sunsettommy

I would doubt that Ann is nothing but an amusement for the right. She gets Libs riled and they like that. I also think they do not take her serious although I am aware of some on the right saying she better shut up as she is doing no one any favours. Ann has been shown for what she is, classless agitating homophobe who when presented with the truth attacks the messenger. Shes lightweight stuff.... LOL, For someone who is called this: "Shes lightweight stuff...." She is able to get you,newbie,Figleaf and millions of others excited to a high degree. He he....

Are you talking about the "Marxist one world government" conspiracy I hear so much of these days? No. What about this? How Many Climate Scientists Were Involved With Writing the 2007 IPCC Statement For Policymakers? Canadian Blue are you curious?

Maybe instead of a running verbal battle that some of you seem to have been doing including in this thread. Try the ignore button. Life is better when you do not have to put up with the pointless nagging.

That's my impression too. So what do they gain from this, are they trying to prevent panic? At a time when the scientists believe that action to prevent additional global warming is required, and in fact that we should be trying to adapt our civilization to live with the degree of changes that we can't prevent, some level of panic seems necessary. The fact that they aren't trying to bring science forward showing that minimizing concern is more appropriate means that they accept the IPCC scientists conclusions. Perhaps it is only that the longer we can continue to milk the existing system the more toys we can get before we die. I guess.... depending on the toys, eh? Oh really? How Many Climate Scientists Were Involved With Writing the 2007 IPCC Statement For Policymakers? Filed under: Climate Science Op-Eds — Roger Pielke Sr. @ 7:00 am EXCERPT: The media is in error when it states that, “The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change –made up of thousands of scientists from around the world — reported earlier this month they are more certain than ever that humans are heating earth’s atmosphere through the burning of fossil fuels….” (see) Are there really “thousands of scientists” who wrote this report? Hardly. The IPCC is actually led and written by just a few dozen scientists. There is a summary of the final stages in writing the 2007 IPCC Statement for Policymakers in the February 18, 2007 edition of the Denver Post. The article is by Kevin Trenberth and is titled Climate report on deadline. The article states that “A full report that’s the basis for the summary was drafted by 154 lead authors and more than 450 contributing authors and runs to about 900 pages. As one of about 30 lead authors attending the meeting, I found the experience both exhilarating and grueling. http://climatesci.colorado.edu/2007/03/09/...r-policymakers/

Yes, that's the point of the article. The report is not too alarmist, quite the opposite, it is not sufficiently alarmist for the reality of the situation. Spoken like the alarmist YOU are. LOL Valid science research simply does not operate this way. It is sad when Scientists are compromised by politics.

"A new global warming report issued Friday by the United Nations paints a near-apocalyptic vision of Earth’s future: hundreds of millions of people short of water, extreme food shortages in Africa, a landscape ravaged by floods and millions of species sentenced to extinction.Despite its harsh vision, the report was quickly criticized by some scientists who said its findings were watered down at the last minute by governments seeking to deflect calls for action." Yup drop the idea of the scientific method and make dire prediction of the future. LOL "An earlier draft, for example, specified that water would become increasingly scarce for up to a billion people in Asia if temperatures rose 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit - a point that previous studies have said is likely to be reached by 2100." Really they can be that precise 93 years ahead of time! LOLOLOL "The report is the second of four scheduled to be issued this year by the U.N., which marshaled more than 2,500 scientists to give their best predictions of the consequences of a few degrees increase in temperature. The first report, released in February, said global warming was irreversible but could be moderated by large-scale societal changes." "Best predictions" is all they have? BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!! "Between 20% and 30% of the world’s species will disappear if temperatures rise 2.7 to 4.5 degrees, the report said." Including stupid scientists (a species) for making untestable far into the future claims of a warming earths impact. "Global warming is already underway, but it is not too late to slow it down and reduce its harmful effects,” she said. “We must base our actions on the moral imperative and the scientific record, free of political interference.” Yes we must bring in the all knowing world government into the forefront. “When you have it this black and white, it is very hard to deny the reality and continue to do nothing,” she said. “I don’t know how you do that if you have a moral bone in your body.” When we read of such idiocy above.We have to wonder what ever happened to the idea of valid science research that can be TESTABLE!

This thread devolved into mudslinging. Was it Yellow mud that caused it?

I think everything is faked. Its all a play staged by the internationalist/Zionist/Central Banker/Fabian/Anglo-Dutch Royalty central powers of the world. But you believe it and I was wondering what you thought of that latest twist. Polynewbie is a fake. He is really a millionaire sipping soda a mile offshore of Maldives islands. I know this since the BBS shows photoshops of him sunning on his yacht. He has enemies that is why he is far off the beaten path contemplating his next move. That is the truth!

god almighty that was previously posted here, and is a piece of garbage. I wrote this about it about that already................ kuzadd; so why do you think this was written, phony conversation and smear , taken into consideration. I think I named some of the techniques used in it. do you recognize them? Do you know what a Factual REBUTTAL is? LOL.

LOLOLOLOLOLOL! He lies about the Polar Bears populations. He B.S.'s about Sea Levels increases. The man had an erratic academic college career. Gore's Grades Belie Image of Studiousness His School Transcripts Are a Lot Like Bush's By David Maraniss and Ellen Nakashima Washington Post Staff Writers Sunday, March 19, 2000; Page A01 Excerpt: If Al Gore is commonly thought of as a grind, the sort of fellow who during his school days would take notes in precise Roman numeral outline, strive mightily to ingratiate himself with teachers, and bring sterling report cards home to his demanding parents, his academic transcripts go some way toward subverting that notion. From his lower school years at St. Albans to his incomplete effort at Vanderbilt law school, Gore was often an underachiever. Though his IQ numbers and aptitude test scores were well above average, his grades were uneven, never approaching the plateau of A's and B's that might be expected of one who possesses such a pedagogical demeanor. His generally middling college grades at Harvard in fact bear a close resemblance to the corresponding Yale marks of his presidential opponent, George W. Bush, whose studiousness and brainpower have been more open to question during this campaign. http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?p...37397-2000Mar18 Al Gore lies a lot and what is more he is strangely ignorant in science issues.

I thought Gore was an idiot because he distorts the issue so much that even prominent AGW's are backing away from this buffoon. He he ......... Global Warming does exist.

That is fine B.Max Funny since you ANSWERED my question which was NOT directed to you personally.It was open to anyone who would answer my question. Since I did not put a gun to your head.It was up to you to make an honest answer. Something you failed to do. LOL

Well you could have read the original post where I said I had been watching some of it on TV. If I had the Gore trans script I would have given it to you . How old are you? Look Max I read that story even before you posted it on this forum and what is more I even read your first post too.Imagine that! I had asked for the transcript because No one in this thread was making a provable case on whether Gore or Inhofe was an idiot. BASED on what they actually said. Since you and nobody else in this thread provided actual dialoguge between the two men.You and nobody else can NOT prove anything. Here is my entire first post in this thread.Post #20. My second post.#35 You finally bit at post #39.I ignored Canadian blues reply since it was not a TRANSCRIPT. B.Max: That was in answer to my post # 35. What I see is that you can not admit that you paid no attention to the fact that I was requesting a TRANSCRIPT on what Gore and Inhofe said. YOU gave me a link that led me to a very different group of people. When are you ever going to admit that you gave me a run around?

I don't have a trans script and never said I did. I said I watched some it on TV. Oh my! I from the start specifically asked for a transcript of the exchanges between AL GORE and Senator INHOFE. So why did you spend all that time directing me to a DIFFERENT transcript to finally say this: "I don't have a trans script and never said I did. I said I watched some it on TV." You could have said nothing in the first place and save yourself and mine time from the run around. LOL

B.Max, I asked for a TRANSCRIPT concerning the verbal exchanges between Al Gore and Senator Inhofe. What you gave me was this: "MIT Climate Scientist Calls Fears of Global Warming 'Silly' - Equates Concerns to ‘Little Kids’ Attempting to "Scare Each Other" February 1, 2007 Posted By Marc Morano - [email protected] 12:33 PM ET - February 1, 2007 MIT Meteorologist Richard Lindzen’s appearance on CNN’s Larry King Live on January 31, 2007 at 9:00 PM EST" This was between Lindzen,Nye and Cullen. Try again.

I asked for a TRANSCRIPT. Thanks anyway.

Huh? What happened to the few 100,000's Iraqi's who died under the benovolent rule of Iraq?

I think you'd better reread Liam's post above. There is nothing racist about it. His gripe, as is most of the West, has to do with the radical extreme fundamentalist muslim, not the religion as a whole. using this argument to attack Islam (or any singled out religion) is nothing but racist - even if you guys are blind to it - it is real, it eats away at civilization and is as harmful to those who believe it as it is to those who it attacks the truth is, none of those descriptions escape any extremist religious faction and there are NOT more muslim extremist sects than there are Buddhist, Christian or Jewish extremist sects -- you can hide from it but you can't change the truth Aw geez and I thought LIAM was being specific about the EXTREMIST members of Islam.He did not condemn the religion itself. Come on Guthrie! So attacking extremist members of RELIGIONS is a racist act? LOLOLOLOLOL!!! Try reading a dictionary next time. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/racist

Here's something better. http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?Fus...91-E3975CBB96CB Nope not working. Try again.

We will all be 10 years older. He he .... Ask the AGW crowd since they know all about making 50 to 100 year climatic projections and be serious about it. Will it snow in brownsville in year 2016? Will it ________________________ ?

Well since nobody heeded my suggestion of a TRANSCRIPT about what the two men actually said. I will say that you guys failed to prove your claims. He he he ......

Well golly you use statistics from before the war and my gosh the children seriously SUFFERED under Saddam's rule. LOL! You have as yet provided statistical evidence that the children continue to have similar number of deaths during the 2 WEEKS ground war and the subsequent terror/guerilla war afterwards. Pony up please.

No. Most are dying from Malnutrition,poor healthcare and drinking water? Please back this up and by the way almost all of the children these days are being killed by the terrorists.

Come on you guys! Where is that TRANSCRIPT of the exchange between Gore and Inhofe? I want to know what they really said. So far this thread is a classic squabble and no facts.

You are kidding. You think the Iraqi people are free? You have NO right to make any of your claims until the foreign invaders are out of Iraq. You mean those "freedom fighters"? He he he ......