MontyBurns

Vote Liberal! We aren't the sponsorship scandal party anymore! We don't pay ad agencies 100,000$ to "be Canadian" anymore.

I heard a rumour that Ignatief plans to fill government cabinet positions with homosexuals, drug dealers and biker gangs once he is elected.

Finally the government is going to crackdown on the pot growing hippy granolas.

Yeah. True.

Do you really want the sponsorship scandal gang back to power?

They don't criticize Hamas or Islam because they foolishly believe that they are on the same side as the Muslims. Muslims would slaughter Canadian leftists if given the chance. Imagine Muslim extremists getting into bed with a bunch of hippy granolas from Canada. Ain't gonna happen.

I hope the bugger stays in Cuba.

He certainly did his bit for the planet. There are enough hippy granolas on the planet now.

Maybe we should let Robert Pickton and Paul Bernardo get the treatment they need so they can be rehabilitated and re-integrated into society. Jail time is not protecting Canadians from these two.

I'm not advocating damaging anything. But I will laugh at the funny words painted on the Liberal guys house.

LOL. Good. Serves him right.

The "black man" is obviously going to be soft on terrorism and national security. Not good.

Conservatism is natural human thinking and feeling. When a socialist "rebel" is successful in revolution, one would think that they would then be "conservative" themselves. A conservative is based and content. A socialist is envious of the conservative. A conservative is happy with his culture, religion and ultimately himself/herself. A socialist wants to destroy his/her culture and religion. A conservative naturally follows free market capitalism. A socialist tries to change the natural commerce system of humans (usually with not much success). A conservative is family oriented. A socialist is not family oriented. A conservative likes to hang gays. <- just kidding here A socialist does not like to hang gays. And so on ...

Why not?

I'll make things simple: Say person "A" follows "doctrine A" and person "B" follows "doctrine B". Say I am "A" and you are "B". What you are telling me is that you can bring "doctrine B" into government policy but "doctrine A" is not allowed any place in government policy. Convenient for person "B" don't you think?

Isn't secularism a belief itself? Could we not call secularism a "religion" of sorts?

Like in North Korea.

But atheism does.

They are different loser philosophies.

I think we all know who's side the socialists are on. Socialists are traitors and the enemy. They should be shipped to North Korea where they belong.

Nobody, whether religious or secular can remove their beliefs when making political decisions.

Thats what secularists do. Ever heard the phrase "Happy Holidays"? Maybe you should move to North Korea to get the full benefit from secularism.

You just want to censor anything religious in nature.

Nobody on this planet can prove that atheism is right, so it is a belief. No different than Christianity, Judaism, etc.

You wish to impose your secular beliefs on me. Why can't I impose my beliefs on you.