dpwozney

The vaccine passports are non-compliant with Canadian law. The vaccine passports are being done with the understanding that Elizabeth the Second is "Queen". Elizabeth the Second is not Queen of the "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland", contrary to the requirement in this Fifth Schedule, which states: "Oath of Allegiance I A.B. do swear, That I will be faithful and bear true Allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Victoria. Note. The Name of the King or Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland for the Time being is to be substituted from Time to Time, with proper Terms of Reference thereto.". Elizabeth the Second claims to be Queen of the "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland". The provinces of Canada, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick expressed their desire to be federally united into one Dominion under the Crown of the "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland", not the Crown of the "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland", according to the British North America Act, 1867.

In 1863, "... government of the people, by the people, for the people, ..." was mentioned in the Gettysburg Address. Subsequent court decisions supported the notion of corporate personhood with a corporation being a fictitious person. As a result, "... government of the people, by the people, for the people, ..." can thus be transformed into "government of the corporations, by the corporations, for the corporations".

The Governor General of Canada is a "corporation sole", according to Elizabeth the Second in this document. A "corporation sole" is defined and recognized as being a corporation. It is a fiction that a corporation is a person. "A corporation is a fiction, by definition, ...", according to Patrick Healy in a statement found in evidence provided to the Canadian Parliament's Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights in 2002. "A corporation is a 'fiction' as it has no separate existence, no physical body and no 'mind'", according to Joanne Klineberg in a presentation to the Canadian Aviation Safety Seminar in 2004.

The "Employment Equity Act" forces systemic racism in Canada because it requires employers in Canada to discriminate on the basis of race when making hiring decisions.

The "Employment Equity Act" forces racism in Canada because it requires employers in Canada to discriminate on the basis of race when making hiring decisions.

This lockdown tyranny, and draconian forced social distancing, are non-compliant with Canadian law. This lockdown tyranny, and draconian forced social distancing, are being with the understanding that Elizabeth the Second is "Queen". Elizabeth the Second is not Queen of the "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland", contrary to the requirement in this Fifth Schedule, which states: "Oath of Allegiance I A.B. do swear, That I will be faithful and bear true Allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Victoria. Note. The Name of the King or Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland for the Time being is to be substituted from Time to Time, with proper Terms of Reference thereto.". Elizabeth the Second claims to be Queen of the "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland". The provinces of Canada, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick expressed their desire to be federally united into one Dominion under the Crown of the "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland", not the Crown of the "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland", according to the British North America Act, 1867.

Are cases of the flu now being relabelled as cases of COVID-19? Anyways, about ten people in Canada, per day on average, are now reported to have died with this novel coronavirus, from February 15 through April 10, 2020.

About twenty people in Canada died each day, on average, from influenza or pneumonia in recent past years, according to this Statistics Canada link. About five people in Canada, per day on average, are reported to have died with this novel coronavirus, from February 15 to April 3, 2020.

Jason Kenney said the "drug injection sites" are "now more than injections, by the way — they're just illegal sites that do all sorts of drugs, not just injectables". These drug injection sites exist with the understanding that Elizabeth the Second is "Queen". Elizabeth the Second is not Queen of the "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland", contrary to the requirement in this Fifth Schedule, which states: "Oath of Allegiance I A.B. do swear, That I will be faithful and bear true Allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Victoria. Note. The Name of the King or Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland for the Time being is to be substituted from Time to Time, with proper Terms of Reference thereto.". Elizabeth the Second claims to be Queen of the "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland". The provinces of Canada, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick expressed their desire to be federally united into one Dominion under the Crown of the "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland", not the Crown of the "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland", according to the British North America Act, 1867.

Abortions that are done in Canada are non-compliant with Canadian law. Abortions, that are done in Canada, are done with the understanding that Elizabeth the Second is "Queen". Elizabeth the Second is not Queen of the "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland", contrary to the requirement in this Fifth Schedule, which states: "Oath of Allegiance I A.B. do swear, That I will be faithful and bear true Allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Victoria. Note. The Name of the King or Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland for the Time being is to be substituted from Time to Time, with proper Terms of Reference thereto.". Elizabeth the Second claims to be Queen of the "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland". The provinces of Canada, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick expressed their desire to be federally united into one Dominion under the Crown of the "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland", not the Crown of the "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland", according to the British North America Act, 1867.

Endorsing, supporting, or celebrating pride does not include Christians, followers of the teachings of Jesus Christ. Endorsing, supporting, or celebrating pride does not respect the teachings of Jesus Christ. Jesus Christ referred to pride as being an evil thing, as recorded in Mark 7:20-23. "And he said, That which cometh out of the man, that defileth the man. For from within, out of the heart of men, proceed evil thoughts, adulteries, fornications, murders, Thefts, covetousness, wickedness, deceit, lasciviousness, an evil eye, blasphemy, pride, foolishness: All these evil things come from within, and defile the man." (Mark 7:20-23 (KJV))

Statistics Canada is non-compliant with Canadian law. Statistics Canada is operating with the understanding that Elizabeth the Second is "Queen". Elizabeth the Second is not Queen of the "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland", contrary to the requirement in this Fifth Schedule, which states: "Oath of Allegiance I A.B. do swear, That I will be faithful and bear true Allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Victoria. Note. The Name of the King or Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland for the Time being is to be substituted from Time to Time, with proper Terms of Reference thereto.". Elizabeth the Second claims to be Queen of the "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland". The provinces of Canada, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick expressed their desire to be federally united into one Dominion under the Crown of the "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland", not the Crown of the "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland", according to the British North America Act, 1867.

Prince Charles delivered documents declaring the Bahamas a "fully independent" nation on July 10, 1973, but after Hurricane Andrew in 1992, Hurricane Floyd in 1999, Hurricane Wilma in 2005, and Hurricane Joaquin in 2015, the Bahamas has been dependent on aid from the British, the Americans, and others.

You do not need to get rid of all the trees, but rather just enough trees in acceptable areas to reduce the intensity and size of any wildfire so the firefighters are not so overwhelmed. And yes, in some areas (eg. soccer fields), they actually do get rid of all the trees. In this image, taken from this webpage showing the west side of Beacon Hill, the buffer between the forest and homes is less than 20 meters.

A buffer is made up of "non-fuel and light-fuel zones". "Non-fuel" areas consist of "paved roads, gravelled shoulders, and one or more parallel sidewalks or footpaths incapable of sustaining fire". "Light-fuel zones" are "comprised of contiguous grassy or gravelled verges, grassed or bare ditches, plus boulevards and residential lawns". In some locations a buffer is "further augmented by hiking or ski trails, and un-treed park or green spaces that would support low intensity surface fire; non-threatening in terms of direct home ignition by flames or radiant heat".

A new report on the Fort McMurray wildfire claims that "overall, the buffer zone between neighbourhoods and the forest was sufficient", according to a CBC article. The buffer zone between neighbourhoods and the forest was not sufficient. There should be no embers whatsoever from a forest fire falling on any neighbourhoods ever. Homeowners should not have to deal with embers from a forest fire falling on their homes.

He said, according this "full text of Pope Francis' in-flight presser from Poland", "Sharia or sharia law is the basic Islamic legal system derived from the religious precepts of Islam, particularly the Quran and the opinions and life example of Muhammad (Hadith and Sunnah) which are the primary sources of sharia.[1][2] ... ... Sharia is a significant source of legislation in various Muslim countries. Some apply all or a majority of the sharia code, and these include Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Brunei, United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Yemen and Mauritania. In these countries, sharia-prescribed punishments such as beheading, flogging and stoning continue to be practiced judicially or extrajudicially.[5][6]", according to this Wikipedia article.

"Rajm (رجم) is an Arabic word that means "stoning".[2][3] It is commonly used to refer to the Hudud punishment wherein an organized group throws stones at a convicted individual until that person dies. Under Islamic law, it is the prescribed punishment in cases of adultery committed by a married man or married woman.", according to this Wikipedia article.

Why would it not be okay for him to say that, in these days, people kill in the name of Islam, and then point out the last time that someone killed in the name of Catholicism?

Why would it not be okay for him to acknowledge that, in these days, people are killed in the name of Islam? When was the last time that people were killed in the name of Catholicism?

There are central agencies within certain "member states" recognized by the "United Nations" that interpret and enforce Islamic law.

Also according to the article by Catholic News Service, "Mainstream Islamic law stipulates detailed regulations for the use of violence, including the use of violence within the family or household, the use of corporal or capital punishment, as well as how and when to wage war", according to this Wikipedia article.

Does the Catholic Church and community claim to do this in the name of Catholicism?

According to this article by Catholic News Service, In the present church age, Christians are under New Testament Christian law and are instructed to not commit violence (Matthew 5:38-45, Matthew 26:52, Luke 6:27-28, Romans 12:19-21, Romans 13:9-10, 2 Corinthians 10:3-4, Ephesians 6:12, 1 Thessalonians 5:15, 1 Peter 3:8-9).

According to this article by Catholic News Service, Do any of these "baptised Catholics" or "violent Catholics" commit violence in the name of Catholicism?