PolyNewbie

Who would borrow money to deposit it into a bank ?

Of course they pay interest on the amount but to transfer money you use cheque. The particulars of branch operations is not relevant to the influence banks have on world affairs. Its off topic and not interesting enough. This is interesting: Did you know that the only countries taht do not have privately owned central banks are: Iran, Cuba, Sudan, North Korea, Libya Do you think its just a coincidence that the USA labels them as rogue states ?

That came straight out of your a$$ again. Really - try reading some time. Money As Debt explains chequing, so does The Creature From Jekyll Island. Essentially the banks work togather with cheques and the cheques end up cancelling each other out. No cash or very little actual cash is needed to handle cheques. Cheques are a very imporatnt aspect of fractional reserve banking. COMER, the committe on economic reform in Canada is an excellent source of information on what is happening currently wrt banking & money. Most of it is written by William Khrem and IMO he is a great writer, better than JKG who can be confusing at times. Khrems writing is not about simple topics, but it is as clear and understandable as it can be made to be. COMER Many books on banking are reviewed on this web site. Whenever I smell you talking out of your a$$ I will post informative links on monetary reform.

Thats stupid. You make Rome sound like a bunch of little children. Thats it - no more answers to your posts. Your level of insult shows you to be of young mental age.

Go read a book about banking Riverwind. The answer to your question is simple but long. Cheques are very good for banks essentially because they reduce the requirement for cash. Another great source of information on mionetary reform is The British Association For Monetary Reform. They have a five page book on economics on this site as well.

I am not your boy and I am heterosexual. I will no longer be answering your posts. All my posts provide proof that 911 was an inside job. None of the government apologists on this thread have provided one reason why the official version should be believed. I, Jenna and others have provided mountains of facts that indicate that (1) the official version is a big fat lie and there is no supporting evidence for it (2) 911 was an inside job.

Ceasar was assasinated because he was a monetary reformist. Same as Kennedy. If you think they are lying about Kennedy and obviosly you know that there is no evidence to support the official version of 911, why do you believe the government ? What is it about the official version that has any credibility ? It sounds so rediculous - its even funny. Do you know of any evidence that supports the official version besides the fake Bin Laden tape ?

Its just such a stupid question. You think that your $1000.00 cheque must be converted to cash at some point ? You have to understand the basics of banking to know this is not true. I cannot explain this on here anywhere nearly as well as Money As Debt, the video. Thats not true. Chequing is also well explained in The Creature From Jekyll Island, an excellent book. Another free video on google is Monopoly Men (Federal Reserve Fraud)

Obviously BlackDog doesn't believe in conspiracies. Wouldn't it be something if he was a cop, lawyer or judge in real life ?

I'm through talking with you. The question you asked can be answered by watching the video better than I could explain it. The video is free. Another great video on banking is The Capitalist Conspiracy. This video doesn't address banking directly like some others. I will post more links to these free videos as Riverwind adds more posts of nonsense and stupidity. Every time Riverwind does a post I am going to link monetary reform web sites and free videos.

That would be impossible. They compartmentalize intelligence operations to prevent this. Intelligence experts think only about 10 people knew about what was actually happening and going to happen. They shot Kennedy and got away with it. Kennedy's car dissapeared too. In Oklahoma, the bombing was shown to be an inside job by the fact that additional unexpoded bombs were found in the building after the initial explosion. Bomb experts were dispatched to remove them. You can see the mainstream clips on Alex Jones 911: Road To Tyranny - its free on google and an excellent documentary based on mainstream news clips and government docs.

If you took the time to read a book on the matter you would understand how this is all easily possible. You can watch the first 15 minutes of Money As Debt on the Canadian Action Party website for free and it does explain this. Its very simple to understand.

Another great source of information on monetary reform can be found at The American Monetary Institute This has free video presentations. Riverwind: If you gave me $1000.00 cash I would donate most of it to the Canadian Action Party and some of it to The American Monetary Institute. I would buy some copies of "Money As Debt" and lend them out to people to spread the word on monetary reform. The money would never be converted to cash. Monetary reform is the most important political movement of today. Once we have monetary reform all other problems become insignificant and easily solveable. We eat better, get better educations, fewer wars, better hospitalization and a better media. The world becomes more interesting and it leads to individual empowerment and a growth of culture and knowledge like what we have never seen before.

Bushes and Bin Ladens are great friends. The Bin Ladens even invested in Bush Jr's first oil company (Harken I think). You should do some research on these matters then you wouldn't post so much non sense. Did you get that theory off Fox news ?

No. I have congressional testimony that Rumsfeld (or Cheney) forget which gave a stand down order for defences of the Pentagon. It is a fact. If I provide a link can you go away and read a book ?

Anyone interested in this subject matter should watch The Money Masters Its free on google. The monetary view of history is very different from the UNESCO/state sponsored truth taught in the schools. There is a very good reason why the monetary view of history is not taught. It exposes the power that banks have in our society - which is really incredible. Many books and videos say the same thing as The Money Masters. Nothing in that movie has ever been shown to be false. The movie is based on presidential quotes, banker quoptes and uncontested facts of history. The monetary view of history provides a very interesting and more complete view of history than the conventional accidental view. It makes a lot more sense. This is the most important documentary that you can watch. It will change your views on everything from your own finances to wars and politics. Learning more beyond this movie can show you how much the bankers are in control today. They effectively re - engineered women and started the womans movement to get two people on the payroll and paying taxes. Learning about how banks operated in the past and the history of fractional reserve banking can give you perspective on our current system, and an understanding of the various ways it can be changed. Banking is one of the most corrupt, secret and profitable enterprises that exists. Banks make enourmous profits from wars through lending the money to build the weapons and through the reconstruction efforts. Banks profiuts from war cannot even be simply defined, they in in the order of thousands of percent profit. The countries that do not have central banks controlled by the Rothschilds are: Iran, Cuba, Sudan, North Korea & Libya. Imagine why they are on the same "rogue nations" list for the USA. The US army is nothing more than a collection agency and thug for the international bankers.

Riverwind: Go learn something about monetary history. I'm sick of your nonsense. You are just an apologist for the big banks, governments and war and you have no idea what you are talking about. You have never shown me to be wrong about anything. I post on here wrt topics that I have extensively researched and read about and listened to experts on. You speak from your a$$ and know nothing. Go away and bother someone else. If you don't get that most money never gets converted to cash then thats your problem. I am not here to convince you of anything. The fact is that about 3.5 % of our money supply is cash. The cash is debt free currency printed by the bank of Canada in Canada. It is debt bearing currency in the USA.

Things do not have to be this way. See comic about banks Keeping up with Kyoto (even though global warming is fake and made to take attention away from the wars and the NWO) would not cost very much. In addition we could have far better government services for a lot less money than we do now.

I've got a bridge in Brooklyn for sale. Cheap. Interested ?

Showing that the government is lying is a good indicator that they were involved. If you ever got arrested and they thought you were lying in the interrogation room, they would also believe you are guilty because you are lying. Showing that the government is lying all the time and making up things that are rediculous is another way of showing possible involvement. So tell us "little man", why do you NOT think it was an inside job ? If you had said "little man" while sitting beside me you would be shortly lying on the floor wondering what happened and where you were.

No one thinks Bush orchestrated it. He and his family are members of the world ruling oligarchy and have been for 1000 years. He would order it to be done or his associates would order it to be done. Why do you think Osama did it ? Can you state any reason at all ? Got any evidence at all ?

Only people that know nothing about monetary history agree to it. If you read about monetary history you can understand how the banks could function so much better than they do now. Our governments and people are slaves to money and their debt. Things could be a lot different. Banking has functioned the way it does currently for about 1000 years but with legislation that has already passed the country (both Canada & the USA) could finance its own debt instead of going to private banks. Currently 100 % of collected tax in the USA goes straight to the Federal Reserve banks. There is only one reason a government would go to a private bank to finance its affairs - that reason is the government must be controlled by the banks. An interview with Catherine Austin Fitts on Rense radio is very instructive about the banks. You would be too afrraid to listen to that because she knows the banks and she would strongly interfere with your belief system. You would be better off just to keep watching TV, that way your belief system gets reinforced instead of challenged - much easier for you.

I think M Dancer is thinking that someone stole his secret decoder ring. It wasn't me - it was white doors.

No assumptions are required to show that 911 was an inside job. Lets think about what you believe for a moment. You think that Osama Bin Laden and a group of about 19 terrorists attacked US on 911. Three buildings collapsed perfectly straight down on this day - first time in history without the use of controlled demolition. Osama attacked us because he hates our freedom. Do you think that Rumsfeld was under phsychic control of Osama Bin Laden when he ordered the US defences to stand down ? You have *no evidence* to support this. You would think that if there was any truth to the official version there would be evidence. But even of the 19 terrorists pictured on the most wanted list 5 or 6 have even been found alive by mainstream media such as BBC. The FBI didn't even change their suspect list. The terrorists were not even on the original flight manifests. This alone should clue you in that something is very wrong. The fake Bin Laden tape should really clue you in. I just about choked when I saw that on CNN a while after the attacks (I already knew the attacks were an inside job because of how the buildings fell and because of Oklahoma and Kennedy) Why do you believe the official version ? Do you think the US government would lie about war ? You need to carry around a big long list of assumptions before you can even consider the official version as partly true.

Left and right is a false paradigm. The political differences lie among those who believe what they see on TV and those of us who do not. I am a right winger myself, but a real conservative not one of these fake neoliberal conservatives. Harper and Bush are liberals. If you can't see that you shouldn't post and you should go top a library instead.