Black Dog

You know this person has lost several times to other women, right? This isn't a clear cut case of someone absolutely dominating the competition because of their genetic advantages. Do you not see how narrowly policing the boundaries of who is a woman based on physical appearance or rare conditions where someone has elevated hormone levels is detrimental to women in general?

So that's all it means to be a woman then: genetics? Incorrect. Androgens (the hormone people with this condition don't respond to) is what triggers muscle development. Women with male testosterone aren't men though, so you analogy sucks.

Yeah but you said "no testostorone." Can you tell me why excessive levels of naturally occurring testosterone is a Bad Genetic Abnormality compared to, say, a basketball player being 7 feet tall or a swimmer having excessively long arms?

How is this a topic related to Federal Politics in the United States exactly?

F*ck off loser, no one cares what you think. Draw me a clock.

So: you can't quote me saying everyone I don't like is a Nazi and you can't quote the other guy saying he would support the NSDAP. You're a total f*cking fraud, nothing you say from here on out matters one bit. Except for the part where i obviously did know the answer. To wit: Change your diaper, you stink like shit.

Given that all women have naturally occurring testosterone, this would mean no women could compete in women's sports lol.

LOL I never pretended otherwise and it was obvious from context that was the case. Again, I have no idea why you'd think I was making a factual claim about a future event.

Wait you actually thought I was making a definitive statement of fact...about an event that has not transpired yet? I know you have a difficult relationship with the concept of time, but this is ridiculous. This is your brain on tribalism I guess.

Where's the lie, exactly? Again: having an opinion contrary to yours or that hurts your feelings is not lying.

Just because I don't agree with your shitty politics doesn't make me a liar bud.

Holy shit you're a loser, you're just absolutely flailing here. Again: prove it. Show me a direct quote. You can't can you? LMAO, do you not understand that when I ask you a question it is always, always because I already know the answer or are you so very neurologically f*cked that you don't recognize that type of construction? Yeah I know which is why I'm laughing that you would use that as an example of how racial issues weren't a defining characteristic of nazis lol you are so dense. Keep filling that diaper buddy. Except when you decide they are even if they aren't by your own criteria. *shrug*

Again, if you support Trump, you cannot claim to be interested in the truth.

Except the guy you called a Nazi who said he wasn't a nazi. Funny how you keep forgetting that part. Again: prove it. Show me a direct quote, This would come as a huge surprise to Adolph Hitler, whose antisemitism and obsession with racial purity are the central themes of Mein Kampf. But why would he know more about what nazis stand for than some autistic desk jockey. Again, all this does is show how little actual human interaction you have. Ask 10 people what defined the Nazis 10 people would answer "the Holocaust/hating Jews" and not their economic policies. Hey quick question what kind of music/art did the Nazis not want people to consume and why? What a hilarious thing to mention to deflect from their central focus on race lol. Again: no one cares about this shit. The Nazis hated Jews and communists and believed in white racial supremacy. So did the KKK. Both groups advocated for violence to return to a glorious and largely imagined) past. Oh and, most famously, Hitler modelled the Nuremberg Laws after the Jim Crow Laws that were a product of the same milieu that spawned the KKK in the first place. Again, one has to wonder why protecting folks like the KKK, alt-right and white nationalists from being unfairly tarred with the pejorative term Nazi is so important to you.

what nonsense is this now

Trump: gets Heritage Foundation dude shitcanned, thus drawing more attention to his connections with the Heritage Foundation Trump cult members: Masterful gambit sir. Who fired him and why? I think you're leaving some context out here bruh.

Prove it. Direct quotes where he says this. I've read the guy's entire posting history and he's quite careful not to say he is or would have been a Nazi or NSDAP member. I genuinely don't know what you think you're getting out of this hyperfixation because all you're doing is coming off as a guy who wants to protect folks like the KKK, alt-right and white nationalists from being unfairly tarred with the pejorative term Nazi, which, again, is not normal. No one actually gives a shit except you for some reason (we know the reason). Could be worse, I could accuse you of altering quotes or saying you said things and then refusing to provide direct citations, that would be the mark of a real chickenshit scumbag loser.

No we haven't, you've pointed out a couple of minor differences of degree, but not kind. There's more similarities than differences. What's weird is you saying I said something, being asked for evidence, refusing to provide it and then acting like it's a me problem when you're just a lying chickenshit. And yet you went ahead an assumed a guy who denied the Holocaust and expressed admiration for Hitler was a Nazi despite him not self-identifying as such, seems you have a hard time living up to your stated convictions here, dipshit. "A couple of elements" that just so happen to be the defining traits of Nazism. But they're all conservatives and share a conservative ideology. Your insistence that Nazism is not an ideology is extremely retarded.

It's nonsensical, pedantic and would be absolutely alien to the majority of normal people who look at a crowd of people chanting "Jews will not replace us," throwing Hitler salutes and waving torches and various fascist symbols and think "jeez this looks like a bunch of Nazis" without much regard for the minute ideological differences between the various groups of fascist shitbags in attendance. If you're going to really split hairs and argue that, well maybe one or two people who weren't fascist shitbags happened to wander by and join the rally because it looked like a good time or whatever and so therefore you can't call everyone a Nazi, I could honestly not give any less of a shit. Lie down with dogs, catch fleas, hang out with a bunch of Nazis, get tarred with the same brush. No I'm literally arguing that the guy is a Nazi by my definition, but not CdnFux's. As I said:

According to CdnFux, that doesn't matter. he's only a Nazi if he calls himself a Nazi. If he doesn't, he's not. And he doesn't. My argument is that the minute differences that may exist between neo-Nazis, the KKK, white nationalists, alt-righters and the rest of the fascist scumbags gathered at Unite the Right are less important than their ideological similarities and thus the term Nazi is fit for purpose. Now you seem like a relatively sane and reasonable chap despite being a conservative so I'll ask you this: why is it so important to you guys that these distinctions be made? Is it simply a tribal thing? Trump said they were fine people there so you have to accept that instead of saying that gee maybe the rally planned and organized by a notorious neo-Nazi/white supremacist, featuring the aforementioned fascist scumbags to defend the statue of a slavery-defending traitor is not the best hill to die on?

I hope for your sake you're actually a boomer because yeeesh.

LMAO so you don't have any evidence of me saying I thought the people who weren't nazis were nazis because I didn't like them? Even though you said I said that? So you're lying again? lol you pu$$y loser. No it's because they believe Nazi shit, as I've stated repeatedly but you're too dumb to actually argue against that point so you argue the strawman that I just don't like them for nebulous reasons. Pathetic. Again: what was weird was you dropping my words into your post without quote marks, attribution, or comment. And now you're pathetically trying to deflect from what was an obvious posting error because you have to argue every littl epoint because you're a pedantic autistic freakshow. It's the opposite, actually. If you had a guy who said "I'm not a nazi, but I think blacks are inferior, Jews run the world and should be eliminated, and Aryans are the master race" 99 per cent of normal people would (rightly) call that guy a Nazi no matter how he chooses to identify himself. You would know this if you had any actual real world friends, but it's abundantly clear you do not. Which brings us to this part: Yeah about that. You said this: None of this is true. He's never stated that he identifies as a supporter of the Nazis/NSDAP, did not say he would have supported them in the '30s or if they existed today. In fact he specifically says "Nobody is a nazi. That is just a pejorative slang that anglos used for national socialists." Now, it's clear he's a fascist, a Holocaust denier, a Hitler stan, a white supremacist and an antisemite of the highest order. To me, and 99% of people, that makes him a Nazi. But by your criteria, he is not (again, doesn't claim to be one, does not claim to be a member of a Nazi political party). But that didn't stop you from slipping and calling him one because you know, deep down in the turd-filled to sewer you call a brain that it's ideology not official political affiliation that makes a Nazi a Nazi in our common parlance. Now cue your next round of autistic screeching...

Ok Boomer emoji guy.

And yet you can't actually quote me saying anything to that effect, its almost as if you're a lying c)nt and everyone knows it. No dummy: I quoted you quoting me because you dropped some random lines of mine into your post with no context or comment because you were panicking so bad you forgot how to work your computer lol. This is actually not common sense at all because it precludes the most essential characteristic of being a Nazi, which is believing Nazi shit. By your moronic criteria someone could share 100% of their beliefs with Adolph Hitler but if they don't call themselves a Nazi or belong to a political party with Nazi in the name, they're not a Nazi. And it's pretty clear even you don't believe this yourself because: Sigh. You keep saying this retarded argument while ignoring the fact that you called a guy a Nazi who doesn't fit your own definition of Nazi, which is the whole point of me rubbing your face in your shit here. Your definition of nazi is someone who is "in some way attached to or connected with that party by declaration or membership etc." The kid you called a Nazi here hasn't declared themselves a Nazi and denies being a member of the Nazi party (or NSDAP if one wants to get technical) which means you called him a Nazi just because you don't like him. Damn, that's some abject hypocrisy. It's funny that you're such a habitual and compulsive liar you even lie to yourself.

OK Boomer emoji guy.