dub

maybe the links are baboon proof? i don't know. they all work for me. ps - how did you come to the conclusion that all the sources are anti-jew if you couldn't even access them? predictable.

the links were cut off. look at the list again and see if it's still funny. there seems to be a pattern with you when it comes hearing legitimate criticism of israel's actions: 1 - when brought up: share half truths and misinformation to deny it 2 - when further evidence is shown: try to divert 3 - when the diversion does not work and even more evidence is shown: call the source anti jew your dance routine is quite predictable.

you're not going to like this DoP and dancing man; red cross' view of the use of WP Red Cross Statement

you're replying with more of your fluff. that's all you do. type fluff. there is video footage of WP being used on the UN school. of course, that's probably all made up by anti-semite arab nazis in final cut pro.

israel originally categorically denied using WP, did it not? then after the evidence surfaced, like the dozens of burned victims and even video footage of a UN school being hit by WP, it finally said that it was using it. israel lies? NO WAY! here is a response that a good friend of mine posted last month. he's another self-hating jew:

they are a pressure group. a pressure group that tries to hold those who violate someone's human rights, accountable. you think HRW is the only human rights organization that is critical of israel's track record?

can you show me all these instances where hamas has not allowed their injured to receive medical attention?

weekly standard eh? agenda you say? editor: bill kristol? c'mon DoP. no intelligent person takes that paper seriously. perhaps israel is doing something wrong that has all these human rights organizations criticizing it? it may be difficult to swallow and acknowledge, but israel does do bad things. so what is roth's agenda? what about finkelstein?

?

could you show me where they've reported propaganda and not facts? i'm curious to know why you and dogonporch are so quick to discount HRW and i guess the other human rights organization which has not been granted a visit to the gaza strip to investigate what has happened.

what's roth's agenda besides leading a human rights organization? are what he's saying about israel's use of phosphorous a big lie? i don't get what you're getting it and not sure why you're trying to discredit HWR.

really Mr J? see you in 1 year.

speaking the truth.

i like galloway's angry rants. he's right, most of the zionists are pretty shitty crappy people. they'll walk over anyone or anything for their own selfish gain. it's too bad that some people can't distinguish zionists from jews. i have a lot of jewish friends who absolutely loathe zionism the way i do. how do i know the website is good or bad? i look at the content of course. ALL of the articles i saw on the web site come from other sources. so it's another news site with a collection of articles from other sources. what makes it a decent site is that they share a good number of articles in a decently organized matter. i don't think presstv is based in iran, but i could be wrong.

lol. okay. i didn't use a "quote" to wrap the quote that i already mentioned was a quote. you're really reaching dancer. why don't you run along to a moderator to get a 'ruling'. you're such a child.

not sure what you're babbling about. if you had bothered reading the full article, you would have noticed that IDF lies and according to hundreds of cases, it lies often: does this kind of information from an official human rights organization seem pretty lack luster banal to you?

while dogonporch sits there and shares selective information about the middle east, here is some credible information:

you seem to have a problem with anything iranian or arab. the web site is actually not bad. how are the comments any different than the ones you see on ynet or jpost? how is george galloway a good laugh? does hearing some honesty from a politician make you laugh nervously?

by the same account, it sounds like israel didn't really care about injured civilians by not allowing food and aid into gaza. expanding settlements and having checkpoints as a bargaining strategy? then israel has been bargaining for decades.

i plagiarized a quote? wait. how do you plagiarize a quote from a site that has posted a quote from another person?

the difference is that a lot of these people have reached a living condition, ie; israel's brutal occupation that has created an open air prison for decades, where they're willing to sacrifice their lives in order to fight the occupation. i wonder how many of the surviving gazan children will be turning to suicide attacks after what israel did to them recently.

i agree with that with some of the cases, but they're still canadians and we're in no position to be selective. back to the topic; why the hypocrisy? why does israel continue to scream human shields when describing hamas' tactics when they do it themselves?

let me help out dancer, DoP and the few others with their response; holocaust, terrorists, allah, suicide, drive into the sea, holocaust, anti-semite, terrorists

old news? israel has used the human shield tactics since the court ruling. how and why are you trying to downplay this? just because you type a response, it doesn't mean that you've dealt with the issue and the case is closed. good try though. israel has been accused of using palestinians as human shields in their most recent assault on the gaza strip, as told by amnesty international.