Accountability Now

They just want the freedom to spread Covid just as much as their vaccinated friends. Oh wait…that’s already happening!!

Except it wasn’t one word. Misogynists. Racists. He used a number of words to push divide and succeeded because people like you think it’s not a big deal. Again. If that’s your opinion then so be it but it’s not mine

Why is it an either or situation? His choice of words sets the stage for criticism about the emergency act. It’s all part of the Trudeau story

Actually if you look at my posts on here, 99% of them are discussing numbers or objective facts. I rarely discuss things that center on opinion which clearly this topic was.

Again with the personal insult. Perhaps you need to refresh yourself with the Forum Rules? However, I take no real offense from someone who doesn't actually understand the English language.

Your opinion and I have mine. Again...I have quoted the opinions of others out there including Bill Maher who is a notable Liberal pundit. Stop pretending that this is just me noticing the connection. If its not that big of a deal then why do you and others on here keep responding??? I made the claim once and since then have only responded to other poster's faux outrage. Contrary to what you think, this doesn't strike that big of a nerve for me. I am used to Trudeau saying big boy things in French and then scrambling like a buffoon to deny it in English. ? How many people do you think watch Parliamentary proceedings in Canada, not just in Canada but around the world?? Now compare that to how many people (around the world) are talking about Trudeau's Hitler like comments.

Nope. I think I nailed it pretty well and you know it.

Yes...antivaxxers are all misogynists and racists. Didn't you get the memo from Dear Leader???

Actually those ones would have had little to no effect too as we are used to those sentiments. Oh...but here's where you're wrong. He prefaced his "tolerate" sentiment with they are misogynism and racism. He wasn't criticizing them for their actions but rather for who they were as people. Actually the whole world is listening. Maybe you just put your ear plugs in to avoid hearing the truth?

I truly love it when people resort to insults as it means they are defeated in the argument. Just to hammer home the English lesson, comparisons are not comparisons. Keep trying Aristides. One day you just might get there.

You failed English class didn't you? Absolute comparisons are not the same things as relative comparisons. If you are short then then you are LIKE Hitler. If you have a mustache then you are LIKE Hitler. If you say things like "Do we tolerate people" then you are LIKE Hitler. None of these mean that you ARE Hitler. @WestCanMan said it best. If you took the "Do we tolerate" statement and replaced the association of the unvaccinated with ANY other group, there would be a riot. For example. Blacks....do we tolerate? Chinese...do we tolerate? Gays...do we tolerate? Trudeau is not a dumb guy so saying that his English skills are poor is not a fair assessment. He chose those words to inflame and to incite hatred towards the unvaccinated. He wanted to rally the rest of the vaccinated against those who chose not to get the shot and low and behold it worked as suckers like you vehemently go after the unvaccinated and let Trudeau off free. With all that said, I love the fact that I have posted numerous clips of people drawing the same Hitler comparison, one of which is a known Liberal pundit and yet you have posted only your opinion. And somehow I am the idiot? At least you got the spelling right because the rest of your English comprehension needs a lot of work.

All good points Moonbox however this will be the third time I've said that Hitler is the extreme. Anyone can be compared to an extreme but it only works if you can back it up. When you make a claim like "Do we tolerate these people?", you are certainly opening yourself up for those comparisons and other more notable people that me have also made this comparison (as per the above links). Keep in mind, its not that one is saying Trudeau IS Hitler....that would be stupid I find the platforms of every party seem to meld into one another so much that I'm only truly looking for someone that represents Canada in a positive light. I actually wasn't upset when Trudeau won. His first morning after the election he was in the subway shaking people's hands and thanking them which I thought was cool. It didn't take long though to realize he was an empty suit with a narcissistic flair. I will agree with you though in that Scheer and O'Toole were both duds and even I wasn't a fan of having them represent the county. Where we will disagree is that I think Pollievre is the only guy that can beat Trudeau as he has the ability to take him on debate wise. If that's not enough, Quebec may mistake him as one of their own with a name like Pierre. Ontario may vote for him because he'd be the first PM from a sitting Ontario PM since Lester Pearson and of course Alberta, Sask and Manitoba will vote for him because that's what they do. I was actually thinking Bergen would be a good choice too but she's out now that she's interim leader.

I've already stated that Hitler is the extreme. With that said, people are saying Trudeau is acting like or sounding like Hitler even those on the left. Believe it or not, I'm not calling for his head but do want him gone by parliamentary methods. But contrary to what you say, the loudest mob does win. Unfortunately, when it comes time for elections, the leftist mob seems to go deaf to Trudeau's history including ethics violations, scandals and blackface. Trudeau is now an international joke but people in the east will continue to elect him regardless of what he does.

First off...you can ask the liberal commentator Mr. Maher how. Second...if Trump ever used the words "do we tolerate these people", the US would have gone up in flames of angry rage. BTW....Don Cherry got canned for saying " you people" for something that was largely misconstrued. Yet our glorious leader can use language largely directly at inflaming and targeting a group of people and there is zero consequence. There is no consequence for any of Trudeau's antics especially from his loving left.

Ok...what about Bill Maher:

We're not the only one's comparing Trudeau to Hitler. Check out this tweet from Elon Musk.

Michael was stating that one can't say Trudeau hates the unvaccinated simply because no one has ever heard him say those words. I countered by saying actions and other speech can clearly show hatred and used Hitler as the example knowing he is the extreme example.

Keep tryIng…

You’re missing the point. A little hint…this isn’t actually about Hitler

Oh….but did he ever say “I hate Jews”? If not then Michael would say you can’t make the claim

Except you haven’t made any points. You are resting on the fact that Trudeau hasn’t explicitly stated he hates them. According to your logic, someone has to explicitly state that fact for it to be true, hence the Hitler analogy.

What policy? I’m basing opinion on it

I wonder if Hitler ever said he hated the Jews? If not I guess we can’t draw conclusions

So someone needs to say those exact words for it to me true? Ones actions or even other words can’t suggest or even prove it?