noahbody

Source please.

"Currently there are no minimum prison sentences for producing and trafficking dangerous drugs like methamphetamine and cocaine," Harper said. "These are serious crimes. Those who commit them should do serious time." harper -ctv.ca Yes this is sure to have all the traffickers upset and voting Green. I don't think the Green Party is wanting to make trafficking of cocaine legal though. And you don't have to worry about automatic weapons. We have the Gun Registry. When they gangs go to register their guns they'll all be confiscated.

That took about 10 seconds.

That's odd, you assume Joe was there without reason. If I had to make a not so wild accusation, I'd say Byron is likely Clyde's second eldest son, knowing he's a father of three, his eldest son being 20 this year. Can't say for sure, but it would explain the story that only two natives were present. Dad would be pissed. Richard Smoke, on the otherhand, was conceived with a turkey baster. There's a video of this, I'm sure. But I can't show you. You've just got to believe me. While on the subject: Happy Thanksgiving.

Shotgun Messiah used to sing a song with the lyrics "weirdo-rama psychodome, the lights are on, but nobody's home." Thanks I'm going to have that in my head all afternoon.

Your accusation is that Joe changed his story. From the souces provided to you, it shows he's been consistent from day one. End of that conspiracy theory. As far as Joe even being there, what do you think is more likely 1) native youth sees someone with Sam and assumes it's Joe 2) Joe watches his brother being beaten. Then, once the violence has stopped, he goes and hides in the tool box in the back of the truck so no one knows he's there so he can get a ride to the hospital, not that it would make a difference if he was there or not? Doesn't seem too likely does it? If you want to specualte, at least do it based upon facts. Also, do you know if Byron Powless, one of the 18-year old men who has a warrant out for his arrest, is related to spokesperson Clyde Powless?

What are you referring to? Your comment that there's a video?

Source please.

Or, maybe he wasn't there. Why do I feel like a thick Dairy Queen Blizzard right now?

Here's joe speaking to the media on the day of the attack. His words were "about four."

3 boys? Unless two of them were conceived after 2 a.m and some ancient law allows them to be characterized as "young children" or "boys" for life, there were two native men being that they were over 18.

Please explain how that answers the question "Were they all over 18?"? Gee, I think it's you who should read.

Mrs. Brown has four apples. If she puts them together with three oranges what is the ratio of apples to oranges? (Answer: 4:3) If three of the apples go outside to get 2x4s, what is the ratio of apples to oranges in the house? (Answer: 1:3) Secondly, if a boy becomes a man at 18, what was the ratio of men to boys? And what were the ages of the nephews and other worker? Were they all over 18? You must have been working security when you should have been going to Math class.

Which story is that? The 5 on 2 story? The one where Joe stands by and watches his brother beaten? The one where one of the natives is 14 and the other a bit older? There were only three with Sam, Joe wasn't there. There have been warrants for three natives, two of them 18. Here's an account from one of the nephews who was there: http://www.thespec.com/News/Local/article/249113

So you're asking why didn't we offer the Taliban government a position in government? Brilliant!

Have they check Jean Chretien's sock drawer?

http://www.mohawknationnews.com/news/singl.../news/news3.php

Thanks for that. I need a good laugh.

Did you notice he has 1940 posts and you have 12?

Here's an interesting read. It's found about 3/4 down the page. K. Horn gives her reply above it. http://www.mohawknationnews.com/news/news....1&start=120

http://www.martlet.ca/view.php?aid=39590Okay, so the Six Nations accepted an agreement in 1843 to resolve their complaints about the '41 sale. Done deal. In 1844, they again sold land willingly. Then, my interpretation is thatt they then took the position that the original wording of the Haldimand Proclamation suggests they were to take the possession of the land forever, so all deals off. That correct? If that's the case, too bloody bad! The Six Nations were well aware that they could take possession forever. They were the ones to initiate sale of land, due to a famine in 1795. Obviously, it was agreed upon that they would be allowed to sell land with approval of the government. I don't see much of a claim of land. There is a claim where money wasn't invested as agreed. As far as agreements with settler who they can prove defaulted on land agreements, they may have a case, but in civil court and not against the government.

Fraudulent for what specific reason? From oral histories and from the document itself it would appear six chiefs did sign something. So if they did, do they claim they were never given a copy? I find this odd when grannyrants says it was their tradition to ratify documents. Therefore, it should be up to the Six Nations to reproduce their copy if they have not done so. If it matches what the government says they signed, case closed.

I'm just wondering if anyone knows the official argument the Six Nations is using for not honouring the 1841 agreement. I've read a lot of excuses such as they couldn't read English well, there were only six chiefs present and, as grannyrants states, "I know that the government and the Confederacy signed an offer, which the government of Canada still today calls "signing a final agreement", just to befuddle the Canadian population. Just like the unions, the offer goes to the people for ratification and it was voted down, in 1841; but our government still "stands by" this 'final agreement', because that is all Canada has." So far I haven't heard an excuse with any merit.

"Thousands more"? Could you be kind enough to reference that claim?

I think that's the oral history version. Canada actually entered in January. Khadr killed the medic in July. Does that change your view? http://www.forces.gc.ca/site/Newsroom/view_news_e.asp?id=490