Who's Doing What?

The purpose of this thread was to talk about an untendered contract. Why highjack it to compare the President Bush and Prime Minister Harper? Because Bush's VP Cheney did the same thing. Oh sorry am I stalking you by responding? Grow up kid.

USING ALL CAPS DOESN'T GIVE MORE CREDENCE TO YOUR FABRICATIONS. LOOK AT THE SENTENCE AGAIN, IT DOESN'T SAY THAT!!!! Here is the whole sentence: Just where is it you are getting lost? Yes they reclassified some revenue. Including "disclosing an additional $539,915 in previously unreported donations" "Previously unreported donations". Previously unreported. Unreported. Are you following along yet?

Ahhh, that old schoolyard gem. "I know you are but what am I." The irony that every one of your posts on this thread about excessive partisanship has invovled a personal attack on me is beautiful. MY disgust of you personally has nothing to do with your political afiliation. Your inability to comprehend the difference is equally beautiful.

Thanks for that. It's in Greg's hands now. Uh you're a few days slow on the draw there McDuff. Is that the post you reported? LMFAO

He called me pathetic, accused me of 'crying' and said "wah wah" to one of my posts. How could somebody think that is being civil? wah wah was not to you, but yes you are crying about my attitude towards you when it is no different or even as bad as the crap you have heaped on other members of this forum since you've been here. You want to take a poll on which of the two of us has insulted, harassed, or belittled other posters the most? Your list would far exceed mine.

I have no pretense of being civil with this guy. As I mentioned earlier, my civility for him ran out after about his 3rd response to me. I'm just calling a spade a spade. Trust me when I say I am seriously toning it down though.

So this is something you are carrying over from another thread. Of course you would ban me from the board. You would ban everyone who doesn't concur with your Harper-hating anti-Conservative view of the world. I have been civil on this thread, but you haven't. Yet, I'm the one that should be banned? Now you cry because you are getting your own medicine back at you. No I would ban you because you repeatedly attack posters. Stoop to calling them names. Flame, troll and insult. You pull numbers and conclusions out of your ass. You ingore the facts put before you and resort to bashing other posters. You are a prototypical bully. You are all tough until someone is willing to call you on your own game then all of a sudden you are the innocent one. I asked you in another thread if you supported the gun registry's performance of if your post was just to be argumentative with saturn. For some reason you wouldn't answer. Troll? Flamer? Bully? Pick one because they all suit you.

That is another reason why I don't consider him the worst partisan. His racist veiws know no political afiliation. MD's rhetoric is old and lame. Blame the immigrants! Ofcourse he doesn't mention the wealthy immigrants who come over here. Nor does he mention the ones who come over and work the jobs he and his middle class teenage buddies feel they are "too good" to do.

I am the worst of a bad lot? Look at your posts. My attempts to debate are met by mocking and insults. If you really want to change the tone here on the board why not point to a time where you have praised the Conservaties? Or maybe you don't want to change the tone of the board and are just here to attack... My posts? Go ahead. I'm not baselessly calling someone a liar, even after I had my argument shot down twice by facts. First thing I would change on these boards would be you outta here. All you do is flame, insult and troll. My time of civility with you was lost after about your third response to me. Don't start crying when you are getting treated with the same contempt you treat everyone else with on these boards.

This is so good I may have to make it my new sig. Then you wonder why I refuse to take you seriously.

It is a criticism of the CPC. Maybe not strong, but you asked to see it and I showed it to you. Better than any praise you have given the Conservatives. Do explain why I'm the worst of a bad lot while you are calling me pathetic? That isn't even criticism, it's a freaking recommendation.

Ya well I don't read the neo-nazi-ist crap spewed by MD. Wah wah wah Immirgrants immigrants wah wah wah. RB will ignore the facts right infront of his face and procede to call you a liar, just to defend the party line. That is what makes him the worst partisan imo.

He has in many posts. I don't think i've seen the liberal supporters ever once critisize the liberal agenda once. Thank you. WDW says I'm the worst of a bad lot and asks me to show a post where I criticized the CPC. I do it and not a word .... very interesting. Still find it interesting? I call your example pathetic.

Post #3 of this thread. (Link) That appears to be a criticism of the Harper Government's record on the environment. Can you please show a post where you praised the CPC. Something like that would be unique to say the least. LMFAO What a criticism! ...Have to work on the environment file. hahahahaha Is that the best you've got? LMAO Man you are pathetic.

That is some funny s***! Thanks I needed that. A four posts in to prove the OP's point. The blind partisanship starts right away. As the first person singled out by the OP I can honestly say that I have criticized my party. Hey, it takes two to tango.... MightyAC you are more than free to start your own board. You are the worst of a bad lot RB, there is no denying it. Please show a post where you criticized the CPC. Something like that would be unique to say the least.

Correction. We spent $5,000,000 on Arar and $100,000's more on providing him and his family social services and healthcare. It is so unfortunate that we are letting ourselves being taken advantage of from outsiders who couldn't give two damns about us. Have you heard Arar speak? After all this time he can barely speak English. GO HOME ARAR! GET OUT OF MY COUNTRY!! How long has it been since your family were immigrants?

Did ya ever think it is because there are glaring similarities? Leftist cause? Whatever, as long as I'm not on your team I'm happy. You know you are beginning to remind me of that Simpsons episode where Lisa trys to see which is more intelligent, her hamster or her brother. Can I call you Bart?

The Whitehouse said that when it handed Haliburton those huge rebuilding contracts in Iraq. Ding ding ding. That is correct. Somebody give Fortunata a prize. I thought Harper was supposed to be different. You know, NOT Bush-lite?

That is some funny s***! Thanks I needed that.

I would like to see it happen, but I doubt it ever will. Most members are labeled within a few posts of coming here of being right or left wing. How stupid is that? Is anyone truly totally liberal or totally conservative on every subject? Just because I am in favour of daycare and healthcare does it mean I can't support our troops? Am I allowed to be for the war in Afghanistan but against the war in Iraq? Why can't I be for capital punishment but against a GST cut? The ones who cannot see past the party colours, are the ones who ruin any chance of meaningful debate on these boards.

Here's a deal Shakey. (Which based on your post history you'll ignore and start in with the insults.) In the very post WDW quotes the term "undisclosed" if you look at the context of the original sentence they 're-classified' the donations. Skillful editing aside re-classification implies that the funds were reported just not disclosed as donations. All semantics. Again WDW quit lying and provide some proof that you don't have to manipulate to fit your theory. You seriously can't understand what has happened can you? Yes they reclassified their funds to fit with Elections Canada guidelines. IN THAT RECLASSIFICATION THERE WERE PREVIOUSLY UNREPORTED DONATIONS.

"Only firm capable of handling the work." Now where have I heard that line of BS before?

You're lying and you haven't proven anything... I have already posted twice, from the original article no less, where the CPC did not report donations. does the phrase "disclosing an additional $539,915 in previously unreported donations" ring a bell.

As a lawyer can you not see how racist Canadian laws are, in favour of natives? No tax, extra rights and freedoms? Being allowed to get away with terrorist-like actions that would have members of any other race incarcerated? Where does this belong in a democratic equal society? The answer is simple. It doesn't belong.

The missile defense shield. Sounds good but unfortunately, technology already exists to beat it. The new missile will not be put into production right away but the fact the technology exists seems to make spending more on a defense system that won't work a bit foolish. http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/stor...?s_name=&no_ads