Black Dog

Once again I'll remind you that the Olympic boxer you were throwing a fit over has "female" on her birth certificate. When they do ultrasounds on fetuses to determine sex, they don't do genetic tests Physical attributes can be altered you know. Genetically perhaps, but who cares? Imagine you (well, a much younger you) went out and this person started hitting on you: Are you stopping to pull out a genetic testing kit before taking them home? Be serious.

Oh look you're lying again. Again: being aware of its existence via "exposure" to headlines, tweets is not the same as reading it. You total dunce. Huh is this the kind of content that is supposed to appeal to it's massive readership from the centre left side of the political spectrum. LOL seems like humiliating yourself is another part of your NPC programming.

Your original metric for measuring its popularity was website visits now you're trying to claim that simply being aware of its existence is the same as reading it. You have shit for brains if you think this is fooling anyone.

538 had Harris +1.6 11 days ago and +3 now.

You're lying as usual. This was your "evidence" based on a wikipedia article. Even if we accept that 25 million page views is "widely read", the type of content it does is not proof of the diversity of its readership at all. Again, I have never clicked on a Bee article, visited its website or social media accounts, if seeing and registering headlines posted by deranged losers like you here or elsewhere on the internet means i have "read" the bee then I have read the Bible because I saw one in a hotel nightstand once. No, that's your thing, remember? Maybe post a few more times about it and that will help it manifest lmao.

You didn't give any evidence for your claim it was widely read across the political spectrum. You cited some numbers that would indicate it's widely read and then you assumed that some of those people might be non-right wing people but that assumption is not evidence. Your other piece of evidence was a statement from its long-departed founder that they go after all sides, but again, that's not evidence of it being widely read across the political spectrum. Once again, you have proven yourself completely incapable of supporting your own arguments, but at least this time you didn't cite a source that completely proved you wrong, so that's progress of a sort. lmao

Because how someone behaves in large part determines how they are perceived and therefore defined. Literally everything around us is defined by how we perceive it and choose to define it based on that perception. How are objective facts determined, exactly? Sex is biology, gender is (largely) social.

It's not anymore than saying a lawyer is someone who practice law would be. The simple fact you were blathering about women who dress and look like men shows that somewhere in the recesses of your lizard brain that you understand how gender is socially constructed and how one conforms to that social construct determines the extent to which they are considered a woman by others, but it just hasn't bubbled to the surface yet. too complicated I guess.

And you've provided zero evidence of that and are now trying to contort yourself around the idea that my commenting in a headline you posted from an article I didn't click on is the same thing as "reading" it. It's absolute nonsense from top to bottom.

LOL you've lost track of your own argument here already, amazing.

Nah I can't recall which thread it is, but it was something along the lines of "the social roles, behaviours and expectations associated with adult females" and you were like "noooo not good enough!!!!"

Wait you're going to count just scrolling pst something in your TL as "reading it". LOL wtaf.

I did, you just didn't like it but again, that's not my problem. If you can't keep track, maybe you should just f*ck off.

"You didn't give me the definition I wanted so I'm gonna cry about it forever" lol f*ck off loser.

"Seeing something on your feed" and "actively seeking out content" are two different things which you would know if you weren't retarded, but alas! There's no indication anyone who isn't already in a right wing content bubble is reading this junk and your usual crowing about how right you are in spite of having no proof of your assertions doesn't change that. Oh look, the NPC has activated one of his four dialogue trees.

Here's why this tampon thing isn't going to do shit. There are arguments to be made for women/girls having their own spaces and not allowing trans people to compete in women's sports that many middle-of-the-road people would find compelling because of safety and fairness. But who is being served by freaking out over tampons in boys bathrooms? Who's interests are being protected here? Anyone who actually thinks "we shouldn't cater to the delusions of mentally ill children" is a compelling message to moderates has been huffing their own farts for too long, but we all know that's not the point. It's just in-group signalling for chronically online rwnjs.

What someone "really is" biologically is pretty much irrelevant for most of these discussions. They are and you've admitted as much lol. Biological sex doesn't matter in this scenario right up until the point it does.

I wonder why they bother dressing like that if anyone would be able to tell it's actually a man dressed as a bush.

If woman who dresses like a man and looks like a man walks into the bathroom where you are you would perceive them as a man (unless you decided to stick your head under the stall they were using which we can't rule out). Their biological sex in that moment is completely irrelevant.

That's an assumption not supported by the evidence on offer. Also worth pointing out something that seems to have escaped your notice even though it was in your own source (which you didn't read), that the Bee was sold in 2020 and has for the last four years featured exclusively pro conservative/anti-left content. LOL "everyone in my echo chamber posts it therefore it's popular" you're totally retarded. No? the only time I have ever seen it it is when some conservative boomer posts something from it and the algorithm sticks it in my "for you" tab, I have literally never clicked on a Bee post or the site in my life.

LOL why do none of the retarded conservatives on this board have any self awareness? You are the one who is constantly advocating for using the coercive power of the state to suppress viewpoints you don't agree with. You're a fascist through and through.

here we go again If gender and sex are the same thing why should a woman who dressed like a man and looks like a man change their gender expression? Are you telling me you can't tell someone's biological sex without social cues like clothing? I did, you're just too dumb to understand it, which is entirely a "you" problem.

lmao

That the same dummy who said gEndEr is NoT asSigNEd also said this is *chef's kiss*