White Doors

If it is inaccurate, feel free to clarify. I watch what you post.

err.... Your opinions don't best serve me, so that's strike one. Secondly, you mentioned that you are starting a political party... hence, you ARE partisan. Strike two...

Actually, socialism is what precipitated this mess. The government pressured lending institutions to give mortgages to people who would not normally qualify. The answer is not more regulation, but less.

Realism trumps wishful idealism. All that it takes for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing. You are not only wanting us to do nothing, you seem to be saying that the Taliban aren't such bad guys afterall. It's mind numbingly shallow of you to think that we should pull out and leave the innocents of Afghanistan to the will of the Taliban. How do you reconcile this with what one would assume is your backing of feminism?

All others? Please. just because your line of reasoning, isn't reasonable - don't play all high and mighty with me. You are human just like anyone else. Human deaths happen. It is how they happen that are important, something that seems too complicated or bothersome for you to care about. That's what happens when you present a simplistic argument. Don't blame me, blame the argument you advanced.

So you feel Canadian Forces are over there just killing civilians? They are up to no good at all? Evil little bastards, those Canadian soldiers, in your blighted world view, aren't they? Christ. If the world was ordered around being zero tolerance for death then we might as well all stop doing everything now. If the only measure if is no one is allowed to die, then nothing can be done. nothing, anywhere. wait, people will die if nothing is done too. So nothing is not allowed either. See how mush of a BS position yours is now? nah, I doubt it - but others do.

I don't think Condoleeza Rice was painted with that 'brush' and even if she were, her sheer intellect and political prowess would have made short work of it. Biden would not have enjoyed debating Rice. (to say the least).

I think so. As for Coulter, you say that you dislike her for her being so vociferous and agressive in her attacks. Yet you are very aggressive in your attack on her. How are you different from Coulter?

Actually, you can thank the Quebec Supreme court who said it violated people's rights to not be able to buy medical care. I know I thank them everytime I think about it. Private care is here and will be increasing. A government that can balance that with the public system to make sure that all who want medical care, can have it, would be the pragmatic and compassionate choice. Wasting time violating people's constitutional rights trying to shut down private delivery of health care is NOT what is needed now. Your Ideological preferences should not (and thankfully now, DO NOT) violate my right to get medical treatment. Too bad so sad for you and your ilk.

And this post of yours is so loveable...

The sense of it all! Mortgages for people who can afford them! Who woulda thought?

Count me as one. After Palin was shown to have no substance, there really is no other choice. Now if McCain had chosed Condoleeza Rice as VP...

No, because there was no such policy when reform was active. Did they not tell you this on your citizenship test comrade?

Agreed, but not regardless of deeds.

Rule him out? You did notice that Harper won, correct? You are giving way too much credence to left-wing rhetoric. If the Liberals are to win, they have to move to the centre, Rae and Ignatief will not do this - McKenna may. Personally, depending on the platform McKenna ran on, I would have a hard time not voting for him myself.

Unless it's McKenna at the helm of the Libs, Harper won't have much to fear.

If McKenna wants it, he's got it. No one would be able to stop him. simple.

Of Diefenbaker, yes. John A.? No, he was in the Conservative party, not the Progressive Conservative party. History is fun! you should try it!

you would, would you? lol

You're welcome

And you seem to have a hard time 'ignoring' him. I'd suggest that you make up your mind and stop taking threads off topic. Thank you

No, you have it backwards. If it was technically illegal, it wouldn't have happened. (by definition) The legal system is all about 'technicalities' doncha know. The correct way to term it would be to say that the latest election was technically legal.

------------------- This just in - the election is over. Time to suck it up and move on