Chrissy1979

If the majority of people don't want such a monument, then I guess the monument goes.

I understand it must be hard to see the vast majority of the population disagree with you and think your ideas are hateful and wrong.

Fortunately most people strongly disagree with you. That's why everyone one was outraged by Trump's"impartiality". It's easy for normal, loving people to take sides between racism and anti-racism.

Yes, the anti-racist counter to white supremacy. Or what we like to call, good people.

I'm not sure what you mean by alt left. I think it's a way to try to make anti-racism seem radical when in reality it's just now most normal people think.

Because normal people agree with them.

It's hard to believe right-wing political discourse has degenerated so quickly that they are already trying to make the case that anti-racism is just as bad as racism.

As you defend Nazi murder and lie about Trump disavowing Duke, you can deny that Trump's father was arrested in a Klan hood in 1927 like Trump did, even though there were numerous separate reports and records of that arrest during a riot between the police and the Klan in New York. You might as well go all in in defending the KKK, Trump, and Nazism.

Your defence of the Nazis is easily countered by the tiki torches. Nazi mobs with torches use the torches as weapons.

Given how often the video of the car driving over those peaceful antiracist protesters was broadcast, I wonder how you could have missed it. Tunnel vision perhaps.

Something tells me the people ignoring the Nazi violence and focusing on the antiracist violence would be silent if, say, an Islamist preaching Jihad were punched in the face by a protester. They're deliberately ignoring the aggressive attacks perpetrated by F'ing Nazis. That shows you where their allegiances are.

Are you really unaware that it wasn't one-sided and many, many Nazis attacked peaceful anti-racism protesters? Or are you just unwilling to admit that Nazis aren't always peaceful?

Can betsy criticize the Nazis enough to say that the Nazis who were there in full body armour with guns might have also been looking for a fight? Or are Trump's Nazis wholly innocent in this? I just know Trump can't criticize them directly. Maybe Putin won't let him because he knows how divisive to the country being silent about Nazis could be.

The violent hatred of white supremacist Nazis, so good on them. But the ACLU went to court to allow the Nazis to rally, so maybe not all the left is opposed to free speech. At this point, though, I don't think there are any Trump supporters left who aren't Nazis.

Oh shouldn't just regurgitate Trump talking points from social media. They're usually wrong and you obviously don't have the the "inclination" to check. http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2017/aug/09/viral-image/viral-image-wrongly-blames-bill-clinton-giving-nor/

I don't know of anyone who sees no reason to condemn the atrocities. Since you base your argument on their existence, can you provide an example of these people? You're not just making them up to make it sound like you have a point, are you?

I'm aware of the media's portrayal of the doctor. There were numerous reports that he once sold drugs he shouldn't have, or something. You commented on this information when you said you had special access to this information that wasn't in the media (even though it was all over it). My point is, what the hell difference does that make? Can you make an argument based on the facts without researching the guy's history to find out if there is a way you can portray him as a bad guy? I believe whatever makes me happy, which includes that the guy was a jerk to refuse to get off the plane. You should stick to that basic premise and not blame everything on the MSM and the gossip you read there.

As I figured: "Why doesn't the MSM report on things that I know happened because the MSM reported on it?"

I think the guy should have given up his seat when he was asked to do so, but I expect you heard about the $800 offer from some Breaking News facebook alert and got mad at the media for not reporting what you hear on facebook. The only Foxnews angle I could find was them criticizing the security but saying that wasn't United's fault. http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/04/11/united-airlines-is-innocent.html And the issue of whether he has sold drugs in the past is a weak and pathetic attempt at character assassination. What does his past have to do with this situation? I don't care if he's a baby killer. That has nothing to do with how airline passengers are treated. Alternate facts and smears are really, really bad arguments, but unfortunately I still have to be on your side in that I think the guy was acting like jerk.

I'm perfectly willing to accept your version of the events but you can't expect me to just accept anonymous internet guy's word for it. I'm still interested in where you got your information. I've managed to get out of you that it's an "alternative" source but you don't seem to want to reveal much more. That's always suspicious to me when anonymous internet guys do that.

I had to google Chrissy Hynde. Before my time. But I'm not blindly accepting anything. I'm just wondering where you get your information from if you're not getting it from the media.

I think he was beat up before he went back on the plane and apparently he was disoriented from his head injury at that point. In any case, how do you know what actually happened if it was never reported in the press? Were you there?

Now I remember why I stopped posting at this site. It was all just the guy who wants to change every topic to Canada.

It's funny how gullible some people are, but scary that they are allowed to reproduce.

I don't understand why people aren't more upset that Putin interfered with the election. If Obama didn't win the popular vote and only won because Putin interfered, people would be totally freaking out about it and calling him a monkey and a nonAmerican and stuff.