Jump to content

Moonbox

Senior Member
  • Posts

    8,471
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    37

Posts posted by Moonbox

  1. On 2/2/2024 at 3:07 PM, Army Guy said:

    And what have we done with all that wealth...just as one example the Saudi's have accumulated a huge amount of wealth, much more than Canada has, and i'm pretty sure liberalism has nothing to do with it, i would say those in charge have vision, a plan to not only enrich the top but the entire country...all you have to do is look around their country to see the marvels they have constructed.

    That's the system you admire?  A theocratic Islamic monarchy where all of the wealth is concentrated in the hands of the princes?  🙄

  2. 1 hour ago, I am Groot said:

    Western states are now starting to rearm, except Canada. They're pouring money into armament plants and tripling orders for missiles, tanks and other weapons, except Canada. They need time before a confident Putin can push into NATO territory.

    BUT we have a thriving public sector bureaucracy populated by minorities, at least.  That's got to count for something, right?  Stand with Ukraine Justin.  Show them how you're meeting your diversity quotas.  😑

  3. 3 hours ago, CdnFox said:

    ROFLMAO - you just never miss a chance to double down on your stupid do you :)

    "Please!!! Please sir - i'm DESPERATE to believe your life is miserable so i can feel better about myself!!!! - please please acknowledge me!!!!!" :)

    That low self esteem of yours is showing again  :)  but - this is how every discussion ends up because you get so frustrated looking stupid and the only thing you can think of to say is 'ur post count high u bad!!"  LOLOL

    Your post count never even gets mentioned until your default program kicks in, which happens to be as soon as anyone disagrees with your dumb takes.  Then it's all about the aww muffins, and you frantically insisting that you're upsetting people who literally couldn't take you less seriously than they already do. 

    I get it though.  It's tough being exposed as an unemployed no-life with no friends, no family and no hobbies beyond shitting up an internet forum 16 hours a day.  🫡

  4. 1 minute ago, CdnFox said:

    And once again you accuse others of what you do yourself.

    I"m not the one posting other people's post counts ad nauseum trying to say how terrible THEIR lives are :)

    No, you're the goofy little muppet who's here posting 16 hours a day, and that has trouble getting past the first page of a thread (often his own) without a belligerent derailment targeting the first person who disagrees with you.  🤡

     

    • Haha 1
  5. 29 minutes ago, Army Guy said:

    Just curious what would have been your answer to the question...Do you think porn should be restricted to those over 18 years of age....

    No, that was not the question.  The question was whether he thought that porn sites should be required to verify the age of users, to which he said yes. My answer to that question would have probably been something along the lines of, "I think it's up to parents to know what their children are doing online and to make sure they learn about healthy sexuality." 

    36 minutes ago, Army Guy said:

    His answer was a short yes....Liberals are making it into more than it was intended ...thats there thing, lying and making shit up...being that far down in the poles this is only going to get worse...we the readers need to see past the liberal magic, and lies to see the truth

    That's his thing as well, don't you worry, but you're right.  This isn't a big deal, and I don't think anyone is making much of anything about it beyond it being a goofy look worth a couple chuckles.  The real dopes are the ones getting their knickers twisted and making it out to be a pro vs con child pornography debate...one of these clowns is here at least.  

    • Like 1
  6. 2 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

    Sorry kiddo - that's you.  "OOOOOOO POST COUNT# x 18.  There's nothing logical or thoughtful about doing that.  There's nothing logical or thoughtful about doing it ONCE never mind that many times.

    There is when you just cannot resist projecting your emotional frailty on others (which is rarely past the first page of a thread  🤣).  Every time you default back to your "aww muffin" routine and start insisting to people that you've caused emotional damage, or that they're broken, upset etc, a casual glance at your post count proves where that's coming from:

    An angry an emotionally immature little man, seething alone at his computer for 16 hours a day.  😑

     

     

    • Haha 1
  7. 4 minutes ago, I am Groot said:

    The only report I've seen in the media was after Trudeau's first election which said they voted overwhelmingly Liberal. I don't know that this has changed.

    Probably not at all, despite Trudeau cutting UNRWA funding.  That's the nature of centrism.  Who are the Muslims going to vote for instead?  Poilievre, who's even more anti-Gaza? 

    7 minutes ago, I am Groot said:

    We could start by getting rid of all the foreign workers other than agricultural and highly skilled. And I don't mean coders or computer technicians. Require any schools that bring in foreign students to be able to house them on campus.

    I think we're already starting to see that, and will probably see more of it.  The student VISA program has been greatly curtailed, and this will (hopefully) end up being an election issue.  

    8 minutes ago, I am Groot said:

    Legally renounce any treaty that impacts how we deal with refugees. Put in place a new refugee policy using the Notwithstanding clause to ban the courts. Then we detain migrants - er refugees  until their hearings, which would be done rapidly, within weeks, and hearings within months. Then out the door if they fail. I'd also simply reject and send back anyone who comes here from the US or who flies here from a safe country like France. If they were legit they could have applied there.

    I don't know how realistic it is, but I don't really disagree with it.  If we can do that, I think we should.  I don't feel that we are responsible for rescuing peoples from messes of their own making.  Case-by-case refugee reviews are a waste of time and taxpayer money, and there has to be a better way. 

    11 minutes ago, I am Groot said:

    There are people in China with no love of the Communist Party. There are Indians who are forward thinking and not bound by that countries present backward cultural beliefs and values. There are Muslims who want to live in a more secular way, who aren't particularly devoted. We should be restricting immigration to these types of people there and elsewhere. And only if they can support themselves.

    Agreed.

  8. 3 minutes ago, I am Groot said:

    I think that term is very overused. What exactly is this Jewish lobby and how much influence do they have in a day and age when donations are limited to $1200? There are 335k Jews in Canada. They're certainly not going to influence an election with their voting. Are you suggesting this Jewish Lobby bribes politicians under the table or something?

    No, I'm suggesting they exert influence, especially in the United States.  I don't really care what you call it.  

    3 minutes ago, I am Groot said:

    Every politician goes to mosques, temples and churches come election time. There are tons of pictures of Trudeau and Poilievre and past leaders at such gatherings, often wearing the weird costumes you need to wear. Campaigning for the ethnic vote is huge. More than half the population of Toronto and Vancouver are immigrants.

    Muslims, or immigrants?  The question still remains, who are these Muslims voting for? 

    For the record, I'm somewhat with you on the immigration file.  I think we need much less, and much much less from certain regions.  The problem we have is that we have shitty economic and tax policy, and we have made it difficult and expensive for young adults to afford houses or have children.  A declining population is bad, as we can see in Japan and Russia.  If we aren't having enough kids, we need immigrants, and where are we getting them from?  Mostly from shitholes where people want to leave.  That's going to come with baggage, unfortunately, whether that's Chinese or Indian influence, or Muslim sympathies.  

     

  9. 14 minutes ago, I am Groot said:

    The Jews have been here an awful lot longer than the Muslims. Have you ever heard of anything remotely like this coming from them?

    Are you suggesting that the Jewish lobby in North America isn't vocal/powerful/influential, and that it hasn't exerted its influence on the Israel/Gaza conflict?  

    14 minutes ago, I am Groot said:

    You can hardly say the same with Muslims, the vast majority of whom were born elsewhere, mostly in the Middle East and North Africa.

    Sure, but what does that have to do with their voting?  Their saying they aren't going to allow MPs into their mosques sounds a lot to me like if the trannies told them they couldn't come to the drag shows.  They probably weren't planning to anyways, and who are these Muslims going to vote for if none of the parties are supporting Gaza?

  10. 1 minute ago, CdnFox said:

    But it's al you've got isn't it.  As i keep saying - you'll have an emtional break down and all you can cry about is how often i post and how long my posts are - because how can you be expected to pay attention for a WHOLE 15 seconds.

    Insisting that I'm the one having an emotional breakdown while you respond to my one-liners with angry walls of text is...awkward.  😐

  11. 16 hours ago, I am Groot said:

    But their primary voting interest is in their homelands and the politics, disputes, and hatreds of their homelands. 

    So if the Liberals aren't supporting Palestine, and the Conservatives aren't, and the NDP isn't, who are all of these Muslims going to vote for?  Are they abstaining?  Are they going to vote for the New Brotherhood of Canada party?  

  12. 7 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

    I get it fine.  You're a low self esteem person who thinks of himself as intelligent but really is probably on the lower end of average.  You come here now and again hoping to boost your ego by picking fights or making commentary against people who either are also not terribly bright or who don't have the energy or inclination to show you why you're wrong.

    ANd then you bump into me. And suddenly you look stupid, you feel stupid and you lash out like a beaten dog out of anger and frustration because you've had your lower than average intellect rubbed in your face and it triggers all those self-doubt issues you've got.

    Nobody cares. You just make yourself look like a child and people tune you out. 

    I find you amusing so i'll play with you now and again just to see how many times you'll try to argue that 100-50 doesn't eqaual 50 :)  Or post links that prove me right :)  

    You obviously don't get it, because once again your fragile ego demanded a wall-of-text response, and it offered nothing but more clueless projection and limp insults.  

  13. 17 hours ago, Army Guy said:

    this is non news...has anyone heard of anyone having troubles accessing porn... No...3 things Canadians hold near and dear, beer , hockey, porn...not in that order...

    Yeah, we know it's non-news, but it's funny to see PP playing for the dumdums in his audience who don't understand, whilst his office has to play damage control after the fact.  

     

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...