Jump to content

dub

Member
  • Posts

    1,305
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by dub

  1. you're babbling and not making sense. in more than one thread. since you're unable to provide any proof, then we'll conclude that you've lied again.
  2. it's quite a simple question and it seems like you're avoiding to answer it. i'm assuming you're not against the use of human shields. or wait, is your answer: "it depends on who is doing it"
  3. eh? not sure what kind of a response that is to my question, but yeah: can you show me where i have shown support for hamas' terrorist/illegal activities?
  4. hey DoP: is the use of human shields wrong?
  5. 'IDF troops used 11-year-old boy as human shield in Gaza'
  6. 'IDF troops used 11-year-old boy as human shield in Gaza'
  7. when have i not been honest? show me where i have supported hamas to give some credibility to your statement that hamas are my "chums".
  8. when did hamas become my "chums"? what's wrong with you? let us get something straight DoP and i sincerely hope that we don't have to go over it again: my criticism of israel does not equal to the following: - my support for hamas - anti-semitism
  9. why did you quote me and paste something totally irrelevant to what i said?
  10. if they want to achieve justice and peace, they need to approach their internal conflicts differently.
  11. there are many issues at hand here. some things are not simply right or wrong, however, there are some issues which, ie; the illegal settlements which continue to increase. the settlements are wrong. if you disagree with that, go ahead and debate it. all i am cheerleading is justice. is there something wrong with that? what is so wrong when i say we should follow international law? when i see obvious mistakes in describing this conflict, like, for example: "israel unleashed their military because of hamas' rocket attacks" that statement is simply wrong. anyone who has followed and studied this conflict, knows that hamas had not fired any rockets until israel attacked and killed 8 of their members. why aren't we talking about the truth and instead, why are we tippy toeing around the truth and sharing misinformation, exaggerations and lies? one way to resolve a conflict is to be honest about what is really happening instead of spinning the issue. do you agree or disagree with this? i'm not partial to any group. i'm only partial to justice. it just happens that, in this conflict, the palestinians are the ones experiencing injustice. you sound like DoP or Dancer. shame on you. you were doing so well until that comment. can you give me an example of me cheerleading 'terrorists'? again, i have denounced any illegal activity, including terrorist activities by palestinians. i've done nothing but share the truth and try to correct those who have not. if someone says suicide attacks that kill civilians, are wrong, i would not disagree with them and would support their comment without hesitation. i have criticized terrorism and i will continue to do so. on this board, i have not seen anyone who has condoned terrorist attacks. have you? if i ever do, i will speak out. on the other hand, i have seen, time and time again, people condoning israel's attacks on civilians which has left thousands dead. many of them women and children. excuse my language, but, no shit. i'm all for non-violent actions. perhaps you are getting me mixed up with someone else because all i want to see is no violence. what i want you to do is to challenge yourself and actually read what i have to say. next time you see me "support terrorism" or "support violence", please quote me and call me on it. cool? so how about my challenge to you? your accusations and claims about me and my approach to this debate are empty without proof. all you need to do is quote me on what you're accusing me of doing. otherwise, i would appreciate if you would stop with the defamation.
  12. which conflict? how were they the instigators? be a little more clear.
  13. when did i call it a holocaust? just because you know how to press "reply", it doesn't mean that you should type whatever garbage that is on your mind.
  14. speaking of cash. it's too bad for al fatah that they're not guaranteed $3 billion a year of the U.S. taxpayer's money. i guess some don't have the tragedy of the holocaust to milk.
  15. sad for me of course. not for you.
  16. so sad to be reminded of these poor refugees.
  17. that's the problem with arabs. there are still many of them that cannot get along with eachother.
  18. i agree. it would be great if canada did not pick a side and just pointed to the geneva convention and international law when they're looked at for a response. unfortunately, contrary to our past policies, the harper government has clearly picked a side. i'm quite certain that if the western countries did not give political and/or economic support ($3billion a year from the U.S.) to israel, then a solution would come sooner.
  19. the palestinians, for the most part, are the victims in this conflict. so i'm not going to sit here and follow every criticism of israel's actions with something bad that the palestinians have done. i don't see this conflict as a 50/50 situation. my comments about religious/cultural extremism was more about the world in general. the problem here is that our governments have picked a side and the only way for our government to approach this conflict justly and fairly, is for us to say something. so i am saying something.
  20. i take offense to that. okay, now i'm over it. i dislike the zionist culture just as much as the muslim extremist (see wahhabi) culture and the evangelical christian culture. they're all bad for this world.
  21. ignoring ugliness in the zionist culture seems to be your forte.
  22. LOL! george foreman grill! toasters! LOL! nothing to see here kids. it's just a couple of kids (probably reserves) buying and selling tshirts that make fun of killing arab pregnant women with 1 bullet. oh and a rabbi calling this a holy war and telling the soldiers to kill the not-so-chosen people. that's what happens when you poke the kitty cat. purrrr.
  23. you are right about me being selective but you are wrong about me being "dishonest". there is a reason for me being selective; no one disputes that hamas has engaged in illegal activities such as suicide attacks and rocket attacks. however, for some reason, many in the mainstream media have accepted and have justified israel's actions in the palestinian territories, including in the most recent conflict in gaza. don't you find it odd that hamas has been labeled as such a monster here in the west while israel continues to do what it does with little criticism by our governments? it's quite easy for hamas and hezbollah, the palestinians and lebanese, to portray israel as monsters after what happened to them, don't you think? when airplanes, helicopters and tanks shoot missiles into your home and kill members of your family and ruin your life, what do you think the results of that will be? do you know how many civilians were killed and injured? do you know how many will be disfigured for life? do you know how many lost their homes? do you know how many lost a family member? the numbers are quite disproportionate compared to what the israelis have experienced. not to mention the 40+ years of occupation and the settlement increase. not to mention the walls that have cut into their lands. the checkpoints, the assassinations, the frequent kidnapping of people without any justice. it goes on and on. the fact is that those who engage in wrong acts should be held accountable. especially if it's someone who tries to pass itself as the "most moral army in the world". especially someone who is deemed as an ally and a friend and a democracy. especially someone who once experienced brutal treatment by someone else. in your opinion it is. i have in numerous occasions have expressed and condemned what hamas has done. however, this is not a 50/50 playing field. whether you look at the number of times each party has broken international law or how many civilians have been killed, it's nowhere near 50/50. so you're not going to see me follow up my criticism of israel's actions with, "oh and hamas is wrong for..." every single time i bring up what israel has done. this is a simple case of one group, bullying another group. even though i don't agree with some of the tactics the group who is being bullied, to me it's clear who has created this problem and will continue to create problems. most other things are a reaction to israel's policies. i will continue to voice my opinion and stand up for justice. justice would be to, first, stop the increasing of the illegal settlements, and eventually remove all the settlements from the palestinian territory. justice would also mean that, israel would remove the occupation and allow a palestinian state to be formed.
  24. i can see why even DoP is not willing to touch this one.
  25. is that the way holocaust deniers deny the holocaust? "uhm, pics or it didn't happen! i never counted 6 millions jews in the pics!" what? who said 1000 dead children? the report is from the internationally respected PCHR, which has long tangled with both palestinian and israeli authorities in their defense of human rights. you're not being an honest person DoP.
×
×
  • Create New...