Chrissy1979

Then why did Clarence not report it?

"Lock her up! Lock her up!"

Who claimed Biden doesn't have advisors? When you're not caught up in a cult of personality, such things don't matter Now try explaining to yourself how Trump could have gotten Nancy Pelosi and Nikki Haley mixed up.

They did nothing sinful, but using Christ's teachings to attack them is very sinful.

How weak must a leader be to whine about how his opponent is "crooked" and should be "locked up", and then do nothing about it? At least Biden got Trump tried and convicted. Trump just cried about Hillary and was too weak a leader to do anything. Just like how he lost the election.

If it were a Democrat being tried, you would be apoplectic that they're still free. "Lock them up!", you would say. Because it's Trump, all you can do is throw the entire justice system under the bus and pretend jury trials aren't fair. You're like spoiled children with no reasoning skills. 😂

Representing the last supper isn't a sin.

How come MAGA types always try to invent their own reality? I find it very childish, like having an imaginary friend

It's love.

Absolutely. It's in my name. Jesus preaches love. He would sit with the drag queens and say those who condemn them are worse.

Because Trump always sows chaos, it looks like Vance's days are numbered now that his trove of emails calling Trump a "morally reprehensible human being" came out. How many Scaramuccis was that?

Why is the last supper offensive? Sounds like you just hate the people representing the last supper and therefore think they shouldn't be allowed to represent it. And if you think some people shouldn't be allowed to make Christian representations, guess what? You ain't a Christian. Not even close.

Yes, police notoriously have a far-left bias. You'll beleve absolutely anything if it's told to you by a Russian bot.

I'm sorry your mommy was mean to you.

See what I meant by "neutered"? 😂

So after being schooled on how a jury trial works, you can't even answer why you called it a kangaroo trial. You, sir, are light work.

Did you know that Trump had the power to reject any of the jurors that found him guilty? But he agreed to each of them. So what is your basis for calling it a kangaroo trial, other than you want to create your own reality because you look like a neutered cuck in this one?

So you have no rebuttal to the deconstruction of your argument that Trump didn't collude with Russia, other than to say, "yeah, so?" Very typical. You lie to save face and, when caught in the lie, try to pretend what you were lying about didn't matter. Do you even have balls under those gym shorts, baby?

Do you know how jury trials work in the U.S.?

They admitted to taking extravagant gifts from their billionaire "friends" without reporting them. If that were a liberal justice, you would be freaking out instead of insulting me because you're afraid of strong women.

If you read the Mueller Report, you would be aware of the many, many ways the Russians worked to get Trump elected. You would have also read this: "[a] statement that the investigation did not establish particular facts does not mean there was no evidence of those facts.... The investigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the Campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts.” Does this sound like an exoneration to you? "Mueller found that Trump campaign members Donald Trump Jr., Paul Manafort and Jared Kushner met with Russian nationals in Trump Tower in New York June 2016 for the purpose of receiving disparaging information about Clinton as part of 'Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump,' according to an email message arranging the meeting. This meeting did not amount to a criminal offense, in part, because Mueller was unable to establish 'willfulness,'that is, that the participants knew that their conduct was illegal." Mueller found that Trump campaign members Donald Trump Jr., Paul Manafort and Jared Kushner met with Russian nationals in Trump Tower in New York June 2016 for the purpose of receiving disparaging information about Clinton as part of “Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump,” according to an email message arranging the meeting. This meeting did not amount to a criminal offense, in part, because Mueller was unable to establish “willfulness,” that is, that the participants knew that their conduct was illegal. Mueller was also unable to conclude that the information was a “thing of value” that exceeded $25,000, the requirement for campaign finance to be a felony, as opposed to a civil violation of law. But the fact that the conduct did not technically amount to conspiracy does not mean that it was acceptable. Trump campaign members welcomed foreign influence into our election and then compromised themselves with the Russian government by covering it up. Mueller found other contacts with Russia, such as the sharing of polling data about Midwestern states where Trump later won upset victories, conversations with the Russian ambassador to influence Russia’s response to sanctions imposed by the U.S. government in response to election interference, and communications with Wikileaks after it had received emails stolen by Russia. While none of these acts amounted to the crime of conspiracy, all could be described as “collusion.” https://time.com/5610317/mueller-report-myths-breakdown/

Other than their admissions after getting caught

Was Teddy Roosevelt sick upstairs? He wanted to expand it to 13. Given the overwhelming evidence at least two justices are bought and paid for by billionaires (and tried to hide it), why are you opposed to them having ethical restrictions that are enforceable?

You're saying Russian collusion didn't happen? It happened. The Mueller Report spelled it out but you pretended it didn't. Why do you think Trump's campaign manager Paul Manafort went to jail? He was working for Russia and lied about it under oath.

You shouldn't have to lie to make your point.