Black Dog

It's funny that in a place full of mentally ill right wingers, this Dougie guy stands out as the biggest rat in the shithouse. Completely bugged out.

Turkey sucks, no idea how that shitty bird became the official holiday go-to.

Why am I not surprised your research skills suck shit too., https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2023/02/28/anti-trans-bills-gender-affirming-care-adults/ https://www.axios.com/2024/01/10/trans-care-adults-red-states https://www.npr.org/2023/05/17/1176600711/republicans-in-several-states-push-for-limits-on-gender-affirming-care-for-adult LOL it was absolutely a freak out. People were posting videos of them shooting cases of Bud light, dumping out cases of the stuff, shit like that. You f*ckers wouldn't shut up about it for months. 1. the 12-18 age group includes actual adults. We need to see the numbers without the 18 year olds. 2. The study doesn't did not exclude procedures with clinical justifications outside of gender affirmation. 3. You said "small children". No one considers adolescents small children. 4. The majority of gender affirming surgeries for minors are breast reduction surgeries carried out on cisgender males. In other words: removing man boobs. LOL you failed, better go back to lying. How are you so f*ckin retarded that you still don't know how arguments work? You made the claim, you bring the evidence. I'm tired of spoonfeeding you. LOL thanks for conceding my entire point regarding the right's hostility to trans people as a whole. F*ckin loser.

Do you think slavery ended in the 1950s?

Shout out to all the people who made the difficult but correct choice to shun their Trump voting family members this year.

You stupid twats don't even know what your own god stands for, it's amazing. Trump takes aim at legal immigration Trump Allies Draw Up Plans Targeting Legal Immigration H-1B hopefuls say they’re bracing for the impact of a second Trump term

Well no dummy that's not how it went, but of course you can't be truste dto tell the truth about anything. LOL what corner? I asked you dumb shitheads to provide some evidence Bernie and AOC want total control of the economy and all you've come up with is her criticism of capitalism (spoiler: those aren't the same thing). The fact you think you've landed something here is a testamanet to the depth of your selfelusions. LOL you've already admitted you're old and unhealthy/fat IDK why you're pretending otherwise tubbo.

Lol you stupid c*nt, are you still so retarded that you're pretending DemSoc s and marxists are the same? Lol what a absolute turd. The truth is you're liar. Nah. You whined and cried instead of doing the bare minimum to back up your point and you still ended up shitting thw bed by conflating Democratic Socialism with Marxism because you can't win for losing. Aren't you like 65 years old and 300 pounds, why are you doing emojis?

All of this is a lie of course. Took you long enough you little c*nt. Nope, the thing is I probably know more about what AOC stands for than you dummies, but I wanted to see if you could actually back your arguments up. Turns out I had to drag you kicking and screaming to actually get there. lol That's bullshit of course. She specifically talks about giving workers representation on corporate boards, which is not a very Marxist idea (Marxists would advocate seizing the whole goddamn thing). Again: all marxists are socialists but not all socialists are marxists. You're literally retarded.

The funny thing here is you could have provided this when i initially posed the question, but you whined and b!tched like a little whiny baby instead. Lazy c*nt. Anyway lots of people have criticisms of capitalism, even from the right: where's the evidence she wants " total control over the economy?" What do you think that looks like to her?

No I asked for evidence they said they did and your only proof is that AOC was once a member of the DSA, an organization which has actually withdrawn its endorsement of her. But they aren't the same as Marxists, and your quote makes that clear. But nothing from AOC or Bernie, which is the whole issue here. Oh I see so this is about your failure to understand the differences between different schools of socialist thought, got it.

That you so often fail to provide cites that actually support your argument is a you problem. Well it should be easy to provide some sort of cite of them saying they want total control of the economy them shouldn't it, you dumb c(nt? LOL Marxism is socialism, but not all socialism is Marxism, but then you're a person who doesn't understand the difference between democratic socialism and social democracy so you shitting the bed here is no surprise.

Democratic Socialists aren't Marxists, dummy. Democratic socialism is contrasted with Marxism–Leninism, whose opponents often perceive as being authoritarian, bureaucratic, and undemocratic in practice.[18] Democratic socialists oppose the Stalinist political system and the Marxist–Leninist economic planning system, rejecting as their form of governance the administrative-command model formed in the Soviet Union and other Marxist–Leninist states during the 20th century. I've never heard Bernie or AOC actuallycall for the complete overthrow oif captalism and total control over the economy. They're social democrats, not revolutionaries.

Lol the irony https://www.legaldive.com/news/noncompete-ban-likely-dead-under-trump-greg-care-Orly-Lobel/732438/

Hey dipshit, do i need to explain your own claim to you again? You said ""Bernie and AOC are just two well known for their support of total control of the economy." Do you have any public statements by either of these lawmakers expressing such views or are you full of shit? BTW socialist and Marxist aren't interchangeable terms. All Marxists are socialists but not all socialists are Marxist. You dumbass.

She's not with CBS anymore, why doesn't she get a Substack and dump it on there.

A number of red states have pushed legislation to limit gender affirming care for adults. lol what? You guys had an extended freak out because Bud Light did a social media promotion with a trans influencer. Republicans banned a transgender member of Congress form using the bathroom that corresponds with their gender identity just to be dicks. The right has spent the last four years calling trans people )and drag queens who aren't even trans) groomers. The level of hostility by the right towards transpeople is sky high. Yeah I know you guys love to lie about this stuff. Small children are not being "mutilated." A study by researchers at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health found little to no usage of gender-affirming surgeries by transgender and gender-diverse minors in the U.S., instead finding that cisgender minors and adults had substantially higher utilization of such gender-affirming surgeries than their transgender counterparts. In trans teens ages 15 to 17, the rate of gender-affirming surgery was 2.1 per 100,000, the study found -- a majority of which were chest surgeries. Physicians and researchers have told ABC News that surgeries on people under 18 happen rarely and are considered only on an individual basis. Harris never proposed that, why can't you guys stop lying about every goddamn thing? She filled out a meaningless ACLU survey indicating support for those things and subsequently did bugger all about any of it. If you haven't already you will soon because i guarantee that's the next frontier.

What's stopping her from publishing this story with the evidence on her own?

It is. Funny how so many right wingers seem to have so much time on their hands that they can do this kind of dumb shit to "own the libs" but no lefties bother doing the opposite.

Stop using bullshit sources then, IDK what to tell you.

As evidenced by this thread and others where you retarded chimp-people lose your minds over a daytime talk show. QED. Again, "the View is popular" is not related to the claims you made. You seem to really lack confidence in your own arguments given how frequently you backpedal away from them. Again your actual claims were 1. The view has had a powerful impact in spreading this information and disinformation. 2. The left considered it a powerful tool to attack their enemies. 1. requires showing at least a correlation between the view making a claim and that claim being spread or repeated afterwards while 2. requires evidence of someone from the "left" saying or suggesting such a thing. Yeah it turns out that the rare time you bother to provide sources they seldom actually prove your argument. that's not about me "not liking them" that's you sucking at arguing. Well you usually don't and I'm far from the only person to notice this. Also don't forget the part where you cry and whine all the time about the burden having to back up your bullshit. Projection, given you're lying in this very post. LOL you're gonna cry about insults? You? No it just means you're boring. Proving you wrong here would require you provide evidence in the first place that I could rebut. Without that I'd just be responding to a subjective opinion. The fact the copemojis are out so early is never a good sign for you.

Oh wow you actually provided a source! Mark it on the calendar for this is a momentous day. Unfortunately, your source does not address the claim that was actually made which was not "AOC and Bernie express ideas around economics that can be traced to Marxism" but rather "Bernie and AOC are just two well known for their support of total control of the economy." So while we can applaud the effort, you have failed again. This problem would be avoided if you simply bothered to read the things you post before they post them to ensure they actually connect to your arguments, but alas that is seldom the case.

That's because you MAGAtards are always full of shit.

I haven't made any claims requiring evidence, I've just been mocking the brain damaged right wing losers freaking out over a daytime talk show. Except you made the following claims without any evidence to support them. The typical pattern with you is: 1. Present dogshit opinions as facts without supporting evidence 2. Lie and say you provided evidence and whine about being asked to back up your arguments 3. Go back to 1 and repeat ad nauseam. The pattern has repeated itself countless times and frankly, I'm bored of it. You're boring.

Claims made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence, which is why I don't bother much with your opinion-casting disguised as debating.