dpwozney

According to Wikipedia, Petro-Canada started in 1975. Also according to Wikipedia, Shell started up the Scotford Refinery in 1984. It tells us you're wrong.

“We're not running a deficit. We have planned a realistic scenario. We've got conservative budget estimates. We've got a modest platform that doesn't even fill the existing fiscal room that we have and we have plenty of flexibility in how we phase it. So that's our policy. We're not going into deficit.” -Stephen Harper, October 2008

“We're not running a deficit. We have planned a realistic scenario. We've got conservative budget estimates. We've got a modest platform that doesn't even fill the existing fiscal room that we have and we have plenty of flexibility in how we phase it. So that's our policy. We're not going into deficit.” -Stephen Harper, October 2008

“But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know [them], because they are spiritually discerned.” (1 Corinthians 2:14)

Jesus said: “My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me:” (John 10:27); and, “Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also. And if any man will sue thee at the law, and take away thy coat, let him have [thy] cloke also. And whosoever shall compel thee to go a mile, go with him twain. Give to him that asketh thee, and from him that would borrow of thee turn not thou away. Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate thine enemy. But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you; That ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven: for he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust.” (Matthew 5:38-45).

The provided quote does not refer to “blood” or to “different Christian sects within a small space - all with conflicting goals”. “For though we walk in the flesh, we do not war after the flesh: (For the weapons of our warfare [are] not carnal, but mighty through God to the pulling down of strong holds;)” (2 Corinthians 10:3-4) “For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high [places].” (Ephesians 6:12)

Can you prove that “Christianity had bloody wars” and that “there were different Christian sects within a small space - all with conflicting goals”?

No. What's not exactly new information? People in Bosnia in the '90s, among others, had access to the New Testament.

In the present church age, Christians are under New Testament Christian law and are commanded not to kill enemies, are required not to take physical revenge, and are instructed to not perform physical violence (Matthew 5:38-45, Matthew 26:52, Luke 6:27-28, John 18:11, Romans 12:19-21, Romans 13:9-10, 2 Corinthians 10:3-4, Ephesians 6:12, 1 Thessalonians 5:15, 1 Peter 2:21-24, 1 Peter 3:8-9).

What does the word “that” in the above sentence refer to? Does it mean that all true predictions, that have been made after the completion of the writing of the New Testament, were messages from god?

“Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation.” (2 Peter 1:20)

Members of the coalition expressed allegiance to Elizabeth the Second. Elizabeth the Second is not Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, contrary to the requirement in this Fifth Schedule, which states: “Oath of Allegiance I A.B. do swear, That I will be faithful and bear true Allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Victoria. Note. The Name of the King or Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland for the Time being is to be substituted from Time to Time, with proper Terms of Reference thereto.”. The provinces of Canada, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick expressed their desire to be federally united into one Dominion under the Crown of the “United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland”, not the Crown of the “United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland”, according to the British North America Act, 1867.

Did they not state their allegiance to Elizabeth the Second before taking their seats in the House of Commons?

The Governor General of Canada is a “corporation sole”, according to Elizabeth the Second in this document. A “corporation sole” is defined and recognized as being a corporation. It is a fiction that a corporation is a person. “A corporation is a fiction, by definition, ...”, according to Patrick Healy in a statement found in evidence provided to the Canadian Parliament's Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights in 2002. “A corporation is a ‘fiction’ as it has no separate existence, no physical body and no ‘mind’”, according to Joanne Klineberg in a presentation to the Canadian Aviation Safety Seminar in 2004.

Elizabeth the Second is not Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, contrary to the requirement in this Fifth Schedule, which states: “Oath of Allegiance I A.B. do swear, That I will be faithful and bear true Allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Victoria. Note. The Name of the King or Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland for the Time being is to be substituted from Time to Time, with proper Terms of Reference thereto.”. The provinces of Canada, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick expressed their desire to be federally united into one Dominion under the Crown of the “United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland”, not the Crown of the “United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland”, according to the British North America Act, 1867.

How many different choices are there for Queen? How many different possible outcomes, for who is Queen after voting day, do elections involve? The executive authority of and over Canada is vested in the Queen. Is the act of voting considered to be giving voluntary implied consent to the idea that Elizabeth II is Queen?

“A corporation is a fiction, by definition, ...”, according to Patrick Healy in a statement found in evidence provided to the Canadian Parliament's Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights in 2002. “A corporation is a ‘fiction’ as it has no separate existence, no physical body and no ‘mind’”, according to Joanne Klineberg in a presentation to the Canadian Aviation Safety Seminar in 2004. In the real world, how is it possible, for a real non-artificial living physical natural person, to buy shares of a fictional corporate entity on a stock market?

Elizabeth the Second is not Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, contrary to the requirement in this Fifth Schedule, which states: “Oath of Allegiance I A.B. do swear, That I will be faithful and bear true Allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Victoria. Note. The Name of the King or Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland for the Time being is to be substituted from Time to Time, with proper Terms of Reference thereto.”. The provinces of Canada, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick expressed their desire to be federally united into one Dominion under the Crown of the “United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland”, not the Crown of the “United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland”, according to the British North America Act, 1867.

Last week I contacted an “Elections Canada” person and I asked him: The “Elections Canada” person stated that writing, on a ballot, “Only One Choice For Queen”, is “not technically illegal” but the ballot “would not be counted”.

In this election campaign, how many different choices are there for Queen? How many different possible outcomes, for who is Queen after voting day, does this election involve?

Are you claiming that Canada is being operated in a state of lawlessness? Laws of Canada state: “The Executive Government and Authority of and over Canada is hereby declared to continue and be vested in the Queen.”; “There shall be One Parliament for Canada, consisting of the Queen, an Upper House styled the Senate, and the House of Commons.”; and, “It shall be lawful for the Queen, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate and House of Commons, to make Laws for the Peace, Order, and good Government of Canada, in relation to all Matters not coming within the Classes of Subjects by this Act assigned exclusively to the Legislatures of the Provinces; ...”.

Was George VI at war with himself?

What law states that the Queen is a “figurehead”?

Elizabeth the Second is not Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, contrary to the requirement in this Fifth Schedule, which states: “Oath of Allegiance I A.B. do swear, That I will be faithful and bear true Allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Victoria. Note. The Name of the King or Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland for the Time being is to be substituted from Time to Time, with proper Terms of Reference thereto.”. The provinces of Canada, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick expressed their desire to be federally united into one Dominion under the Crown of the “United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland”, not the Crown of the “United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland”, according to the British North America Act, 1867.

Do you believe there is a good chance the people at the RCM might mint pennies with 98.4% zinc and only 1.6% copper again? Or do you believe people, in the future, might want to melt the 1997 through 1999 RCM pennies to extract zinc metal if they were allowed to? This web page, “Canada Coin Melt Values”, lists a “Face Value” and a “Metal Value (USD)” for the “1997 - 1999 Cent” (which would be better labelled as “1997 - 1999 Penny”).