Signals.Cpl

I have never seen you, therefore you don't exist... right?i have never seem a rapist nor been witness to a rape therefore rapes don't happen and rapists don't exist? You seem to constantly escape from reality if it does not fit in nice and neat within your beliefs.

Using your "logic" since I haven't seen it it doesn't exist.

I've heard of police abuse, but I have never seen it... Does that mean it doesn't exist?

Would it be such a problem finding doctors willing to do this? I realize that there may be a great many doctors who will want no part in this but how would giving out a kit help? They will know that the one and only use for that kit is to commit suicide so wether they have a hands on part or a standoff part they still have a part to play and there is always the chance of unanticipated problems which would require a doctors assistance rather than a one size fits all kit.

But everyone who is depressed is not necessarily terminally ill… there is a significant difference between someone who has no hope of getting healthy committing suicide with the assistance of a doctor and an individual who is depressed and has a very good chance of being cured. Assisted suicide should be a last resort for those who are terminally ill and would like to choose the time, place and manner of death to allow them dignity for their last days, but it most definitely should not be a "treatment" option for depression and other such mental issues. There has to be a vilid reason and a valid reason that is not likely to change at some point in the near future.

I don't know, they might or they might not be as a result of the mission to Iraq. What I think is that now we have ISIS which is encouraging individuals to action whereas before terrorist groups tries small cell attacks planned and funded now they just see they can do more damage by encouraging individuals with little or no logistic support and see where that gets them. It might be because of Iraq or it might be because ISIS is pushing for every nut to do their part...

I think we were on the list since 9/11… we have either been lucky or good but something was bound to happen…

A Guy dressed in civilian clothes with a rifle stands out, if a soldier drops to the ground wounded and people see a guy with a rifle most people can add 2+2...

I think we need to get a few military Parades going to show those idiots we aren't going to hide and the MPs should have a meet and greet with the public to once again show that you can't force us to hide under our beds...

You have got to be trolling… you can't possibly be real… thats right let idiots report hundreds of thousands of muslims as terrorists nothing like overloading your security apparatus by investigating EVERYBODY.

I agree one hundred percent with this, if you lied coming in you get kicked out, but once Canadian always Canadian.

You have got to be kidding me…What do you suggest we do? Send all muslims to prison? Anyone who opposes the government on any issue whatsoever gets thrown in prison? There is a right way to do this and a very very very very wrong way to do this and you seem to be the supporter of the "solution" that will make us a secular version of ISIS.

What the hell would a militarized government do? It won't solve a thing.

But it doesn't seem to be working too well for us now does it?

And I assume that Parliament has armed officers and some sort of security...

If it turns out that this guy is also one of the guys the RCMP is monitoring I would assume that we can see the rest being kept under a very close watch.

This might be one of those cases where one did it and some other guy wants his 15min of fame… he did it on yesterday and I'll do it tomorrow...

This will get more reaction, not because of the soldier being shot, but because the MP's would be in danger as well… I'm waiting for their reactions.

I'm not talking about voicing opinions. I know plenty of muslims who oppose Canadian involvement in Iraq and out involvement in Afghanistan before that but none of them make statements that they want to kill Canadian soldiers or civilians. My whole point is that if someone preaches violence against Canadians then throw him in jail, if someone preaches terrorism, once again jail. There is a difference between I don't support this government, and I want to kill Canadians...

Your "logic" is that we should maintain a service for 100% of the people because 5% of the people may actually need it, and that we should maintain that service because at some point in time the other 95% of the people MIGHT need it. There is no logic in that because meals on wheels indicates that when there is a need, there will be a solution without giving 100% of the people meals on wheels because 5% of the people need it. You haven't given any intelligent reasons why this is bad, every one of your reasons is faulty and I can see why you can't respond. At least you realized your position is idiotic in only 12 pages.

You do realize we already have limits to our freedom of speech…right? I'm going to slit your throat is one of those "freedoms" we don't have because the second you utter that you have more than likely set yourself up for an arrest. Tell me that you a free to say whatever you like to anyone you want without any legal consequences, if you can't that means that your freedom of speech is already limited.

And it will work less and less… the terrorists in West Germany did not have access to the internet and its educational potential. You can take the guys passport and he will go to a computer club, use google to find a way to make a bomb and he just saved himself some time.A 128Gb USB stick can hold plenty of information someone passes it to you in a mosque and guess what, you saved yourself a trip to Iraq as you have all you need to build bombs, strategies to make your attacks count etc... Do you know what kind of information the Internet has? Can you imagine someone with the intelligence to do some research building bombs with materials that every Canadian uses daily? Terrorist camps are great to solidify their hold over the individual, give them ideas, fund them and maybe help their field craft(how to avoid getting caught too early). We are very lucky that these idiots have the mental ability to kill us only one at a time. Revoking the passport might work for a small minority of individuals but the reality is that it is more of a feel good solution( I did something about it) instead of being a real solution.

Strengthen the laws in the sense that if an Imam preaches violence then the hammer comes down. If/when we catch one of these idiots we lock him/her up for a long long time and if we catch them coming back from one of those nations lock them up as well… should we have rock solid proof that they fought as part of a terrorist organization that actively aims to hurt us or our allies then we lock them up for treason and throw away the keys. And maybe take their words more seriously, if someone says that we should kill Canadian soldiers in Canada then charge them, if they say they will kill Canadians in Canada or abroad then again send them to jail… essentially if they are inciting terrorism in any way shape or form you lock them up. In many of these cases I assume the parents/families would be more than willing to cooperate in order to prevent their loved once from dying in Iraq, Syria or a terrorist attack in Canada. There is a limit to freedom of religion and there is a limit to freedom of speech. We should take special care to lock up those who cross those lines.

The only education any of them need could be obtained from the internet… Confiscating their passports while in Canada means that they cannot leave but if they are smart enough there is plenty of damage that can be done right here, right now without any external help.

By revoking passport while person is overseas we leave our trash to be taken care by others. By revoking citizenships for immigrants we do more damage to our citizenship as a whole then we prevent terrorist attacks etc… there is a way to make us safer without belittling the our own citizens or leaving other to deal with our problems. And preventing him from leaving the country sure saved us from an attack… right?