Barquentine

Exactly! She was trying to flee, not run him down! Which way were her wheels turned?

Riots are useless , but are the exception. The vast majority of protests are peaceful.

That's what critics do.

What about them? You're the one talking about them, not me?

Huh???

What does that mean?

So in your twisted little mind 5% = 20%.

Lie. You need to get your eyes checked out. You need to get your eyes checked out.

What are you talking about?

Maybe a question of degree, but the effect is the same - to instill fear, and suppress opposition. And it 's working. People stay home from work, keep their kids out of school, for fear of ICE showing up. But the most telling aspect is Trump sending hordes of ICE into primarily Democratic states where his opposition is. I wonder, how many ICE agents will be on the streets in Blue states during the mid-terms?

You don't know what the phuck my sources are!

AI Overview Police protocol prohibits officers from standing in the path of an occupied vehicle or shooting at a moving vehicle unless there is an imminent threat of death or serious bodily harm that cannot be otherwise avoided. Most police agencies have policies specifically stating that the moving vehicle itself does not automatically justify the use of deadly force. https://www.wdbj7.com/2026/01/08/what-know-about-rules-officers-firing-moving-vehicle/ When can officers fire at a moving vehicle? But most police departments and federal guidance bar shooting at a moving vehicle unless the driver poses an imminent threat of deadly force beyond the car itself. Why are shootings at vehicles restricted? Experts say firing at a moving car is one of the riskiest forms of lethal force, increasing the chance of stray gunfire or a loss of vehicle control that can endanger bystanders. Are officers expected to move out of the way? Yes. Justice Department policy says deadly force is allowed only when no reasonable alternative exists, including stepping out of the vehicle’s path. Can officers use deadly force just to stop or arrest someone? No. Policies generally state officers cannot use deadly force solely to arrest someone or to disable a fleeing vehicle if the person does not pose an immediate threat. https://www.foxcarolina.com/2026/01/08/south-carolina-police-training-limits-when-officers-should-shoot-cars/ New training focuses on positioning and avoidance Officers are now trained to position themselves so they can’t be hit by cars, according to the new protocols. University of South Carolina Assistant Professor of Criminology and Criminal Justice Ian Adams said not shooting at a vehicle is the standard nationwide. Officers should use distance and barriers to protect themselves instead, Adams said. The main reason, Adams said, bullets don’t stop cars. https://academic.oup.com/policing/article/doi/10.1093/police/paaf004/8058528 Part of the NYPD’s Operating Procedure 237, developed in 1971, included a prohibition against shooting at moving vehicles unless the occupant(s) was using deadly force by means other than the vehicle itself. In the decades since, multiple police departments followed suit by enacting their own policy restrictions https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/what-federal-guidelines-say-about-agents-using-deadly-force There are all sorts of caveats and qualifications, but, as a general rule, police officers and law enforcement do not shoot into moving cars, do not put themselves in front of cars, because those are things that are easily de-escalated. You need to get your eyes checked out.

Well you've been told the why. You may not agree with the why but pretending that this hasn't already been answered just makes you look childish. I would recommend if you want to compare the two that you go back and try and take a look at trump's claims of mistreatment by the legal system for the other person and see if there's any sort of substance to it or possible substance to it. I'm honestly not that interested. But it is absolutely true that that guy is no longer leader of that country. And it's probably quite true that even if he wins his court cases, which he might, maduro will have been removed from office and therefore no longer be the same threat that he was. Tell maybe the difference in the long run is that in both cases trump was satisfied with removing them from power and after they were removed from power he didn't consider them to be such a threat What a lot of wasted words just to avoid a question. You sound like just another Republican twisting into a pretzel to defend Trump. So sad, especially from a Canadian. Yoiu are a Canadian, aren't you?

But there is intention. Sorry to disappoint you. On second thought, not sorry.

Pants on fire! Just making sh!t up again.

Except we can see the videos. She was letting ICE vehicles through - she waved 2 vehicles through, which they did, no problem. But the third car decided to play "Cops 'n' Perps" with her and drew their guns. One untrained id!ot stood in fron of her car with his gun drawn. That action is against every police organization's protocol. She turned away to go. She did not ram anyone. That was murder. Congrats to Trump: he's got American para-military shooting innocent Americans. MAGA = Make Americans Gestapo Again !

And you just accept his 'reason' at face value? I think you're smarter than that but become wilfully ignorant when defending Trump. Why is that? 2 very similar Narco-terrorist leaders: one gets arrested and charged, one gets pardoned. Why?

Pretty sure they're not using automatic weapons.

Where's the lie?

OMG! That's what happened to Hunter Biden's laptop - Freeland's got it! Great detective work everyone - another conspiracy theory proven!

https://19thnews.org/2025/08/pete-hegseth-doug-wilson-women-voting/ The discussion of 19th Amendment rights was part of a news segment focused on Doug Wilson — a self-proclaimed Christian nationalist pastor based in Idaho — that was reposted to X by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. “In my ideal society, we would vote as households,” a pastor tells CNN. “And I would ordinarily be the one that would cast the vote"

Quote where I said that?

As usual you just lie, make sh!t up and can't find any quotes where I even suggeted that. What a pathetic excuse for an argument.

Watching the news makes it clear Trump has no plan. (Why does Rubio always look so scared on camera?) Still no clear reason why Trump pardoned one of the biggest Narco-Terrorists? No one's shedding tears for Maduro. It's not the what but the why. Because Maduro stole Trump's dance moves? So far no plan excepet to steal oil. And no plan to help Machado because she wouldn't give Trump her Nobel? A 7 year old is running the US and phucking things up all around the world. Russia and China are laughing their asses off. Big time criminals around the world can't wipe the smiles off their faces.

Wonder if someone in Trump's circle (axis of evil) read Richard Condon? Again from Winter Kills (1974) p.282 Tom Kegan, loosely based on Joseph Kennedy: "Watch the price of oil go up... and that small town they call Canada taken over and annexed if they don't go along." Of course now it's the rare minerals more than oil.