Jump to content

Moonbox

Senior Member
  • Posts

    9,547
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    47

Posts posted by Moonbox

  1. 53 minutes ago, User said:

    If you don't even know what we are talking about anymore, no worries. Same game you have played before. 

    The only "game" being played here is the T-ball kiddy-shit debating you're attempting on this forum.  Unable to debate what anyone is actually saying, you're compelled to reframe it into a nonsensical make-believe version that you find more convenient and easier to take down.  The problem is that you're not debating with the other person anymore.  You're teeing the ball up and batting 100%...against yourself! 🤡

  2. 22 minutes ago, User said:

    Clearly not. You are flip-flopping... like you have done in the past in our discussions. 

    Flip flopping on what?  🤣

    23 minutes ago, User said:

    You agree it is retarded to force women to have to compete against men though, I agree.

    Except I didn't even do that.  I agreed that transgenders don't belong in women's sports, which isn't the same thing at all.  

    Like clockwork, you've fallen back on your standard procedure:

    Step 1)  Respond to your opponent's latest point with a retarded and completely made-up strawman 

    now we just need to wait for the next part:

    Say The Line Bart GIF - Say The Line Bart School - Discover & Share GIFs

    • Thanks 1
    • Haha 1
  3. 2 minutes ago, User said:

    So, which is it then? Do you agree with me or now you think it was not even an intelligent point?

    I was pretty clear.  Go read it again.  🤡

    3 minutes ago, User said:

    You claim to agree with me now.

    No, I agreed with you that transgenders don't belong in women's sports.  I also pointed out that this was a useless red-herring that has no bearing on how retarded Donald Trump's lies are, and how the MAGA bobbleheads are even more retarded for believing them.  

    • Like 1
  4. 2 hours ago, User said:

    Well, that is just the sports side of things... the point was to show the same stupidity from folks on the left who refuse to define man or woman in any meaningful way so they can further the trans madness they are pushing. 

    Right, so you didn't actually have a point, or at least not an intelligent one. 

    As you've already acknowledged, calling out the mind-warped stupidity of Donald Trump's endless stream of bullshit doesn't require buy-in to out-of-touch gender politics.  

    2 hours ago, User said:

    There is no "debate" here, this is a thread started for no other purpose than to attack and label "MAGA" with hasty generalizations and absurd baseless assertions. 

    Except they were neither absurd, nor baseless 🙃.

    This thread was created to mock and point out all of the retarded things Donald Trump says, the even more retarded lies he tells, along with how the witless MAGA monkeys clap their hands and cheer at being lied to.  

    Your counterpoint was your typically brilliant:  "but but but the immergants and ladybois!"  🫠

    • Like 2
  5. 13 minutes ago, User said:

    This thread is not the only place we have discussed these topics...

    When the search function returns, feel free to do a deep dive on it it.  We both know you'll come back empty handed. 

    16 minutes ago, User said:

    Well, since you love to play this technicality game and obfuscate, and folks muddle the meaning of words like men and women... lets be more specific:

    What is your position on a biological man, who is trans and identifies as a woman, playing against biological women and the policies of government/organizations in "forcing" biological women to have to compete against those biological men if they want to compete?

    Same answer as before.  I don't think it should be allowed. 

    Maybe now you can explain what you hoped to accomplish with this useless red-herring, and what relevance it had to the debate?  🙄

    • Like 1
  6. 15 hours ago, User said:

    Well, no... I can't do much of anything right now and neither can anyone else because the search feature is not working. 

    This thread isn't very long...

    15 hours ago, User said:

    All you are doing is saying I can't show you... so, tell us, what is your position then?

    That men shouldn't participate in women's sports!  Now what, genius?  🥱

    • Thanks 1
    • Haha 1
  7. 18 hours ago, User said:

    See, in the end you are just as dishonest as you sit here decrying Trump for being. 

    We both know you can't show where I said I support men beating women in sports, anywhere, ever, but this sort of mind-warped fantasy is standard procedure for you in almost literally every one of your "debates".  

     Step 1)  Respond to your opponent's latest point with a retarded and completely made-up strawman 

     Step 2) Squeal about dishonesty when the opponent points out that you made it up.  

    That right there accounts for about 95% of your content on this forum, and it's why engaging with you is a waste of time unless someone is bored and looking for a quick chuckle.  🥱

    • Like 2
  8. 2 hours ago, User said:

    Sure... I already knew you were avoiding the point. The fact that you and others are making such a big deal out of the whole eating pets issue was motivated to avoid this point on the failures of immigration policy under Biden. 

    People made a big deal out of it because it was batshit insane.  Whether or not something needed to done about immigration and the border does not diminish how buffoonish and out of touch with reality it was to repeat that on national television.  

    2 hours ago, User said:

    Just like you went down this rabbit hole to avoid having to answer for your own shameless lying and obfuscation to support men beating women in sports and forcing men into women's personal spaces... 

    Something you literally and completely made up.  Not only is it kind of pathetic how much time you waste crying and whining about "dishonesty" as soon as someone says something you don't like, it's truly farcical coming from you of all people.  If you actually cared about honesty, you wouldn't spend the bulk of your time here fluffing for the World's Biggest Buffoon/Liar/Bronzer.  🤡

    • Like 3
  9. 1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

    That depends on the circumstances and frankly...who you ask.

    Well I was asking you.  

    1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

    Now I'll ask you a question. If you find out that a candidate lies habitually and is a thief AND is in business with someone you dislike, do you cast a vote for that candidate?

    That would depend on whether I was "finding it out" from a credible source, or if I was "finding it out" from reshared facebook and twitter posts and conspiracy blogs.  🙃

  10. 10 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

    The carney will do whatever Trump wants. Trump owns his a55.

    If you say so, but you still didn't answer the question.  If the lines on your conspiracy chart connecting Carney to Kushner are real, is it a good or a bad thing for our PM to have an "in" with Trump's family?  🤔

  11. On 5/2/2025 at 7:27 AM, Nationalist said:

    Elbows Up. The lie of the election. The carney is in business with Trump's son-in-law.

    So as a Trumpy yourself, do you consider this a good thing or a bad thing?  

    This is a fascinating line of attack.  Let me get my notebook before you respond....

    • Like 1
  12. 16 hours ago, User said:

    You can agree... but you certainly do not seem to. 

    Because that's how you reframe the debate to avoid addressing the point at hand.  Whether Joe Biden's immigration policy was bad or whether he was a vegetable have nothing to do with how much of a shameless liar Trump is, nor does it excuse or explain all of the truly retarded things Trump says.  

    16 hours ago, User said:

    I know what the possibilities are.

    Doesn't seem like it! 🙃

  13. 1 hour ago, User said:

    No, it is a dishonest tactic how you don't give one crap about the larger issue and only want to focus on this instead, and exaggerate about it.

    No, it's the understanding that this isn't a mutually exclusive choice.  I can both agree with the idea that the Biden woefully mishandled immigration, and at the same time, I can also recognize that Americans elected a blustering assclown whose relationship with the truth is virtually non-existent. 

    To simplify:  I don't need to rationalize the utter stupidity of suggesting immigrants were eating people's pets, to also believe that American immigration policy was bad.  🙃

    • Haha 1
  14. 52 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

    LOL...a lot of you Libbies still think Brandon was mentally fit. That the border was closed.

    I saw his attempt to debate.  He's a vegetable.  That's the difference between deluded clowns like you, and functional humans with working brains.  Normal people can take in inconvenient or unpleasant information and deal with it, rather than needing to distort reality around themselves to continue living in fantasy.  

    57 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

    Enjoy being a loser.

    Enjoy the next 4 years of Liberal government, LOL.  🤡

    • Haha 1
  15. 17 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

    Is that honest? Seems there's quite a bit of folks who don't believe that.

    A lot of people believe the lunar landings were fake and that 9/11 was an inside job.  They're still retarded.  🤷‍♂️

  16. 25 minutes ago, User said:

    Yeah, this started off as some off-hand comment made based off a comment from someone in that community, as part of a larger point, and then instead of caring about the community being impacted by this massive influx of immigrants and the hardships caused to them, you guys on the left hyper-focused on just that one thing so you could dishonestly ignore the rest.

    Riiiiight. 

    It's not the brazen lying or the batshit distortion of reality that's dishonest.  It's the folks who point it out and don't twist their brains into pretzels trying to excuse and rationalize the lying that are being "dishonest".  

     Yeah..Totally.  Mhmm 🙄👍

  17. 53 minutes ago, User said:

    Yes, I will gladly take the policy being executed over OMG, they repeated something they heard about Haitians eating pets without better verification and then Democrats hyper focused on that and went crazy!

    Without better verification?  🤣

    The batshit absurdity of the claim was the first step in the verification process.  A functioning critical mind demands ironclad verification for something as ridiculous as that, or dismisses it right out of the gate.  Instead, the Lord Of Bronze announces it to a national audience, and his pliant chucklef*cks nod their heads, clap and exclaim "Yup Yup Yup!"

    • Thanks 1
  18. 2 minutes ago, User said:

    "campaigned"

    There are not eye rolls big enough. 

    I mean, I'd say the debate qualified as part of the campaign, no?  That fat buffon literally went on national television to tell everyone they're eating the cats, they're eating the dogs, they're eating the pets of the people who live there. 

    You're like, "THAT'S MY GUY!"  🤣👌

     

    • Thanks 1
  19. 2 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

    Duhhh, Dude....so did the Liberals..... and whats more, they got more votes than the conservatives :)

    And therefore, they won the election. Are attempting to jump in the LOSER bucket?? It is quite full already LOL

    Popular vote

    Liberal 

    8,594,003

    Conservative 8,105,861

    So, your point is moot :)

    Yeah but, yeah but, yeah but...the Liberals STOLE/BORROWED temporary votes from the NDP/Bloc, and every single Conservative vote is a guaranteed vote from the base that will 100% be there next election!  🫠

  20. 12 minutes ago, User said:

    This entire thread was an effort on your part to assign hateful things to MAGA and anyone associated with the use of that political / campaign slogan. 

    Well you voted for a guy who campaigned against the fictional kidnapping and barbequing of family pets, so at a certain point you have to "call it like it is". 

    Stupid.  

  21. 1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

    You have a lot of accusations and made-up chickenshit designed to shock and scare the mindless. But a real and honest point? No.

    A real and honest point is that Donald Trump lost in 2021, and you never even managed to admit that.  🤡

  22. 2 minutes ago, User said:

    I was making a point about the stupidity of folks like you trying to define MAGA when you refuse to define woman in any meaningful way. 

    That's what you think you're doing, but it would probably break your brain to consider that a lot of so-con/RINO style conservatives or softer democrats etc would agree that a biological woman is a woman, and that Trans-women aren't the same nor should they be considered the same.  

    As out-of-touch and contemptible as runaway social justice had become, it pales in comparison to the hysterical overreactions of the MAGA culture-war circus.  Where a trans person poops is not the existential crisis of our time that you would have us believe.  

×
×
  • Create New...