myata

Putin: "a genius" Jong Un: "very honorable person" The eyes and a brain is all that one needs. It's all right there.

Also by the U.S., the UK and France. This is one time to fail all pledges and commitments. Who would take that word for its face value after that? Who would even think of giving away the nukes? This is what spineless Republicans are playing with these days, nothing less. All only to gratify one pathologically lying dictator thug admiring buffoon. What a contorted, shrunk caricature, on the background of Lincoln and Reagan.

Mike Johnson has decided to set Trump's personal agenda over the long-term pledges and commitments of the United States to defend freedom. The Republicans have this choice to make now. They can stand up for the principles and the right; or give in to the lying mob. The game of the House Republican leadership is transparent and obvious and there will be nowhere to hide from the judgement of history. The consequences of this choice will be recorded in generations. Yes: you knew.

It's no point to argue with tinfoil brain people. The reality is reflected with 100% efficiency. Science cannot do that with sunlight yet. Trudeau and Obama are fascist dictators of the worst kind. Putin is a "genius", only slightly misunderstood, and Jong Un, "very honorable person". No need to waste any useless words. Just look. The eyes and the brain have the full story. Yes, you only need those two.

Why couldn't you ever get the facts right? This is the information age. What could go wrong? The U.S. aid to Ukraine In what f-ing alternate reality? What color is the seventh moon?

Obama released all his relevant tax returns: Obama released seven years’ worth of his tax returns during his 2008 presidential campaign — keeping with longstanding tradition of transparency by many major party candidates. Then, while in office, he published on the White House website his tax returns for 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015. The facts make the difference. If only tinfoil brains could create the reality outside of their useless brains.

The answer is simple: if you won't give some money, a fraction of the defense budget to fight Putin and his likes elsewhere, they will come to your doorstep. Why wouldn't they: they always do when they smell weakness, fear and indecision. And what will it cost you then? Not in dollars, that other currency: thousands, tens, thousands? One only needs a working memory to know it. Such a precious asset in some groups, these days.

Newsweek: Tucker Carlson being spotted attending ballet in Moscow Earlier, a ruthless dictator Jong Un led Trump around his finger, with nothing to show for his bombastic claims. Admiring dictator thugs. Spreading their propaganda lies. "Free media" to interview Hitlers. No: you can make no mistakes about what kind of sh*t you're stepping into. The history will record and remember every twitch of every little finger.

The Republicans are getting ever closer to becoming a place with no heart and no principles. Worshiping the lying Idol as the only remaining claim to existence. The political game can be catchy and it's not always clear where it's going, but there are those with hearts of stone and cold, slippery minds that will take you all the way: beyond all lines of no return. If you cannot or wouldn't matters not think and act for yourself; what you think, decide and believe in. That is their game, and their purpose. Do you have yours? Your principles? Your integrity? Your pledges and your heart? In the times like these there will be no prescribed excuses. The question is set by the Time itself and your answers are recorded for the posterity. Make no mistakes about it.

No lying weasel words will fool the history. They're are playing with America's pledge and commitment to freedom, nothing less and for no other cause than to gratify a lying buffoon who is full of his own sh*t and admiration for dictator thugs that he has expressed publicly, and not once. And this is exactly how they will be remembered. There will be no explanations and no excuses. Absolutely, their lies should be called and exposed for everyone to see what they are. No way anyone dumb or duplicitous could claim and pretend that they didn't know what kind of sh*t they were stepping into this time. Not a chance.

I hope this is genuine and if so I would be very close to a full agreement. We can have differences. We can discuss them and try to come to understanding and seek solutions. But once it becomes the cult game: my version of truth against yours, my Idol is greater than yours there's no chance for any meaningful conversation and any solutions. It's a dean blind end, as dead and blind as can be.

The Republicans who let their rotten leadership betray every claim and principle of defending freedom, only to play into the glory aspirations of the lying buffoon will have their names written into the history books. Of shame. For perpetuity, or as long as the democracy lasts. This is not just political games, not just another election. The freedom of people who put their lives and future on the line is at stake and you're choosing to play with it, and betray it with empty, pathetic and meaningless, lying rhetoric. The history won't be fooled as a mindless cheering mob. Your names will go into it. As you know. Think of it now.

Can you have it both ways: like plain, obvious bullshit because you have a sovereign undeniable right to like anything you like including obvious bullshit of course; and then, complain about the consequences? Nope. You knew the rational consequences of your choice and a spontaneous urge to try random things like licking the dogshit on the ground, what would it taste like? has nothing to with the responsibility for important and critical choices, and their consequences. Obvious, no?

The only objectively verifiable truth in the above is that the binary political system creates a natural environment and a platform for extreme partisanship and as a consequence, personality cults. "Everything" is just his usual bullshit. Just because he said so, it has to be true.

No, not at all. At no time, by any objective standard, was this a catastrophic problem it was painted in the propaganda. This means that there was no objective justification for any government overreach, legal or no. The medical oath is very clear what goes next: you cannot allow any net harm to the patient. Every treatment has to be reasonable and proportional to the problem of the patient. Social engineering based on bubblegum models just isn't a part of it. You have to prove that the treatment's benefit strongly outweighs serious side effects for every age group it's recommended for. No. You have to prove that vaccinating it would result in a strong overall improvement, even after all other reasonable measures were implemented, competently and effectively. No. Even if you ever reached this stage, in the absence of a real catastrophic emergency it still wouldn't give you an automatic mandate to coerce people into the treatment. Wasn't even close. Decree-happy social engineering at its worst.

It was not proven with any confidence that not recommending these treatments for healthy children 0 - 18, who statistically did not need them, had any measurable effect on the severity of the outcome, if other necessary measures were implemented timely and competently. If someone had such a magical ball they have to be able to show it predicting reliably and accurately all kinds of complex social events. Many countries, given the absence of such evidence and a real possibility of severe side effects did not recommend them for this age group. Social engineering is not what democratic governments are elected for. This is not science-based policy, but another attempt at social engineering at its worst: opaque; arbitrary; zero accountability decision making; manipulation and misleading pseudo-information aimed at scaring and confusing people to a predetermined ends rather than giving them reliable, objective and honest information.

Just as said. When the expectations do not match the reality. Too bad for the latter.

First you create an expectation; then you fail to live up to it. A no-brainer of failure for any project or policy.

There was never a mandate to engineer the society for a perfect outcome as defined and seen by the bureaucrats. That's what happened with residential schools and the conclusion cannot be avoided: in well over a century, we didn't care to think and to make things any better. It's useless and in my personal view, not smart to march and chant "every child matters" a century after the events when the same thing is happening again in a different area. All the hallmarks are where, unmistakably: bureaucratic power to do whatever they like, on the thought of the day; unrestricted by any checks or controls internal, or external; manipulation of opinion in contrast to transparency, accountability, evidence and clear results. When things wouldn't go as expected, quietly shuffle stuff under the mat and pretend it wasn't there. We haven't learned anything. And we didn't even care to think, as it seems.

No you don't need a "study" for a fact of common knowledge. A number of countries in Europe, including Germany, Scandinavian did not recommend them and you are free to research the rest. The medical oath requires the practitioner to only apply treatments that have a clear benefit to the recipient that clearly outweighs possible negative side effects including severe ones. If the treatment in that age group had that, there wouldn't be any reasons to not recommend them, as for the other ages. This answers the question as far as I can tell. If both parts: a clear benefit to the recipient; and the risks proven to be significantly less than the benefit; aren't present, approving, prescribing and recommending the treatment would go against the medical oath. That's what the folks in question were involved in under the drumming of propaganda, and nothing short of. Social engineering for the greater (perceived) good is not a part of the legitimate mandate of the governments, neither public health authorities funded 100% by the citizens. So easy to forget, guessing.

Cult converts bounce the reality off their tinfoil brains with near perfect effectiveness. No chance for a connection. Not a slightest point.

Like Un being "a very honorable person" sure. Like who wouldn't know about all the crazy, incredibly bizarre notions bizarre cult converts would worship, pray and chant? Like anyone could be surprised here. Yaaaaaaawn.

C'mon Michael. Responsible health authorities did not recommend these treatments for the age group in question because they bring very minor if any statistically significant benefits while having non-negligible risks of serious side effects. This is a condition the medical oath gives a very clear answer to. The responsible people had based their decision on the responsibility toward the science; and the society. Not in Canada though. And this is no less than a failure of: the professional standard; the medical oath; the responsibility to the society, any way one looks at it factually and objectively.

Yes, you knew.

Common knowledge is not burden. Many European health authorities did not recommend them for children and young adults. This is Germany, for example: Healthy people aged between 18 and 59 years (including pregnant people) are recommended a basic immunisation as well as a booster to build up a basic immunity. "OMG can't wait to have my 6.5 month old vaccinated!". Is it criminal yet? (what is?)