Moonbox

Okay, what does that have to do with the WEF?

Sure, but you can't explain how they'd end up being the actual gatekeepers. Rather than it being a joint effort between the Netherlands and Canada (and other partners that join), why is the WEF the one in charge?

Why not? Maybe they thought it was a good idea and other people agreed. Why are we worried about the WEF being involved again? I'm still waiting on an answer for that. I'm asking questions and you can't answer any of them.

So now use that kernel of truth and examine your own theories and worldviews. Ask questions like, "How does this make any sense whatsoever?" "Is it possible for this many people, organizations and governments across the world to be in on the same conspiracy." just for a start. Come back to us in a few weeks and let us know how you made out.

Why is the WEF in control, rather than a joint venture by all parties involved, who'd be bound by electronic privacy laws in both Canada and Europe? Ask the questions, by all means. If you're going to make conclusions, however, you have to be able to explain them properly, rather than referring vaguely to other unrelated issues that have little/nothing to do with this one - especially when the conclusions you draw on those other issues are equally poorly explained and rationalized.

That's the conclusion you draw from this - that the WEF would control all travel and commerce? Explain the process to me here. Please. The leap in logic you make there is about....5000 miles long. I'm asking questions for which you obviously don't have answers.

You obviously care enough to make shit up and then argue cluelessly about it. If you weren't brainlessly championing the sort of activity you complain about in your neck of the woods, more people would actually take you seriously. It doesn't affect me directly so it's perfectly fine. Yep. That's the attitude I'd expect from someone like you. Pipelines from Alberta don't affect me either, yet somehow I still support them and see the wisdom in them. ?

Yeah okay. Ukraine is a tumor. ?

The picture shows the crossing from the American side completely blocked, clown. Any truck/vehicle crossing into Canada here is has to go through Border Services, which is behind the line of trucks I highlighted. Those trucks were blocking the ONLY exit point from there, which EVERYONE crossing into Canada has to pass. The only other crossings from Detroit are the Detroit-Windsor Tunnel (two lanes, or half the capacity of the Ambassador Bridge) or the Blue Water Bridge in Sarnia which is an hour and fifteen minutes away. Considering they are building a new bridge at the Detroit/Windsor border because the current ones are insufficient to handle existing traffic, it doesn't take a math wizard to see why having the Ambassador Bridge blocked caused so many problems.

The cops beside the McDonalds are on the OTHER side of the blockade - there are trucks in between them and the bridge. Now you're purposely bullshitting - and I don't think you're even trying to convince anyone but yourself The idea that you're wrong is so jarring to the mental fantasy you've constructed that you'll move Heaven and Earth to rearrange picture-proof to fit your reality.

Russia is pretending to be paranoid. There are NATO bases in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania already. If NATO wanted to fire nukes point blank into Russia they could do so from Estonia. Putin and his regime know there's literally zero threat of Russia proper being attacked (there'd be no political will for it anywhere in NATO) but is using this silly idea as a pretext for invasion.

Question it all you want, but whatever conclusions you make and want to present need to be based on real stuff, rather than made-up conspiracy trash. Develop a platform along with a bunch of governments and travel authorities. Maybe. I don't really know. You're pretty vague on details here (as usual) and haven't really explained what's so awful about this and why the WEF in particular is such a nefarious partner.

The question isn't whether there's a connection. In a global economy, the Canadian is "connected" and "influenced" by a countless host of outside factors. The real question is why you keep wetting your pants over Charles Schwab and the WEF? It's just another version of the Illuminati, the Free Masons or the Deep State - vague shadowy bogeyman for the conspiracy clowns to natter about.

I showed you a photo of full access to the bridge being blocked. I even highlighted for the pea-brains exactly where the blockade was, and how nobody was getting around it. The two US->Canada lanes being empty on the actual bridge are irrelevant, since once you crossed you couldn't actually go anywhere. This logic is like saying a highway isn't blocked by a jackknifed truck because police are diverting traffic away from and around the accident. West would be here pointing at how lanes are empty on either side of the wreck saying, "Hurr all lanes flowing freely".

I think given time and no Vladimir Putin, Russia's younger population would naturally shift towards European values. They've just never really had the chance.

If you're going to bullshit people, at least do it with stuff that can't be easily demonstrated false with a 5s Google search. It's hard to tell if you were lying or you were completely clueless and believed what you were saying, but either way it was pretty obvious misinformation.

"Healthcare"....Okay. Cool?

So consuming too much sugar makes you fatter and less healthy? Did you also know that cigarettes are bad for you, as is not exercising? What does this have to do with vaccines, exactly???

"The Ambassador Bridge was blocked off by police, not protesters. They only blocked off a lane into the weigh scales and the crossing was accessible though slowed down." - West 2022

Nope. The police may have been diverting traffic, but protestors were blocking the bridge. No genius. You can see in the pictures what they're actually blocking. It makes it pretty hard for you to bullshit this stuff when it's this easy to show how you're wrong. It's safe to say, I think, that you've never actually been here. Obstinate/ignorant Canadians refusing to comply with health and public safety mandates? Sure.

We don't know how much it was, but here's what we do know: 1) The Ambassador Bridge sees ~$350-400M of daily trade crossing each day 2) It is already deemed insufficient to handle daily traffic, which is why the Gordie Howe bridge is being constructed at the Detroit/Windsor crossing with 6 lanes (compared to the Ambassador Bridge's four). Given the Ambassador Bridge's daily capacity and the fact that it's a trade bottleneck at the best of times, we can safely conclude the economic losses from its closure were immense. Billions? Possible, but perhaps not. Hundreds of millions? For certain. I wasn't apologizing for the Emergency Act. I was pointing out that you were bullshitting again, trying to say the Ambassador Bridge wasn't shut down.

Not true at all. The Ambassador bridge was completely blocked, totally shut down and not accessible to traffic. The whole thing didn't close down at once, but it did 100% shut down once the protest got fully rolling. This is the most vital trade artery in the entire country with $300-400M in daily trade crossing. Judging by the fact that large automotive plants had to literally shut down because they couldn't get their parts delivery, it's safe to assume the material cost of this protest was immense.

Where in there does he say he doesn't support Putin? He's been a vocal Putin supporter in the past and continues to be. "Please no more war" is a worthless statement and should be viewed as such - akin to China saying, "hey guys stop fighting" (with a wink-wink nudge-nudge to Russia." If Olex Ovechkin was against Putin's invasion in Ukraine he would have said so. Instead, he offered a fluffy marshmallow statement that meant nothing and was only delivered in the hopes to appease fans, teammates and peers who are obviously judging him now for his long-standing support for Putin.

This is what you said: No they are straight out of the Geneva convention... If a person is declared a civilian , and he picks up a weapons' he becomes an unlawful combatant....which is not only illegal to be and can be tried as a war crime This is what's in the Geneva Conventions: 4.1.6 Inhabitants of a non-occupied territory, who on the approach of the enemy spontaneously take up arms to resist the invading forces, without having had time to form themselves into regular armed units, provided they carry arms openly and respect the laws and customs of war. I'm not terribly concerned about the terminology you want to use (not-lawful or unlawful - it doesn't really matter to me), the point I was trying to make was that you were quoting the Geneva Conventions and getting them very wrong, with your statement above directly contradicting Article 4.16. The standards for laying charges against Ukrainian militias and resistance fighters would be high. Even partisans in occupied territories would be afforded protections providing they follow some basic rules.

The regime will be, and the country with it as long as it's in charge. There are ways to rebuild those bridges, just none of them involve Vladimir Putin or his cronies.