guyser

There aren't any here? Hows about that huh? Guess what, we have had threads about Jet planes (F35) and NOT A SINGLE engineering whos worked on them has posted. Why is that? Hmmmm? Guess what? We've had threads on the NHL, and NOT A SINGLE pro hockey player has posted Why is that? Hmmm? Apparently only you have this problem.

If only that were true. But you can sleep nicely making things up all you want.

What does a Kirpan say to anyone other than a Sikh? Its a knife..........and carried in school. and allowed. Symbol is meaningless really. We have ok'd others as we have this one. Taking offense and codifying laws are two different things Argus. I may be offended, and may not. I can say easily that I would be in some scenarios and some not. The point is we all have an offensive meter....and all are different. But we dont in law. The words have to have physical or the chance of physical harm for it to be brought into a court.

Why do you post water is wet when everyone knows this? Good lord you a pain in the ass. I know what it is , We all know what it is. What the SCC is saying is it deosnt matter, she can wear it, afterall, she was privately confirmed as to who she was. Huh? And you want to talk about maturity? What value are you talking about? We are talking about a SCC ruling ......duh Poor poor rue, always playing the jew card. Feel repressed are we? Good lord, you wanna talk about zip over the head? The inclusion of a yarmulke was (and as shown) was to compare that some religions are given a bit of a carte blanche in certain areas, think Turbans, Kirpans, Yarmulkes and Succah. But of course any mention of jewish is baiting. We get it, you are incredicbly thin skinned . IF so, ok....so is a yarmulke or succah. IOW....ok for you to dictate but any dictating to you is verboten. Oh my...poor me and the opression- got that about right? Sure seems so. Your religion is of no concern to me, obviously it is merely a card for you to play , whiny folks like that are a problem. You bring up a lot of stupid childish BS . Pathetic really. You dont, Look above in your posts FFS . Its accommodation !!!! How F hard is it to see. ONe gets accommodated, they all get accommodated Kirpans Succah Turbans Crucifixes Yarmulke How can one be so damn ignorant ? Yup....totaly ,missed the point Good job What, no dead dad jokes today?

You first, make it two months and we will see how much better it gets, It actually was pretty good for a week or two.....say werent you gone for somewhere around that time? Maybe you are on to something.

Not in any the same way as a Hosp CEO does. What does Rona have? Masters? Arts degree? (not that I weight it lightly) CEO of HRR? Yea....I think you can see the problem. What happens when Harper decides to replace Rona? He picks from his own bench. What happens when the CEO of HRR needs to be booted and replaced? Open the door and yell next? Come on, I am not slagging on any Minister, but it is certainly not in the same league as a CEO of a major Hosp. How many hours did ROna put in learning about the Minstry of Health? Did they test her at all? Hours are not the measuring stick per se. In the first, I suspect both do long hours. But I cannot help the simple fact that our defence wages are horrible. But thats for the Ministry of Defence to correct. The TO CoP is paid by the city.,.....for them to decide. Ok, ya gots me on the professor.....i concur.

Good thing I am not a Dr like the guy in the video, nor am I a paid shrill like him because that would mean I make really stupid claims of " one can drink a quart of this or that and be safe." Tim, seriously, stop this insanity. He made the claim. He wouldnt back it up. WOuldnt take even a sip. Period. Full stop Dance all you want but it was a dumb thing for him to say and he wears it now.

Yawn blah blah blah...more spouting nonsense. Show me back it up...but you wont. It was idiotic, join him, leave him I dont care, but it is what it is. Idiotic Ok you can try but I suspect epic fail... Woo hoo...so far youve told us water is wet. Thanks teach ! What intolerance? Yours and tims who cannot tolerate what someone wears? I find yarmulke intolerant? Now what? Remove them? Naw, let em wear them, after all, no skin of my back. Gosh, how easy is that? Pretty hard for some blowhard who want to tell woman what to wear. I do hear it is a jewish thing too, orthodox of course but there ya go. sexually repressive? WTF are you on about and when did YOU decide this for these women? Wow, talk about missing the point

LOL. You stand by that one . Lets recap this shall we? You decided (for yourself) your offended by what a single womna puts on her head. You decided that words are offensive (they arent of course , only if direct harm can or does to come ) Therefore , the bad words being banned means someones headdress should be banned. Oh my.....the single worst comparison in MLW history. I find TV shows about little kids beauty pageants offensive.(not criminally tho) I find people calling other folks bad names offensive .(not criminally tho) Therefore guns should be banned. Have I got it right?

Oh I certainly would.......if I made the claim that 'one can drink a whole glass of it and be safe". But I didnt, so the question is moot. Your point is ridiculous and you know it, but for some reason logic escapes you here. "ridiculous for people to conclude that his refusal provides any information about the safety of the product. " See ^....what is idiotic is to make the claim and then fail to back it up.His refusal to drink abosolutely makes his product he is shilling not safe to drink...otherwise he would have. Monumental stupidity is shooting your mouth off with nothing to back it up.

The guy was a classic BS idiot. He made the claim, he couldnt /wouldnt back it up. As for anyone tainting the Roundup, totally preposterous and without a shred of merit. Bill Gates promoted a fliter for water from tainted sources and then drank it on camera. So have many others. Funny how that works.

Same thing really. The Deputy of Health, Minister of Health whatever, the Dr running the hospital has immensely harder job and a ton load more obligations and commitments. Does a CEO of HRR get a summer break? Does he call for a break in July and tell everyone...." see you when the Fall sitting commences'?

You can attempt to squirn all you want but the basic premise throughout this thread was banning clothing is ridiculous and against our Charter , as evidenced by the SCC . Good lord, how disconnected can one be in their immediate arguments? You quote the Charter in a post = good You slam the Charter in this post = not good.

Suppression of rights is something you agree with. Not surprised but expect this to come back and bite you. I guess if suppresion of clothing, religious and the not so religious , you will attend synagogue tonight and request a ban on yarmulke's and the seperation of women from men in the orthodox synagogue? What? You wont? Why am, I not surprised? Let me leave you with your buddy tim's quote, only slightly modified.....You Support free from religion only when you are not offended is no defense of freedom.

Why don't you make the right argument instead of hiding behind the made up oppression BS. e.g. freedom from clothing means people should be able to wear things that offend you personally Hmm.....best ponder that.

Yes they have, by saying that the Govt is trying to make clothing illegal, the posters here have consistently said thats dumb. What like the way some (cough cough) have open disregard for scientists and academics who want to discuss global warming, or is it the ones who get mocked for protesting against big oil? Those progressives? Take another gander at the Charter will youre at it, you may find something of value as respects trying to ban a piece of clothing.

Um tim....you are projecting your own version here. No one has said the hood or swastika is forbiden nor do they want it to be, Politcally Correct is merely a buzzword for righties who dont get their way. Congrats to you, youve earned it.

Did you outfit an apartment building hi-rise? How else could one spend $100k on appliances.

Got a link for that?

SoS is par for the course.

You mean this entire thread where folks have debated that the govt cannot ban an article of clothing? No tim, you Argus and a couple of others have been arguing that this womans covering be banned when it offends them personally , not to mention the article in question has nothing to do with you me nor anyone else, doesnt impact our way of life, doesnt hurt us in the slightest and so on. They have, its just you who has some weird hang up on trying to input some value to the swastika/KKK hoods . And you seem to ignore when that is pointed out. Id laugh pretty loud if some guy walked by me with a KKK hood or swastika adorned jacket. Id actually shake his hand and congratulate him or her on their outfit with a complimentary 'you are proud to display your ignorance and I salute that'

Now now , please dont bring common sense into the argument. No place for that. People , lots of 'em, want to keep their kids ignorant , dumbed down versions of themselves. Most of them have no idea that most of these kids have prior knowledge of all the sex acts their parents dont have a clue about nor understand. I guess they could all move to Texes or Alabama .

Primarily the problem as presented is that one is somparing a hospital CEO to a Minister of Health. Who has the harder job? Who has the harder time figuring out the wheres and whys of medical hospitals , staffing , legal issues , funding issues and the daily minutiae of running a huge hospital(s) DOes Rona have 3000 staff? 700 Dr's to deal with ?

Probably best to write "community standards" out as Charter of Rights and Freedoms, but I suspect you wont. Yup. Knock youself out. I think youve tried this angle of reasoning a half dozen times, no one has said they cant. Subjugation...something you determined on your own I see. Good thing 'your values' are pretty much worthless in the scheme of things huh> The court spoke.

Not to mention big pharma pushing for making it prhobited lo those many decades ago Who knew....politicians were money whores way back when too!