Moonbox
-
Posts
8,988 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
40
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Moonbox
-
-
14 minutes ago, CdnFox said:
Provincial statues spell out restrictions. They say what must be done and what can't be done. They don't impart rights.
You dropped a link, but no quotes or references to what you're saying. More useless make-believe from our resident know-nothing. 🤡🤡
-
1 minute ago, User said:
Oh my... well, great discussion then.
Who cares!
The question remains, what is it about this that you find so outrageous?
1 minute ago, User said:I think the visuals on this are enough to be concerning, and it is not any one individual piece; it is the whole thing together.
Not much of an answer I'm afraid.
If you were actually concerned about the behavior rather than just the partisan angle, you'd have also brought up shameless Putin-shill and authoritarian Viktor Orban, who's "attacked" the Biden administration, openly endorsed Trump (who subsequently lavished him with farcical praise during the last Debate) and who wined and dined him at Mar-a-Lago. The "visuals" for that don't look so hot either.
1 minute ago, User said:I think you get that too, so you keep disingenuously breaking them up as you did here.
I think you may actually believe what you're saying, but it's just blind partisanship.
The whole reason for remaining neutral regarding foreign elections is to not pre-emptively antagonize the other side (who may end up winning). If JD Vance hadn't spent the last year undermining the Ukrainian war effort and making it clear he'd throw them under the bus, Zelensky would have nothing to say about him.
Had Zelensky spoken out against the Democrats, we'd not hear a peep out of you over it. What bothers you about this is the angle.
-
1
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, CdnFox said:
There are no rights for landlords and your weird hissy fits and mental defects don't change that.
The right of landlords spelled out in Provincial Statute. A 5+ page tantrum and a bunch of useless ranting doesn't magically reorganize reality and the Law to save you from this shockingly stupid claim.
Here's a refresher for you below:
https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/06r17/v8
Residential Tenancies Act of Ontario:
Purposes of Act
1. The purposes of this Act are to provide protection for residential tenants from unlawful rent increases and unlawful evictions, to establish a framework for the regulation of residential rents, to balance the rights and responsibilities of residential landlords and tenants and to provide for the adjudication of disputes and for other processes to informally resolve disputes. 2006, c. 17, s. 1.
🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
-
47 minutes ago, User said:
Was it the American military flying him down there for that visit? When he was down there, was he giving interviews to attack Biden and Harris?
Who cares? You're drawing petty, irrelevant distinctions that only matter because it goes against your tribe.
It's outrageous that a wartime leader from a nation under attack and whose enemy is trying to kill him is being transported in a military plane? Really???
47 minutes ago, User said:All of these things have been pointed out, and you conveniently ignored them.
Not ignored - dismissed as hypocritical, partisan commentary. You're ignoring that Vance has been actively undermining Zelensky and Ukraine vs Russia - something you've argue against on this forum yourself. It's not okay for Zelensky to respond? Or is just not okay for him to respond in...Pennsylvania?
Is peddling deranged nonsense like Haitians kidnapping pets and cooking them not...radical?
-
22 hours ago, Boges said:
People voting for him are voting for the party, not the person. He's clearly diminished.
People are voting for that Orange Baboon, not the Republican Party. It's nothing but sycophants and weaklings now, and most of them can't get re-elected if they speak out against him. Look at how they scramble and cope with all of the batshit things he says, desperately trying to reconcile it with reality somehow.
"Okay, they weren't literally kidnapping and eating pets, but Trump was rightly pointing out the immigration crisis in Springfield..." 🙄
-
1
-
1
-
-
30 minutes ago, User said:
The GOP Invited him to talk to Congress, where everyone is at, both Democrats and Republicans, not a major campaign state.
The GOP invites Netanyahu, he delivers a clearly partisan speech, dines at Mar-a-Lago with Trump, and this is OKAY.
Viktor Orban attacks Biden and his administration, pals up with Putin, hangs out with Trump at Mar-a-Lago and endorses Trump, this is also OKAY.
Zelensky gives an interview where he says Vance (who's been arguing for some time that Ukraine should roll over and make concessions to Putin, and who's also been claiming Haitians are kidnapping and eating pets) is too radical...and this is NOT OKAY.
Interesting logic there mister. The line in the sand is...what? That it was Pennsylvania?
-
2
-
-
1 hour ago, CrazyCanuck89 said:
What low score games? Miami just scored 3 points on Sunday and they have one of the best Recieving duos in the league.
Miami's quarterback has a brain injury, their backup's name is Skylar (he also got injured), and so they're playing with a dude who wasn't even better than...a Skylar!
As for CFL scores, I'm willing to believe they're not low scoring. I'm pulling from years-old memory and my utter lack of interest in the League doesn't make me much of an authority on what it's up to today. 😆
-
7 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:
There are videos of cats being grilled,
No, there isn't. There may be a video of a grill with meat on it, and some clowns calling it cat, but that's it.
7 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:Haitians carrying geese they poaching
A guy carrying roadkill off the street...that's evidence of cats and dogs being kidnapped and eaten? LOL
7 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:But, you are right, don't believe all the evidence.
What evidence? People saying goofy shit online is evidence now? Oookay.
-
2
-
-
19 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:
Or for fu ck's sake. Ain't nobody claiming democrats are drinking blood other than some .001% guys.
Maybe, but you had the Republican Nominee raving about Haitian illegals kidnapping pets and eating them during a televised debate, which is every bit as ridiculous. Those living under Trump's reality distortion umbrella (numbering far more than the .001%) believe it because he said so, or because they saw a video on Twitter, but the more reasonable among Republican voters are left having to cope with the cognitive dissonance of their candidate regularly saying batshit nonsense.
-
On 9/22/2024 at 6:39 AM, Michael Hardner said:
To believe that Dominion was at fault, you would have to believe that the entire legal system was compromised.
You're saying it's not??? The whole system is compromised. The courts, the media, the FBI, the administration...all run by lizards.
-
1
-
-
25 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:
My question is why is it only CRA employees? Is no other government agency investigating to find out if any of those employees illegally got CERB payments?
My guess is it would be really easy for CRA to investigate their own employees on this because they already have the information at their fingertips.
As for the rest of the federal public sector...well...the Liberals really need those votes. 😑
-
3 minutes ago, CdnFox said:
If i'm saying categorically retarded things then in your case i'm writing for my audience
Your audience is yourself, and nobody else...so I guess you're right in a way. 🤡
-
1
-
-
If you're saying categorically retarded things, that's the best response you're going to get. You're literally too stupid to debate with.
-
1
-
-
Yap yap yap yap yap. 🙄
-
1 hour ago, suds said:
From what I have read, property rights can be traced back to 1215 (the year the Magna Carta was signed). They are also included in the English Bill of Rights (1689).
Oh you sweet innocent child. This is way too smart and complex for the person you're responding to.
-
1
-
-
33 minutes ago, Army Guy said:
You just can't help yourself, you feel the need to be right all the time, at first i thought it was the other posters,that you engaged but it is not it is just you....just man up and admit your wrong...
So...let's get this straight:
You felt compelled to rehash a previous discussion in which at least three people laughed you out of the conversation, but I'm the one who just can't help myself.
I need to admit that I'm wrong, because...you quoted the Kazakh Prime Minister? Or because you said so? 🙄
That's some funny shit man.
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, Army Guy said:
You don't take Loosing very well....
Like so much of the rest of your useless natter, insisting on something doesn't make it true. 🤡
-
19 minutes ago, CdnFox said:
THis from a guy who didn't realize that constitutional law predates and supercedes the parliament
You can make up whatever dumb nonsense you like, everyone can see it's coping after you made yourself look like an assclown. How many threads can you get laughed out of today, do you figure? More than yesterday, or less? It'll be entertaining regardless!
-
2 hours ago, User said:
OK, now I know you are just screwing with me. There is no way... no way you are this stupid, certainly you are this much of a liar.
Have a couple more conversations with the guy. You'll figure it out pretty quick. 😆
-
2
-
-
6 hours ago, Perspektiv said:
All you have left is to deny it being false, insult and happy face emoji your way to most posters giving up at how pathetic you are, so you can tell yourself you won the debate.
You're not the first person to tell him that, or even the 10th, and you won't be the last.
-
On 9/21/2024 at 8:51 PM, I am Groot said:
The people with the clout to talk to politicians and get small, little-noticed alterations made to the voluminous tax codes are generally the representatives of the very well-off. And incrementally, year by year, the tax codes have changed to provide a ton of small loopholes that aren't really accessible to ordinary people. That's how we have the rich - not the rich as defined by Trudeau but the guys who have limosines - have managed to slash their taxes by so much.
I have to say, I've come to appreciate your posts more and more over the last year, even if I frequently disagreed with you. Whatever your positions are, they're at least very clearly your own. You're not just another ignorant opinion shouter regurgitating tribal mantra.
I always get a laugh out of the geniuses who've never opened an economic textbook try to teach us about trickle-down economics, and how sheltering the wealth and reducing the taxes of the ultra-rich who are exporting their jobs to Bangladesh is good for them.
-
On 9/20/2024 at 10:03 PM, Army Guy said:
2...It was a warning to the Germany....passed on from Putin , warning him about giving permission to Ukraine to use germany's long range missiles....To which Germany refuses to give permission because they are afraid of what Putin will do...
It said nothing about missiles whatsoever. Once again, you're just making up what you want your sources to say.
Regardless, you're unironically citing the Kazakh Prime Minister proclaiming Russia's military as invincible, while it faceplants in Ukraine. 🤣
On 9/20/2024 at 10:03 PM, Army Guy said:3....It's NOT meters per day i've show you this dozens of times....it is also covered in almost every news media station there is....this is a "you" comprehension problem not a my problem...
You haven't shown squat. Dumping dozens of useless/irrelevant news articles doesn't somehow re-organize reality and re-draw the maps for you. Even on the hottest part of the front, Russian progress is measured in meters per day. At no point over the last two years have they managed any sort of sustained progress beyond that, and what little there has been has been highly local.
At Russia's current rates of advance, they'll complete their conquest of Ukraine in around 1000 years. That's the math, and it doesn't give a shit about your snowflake opinion.
On 9/20/2024 at 10:03 PM, Army Guy said:your now making the augments you don't like my posting style or it is me that does not understand the sources i posted...this is not just me....you do this with everyone you post to...if they don't hold the same opinion as you....your never wrong and will argue to the death despite being wrong...
You complained I wasn't reading your longwinded rants. I told you why. If you're too lazy to organize your thoughts and write concisely, you're wasting nobody's time but your own. Barfing out cites that don't say what you pretend they do is similarly worthless.
I always get a chuckle out of this sort of clueless whine-post though. You're complaining that I argue to the death while you...argue to the death. It's kind of like crying like a child about marshmallow insults after you just finished calling another poster retarded. Look at the mirror and grow up.
-
On 9/21/2024 at 2:27 AM, CdnFox said:
Awww - Best you had kiddo?
Couldn't even post a childish meme or pretend it's cause my posts are so long? LOL
We both know the truth. You screwed up and wound up looking stupid again. It's there in black and white. There's no 'convincing' it's just a thing that happened.
Yes, we both know the truth. You've said some utterly ridiculous, easily-disproven things and fully humiliated yourself...again.
All that's left now is your flailing and pitiful attempts to re-arrange reality to try and save face. It's all there, in black and white. Your coping mechanism doesn't require much of a response. 🤡
-
Who do you think you're convincing here? 🤣
Kamala Just Slammed Her Economy
in Federal Politics in the United States
Posted
That sure is some articulate criticism you have there. 😐