Moonbox
-
Posts
9,551 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
47
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Moonbox
-
-
9 minutes ago, CdnFox said:
Everybody says so dude. He's right you're wrong.
I have to wonder what your little pea-brain thought this sort of comment would accomplish. 🙃
-
19 hours ago, Army Guy said:
Have you read your posts , the only one whining is you...I'd high five you if you had anything of value to say...but thats rarely happened...
Because you say so? 😆
When you gauge the "value" of what people are saying based on how much it agrees with what you've chosen to believe, your opinion on this is worth less than nothing.
Somehow it's lost on you how ridiculous you make yourself look whining about insults while happily throwing around your own, and upvoting the endless stream of insults from our forum's biggest troll.
Have you ever heard of....double-standards?
20 hours ago, Army Guy said:it's why you won't put me on ignore, because you can't ....
...and miss out on your deeply informed gems of wisdom? No thank you sir!
-
2 hours ago, CdnFox said:
If the behavior is predicated on your loss, then it MUST be you who has determined that. It would not be possible for your behavior to be based on MY determination. That wouldn't make sense.
That's why I said "supposed" behavior.
It's still just you projecting.
It's still just you insisting on both what the behavior is, and what causing it. While you spiral out raving in paragraph form at the latest person laughing at you. 🙃
-
23 hours ago, Army Guy said:
Becasue this is all you have, this is why your on this forum, to attack/ insult people....just go back through all your posts maybe 10 % sees you contribute to the conversation the other 90% is insults and you getting angry...
To have you of all people complaining about insults is a laugh. 90% of your posts are clueless, buffoonish b*tching and ranting, and then inevitably lashing and insulting the people who contradict or correct you. Meanwhile, you bounce around high-fiving the insults and tantrums of the biggest no-life troll this forum has ever seen
Put me on ignore, or quit being a crybaby. Whining and moaning about the fight you keep running straight back to is babyshit. You're a joke.
-
43 minutes ago, CdnFox said:
No i did not. I pointed out your behavior when you lose, and that's not the same thing at all
If the supposed behavior is predicated on my apparent "losing", and you're the one who's determining who lost, it's absolutely the same thing. This is more retarded Fox donkey-logic.
I'm sorry if your own words make you look stupid, but nobody does a better job of that than you. 🤡👍
-
17 hours ago, CdnFox said:
Let me explain basic logic and reason to you. Or at least as it applies here
Oh boy. This should be good. 😆
17 hours ago, CdnFox said:You are making the claim that the books being removed are a sign that they were inaccurate or untrustworthy.
Yes. That's called inferential reasoning. If the books got removed shortly after being highlighted in a National Post article about AI spam and misinformation, and the AI that wrote it got something as basic as where Carney went to university wrong, it's probably wasn't very credible.
21 hours ago, CdnFox said:Therefore the onus would be on you to demonstrate that this was the reason the books were removed.
If you can't then your point is invalid.
No dumdum. The fact that Amazon, Indigo etc didn't issue press releases, or that the author can't be reached for comment on why the books were removed doesn't somehow (magically) make them credible.
Maybe you have some insights on who the author is, or why anyone would trust self-published AI generated spam? No???
Thanks for the "logic" lesson! 🤡👌
-
17 hours ago, CdnFox said:
I never told you you lost. I told you the way you behave when you lose is it pretty bad.
In this thread you told me I was losing, and it's the same thing. In your little pea brain, you figure that if you insist hard enough that you're winning and the other guy is losing, this somehow manifests in reality.
Unfortunately, we already know that this is a fool's game:
-
5 minutes ago, CdnFox said:
Did they say they removed them for errors??
Why don't we try your logic for a change:
Did they say they didn't remove them for errors?
🤡🤡🤡
-
2 hours ago, CdnFox said:
BuT I DiDn'T HaVe tO TeLL YoU, YoU jUsT aCt tHiS waY wHeN YOU ThInK iT
You -"I lost! ANd now i'm going to chase you and yap like a Chihuahua in revenge ! "
Me "It's not good to behave that way just because you lost"
You : "HA!!!! You told me i lost!!! HA!"
No punkin, what i said is behaving this way just because you lost is childish and dumb. Unfortunately you were too childish and dumb to see the difference
All of this wailing and gnashing over being confronted by your own words:
The amount of time you spend on this forum insisting to people they've lost to your belligerent stupidity is only matched in stupidity by the fact that by your own words this means they've beaten you. 🤣👌
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, CdnFox said:
Well then there must be a bunch of things it got wrong. Apperently despite looking they've only found one fairly minor bio error in 3 books
Riiight, and that's why all three books were removed from sale by the vendors, and why the National Post published an article about them...because of their accuracy.
With donkey-logic like that, it's no wonder you're able to convince yourself you win all these debates. 🤣
-
12 hours ago, CdnFox said:
You know I was just about to post in the other thread how seeing is your angry about losing once again I could expect to see you following me around and making random comments and here you are
"If yOU haVE to teLL thE otHEr gUy he lOst, then He PrOBAbly WoN:
If
-
1
-
-
15 hours ago, CdnFox said:
My intelligence and learned conclusion
You could have stopped there and we'd have had just as good a laugh as if you continued.
15 hours ago, CdnFox said:you have no basis or grounds for dismissing the rest of the content of the books of which I believe there were three?
Other than that they were AI-generated slop that got something as basic as where Carney went to university wrong, and that they were all taken down and removed from sale shortly after being released...
CdnFox's intelijent and lernd conclusion:
"YERP YERP TOTALLY LEGIT" 🤣
-
I'm just really glad that you kept yourself busy over the long weekend with friends/family/life activities.
....
Oh wait...you're a complete no-life and you were pounding away at your keyboard the whole time.
-
1
-
1
-
-
2 hours ago, CdnFox said:
He/she presumably wouldn't be so daft is to claim there were errors unless they could demonstrate them.
I've demonstrated that it was it was written by AI, that Bloomberg discovered right at the beginning of the book that the AI couldn't get a detail as basic as where Carney went to university correct, and I've demonstrated that the book has been removed from sale/circulation by the vendors.
Your donkey-brained conclusion:
"Yerp yerp tortally legit source!" 🤡
-
15 minutes ago, CdnFox said:
A reasonable and thoughtful person would expect that if there were more mistakes they would have been found.
Who's to say they weren't?
I'd say the fact that the book's been completely removed from stores/vendors, and that looking it up yields this forum on the first page of a Google Search suggests there was something fishy about it. Not to you though...of course not.
Speaking of a reasonable and thoughtful person, he/she wouldn't ask someone to find mistakes in a book that cannot even be found anymore.
15 minutes ago, CdnFox said:So you couldn't find any other mistakes
You and Army Guy can wallow in the intellectual muck together. 🫂
-
On 5/17/2025 at 5:19 PM, Army Guy said:
No you wouldn't , if it is not me then it's some other on this forum that you'll attack for endless pages of nonsense...
Then what do I need you for?
Put me on ignore or stop whining. You're just embarrassing yourself.
-
On 5/17/2025 at 5:26 PM, Army Guy said:
Thats all you got is one mistake, out of 388 pages One mistake....on a book that gives carney a glowing review, and your still not happy, mind you voted liberal, i'd be a tad upset as well ....sorry your going to have to do better....
Right, it was "just one mistake"...
When the AI can't even the most basic facts straight, a reasonable and thoughtful human being would suspect that there'd be a great many other errors in those 388 pages. Nobody ever accused you of being thoughtful or reasonable though, so don't worry.
I know it sucks being the sucker, so if you want to pretend that this book was legit despite the fact that it's been removed from sale everywhere and that this forum now comes up on the first page of a Google Search for it, go ahead.
That doesn't change the reality. It doesn't change the fact that you didn't just fall for AI-generated slop. You paid for it.
-
9 hours ago, CdnFox said:
I know you think that if you use that term you'll sound intelligent but really you just sound out of touch. You probably don't know much about computers but AI is actually considered to be a pretty powerful research tool these days
Yes, it certainly can be. Check this out:
It can also be used to program shovelware, to barf out and spam click-bait articles/videos and flood social media with propaganda (slop).
10 hours ago, CdnFox said:Can't refute the important parts of the book that he's referring to then that strongly suggests that they are fairly accurate.
Two things:
1) When the National Post publishes an article highlighting how this "author" published three different books within weeks of one another, when they weren't even capable of getting basic stuff right like where Carney went to university, and when the vendors all pull the books off the shelves within a few weeks, I'd say it strongly suggests the opposite.
2) Nobody else was foolish enough to fall for this and read it, let alone pay for it.
-
9 hours ago, CdnFox said:
Exactly!
And you kept zooming in till it didn't look like there was so much blue
Exactly! and then Treebeard showed us much red there was in Alberta, because you're apparently so dumb that someone had to explain that the amount of paint on the map isn't important, but rather the number of seats won.
When this level of stupidity
is how you convince yourself that you're right, it's no wonder you think you're batting 100.00%
-
37 minutes ago, Army Guy said:
Yes a book generated by AI, a process that millions are using today, a book that somehow people like you have only found one mistake
Yes, AI-generated slop that didn't even get a basic editing or fact-checking pass, self-published by a guy who released at least two other books on Carney within weeks of each other.
If anyone was going to fall for that, of course it was you.
42 minutes ago, Army Guy said:Attacks, there are literally thousands of pages that you have created with absolutely no value at all , except to trade insults...it is what your here for...
Nobody spends more time on this forum crying about attacks and insults than you, and usually in the same breath as you're delivering attacks and insults. 🥴
-
27 minutes ago, Army Guy said:
This is what i've been saying over and over again, nothing of any value.........God i'm going to miss your banter when your gone....
At any moment you can put me on ignore. I'd be happy not hear from you. 👍
-
18 minutes ago, CdnFox said:
Dude you are wrong literally every time we talk
Right, like how the Conservatives "swept" the GTA? 🤡
-
9 minutes ago, User said:
I have already made my position throughout this thread.
The topic might change, but your "position" is the same in every thread:
Step 1: Respond to disagreement by making up a retarded strawman to argue against
Step 2: Squeal and moan about dishonesty when your opponent pushes back at your make-believe
-
1 hour ago, CdnFox said:
So. What were you saying about hyper partisans who just spout any old lie to prop up their tribal echo chamber? LOLOLOL
The blind squirrel finds a nut once in awhile. Good job muppet. You finally got one. 👍
99/100 times, I'm pretty comfortable giving eyeball the benefit of the doubt over a chucklef*ck like you.
Carney, Master Economist, Refuses To Table A Budget This Year.
in Federal Politics in Canada
Posted
In other words, you're so fragile that a casual one-liner sends you spiraling into yet another useless, longwinded rant. 🥱