psikeyhackr

Capitalism: An economic power game designed and evolved by Europeans where natural ignorance helped keep the peons down in the bad old days. But 700 year old double-entry accounting could have been mandatory in the schools since WWII but our brilliant economists manage to not suggest the possibility and planned obsolescence got added to the mix. Engineers could design fighter planes in the late 1930s and early 40s to do 400 mph but we need to keep redesigning cars that roll along the ground at less than 120 mph. Socialism: A political economic delusion where every pseudo-intellectual who thinks he is as intelligent as Karl Marx gets a say. Communism: A utopian economic delusion created by a man who never drove a car. I do wonder how well he could explain a triple-expansion steam engine. I asked a PhD economist from the University of Chicago to explain how an automobile engine worked. He couldn't even start but he drove a white SUV.

This is hilarious. Is this an endless debate about the economic future of technological society? Adam Smith: Download Wealth of Nations, it has been in Project Gutenberg since 2001, and search it for "and account" you will find multiple instances of "read, write and account". Why doesn't the right or the left advocate mandatory accounting/finance in the schools? Karl Marx: Search Das Kapital for depreciation. Marx mentioned depreciation of money and machinery multiple times. There were no steam trains when Adam Smith died. Marx road in trains and saw machinery that was modern for his time. But what sophisticated consumer technology was there to depreciate in his day? In the 1930s John Maynard Keynes was writing about a 15-hour work week for grandchildren. That could have been the 1990s. But did Keynes ever see a television commercial for automobiles? When I went to college for Electrical Engineering the term e-waste did not exist. Today: Planned obsolescence has been going on for decades. What has happened to the DEPRECIATION of durable consumer goods? How many automobiles have Americans trashed since Sputnik? There were 200,000,000 motor vehicles in the US in 1994. Economists: Do not mention NDP, Net Domestic Product. They subtract the depreciation of Capital Goods from GDP like industrial robots and 18-wheel trucks but Joe Blow's car can fall apart and not get noticed. Can economists tell the difference between a banana and an air conditioner? NDP = GDP - Dcap (official economic delusion) NDP = GDP - (Dcap + Dcon) (reality) Dcap == Depreciation of Capital Goods Dcon == Depreciation of Durable Consumer Goods GDP == Grossly Distorted Propaganda I guess intellectuals and pseudo-intellectuals cannot figure out that economists cannot do algebra. Science Fiction: Daemon & Freedom by Daniel Suarez

History is tolerable if you take it with a pound of salt and let the Europeans maintain their self righteous delusions of grandeur .

ROFLMBAO The Economic Wargame is a continuation of the Military Wargame by other means. "All warfare is based on deception." - Sun Tzu The Planned Obsolescence of consumer garbage with the economics profession ignoring the depreciation of durable consumer garbage isn't just a high technology form of economic servitude? Yeah Right! Then economists cannot suggest something as simple as mandatory accounting in the schools even though Adam Smith wrote "read, write and account" multiple times in Wealth of Nations. Check out: The Screwing of the Average Man (1974) by David Hapgood If you can believe your delusional nationalist bullshit that is yourbusiness .

As an agnostic with degenerate apatheist tendencies I try to treat all religions with equal indifference. However due to my Catholic elementary school attendence I am probably more prejudiced against that mindless cult. LOL

But it was OK for the government to steal all of the land though everybody has to live somewhere. Palefaces accept slavery to governments.

The Conservation of Momentum is relevant to falling skyscrapers. Since every LEVEL of a skyscraper must support the weight of all LEVELS above the designers of such buildings must determine how to distribute the steel. Consider the shape of the Eiffel Tower. It is described as exponential with 10,000 tons of wrought iron. How much iron is in the bottom 50 feet compared to the top 50 feet. The Twin Towers were 35% taller with 100,000 tons of steel in each. So how could a straight down collapse be analyzed without accurate data on the distributions of steel and concrete down the structures? Try finding any "experts" discussing the need for that data in the Two Decades of The Twin Towers Affair. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ZT4BXIpdIdo

The difference between Manifest Destiny and Lebensraum is that the 7th Cavalry did not have tanks and gas chambers in 1876.

@Michael-Hardner https://repolitics.com/forums/profile/201-michael-hardner/ I can think of several reasons why the previous post could be funny. Could you explain yours?

Winners can rationalize anything. If you search Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations, which has been in Project Gutenberg since 2001, you will find that he used the word 'education' Eighty Times. If you search it for "and account" you will find multiple instances of "read, write and account". But in 1776 50% of Brits were illiterate. Suggesting mandatory accounting in the schools that did not exist for the masses would have been absurd. How many homeless White people are there in the United States? I watched a YouTube video about homeless in Australia a few days ago. Double entry accounting was invented in Italy 700 years ago. Why isn't it regarded as part of European culture? But I had to take 4 years of English literature and compare Romeo and Juliet to West Side Story. I don't even know if my high school had an accounting course at the time. You haoles have spread your economic wargame culture around the planet and you don't explain it properly to your own kids. The majority of palefaces are supposed to be pawns and losers being used by the super rich. One nitwit socialist told me that he objected to mandatory accounting in the schools because the math would make Capitalism seem logical to the students. He claimed to be a high school teacher. http://blog.lostsoulscorp.com/articles/economic-wargames/

Is this an endless debate about the economic future of technological society? Adam Smith: Download Wealth of Nations, it has been in Project Gutenberg since 2001, and search it for "and account" you will find multiple instances of "read, write and account". Why doesn't the right or the left advocate mandatory accounting/finance in the schools? Karl Marx: Search Das Kapital for depreciation. Marx mentioned depreciation of money and machinery multiple times. There were no steam trains when Adam Smith died. Marx road in trains and saw machinery that was modern for his time. But what sophisticated consumer technology was there to depreciate in his day? Today: Planned obsolescence has been going on for decades. What has happened to the DEPRECIATION of durable consumer goods? How many automobiles have Americans trashed since Sputnik? There were 200,000,000 motor vehicles in the US in 1994. Economists: Do not mention NDP, Net Domestic Product. They subtract the depreciation of Capital Goods from GDP like industrial robots and 18-wheel trucks but Joe Blow's car can fall apart and not get noticed. Can economists tell the difference between a banana and an air conditioner? NDP = GDP - Dcap (official economic delusion) NDP = GDP - (Dcap + Dcon) (reality) Dcap == Depreciation of Capital Goods Dcon == Depreciation of Durable Consumer Goods GDP == Grossly Distorted Propaganda I guess intellectuals and pseudo-intellectuals cannot figure out that economists cannot do algebra. Science Fiction: Daemon & Freedom by Daniel Suarez

Is there a conspiracy regarding the tons of steel and tons of concrete on every level of the towers? So why haven't we heard that in SIX YEARS? How can you analyze the physics of the impact without the distribution of steel and concrete thru the building? How many tons of steel can you heat to 1100 deg F in 56 minutes? Didn't the designers have to figure out what ot put on each level in the 1960s? How much steel was on the 80th floor of the south tower? Windsor Tower 131 ft x 82 ft x 348 ft tall 30 flrs of WTC 205 ft x 205 ft x 360 ft tall There had to be enough steel on the 80th floor of the south WTC to hold FOUR Windsor Towers. But we haven't heard how much steel was on every level of the buildings in SIX YEARS. The Windsor Tower didn't collapse in 18 hours of fire so how did all that steel weaken in 56 minutes? Don't steel the TRUTH! psik

Why don't you compare the dates of the events? What did the Founding Fathers know about the Trail of Tears? It might be nice if most Americans believed in the document too. We might not have invaded Vietnam. It is curious that 30 years after that war about capitalism our American economists can't tell us what we lose on depreciation of automobiles each year. 230,000,000 cars, that should amount to a significant piece of change. psik

I was in a draft lottery for Vietnam. I clearly remember watching TV in the tube room at the frat with a packed audience constantly wondering what I was going to do if I came up with a low number. The question is who is supposed to risk their lives and possibly die for someone else's stupid mistakes that lead to chain reactions of idiotic events? I watched the Fog of War documentary about Robert McNamara. At one point I busted out laughing about McNamara having an argument with a Vietnamese official about their perceptions of the war. I watched the Vietnam crap all thru high school. At the time I was wondering why anyone expected the Vietnamese to think of White Americans any differently than they thought of White Frenchmen. The existence of the United States is built on genocide. Didn't they expect educated Vietnamese to know that? The US overthrew the legitimate leader of Iran in the 50's and put in the nitwit Shah. The US helped establish and maintain Israel. So people who had nothing to do with starting this shitstorm are supposed to risk their necks limiting the damage. And most likely there is more stupid BS that has gone on behind the scenes that we don't know about. That doesn't even bring up that minor detail that I don't believe for one second that a 200 ton airliner can knock down a 500,000 ton building level to the ground in less than 2 hours. Is there a difference between Jihad, Lebensraum and Manifest Destiny? psik

So do you have any comment on analyzing what happened to WTC 1 & 2 without mentioning the tons of steel and concrete on each level of the building? psik

Has anyone learned how many tons of steel were on the 79th, 80th and 81st floors of the south tower yet? How do you analyze the effects of the impact and fire without that information? Didn't the people who designed the building in the 1960's have to determine that to design the building? The NIST report says one plane had 9 tons of cargo and the other had 5 tons. If they can give us that information why can't they tell us the tons of steel and tons of concrete on every story and basement level. It is not like it should have changed since 1973. psik

Bush Stole The Election - BBC Documentary PT.1 Bush Stole The Election - BBC Documentary PT.2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vWKlVSENOKM HO HUM psik

Potential energy is the mass * acceleration * height. Are you computing the potential energy from the ground? If you take a hollow glass sphere to the roof of a 3 story building and hold it 35 feet above the sidewalk the potential energy is the mass of the sphere times gravitational acceleration times 35 feet. If you let it go that energy won't be released until it hits the sidewalk. It is not going to shatter 5 ft from your hands. If you are computing the potential energy of the World Trade Center relative to the ground then why were things bursting and turning into dust hundreds of feet into the air far from the ground. If the building had tilted over at the 5th floor and come down like a chopped tree then this potential energy would make sense but the building would have remained intact until it hit the ground. psik

A red herring. The structure itself is likely not perfectly symmetrical, however, 5000 tons/floor is a reasonable estimate. Even if the top floors were half that mass (2500 tonnes/floor) they would still have a potential energy of 45 tons of TNT - more than enough to explain the results observed on 9/11. Now this is totally absurd. All you have to do is check the NIST report. There were 12 grades of steel used on the perimeter columns alone. From 100 kips down to 35 kips. That's thousand pounds per square inch. The steel of the core columns had to be and was thicker at the bottom of the building. If it is possible to build a 110 skyscraper with constant mass from bottom to top then it is stupid an unnecessarily expensive because it means the top is stronger than necessary and the bottom has to hold more weight than necessary. So why can't the EXPERTS tell us the tons of steel and tons of concrete on every floor. Sure, it's a Red Herring because you can't come up with the data. So why don't the world renowned scientists and engineers at the NIST put it out there for the whole world to see? ROFL psik

If you can tell us that, and be correct of course, then you should be able to tell us the tons of steel and tons of concrete on every floor above the impact point. Let's see you do it. The NIST report doesn't even specify the tons of concrete in the buildings. Greening is talking bullsh!t by averaging the mass of the building over the number of floors. http://booksliterature.com/showpost.php?p=2382&postcount=5 psik

Only the delusional who don't do the most casual checking can believe the government has done its job. How many tons of steel were on the 80th floor of south tower where the plane hit? Have you heard that in SIX YEARS? But supposedly 34 tons of kerosene, alias jet fuel, turned an unspecified amount of steel into licorice. EXCUSE ME!!! I have downloaded and searched the NIST reports, they don't even specify the quantity of concrete in the towers though in a couple of places they say "roughly 200,000 tons of steel." A lot of websites say the towers contained "200,000 tons of steel and 425,000 cubic yards of concrete" so half of that was in each tower. Calculating it out results in 100,000 tons of steel and 280,000 tons of concrete in each tower. You won't find that in the NIST report. Now the floor slabs account for almost 80,000 tons of the concrete so where was the other 200,000+ tons? In the core? What was the distribution of mass of steel and concrete in the buildings? Why can't the experts tell us the tons of steel and tons of concrete on eery floor of buildings designed in the 1960's six years after their collapse? Don't they have enough computing power? They had enough to design it in the 60's but now we don't have enough to find the distribution of steel and concrete? Anyone that can believe that a 166 ton airliner containing 34 tons of kerosene can knock a 500,000 ton building level to the ground in 56 minutes needs to have his head examined by someone other than the US government. Ever take a physics course? F.R. Greening needs one. http://booksliterature.com/showpost.php?p=2382&postcount=5 psikey

On page 3 of his Energy of Collapse F.R.Greening makes a couple of interestingly dumb mistakes. He says he divides the total mass of the WTC by 110. Doesn't the total mass include the 6 basements? So shouldn't he be dividing by 116. But even worse, isn't the WTC going to be bottom heavy because every floor must support all of the floors above? Doesn't that mean a lot more mass at the bottom? So averaging that mass shifts the mass upwards. He is saying the upper floors are much heavier than they actually were so that would mean a lot more potential energy would go into the collapse therefore his computations are WRONG. 9/11 & when to Average After all of these years shouldn't the experts be able to tell us the tons of steel and tons of concrete that were on every level? Didn't they have to figure that out to design the building in the 60's? psikey