Moonbox
-
Posts
8,455 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
37
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Moonbox
-
-
26 minutes ago, CdnFox said:
ROFLMAO!!!! Holy hissy fit batman
We've already finished with your sad little attempt to deny what you said
Yeah, we concluded that you made it up! You spent the last 2 pages of this thread trying to explain why you won't (read can't) provide the quote, and now you want to move on. Spasming out in more paragraphs of written puke doesn't change that you were caught lying and bullshitting...AGAIN!
🤡
-
53 minutes ago, CdnFox said:
Holy shit kid
So your arguement is that people think the vaccines are a great idea - and therefore because they think they're great they don't take them 
Nope. That's just you making up what you want to argue against...again! Too dumb to argue against anyone else, CdnFox can only argue against himself!
Who will win? CdnFox, "Loser of the Year" or CdnFox "Fullretard strawman"? Even odds, I'd say.
-
1
-
-
10 hours ago, CdnFox said:
Yes actually - well medical data anyway:
just 15 percent of canadians though the vaccines were a good idea in 2023.
That's down from 80%. And the doctors were still advising everyone to do it - signs were up at every pharmacy, heard it on the news quite a bit.
Aww...muffin. Why are you talking about polls and prevailing attitudes when there are no actual polls? Is it because you're cluelessly bullshitting again?
Getting the vaccines and thinking the vaccines are good idea are not the same thing. 🤡
-
1
-
-
This is what you were claiming:
On 4/15/2024 at 12:03 PM, CdnFox said:Only a left wing nutjob would claim that a tax worth many billions of dollars per year doesnt' make things more expensive. "Sure we pay tax on it, but that doesn't make the price go higher! Derp!"
This was a fantasy argument you invented to argue against, because you're too dumb to argue with anyone but yourself.
Whatever question you may or may not have asked was probably lost amidst you soiling yourself with pages of worthless rant-spam nobody reads. As for the eventual question itself, now you're the one sealioning, LOL. Refer back to:
-
29 minutes ago, eyeball said:
On the decision making process.
Ever heard of elections?
29 minutes ago, eyeball said:Their monopoly.
That doesn't exist.
-
It gets a lot of money from the UN, the UAE and other muslim states, and let's not forget all the funding from Iran.
-
44 minutes ago, CdnFox said:
The fact you won't even clarify your position on it proves you know you said it
I have clarified my position. It's that the effects of carbon taxes on inflation are grossly exaggerated by know-nothing clowns like you. It was my first post in this thread. I've reiterated it several times.
The fact is that even in light of that clarification, you're so tragically stupid that you kept going back to argue against the point you made up, that someone somewhere ever argued that taxes don't increase costs/prices.
This summarizes pretty much every debate anyone has here with you. You're literally too dumb to argue with anyone but yourself.
-
23 minutes ago, eyeball said:
Not if Ottawa or Victoria or wherever still has the same monopoly on authority they enjoy.
What monopoly is that? On job positions? Private sector still has plenty open...the public sector doesn't. What does that tell you?
23 minutes ago, eyeball said:I don't know...they make me work under the glare of cameras to keep me honest, what makes the decision makers so special?
Who said anything about the decision makers being special?
-
4 minutes ago, CdnFox said:
And the polls and prevailing attitudes suggest that your echo chamber has been exposed as nonsense to the general public, Even the kids are leaving the ndp at this point.
What polls are those? Do you have some new polling that folks (and the medical community) have reversed their thinking on vaccines? Or...are you just cluelessly bullshitting again?
-
10 hours ago, CdnFox said:
Not how it works kiddo.
That's exactly how it works, unless you're an absolute fool and live in clownworld. Proof is always on the affirmative, rather than the negative. If you claim I said something, you need to prove it. I can't quote myself not saying it.
Way to tell us you never received a higher education without actually saying it.
No Education, Employment or Training.
CdnFox - Re:Politic's resident N.E.E.T.
10 hours ago, CdnFox said:If you're claiming you DIDN'T mean that or you DON"T believe that then it takes you 2 seconds to clarify your position and that's your job, not mine.
I didn't say it, so I couldn't have meant it. 🤡
-
5 hours ago, eyeball said:
A lot more local governance and jurisdictional autonomy might correct this. Hopefully the cost of increased redundancy is offset by more realistic efficiency due to a more focused allocation of available resources.
When the problem is too many underperforming and overpaid public servants, and the militant public sector union monopolies and a government that panders to them, you think that adding layers of bureaucracy is going to improve the situation?
5 hours ago, eyeball said:I think the closer a region's politics and decision making processes are to the ground that everyone calls home the better.
I agree with this, but when you have ironclad job security and a sweetheart CBA that ensures you never have to do more than the absolute bare minimum, the decision making priorities are how to maintain the status quo rather than actually improving outcomes.
-
13 hours ago, CdnFox said:
Uh oh.... still refuse to prove me wrong huh
Guess i must have been telling the truth then
If you're claiming I said something, you have to prove. That's how logic and reason work, muppet-brain.
Having a seizure and compulsively spamming emojis doesn't cut it.
-
Still can't find that quote, it seems. Just, 8 more emoji-spasms, and another several paragraphs of worthless carrying on:
-
2 minutes ago, Goddess said:
Well, a good chunk of that was that by the time we got our $2 billion of ventilators, the US had already figured out that's what was actually killing people.
Angry, ignorant Karens and their like. 👍
-
9 minutes ago, CdnFox said:
Other than you
If I did, all you'd have to do to prove it is take 10 seconds to copy+paste a quote. Instead, here you are on page three, still shitting yourself and carrying on like a clown.
-
6 minutes ago, eyeball said:
As naive as a Zionist I suppose.
What, do the Zionists suppose they're getting full reparations hundreds of years of anti-semitism? Don't think so. They barely even got anything out of Germany.
6 minutes ago, eyeball said:Ok, but he'll also be water under the bridge before you know it. Like he never happened.
Maybe, but if he gets what he wants out of Ukraine, he'll have emboldened the regime he built and his successor could carry on with much of the same.
6 minutes ago, eyeball said:This is one very convenient principle. Why don't we use it for Canada's debt, just walk away from it and next week on year it'll be like...what?
We'll be insolvent, our economy would collapse, nobody would lend to us or want to do business with us, and it would probably take us decades to recover. That's why.
-
22 minutes ago, CdnFox said:
Sorry kid, you're the stupid one.
You'd have to be to suggest that taxing something doesn't make it more expensive.
Nobody anywhere, ever said anything even remotely close to that. The only person who did is you, when you were making up things to argue with yourself about. Now we have another half-page of raving emoji spam and worthless carrying on, amounting to nothing more than:
All of this could be resolved with a copy+pasted quote, you hilarious assclown - if only that quote existed outside of your clownworld make-believe. 🤣
-
2 minutes ago, eyeball said:
Is this a new geopolitical principle that's been established by the UN or the authors of history books? Is there a statute of limitations on this business? At what point does it switch from being a crime to tough titties? Some people seem to think it was tough titties for Ukraine from day one hence my question about a statute of limitations of some sort.
Of course it's an established principle. How naive do you have to be to suggest otherwise? Ukraine isn't being supported by the West because of International Law or any steadfast moral principles. It's being supported because Putin is a megalomaniac and geopolitical foe whose ambitions are in everyone's interest to thwart.
Whatever grievances Iran may have against the US/UK etc, decades of poor decision-making doesn't all come back on them, just like you can't blame the Teacher in 5th grade who hit you for the hit-and-run fatality you caused under the influence 30 years later. That doesn't mean the teacher is absolved, but she had nothing to do with you getting drunk and getting behind the wheel.
-
27 minutes ago, CdnFox said:
I CAN - i just don't. Theres' no point. The only reason you ask is to constantly make people run around and post crap rather than deal with the issues.
You can't. That's why you run yourself around posting "crap" for pages and pages trying to explain why you won't prove it, instead of taking a few seconds to copy+paste and actually prove it.
This is the sort of 10-IQ batshit stupidity that makes you comedy gold.
-
4 minutes ago, CdnFox said:
So you can't refute any of the points
And the guy who posts ass porn and fantasizes about it being a 'selfie' is claiming insults and 'verbal diarrhea
You didn't make any points. It was just verbal diarrhea, like 90% of your posts. Thankfully, your ranting and worthless nattering comes with a warning label: compulsive
every sentence.
That means you're having another seizure or something, and thus the substance of your post is nothing more than:
-
1
-
-
2 hours ago, eyeball said:
The dysfunction the US and England initiated in Iran will persist for generations to come.
They may have initiated/helped it along, but 50 years later, blame for this dysfunction lands back home. Iran is a shithole because of its leadership and because its people continue to tolerate it. Colonialism and Imperialism are a lazy excuse for why the Middle East can't sustain anything but repressive dictatorships.
-
1 hour ago, CdnFox said:
LOL - i'm not
I wish i could but I"m just not that good a comedy writer
but you are - you're just not trying to be. 🤡
1 hour ago, CdnFox said:And i quote or point out what you say all the time and anyone can go back and look. I just don't play your stupid sealioning game
Yes, they can go back and look. So can I. So can you. If the quotes you're saying exist are there, you'd be able to take <30 seconds to copy and paste them in lieu of pages worth of batshit nattering on why you won't.
-
1 hour ago, CdnFox said:
I"m not making up what you say - you're responsible for what you say . I know that must be brutally inconvenient at times.
. I simply tell the truth.
You're absolutely making up what I say. That's why you can never, ever quote me actually saying it.
Instead, all we get is you pissing all over yourself with another worthless, long-winded tantrum. 🤡
-
15 hours ago, I am Groot said:
We need a guy with something like a hard-assed Mike Harris mentality that will go in and start laying people off and freezing promotions and hiring.
We do, but the most important thing is getting the public to understand. For the last 10-15 years, the public sector unions have done a better job building their narrative and driving the story. Tone-deaf buffoons like Tim Hudak were easy targets for the Teacher's Unions etc to make them out as villains.
15 hours ago, I am Groot said:Not to mention eliminating all those high-priced consultants.
This is also a problem, but I suspect small potatoes. Part of the problem is nepotism, where contracts are getting awarded to friends and acquaintances with little oversight, the other side of it is that the public service is full of mediocre to useless people who are incapable of doing the work themselves.
Would a mixture of public and private health care solve the health care crisis?
in Federal Politics in Canada
Posted
Yeah I don't really understand what you're saying here at all. 🤷♂️