WHY CAN'T YOU UNDERSTAND?! dogonporch is here to push an agenda. he doesn't care about the US and even Canada. not the way he cares for the zionist agenda.

tell me when you become interested in talking about the real world and not the fake world you're trying to shove down our throats.

thanx for the opinion articles by Edwin Black, but just like dancer, you've failed, again, to show that iran broke any laws of war when it declared itself "neutral". who cares that there is a sentence about Schacht in wikipedia that says that he convinced iran to call itself "iran" to the outside world. even though iranians have been calling their country iran well before the 20th century. how is that breaking the neutrality law? call me when you're able to show that iran broke the laws of war after it declared itself neutral.

yes. the rebuttal is in the fact that iran followed all rules when it declared itself "neutral" in the war. it's very simple.

israel's definition of "peace" and their definition of many other issues in this conflict is much different than what their true meanings are. israel will always try to justify, one way or another, their reason for sidelining the palestinians when trying to negotiate their future.

JB Globe will have his own reply i'm sure. however, if i may, you keep mentioning hamas like they've been "a problem" for the past 60+ years of the occupation. they were recently elected as the government of the palestinians. what is your excuse for supporting the occupation for the past 60 years or your inability to criticize israel's actions for the past 60 years?

what's wrong with you? iran nazi past? has your posting life become a big illusion? why do you try to twist everything in order to drive home an agenda? why can't you separate yourself from your nationalistic and tribalistic views and tendencies and try to share facts instead of misinformation? every single comment i see you type here has the same old twist on it. iran nazi past? get real.

*i edited my post to reply to a previous post by you* regardless... see what? when iran and iraq had a war, iraq lost some land to the iranians. iran didn't start building settlements on the land with crazy religious zealots who see all of iraq as one greater iran. they left the territory, respecting international borders. so you don't care about international law, eh? so you would be okay if jordon started building nuclear weapons, which is against the NPT, right? or do you prefer that they follow international law? i'm confused here.

what do you mean it's not? if an arab country occupies, lets say... greece and starts creating settlements and begins to annex land saying it's arab land, then i'm sure international law will prevail and something would be done. while israel continues to break international law, you will continue to hear about it.

meaning that you are okay with israel breaking international law. does this mean that you're okay with others breaking international law or you feel it's okay for only israel to do it? lets get this out in the open. just because they're not "ethnically cleansing" the west bank, it doesn't mean that it's okay and it's not illegal.

spare you the "illegal" line? why? when it's illegal, it's illegal. it's very simple and a perfect reason for israel to stop the increasing of the settlements and start finding a way to remove them all.

they are illegal. maybe you missed the memo. they are illegal. get used to illegal settlers in their territory? settlers who see all of the territories as israel? get used to israeli controlled roads that separate palestinian towns, villages, schools and hospitals from each other? i don't think the settlers are about "multiculturalism" and "business of peace". you make funny statements. good old "self defense" argument to continue to break the law. have you ever thought that maybe if israel followed the law, that maybe people wouldn't be as pissed off at them and israel wouldn't need to feel threatened?