Who's Doing What?

Yes perverted and corrupted by atheist perverts infiltrating the church and masquerading as Christians. Elton John is a good example as to why him and his filth should be put back in the closet and the door locked. UH.... Jimmy Baker, Pat Robertson, the lastest Meth using Gay preacher Haggard, how about the Catholic Priests who molested all those children. Were these people all athiests? Wake up man you've been brainwashed. Ever see the show Chris Angel Mind Freak? He is a crazy illusionist who astounds peole in this day and age where science is widely taught. Keep that in mind. Now most people/christians don't know that Jesus went to India during his "missing years". He learned mysticism form the Yogi's. It is actually in their texts. (read Paramahansa Yoganada) Now with his training in eastern mysticism, like the fabled climbing a rope that goes nowhere, imagine how he would have appeared to a bunch of uneducated, illiterate, scared and impoverished people. He would have appeard to have magical powers. Have you ever read the bible? Jesus himself says he is just a man, and that someday we will do as he does. I say Jesus was nothing more than a great illusionist, just like Chris Angel is.

That is a pretty ignorant response, but what else can be expected from one of the brainwashed masses. You keep making your Rabbi's rich, I'm going to spend my time and money on something worth while.

I don't know about any other religion, but my religion (link to source) attaches very little importance to or emphasis on the afterlife. While I am not familiar with the linked site, this is in accord with my understanding, through worship and religious school, of the role or lack thereof of an afterlife in Jewish thought. It still discusses the after life. It is still used as a means of control. It still says an all powerful being is the reason for our existance. Your "word of god" is only a man's musings. God did not create man, man created god.

we are both agreed on another thing, that mcguinty has no balls. further , neither does stephen harper who keeps passing the buck (so to speak). that 6n is at the negotiating table is a show of good faith because ultimalty a third, outside, government is necessary for all negotiations with them. 'Sections 109 and 132 of the Canadian constitution respect our nation-to-nation relationship, which sets out the process for our formal relationship. Parliament only has jurisdiction to make treaties with us, that’s all. We never surrendered anything to anybody. We were and continue to be governed by our own constitution.' so you see, 6n has mcguinty over a barrel. the clan mothers are in accordance with being at the negotiating table for now. and what qualifies as a clan mother? prey, do tell? chiefs were signatories only because it was demanded by the colonial government , and they demanded male chiefs. this is in violation of pre-colonial ways. and only holds in modern times for co-opted bands who have been forced to set up municipal style governments, which are not representative of the ways or the people. Brandt became a british subject, violating wampum 58. under wampum 35 he became a 'pinetree chief, a ceremonial position with no authority. in 1808 he muredred his own son and was no longer allowed to live with the mohawk. from the original document deposing brandt: "Brethren. It is (erst?) a few words that we, the Six Nations, wish to inform at this time, it is what have been saying at our fireplace in Buffalo Creek. As it is customary for the Six Nations to call Councils for the misconduct of chiefs so as to have all faults related here before such councils, we have learned from information that Captain Brant has not conducted himself to the satisfaction of the Six Nations and according to our Indian customs he is no more a chief. And we the Six Nations all of us agree is no longer to be noticed as a chief in the Six Nations. The following are the names of the principle chiefs in the Six Nations. " brandt was and is no hero in mohwaks's eyes. your brandt history is from colonial perspective. like yesterday pluto was a planet and today it no longer is. what will tomorrow say? if you are referrin to past armed occupation then you should have stated so. i am not imposing a double standard, i am pointing out that today, the opp have gone in and harmed unarmed people, that is my point, you need not get so riled. relax. as far as i know there are no guns at caledonia. if someone there were to be found with one the clan mothers would kick their butt. please cite what you are referring to. i have nothing to do with the cops in your area. they are part of your government. what arguements have been beaten down? the more 'militiant' (your choice of words) we become the more everything stands a chance of finally being properly sorted out. the backlash may appear hard at first but we are prepared to go through with proceedings. time will tell. oh, you advise me to do that, do you? and while we still have them? i'm shuddering. well, you are good for a laugh, quite the humour you have there We'll see how hard you are laughing when the racist policies of this country are struck down and you have to stand in line with me to buy your fishing license.

I agree. He is not preaching hate or murder, but he(like the rest of them) is robbing people using their faith and fears as his weapon, instead of a gun.

Who cares why he denouced it atleast he got it right. Organized religion is for suckers. It has been perverted and corrupted since the beginning and imo exists for no other reason than to control the ignorant and uneducated. Which used to be 99% of the population. The smart followers are just scared of what will happen after they die.

Like the recent discovery that Europeans made it to North America 14,000 years ago? Oh so you are allowed to quote 300 yr old treaties and I can't bring up armed occupation because there isn't one going on right now? Nice double standard you have. Who's to say there are no guns at Caledonia anyway. Who say's it is your land? Only you do. Uh police not allowed to search for remains, or a killer even after finding a severed foot, because the search would be on alleged First Immigrant land. I would like to try and keep the cops from searching my yard after they had found severed apendages. Your arguments have all been beaten down. The more militant you become in your demands for land and money the harder the backlash will hit. I would advise you stop typing on the computer and go enjoy your tax free status and your hunting and fishing rights while you still have them.

some do have asian features while others have polynesian. still others can't quite be placed. there was a lot of travelling done in early times after the continental shift. prior to that we were a unique people , here, on this land. science will catch up one day. Science has caught up and passed you by. As I said there were TWO migrations from Asia across the Bering land bridge. One was from the peoples in south Asia(what would become your polynesian people) and a second migration came from further north in Asia. (that would be your Oriental people) You think your people were here when the continents were one land mass. It was called Pangea(sp) and it hasn't existed for millions of years. Infact the continents broke up millions of years before mankind even had a primate ancestor walking the earth. There is no way any man of any race was living in North America before the migrations. We are all immigrants. You, me and you neighbour down the street. Your perpesctive is not new. We had two or three "warriors" on here who said everything you are saying and went even further saying they would starve me out of my home if that's what it took to get my land. You think my saying push comes to shove is forceful? Just what the heck do you call armed occupation of land and blockades of railways and roads? Intimidation of Police? Sounds forceful to me. Almost sounds like something a terrorist would do. I think you will find your support flying out the window when people realise you are after their land and homes. I know mine did.

Don't forget the POW's held by the Japanese either. They had their own POW camps.

We've been through this all before. When push comes to shove the majority will win. Treaty or not. Sorry.

About time! In my youth I may have been known to go for a tour for no other reason than to puff a doobie, but over the last few years I have seen way too many people swallowing or even snorting Hillbilly heroin and then hopping in their car. How the hell are you supposed to drive normally when your high on drug store heroin? I've heard all the crap "I take it for pain, it doesn't get me high" That is pure BS. Even if you don't feel "high", you just injested a strong opiate, which has to affect you.

If'n yooze gonna git all conflabergated over hows I chooses to spoke, I's jist gonna stop spoking to yooze.

But what happens if you do not have any extra wheels, and it is a four wheeler? On the other hand, if it is an 18 wheeler, perhaps the truck would run ok without it. Education

They say the squeaky wheel gets the grease, but sooner or later you get sick of the squeak, then you take the wheel off and throw it away. Those articles look like editiorial clap trap.

Yes.

Like you are superior to me and deserve extra liberties because you are a First Immigrant? Uh DNA has shown there were TWO migrations across the Bering Land bridge, and one from Europe. If that is a theory to you, go right on trucking. But you might want to ask yourself how nearly 25% of First Immigrants in North America have some European DNA. Research the Clovis Spearhead. You must have missed your fellow warriors posts where they were claiming ALL OF CANADA. Telling me how they will starve me off my land if it should suit their needs. It doesn't matter what Politically Correct term you use for "ol' whitey" when you are still going to sit there and tell me you deserve something I don't because of your race. Current law prohibits me from taking up arms and holding land hostage. If First Immigrants aren't going to follow the law why should the rest of Canada? The Queen is nothing more than a figurehead. A left over curiosity from another time. The minute she tried to impose her will on this country she would be sent packing. The problem is First Immigrants apparently feel they own my back yard.

Hmmm Torontonians voted more strongly Liberal than pretty much any other part of the country. The ads re-inforced the *scary* *scary* *scary* Harper message that only the hardline anti-Harperistas bought into. But you know that the Liberal voters in Toronto didn't buy into this patently false and misleading ad. I marvel at how you come to conclusions. "Toronto voted Liberal, therefore the Scary ads worked on them." So why did some NDP get elected?

oops

That is a load of crap. Why are you any better, or more worthy than any other Canadian? Because of your race? Puh-lease! OH and FYI, you are not "decendents of this country" You people did not spring out of the ground somewhere in North America. You are an immigrant just like the rest of us. At some point in history your family either crossed the bering land bridge, or, a more recent discovery, possibly came from Europe across the ice sheet that once covered the North Atlantic. Did you ever see that for yourself? Unless the population of Natives is equal to the population of non-natives there should be more non-natives in detox. Simple math reallly. Previous paragraph doesn't make sense. Again with the "I deserve this because of my race." Total crap. Sorry, but it is. You are surprised there is racism, yet you feel you are owed something because of your race. Does the irony not hit you like a cold shower? Are you not perpetuating racism by saying your race is better and more deserving than other races?

Holy Starbucks Batman! You buying $10.00 coffees? At a $0.01 decrease in GST it should only save you a penny on every dollar. It's more like buy 100 and get one free. Kinda makes your point even more valid. I guess the guy spending $400,000 on his Rolls Royce got to save $4,000 so it all works out in the end.

All I was saying was, Emerson, Income Trust, appointing a non-elected senator ect. should be all the Liberals need to bash with. I don't think they will need to drag up the "scary scary" bs. Nice over reaction though.

Has anybody bothered to loook at pictures of former ministers in her position? It is quite possible she has the best hair ever. Nice to see the Fem-bots have made commenting on a womans hair a "sexist" remark. Grow up. Apparently I am not allowed to tell a woman she has nice hair. It's sexist. Heaven forbid I would ever say a woman is looking good in her outfit. That's Harassment. What a joke. Personally I don't like her hair. I think it makes her look snobbish. But that is just my oppinion. Am I still allowed to have one when it comes to women?

Quite right. Kick their butts Army Guy.

Harper's track record will provide ample ammunition for the Liberals. Over the top scare mongering shouldn't be needed.

Just like Saddam's conviction? No, more like what the Swiftboat Vets did to John Kerry during the presidential campaign. What's good for the Republicans is good for the Democrats, I guess.