
weaponeer
Member-
Posts
451 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by weaponeer
-
Typical right-wing two-faced hack. Didn't hear you chomping at the bit to liberate the downtrodden in North Korea...nope. silence regarding democracy and human rights there. Actually I am highly in favor of doing what you suggest. I would love to see all the people of the world stand up to oppressive regimes like N Korea, Iran etc... and give these people the rights they deserve as human beings....
-
Off the back of a match book no doubt. Apparently any jackass can get a degree.... I don't agree with Jack that there can be a negotiated peace with the taliban. Nor do i agree with the likes of you that there is a military victory that is possible via Canadian forces. The absolute only chance for Afghanis who dont want Nato or the Taliban in their country is for them to do it themselves and for pakistan to clean up their border region. Canada has no role to play here. Its a waste, it always has been. Are you claiming to actually be in aghanistan? I certainly hope you are not representative of the CFs? What a disgrace. In some cases you absolutely are killing tribes people native to the region. Or is there a taliban uniform that you use to distinguish between afghan tribes people and taliban from pakistan? How do you know? And why have you not changed a fucking thing in six years? It will only get uglier. For somebody who supposedly 'studied' military history you have an embarrassingly narrow minded definition of genocide. Yikes. If you are actually in the CF i have lost some respect for that institution in our brief tit for tat here. You come across as a meathead..... Andrew Well at least you'll be safe hiding behind your computer in your home. Your not here and have no idea what's going on. A disgrace, how about jack raising the retreat flag on the bodies of fallen Canadians. Means a little more to us, especially if you know them. Yes, he cares so deeply for the people here that he will abandon them to their fate. It is really easy for you, your NOT here to look them in the eye... Again, the left folks (agreed not all) like to get together and protest, and talk about how morally superior they are. How they believe in human right, rule of law, etc... but they have no interest in doing the really hard (sometimes nasty) work need to be done to get us there. As well, I do not see how a thread about jack, Afghanistan or the war has anything to do with the Indians at home. Genocide, The systematic and planned extermination of an entire national, racial, political, or ethnic group did NOT happen to the Indians tribes of Canada, they are still here today. For the record I DO NOT agree with everything that happened to the indians years ago, but it was not a genocide. This topic is for another thread. As for you thoughts of me, I could care less, I owe you nothing. As for your respect of the CF, I doubt very much it was every really there...
-
Colonel McMaster was asked about this strategy the past month on a PBS special. http://www.insidebayarea.com/sanmateocountytimes/ci_6176181 I think the rest of your proposal about not stopping at the Pakistan border essentially means declaring war on Pakistan. I don't know that the NATO has the military to be able to fight a war in three places. I can imagine how big a force that would be. A few hundred thousand? Five hundred thousand? My point is that Pakistan and now Iran are where the threat is and most likely always has been. AQ has been defeated in Afghanistan and has abandoned the talibs to fight NATO. Yes, AQ helps the talibs, training, ammo, tech advice, some small AQ units, but the talibs are for the most part on their own. There's now some evidence that Hezbuhla (not sure how you spell it) is operating in Iraq. They are an psuedo army of Iran, the Iranian Foreign Legion. Another point, Iraq and Afghanistan are roughly the same size, however there are 140K troops fighting in Iraq and 30K in Afghanistan, with only about 10K doing any fighting... I think a light fast lethal force is needed. Wherever we detect AQ in the world, Afghanistan, Iran, Pakistan, Sudan or Somalia, or at home in Canada, insert a fast light force to engage and destroy them with heavy air and sea support then extract. AQ will know we are not affraid to get them not matter where they are...
-
Yes and they have done it ever since Alexander the Great. What fools we are to think that we can change thinking that has been going on for probably 6,000 years. Oh yes the great white hunter. Alexander the Great used roadside bombs??????
-
Not relevant. Its the local tribes people that know the land and will fight indefinitely as their fathers and grandfathers did before them against the British and the Russians. Those were far more formidable foes than the ATV bound canucks. So, 6 years later and what has really changed? Actually, we were a bunch of jew haters who gladly did business with nazis at the time of WWII. This of course was not too long after we committed our own genocide against the natives. Nevertheless, AQ is little more than a murderous criminal organization, one that feeds off of nato and american expansion. You have no idea how stupid and corrupt the 'west' really is. Ahh yes, the 'left' is the source of all your problems. Do yourself a favor and pick up a history book or two. Im thinking ignorance is maybe closer to the source of your actual problems. Andrew Actually I have a degree in military history, thanks. And yes the leftards are a major source of the problems, of course they have been kicking the CF around any chance they get. Hoist the surrender flag over the dead bodies of Canadians. How come ejack has not volunteered to go over to Afghanistan and negotiate himself..... As for what's going on over here, you are not here and don't have as clue, we are NOT fighting farmers with guns, if we were it would have been over by now. we committed our own genocide against the natives, please give me a break. we didn't round them up and gas them, mass executuions, get off it. Some indian threatens to block a road or railway track & Canadians can't kiss their asses fast enough, genocide, you would not know it if it bit you in the a#@!!
-
There are plenty of ways we can avoid roadside bombs, there are many different types of vehicles that can be used in these dangerous areas. The problem is that in war, the enemy sometimes gets lucky and scores a kill. tactics wise, instead of driving on roads you can move cross counrty line abreast, however your wheeled vehicles really take a beating, that's why an army needs tracked vehicles. The Canadian Army was almost all but out of the tracked vehicle game until recenty, we are slowly getting back into it. even if you travel off road in line abreast you eventually will encouter terrain that will require you to get back on the road, forest, mountains, swamps etc... Historical side note: in the Battle of the Bulge in WW2 the US Army was able to slow down and blunt a major German offensive in the Ardennes forest by blocking the roads, as the German tanks could not move cross country. Another tactic is to fly in troops and supplies with aircraft such as the C130 C17 or transport helos. Canada does not have transport helos yet, or C17 (we get our first in Trenton Aug 9), but we do have C130's there. They can great for ariel resupply, howver they can be hampered by the weather. You can use very heavy armoured vehicles, however they can be destroyed by a bigger bomb. They only real tactic that I have seen that works is the US Army method known as Clear, Hold and Build. It was first "invented" by Col McMaster USA, in Tal Afar Iraq. Using a large force (in his case an armoured infantry brigade) he cleared Tal Afar house to house, door to door. Then he had his troops dig in and stay, soldiers on the streets day & night. Nobody could move without US Army knowing about it. Then he brought in the PRTs and NGO groups to rebuild. It worked, and reduce insurgent activity to almost nothing in his sector. The underlying problem in both Iraq and Afghanistan is the we are simply too politically correct, we are trying to fight a serious war without our fangs out. Generals are more concerned about the press release that killling the enemy off in an aggressive manner. The answer is to fight in Afghanistan and Iraq like WW2, massed combined arms offensives, and don't stop at the Pakistan border.
-
By definition anybody who invades and occupies Afghanistan obviously has zero knowledge of war and history. Andrew Oh yes, the talibs are sooooo scarey, we should tremble before them. They like to kill women and children, especially little girls, they even rape young boy, we should run away. No we should not stand up to them, they are tooo tough for us. They are real heros, they skin women alive, chop hands and heads off, really someone to look up to.... Yes Afghanistan is the superpower of the world, we should jkust let them harbour AQ and kill us at their lesiure!!!! AQ has declared war on the western world whether we like it or not. We did not run from or negotiate with the Nazis. Typical leftards, you believe in freedom, democracy and human rights, you just don't want to do anything about it!!! Just make excusses for the enemy...
-
ejackulayton is a bottom feeder. He's a vulture standing over the Canadians who died today. He does not have a goddammed clue about Afghanistan, war or history, he just makes up his own BS. There are actually very few wars in history solved at the peace table. AQ and the talibs are religious zelots that are not interested in negotiations, they view peace talks as a sign of weakness. "Our enemy wants to talk peace, they are defeated". ejack is a very dangerous person, not willing to stand up against AQ, talibs and islamic evil. He is more hated here than the talibs, he makes me physically ill....
-
That's what leaders do, they lead, they call the shots.....
-
The Liberals had no problem participating in a blockade of Iraq and enforcing the no-fly zone. That meant supporting ground attacks from the air as well. You certainly wouldn't have heard complaints from me about attacks in and out to eliminate threats. And after September 11, there was no one who was going to raise a peep about attacking al Qaeda bases and the Taliban if they continued to harbour them. My concern all along for Iraq and Afghanistan is that any attempt to make-over those countries was doomed to failure since the driving force came from outside rather than inside. At the moment, what you are proposing is a commitment that lasts...forever. Do you actually think that Afghanistan will take care of itself if they can rely on Canada to do the job with no timetable in place? Hi Jdob, I hear it's been raining alot in the "Peg", hope your not under water:) The Libs participation in the Iraq no-fly zone consisted of having Canadian Forces Air Weaqpons Controllers (guys like me) aasigned to USAF AWACS aircraft, we had no fighters in Saudi or Turkey at all. We controller the USAF and RAF fighters over Iraq. The prob with no-fly zones, blockades, etc is you have to have an end state. They too, cannot go on forever, they drain resources. The big prob with Iraq is that Saddam eventually had to be dealt with. A huge opportunity was lost after GW1 in 1991, UN should have kept going, or perhaps we should have directly supported the post war uprisings. The entire philosiphy of "Nation Building" in my experience is folly. Americans cannot build a nation other than the USA, Canadians no matter how well intentioned cannot build any nation other than Canada. When anyone attempts Nation Building, you always do it with your own pre-set morals, values and prejudices. You naturally try to build a nation like your own. Good intentions, yes, but it does not work. Afghanistan is not Canada, the USA or any other country, other than Afghanistan. Yes we should help, give technical advice, instill some "international" accepted norms, but any country has to ultimatly stand up on it's own two feet. "We can help lift the up, but we cannot carry them". The entire reason we are in Afghanistan, and we have all as Caandians forgotten this I feel, is to hunt down and kill AQ. The talibs, they harboured AQ, they are not even the real reason we are there, AQ is. AQ is still active and very dangerous, they do not have any love for Canada, and I fear we will see it on our shores one day. Everyone thinks that once the Afghanistan mission is over in 2009, our troops will come home and all will be as it was. Nonsense, once we are out of Afghanistan we could find ourselves in combat chasing AQ in Somalia, Darfour, or God knows where else.... AQ has declared war on the western world....it ain't over by a long shot......
-
Private Healthcare? Why Not?
weaponeer replied to FascistLibertarian's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
Hey I thought you lived in North Bay, its only 5:19 He's serving our country in Afghanistan. Says who??? What do you mean, he said he lived in North Bay and then critized the hospital there. There are two hospitals in North Bay and a new one being built. Where do you come from, is it because as I said a liberal represents North Bay I do live in NB margarce, CFB NB up on Airport Hill, I am just deployed to Khandar Astan currently... Yes, I have critized the NB hospitals, they are not very great, there's worse, but there's better. For the record I think the new hospital will great for NB, they deserve it in a big way. I have had the opportunity to live throughout both Canada and the USA, and the current situation back home leaves alot to be desired. -
Private Healthcare? Why Not?
weaponeer replied to FascistLibertarian's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
Hey I thought you lived in North Bay, its only 5:19 I do live in N Bay, just not there right now, which is not a bad thing with all the rain I hear has been happening:) -
Private Healthcare? Why Not?
weaponeer replied to FascistLibertarian's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
margrace, not running away, bed time as it is very late here..... -
Private Healthcare? Why Not?
weaponeer replied to FascistLibertarian's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
Just for fun... You actually cannot spend your own money on your own car according to your own whims. That is illegal. You may only purchase cars that meet government regulations for safety, environment and whatnot. You actually cannot spend your own money on your own kid's education unless the education you propose to purchase meets government regulations for educational criteria and whatnot. You cannot spend your won money on your own houses unless the improvements you propose meet with government regulations for home renovations safety, environment, fire code, etc. So, how or why should healthcare be any different? You actually can spend money on you car how you want, you can decide which vehicle you want (choice) what colour etc.. you can than customize it, after market stereo, rims, paint job etc... You don't have to buy a bland gov't made car. the gov't regulates, but does not build or service them... Yes you can spend you own $$ on your childrens education, private schools, private tutors, home schooling etc... again the gov't regulates but does not provide the product.... As for a home, yes you can customize a home, put in a pool, make your gagrage bigger provided you meet some gov't regs. The gov't does not build it for you, does not provide a gov't approved backyard plan.... -
Private Healthcare? Why Not?
weaponeer replied to FascistLibertarian's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
The new hospital is going to be great for N Bay, no doubt. The Sudbury cancer ceter wrote off my friend, that's why he went south and will recover. As for whose riding it is, that does not matter to me one bit... -
Private Healthcare? Why Not?
weaponeer replied to FascistLibertarian's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
I've never heard of a comparision of auto and home insurance between the US and Canada,is there a big difference in those two? My point was about private health insurance. Where I lived in Oklahoma you could purcahse your auto, home and health insurance from the same company and get reduced rates.... My point is that this is the type of Mole we do not need on this board. Has it ever been in North Bay hospitals or was this just a straw argument, disappeared in a hurry when challenged. I did not disappear, my break was over and I returned to work... I have sat in the N Bay hospital with my girlfreind and kids, 12 hours one day for a fractured wrist. One of my best freinds was in there for cancer recently, the place is a dungeon. He and his wife have gone down to a cancer center in Houston TX, he's going to be OK... My entire point here is that I have lived in both Canada and the US, have experienced both systems up close and personal, and we have alot to be desired here in Canada.... Socialist medicine does not work.... -
Private Healthcare? Why Not?
weaponeer replied to FascistLibertarian's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
I have NEVER said, if you review my posts, that lower income people should be denied healthcare. I have NEVER said let them die, not at all. I have said we should have, and already do have, a two tiered system. Canadians pay the dentist. A Canadian that has the financial means to travel to the USA, and it is many, already participate in a 2 tiered system. They do not wait in lines at Canadian hospitals. Canadians love our system because most have known no other, and like the fact they walk out of the hospital without a bill. If they had much lower taxes, and access to private health insurance, they would like the system. As I stated before, if you make below a certain income level you are covered by the gov't, above that level, you buy health insurance. If you can afford a new SUV, you can afford private health insurance.... -
Private Healthcare? Why Not?
weaponeer replied to FascistLibertarian's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
What if he is the one who ends up with no legs? How is he ever going to pay off his medical debt? What will he do for a living? He is only 16, not been to university yet or learned a trade... where will the money come from? Do you expect that he (legless) will get a student loan (who would loan money to someone in debt to the tune of $250,000?) and go on to university, earn a degree and get out making big bucks. Poor kid would probably end up committing suicide and you would be to blame. One mistake. You are a nasty father -- your kid makes one mistake and not only does he have no legs but he will never be debt free again. There will be ongoing treatment which will only add to his debt. I am not a nasty father, but I am not a pussy assed wimp either. Responsibility is what I have tought them, you screw up you have to take the consequences. In the USA if MY son in this scenario lost his legs, my insurance company wouls sue the person whom injured my boys company for the medical costs. As well, I could sue him for injuries/damages. In Canada, if this person hurt my son like this I am powerless, I cannot sue for damages, no fault insurance. -
Private Healthcare? Why Not?
weaponeer replied to FascistLibertarian's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
I've never heard of a comparision of auto and home insurance between the US and Canada,is there a big difference in those two? My point was about private health insurance. Where I lived in Oklahoma you could purcahse your auto, home and health insurance from the same company and get reduced rates.... -
This is the true account of how mankind has developed. Humans originally existed as members of small bands of nomadic hunters/gatherers. They lived on deer in the mountains during the summer and would go to the coast and live on fish and lobster in the winter. The two most important events in all of history were the invention of beer and the invention of the wheel. The wheel was invented to get man to the beer. These were the foundation of modern civilization and together were the catalyst for the splitting of humanity into two distinct subgroups: 1. Liberals; and 2. Conservatives. Once beer was discovered, it required grain and that was the beginning of agriculture. Neither the glass bottle nor aluminium can were invented yet, so while our early humans were sitting around waiting for them to be invented, they just stayed close to the brewery. That's how villages were formed. Some men spent their days tracking and killing animals to B-B-Q at night while they were drinking beer. This was the beginning of what is known as the Conservative movement. Other men who were weaker and less skilled at hunting learned to live off the conservatives by showing up for the nightly B-B- Q's and doing the sewing, fetching, and hair dressing. This was the beginning of the Liberal movement. Some of these liberal men eventually evolved into women. The rest became known as girliemen. Some noteworthy liberal achievements include the domestication of cats, the invention of group therapy, group hugs, and the concept of Democratic voting to decide how to divide the meat and beer that conservatives provided. Modern liberals like imported beer (with lime added), but most prefer white wine or imported bottled water. They eat raw fish but like their beef well done. Sushi, tofu, and French food are standard liberal fare. Another interesting evolutionary side note: most of their women have higher testosterone levels than their men. Most social workers, personal injury attorneys, journalists, dreamers in Toronto and group therapists are liberals. Liberals invented the designated hitter rule because it wasn't fair to make the pitcher also bat. Conservatives drink domestic beer. They eat red meat and still provide for their women. Conservatives are big-game hunters, rodeo cowboys, lumberjacks, construction workers, firemen, medical doctors, police officers, corporate executives, athletes, Marines, and generally anyone who works productively. Conservatives who own companies hire other conservatives who want to work for a living. Liberals produce little or nothing. They like to govern the producers and decide what to do with the production. Liberals believe Europeans are more enlightened than Canadians. That is why most of the liberals remained in Europe when conservatives were coming to Canada. They crept in after the Wild West was tamed and created a business of trying to get more for nothing. Here ends today's lesson in world history: It should be noted that a Liberal may have a momentary urge to angrily respond to the above before forwarding it. A Conservative will simply laugh and be so convinced of the absolute truth of this history that it will be forwarded immediately to other true believers and to more liberals just to piss them off.
-
Private Healthcare? Why Not?
weaponeer replied to FascistLibertarian's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
How so? Family is important. Who are you getting your info from? The govt does not pay our bills. I don't know about you but I pay my own hydro... The govt does not look after our kids. Daycares (usually private -- a mom with an extra room or the YMCA) are paid by the working person. If working person earns lotsa dough then they pay for it, if not the govt kicks in so that the working poor can keep working. This is a bad idea? Is is better for a single parent to work at Zellers (getting a $300/month subsidy for daycare) or stay at home and collect welfare ($1000/month). Which is less? Which costs the taxpayer less? Of course. And when your 16 yo son wrecks his car -- do you want him to be saddled with a $250,000 debt for making a mistake by driving too fast? We do, we pay health insurance premiums on top of the taxes that are collected from us. So our medical system certainly is not "free". No way! Combine me and my car on one policy -- that is too funny. (and rather convoluted I would think). Well, the car is covered for scratches but your not! LOL Yes, if my 16 old son seriously hurt someone while being stupid he should pay, and be saddled with a debt. The person he hurt may be saddled with no legs!! There are consequences for our actions. -
Not to get off topic,but, this has me questioning.... Is the financial savings so great for these dresses that it pays to rent a car from Toronto and go to Buffalo and return, just to look at bridesmaid dresses? One would think a good horse blanket with eyeholes would do... LOL:):)
-
Private Healthcare? Why Not?
weaponeer replied to FascistLibertarian's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
I came back because I was transfered back, but that's not what we are talking about. No, I don't hate our social system, I think it absolves people of their responsibilities. Families are not important, the gov't will pay our bills, look after our kids etc... any probs/issues, the gov't will solve it... I believe in personal responsibility. You helped make yourself sick, you should pay something. You hurt somebody, you get out your cheque book.... I did see the movie John Q, lots of BS in it. I lived in Oklahoma, I talked about the whole healthcare issue alot with my neighbours. They are not in favor of our system at all. They can purcahse group health plans, combine home auto and health insurance into a packages. They can tailor their coverage etc.... You can buy insurance to cover you for long term care, loss of wages etc... or you can choose not too...your choice not the gov'ts... -
The whole idea of a legal or illegal war is insane!!!!
-
Private Healthcare? Why Not?
weaponeer replied to FascistLibertarian's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
Actually I am talking about a large tax cut, 50-70% range. We tend to forget when we compare our system to the US system (in order to scare Canadians) that our American counterparts pay far less taxes than we do. I lived in the USA for years, if you had a job you had healthcare, and far better than we have here. I live in North Bay ON, hospital there is a joke to say the least. I take my family to the USA for anything major. You see, we already have a two tiered system. Why should I pay taxes through the ass so some guy that smokes 3 pack a day can have a new lung. Where is his responsibility in this. A person whom acts foolishly and causes the injury to another, should they not pay something for the treatment of the one they harmed... but again, leftards do not understand the concept of personal responsibility.... only the culture of entitlment.... If you make below a certain income level, you get medicare, everyone else buys insurance....